Next Article in Journal
Route of Sensitization to Peanut Influences Immune Cell Recruitment at Various Mucosal Sites in Mouse: An Integrative Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Lack of Association between Inadequate Micronutrient Intake and Prognosis in Outpatients with Heart Failure
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Food Security, Dietary Diversity, Dietary Patterns and the Double Burden of Malnutrition among School-Aged Children and Adolescents in Two Nigerian States

by
Adeleye Abiodun Adeomi
1,2,*,
Adesegun Fatusi
1,3 and
Kerstin Klipstein-Grobusch
2,4
1
Department of Community Health, College of Health Sciences, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife 220282, Osun State, Nigeria
2
Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Parktown, Johannesburg 2193, South Africa
3
School of Public Health, University of Medical Sciences, Ondo 220282, Ondo State, Nigeria
4
Julius Global Health, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nutrients 2022, 14(4), 789; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14040789
Submission received: 7 October 2021 / Revised: 29 October 2021 / Accepted: 2 November 2021 / Published: 14 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Nutritional Epidemiology)

Abstract

:
Background: Little evidence exists on the relationship between diet-related factors and child/adolescent malnutrition in Nigeria. This study aimed to assess the associations between household food insecurity (HFI), dietary diversity (DD), and dietary patterns (DP) with the double burden of malnutrition (DBM) among 6–19-year-olds in two Nigerian States. Methods: This community-based cross-sectional study was carried out among 1200 respondents (6–19 years in age) in the Gombe and Osun States of Nigeria. HFI was assessed using the HFI access scale. DD was assessed using a 24-h dietary recall. DP were determined by principal component analysis using a 30-day food frequency questionnaire. DP scores were categorized into quartiles (Q) for statistical analysis. Diet-related predictors of DBM were assessed using logistic regression. Results: HFI was experienced by 568 (47.3%) respondents. The median DD score was 7.0 (maximum of 14). Two DPs were identified, diversified DP (DDP) and traditional DP (TDP). TDP was significantly associated with both thinness (Q4:OR: 2.91; 95% CI: 1.52–5.55; Ptrend: 0.002) and overweight/obesity (Q4:OR: 2.50; 95% CI: 1.43–4.35; Ptrend: 0.007), while DDP was inversely related with thinness (Q4:OR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.21–0.61; Ptrend: 0.008) as compared to Q1. Conclusions: TDP increased the odds for DBM, while the DDP reduced the odds.

1. Introduction

There has been a steady rise in the prevalence of overweight and obesity among children in all regions of the world. Prevalence rates in the range of 10–40% for overweight/obesity were reported in selected high-income countries among 15-year-old adolescents [1]. The World Health Organization (WHO) reports that 340 million school-aged children and adolescents (aged 5–19 years) were overweight/obese globally in 2016 [2]. Low- and middle-income countries have also experienced significant rise in the prevalence of overweight/obesity with highest prevalence rates recorded in the Middle East, North Africa, Latin America and the Caribbean [1,3].
Despite the rising prevalence of overweight/obesity in sub-Saharan Africa, the prevalence of underweight children still remains high. In a study that assessed the worldwide trend in the nutritional status of 24.1 million children between the ages of 5–17 years from 1975 to 2016, the prevalence of underweight was observed to have been reduced in virtually all regions, except for South Asia, Central Africa, East Africa, and West Africa [2]. Thus, most countries in sub-Saharan Africa, including Nigeria, are experiencing what has been termed as “double burden of malnutrition”, which is the co-existence of both under- and over-nutrition [4,5].
Identifying the determinants of under- and over-nutrition is important not only in improving the understanding about the subject, but also critical for planning appropriate nutritional interventions for affected children. However, to date, most of the research efforts targeted at identifying the determinants of the nutritional status of school-aged children and adolescents in Nigeria have focused on socio-demographic factors [6,7,8,9]. Little evidence could be found in the literature on the relationship between the nutritional status of school-aged children and adolescents and key factors such as food security, dietary diversity and dietary patterns in Nigeria. Thus, a significant evidence gap exists with regards to determinants of nutritional status of school children and adolescents in Nigeria, particularly as diet is reported as an important factor in the epidemiology of childhood and adolescent malnutrition [10,11,12].
Household food security, dietary diversity and dietary patterns are methods that are used to describe the diet and food consumption at individual and household levels. Household food security refers to situations when a household has access to sufficient quantity and quality of food for all members of the household for a given period [13]. Dietary diversity qualitatively measures access and consumption of varieties of food types as a proxy for nutrient/diet adequacy and quality at individual and household levels [14]. Dietary patterns, on the other hand, describe a broader and more comprehensive conceptualization of food consumption as against the traditional method of finding the frequency of the consumption of individual food types or nutrients [15]. Each of these three elements are shown to be associated with nutritional status and studies have also shown relationships between them [16,17].
Few studies have assessed household food insecurity in Nigeria [18,19], and fewer still have directly linked household food insecurity to the nutritional status of school-aged children or adolescents. Likewise, dietary diversity and its relation to under- and over-nutrition among school-aged children or adolescents has only been assessed in few Nigerian studies [20,21,22]. Data on the dietary patterns of school-aged children and adolescents in Nigeria is even more scarce. Previous reports from Nigeria who attempted to describe the dietary patterns of children and/or adolescents only described the frequency of consumption of different food groups or the dietary habits of the children or adolescents [23,24,25]. Only one recently published article described the dietary patterns of a small sample of out-of-school adolescents [26] in Nigeria using dietary pattern analysis [15].
The present study aims to address the evidence gap highlighted above: it aimed to assess household food security, dietary diversity and dietary patterns in relation to under- and over-nutrition among school-aged children and adolescents in two selected states in Nigeria located in two different parts of the country (North and South).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Location

The study was carried out in two randomly selected states in Nigeria. Nigeria has 36 states and is a multi-ethnic nation with significant socio-economic and cultural differences between its two broad geographical areas: the north and the south. The dominant ethnic groups in the north are the Hausas and Fulanis, while the dominant groups in the southern part of Nigeria are Yorubas and Igbos. Nigeria is politically structured into 6 geo-political zones that are equally distributed between the northern and southern parts of the country. For this study, the geo-political zones with the lowest (North-East) and highest (South-West) wealth index based on the 2018 Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS) [27] were selected, and Gombe and Osun States were randomly selected from the two zones, respectively.

2.2. Study Design, Population and Size

A community-based cross-sectional study was carried out among 1200 school-aged children and adolescents aged 6–19 years (600 from each of the selected states). School-aged children are usually defined as those 6 to 11 years of age [28], or 5 to 14 years [29], while adolescents are those from 10–19 years of age [29]. In the present study, school-aged children and adolescents are taken as those from 6 to 19 years of age. The sample size was determined using STATCALC on the Epi-Info software, [30] to get an absolute precision of ±5%. The proportion of expected outcome was taken as 33%, which is the prevalence of stunted children in Nigeria [31], and a design effect of 1.5 was used because of the hierarchical sampling model. The calculated sample size for each of the states was 510, and after correcting for an anticipated 10% non-response, the same sample became 561, which was rounded off to 600 for each of the states (making a total of 1200). The sample size determination was previously described in detail in another study [32].

2.3. Sampling Technique

Respondents were selected using multi-stage sampling technique. At the first stage, two local government areas (LGAs) were selected from each of the two selected states (one from rural and one from urban LGAs) using a simple random sampling technique (Balloting method). Two wards/districts each were randomly selected from each LGA at the second stage. In each of the selected wards/districts, five enumerations areas (EAs), as demarcated by the National Population Commission for the 2006 population census, were randomly selected for the third stage. At the fourth stage, the listing of the households in the EAs was first carried out, then 30 households were drawn in each of the selected EAs using systematic sampling technique. At the household level, one school-age child or adolescent was selected. If a household had more than one school-aged child or adolescent who met the inclusion criteria, only one was randomly selected.

2.4. Data Collection

Ten research assistants (five males and five females) and one field supervisor were recruited and trained to collect data in each of the two states. The questionnaires were administered with RedCap [33] and the anthropometric measurements, i.e., the weight and height of the children/adolescents were taken using standard protocols recommended by the International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry [34].

2.5. Outcome Variable

The primary outcome/dependent variable is the nutritional status, which was assessed with the WHO 2007 reference values, [35] using the BMI-for-age Z-scores and categorized into: (1) thinness, (2) normal, and (3) overweight/obese for BMI-for-age Z-scores <−2, −2 to 1, >1 respectively. This was re-categorized into two different outcome variables for under-nutrition (i.e., (1) thinness, (0) otherwise) and over-nutrition (i.e., (1) overweight/obese, (0) otherwise).

2.6. Explanatory Variables

2.6.1. Household Food Insecurity

Household food security was measured using the household food insecurity access scale (HFIAS) [36]. The HFIAS has nine occurrence questions with a recall period of four weeks (30 days), and these are followed by three frequency-of-occurrence questions to determine whether the condition happened rarely (once or twice), sometimes (three to ten times) or often (more than ten times) in the past four weeks. A response of “No” to the frequency-of-occurrence questions was scored 0, while “rarely”, “sometimes”, and “often” were scored 1, 2, and 3 respectively. The households were then categorized into “food secure”, “mildly food insecure”, “moderately food insecure” and “severely food insecure”, using the responses to these questions and based on extant literature [36]. These four categories were re-categorized into “food secure” (food secure and mildly food insecure) and “food insecure” (moderately and severely food insecure) households for data analysis.

2.6.2. Dietary Diversity (DD)

A scale of 14 food groups including the following was used in assessing the DD score for each of the children and adolescents; [14,21] cereals, vitamin A vegetables and tubers, white tubers, dark green leafy vegetables, other vegetables, vitamin A fruits, other fruits, organ meat, flesh meat, egg and egg products, fish, legumes/nuts/seeds, milk/milk products and oils/fats. DD classification was based on a one-time 24-h dietary recall. This involved the respondents listing all the foods and drinks they had taken in the 24 h preceding the data collection. Using the information collected from the 24-h dietary recall, a point was awarded to each food group consumed out of the 14 food groups, and the sum of all the points awarded was the DD score for each child. Hence the DD score ranged from a minimum of 0 (if no food from the 14 food groups was consumed) and 14 (if food from all 14 food groups was consumed). The DD scores lower than the median score of seven were grouped as “low”, while others (≥7) were regarded as high.

2.6.3. Dietary Patterns (DP)

A 30-day food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) was used to collect information on the frequency and amount of 92 different food items consumed in the last 30 days preceding the study. The FFQ was adapted from the one used among school-aged children in Ghana [37] and further modified after pre-testing the research instrument. For the present study, the 92 different food items were collapsed into 15 food groups, based on their nutritional profile (Supplementary Table S1). Principal component analysis (PCA) with Varimax rotation was used to determine the dietary patterns which best represented the food intake of the population. The number of patterns was determined using the Scree plot and eigenvalues values greater than 1.0. Two components (i.e., patterns) explained 56% of the total variance and were retained. Food groups with absolute loadings greater or equal to 0.4 were used to name the retained principal components/patterns (Figure 1). The first pattern showed positive loadings greater than 0.4 for all food groups and hence was described as “Diversified dietary pattern”. The second pattern showed positive loadings greater than 0.4 for starchy foods/cereals, legumes and sugars and negative loadings for fish, desserts and snacks, and was described as the “Traditional dietary pattern”, because the typical traditional diet in Nigeria is dominated by cereals/starchy foods and legumes. The pattern scores generated for each respondent by PCA were categorized into quartiles for the statistical analysis.

2.6.4. Other Explanatory Variables

Socio-demographic characteristics, which include age, sex, household wealth index, residence, state and ethnicity, were included in the variables for the analysis. The household wealth index was calculated using household possessions through PCA and categorized into tertiles, (1) high, (2) middle, and (3) low, as earlier explained in another article. [32] Pubertal staging was assessed using the Tanner pubertal self-rating scale [38]. The scale has a score range of 1–5, and the respondents were grouped into early puberty (Tanner stage 2 and below) and mid-puberty (>Tanner stage 2). Physical activity was assessed using the physical activity questionnaire for older children and adolescents by Kowalski et al. [39] which was measured as scores from 1 to 5. The higher the score, the more active the respondent was, with 1 representing the option with least or no activity and 5 being the option with most activity.

2.7. Data Analysis

Data from the RedCap database were exported and analyzed using Stata version 15. All the dependent and independent variables were initially described, after which Pearson chi-square was used to test for associations for categorical variables at bivariate level. The Kruskal–Wallis test was used to test the associations between nutritional status and continuous variables at bivariate level, because the variables were not normally distributed. Four models each were fitted for food insecurity, dietary diversity, diversified food pattern and the traditional food pattern, and their relationships with thinness and overweight/obesity using binary logistic regression analysis. Model 0 was the empty model showing crude/unadjusted rates, while Model 1 adjusted for age and sex. Model 2 adjusted for State of residence and household wealth index in addition to Model 1, and Model 3 was the full model that adjusted for physical activity scores in addition to Model 2. Variables with high variance inflation factor (VIF) when multi-collinearity diagnostics were performed were not included in the models. Therefore, pubertal staging, residence and ethnicity were not included to prevent redundancy. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05.

2.8. Ethical Considerations

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa (certificate No: M190514, approved on 25/09/2019), and the Ministry of Health in Osun State (certificate No: OSHREC/PRS/569T/155, approved on 24/06/2019) and Gombe State (certificate No: MOH/ADM/621/1/142, approved on 26/07/2019) in Nigeria. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Written consent was obtained from adolescents who were 18 years and above, and the parents of children less than 18 years, while assent was obtained in addition from children less than 18 years. All severely malnourished children were referred to the nearby public health facilities for further management.

3. Results

The distribution of the dependent and independent variables by the state of residence is shown in Table 1. The prevalence rate of thinness was 10.3% and overweight/obesity was 11.4%. At bivariate level, thinness (under-nutrition) had statistically significant associations with ethnicity (p < 0.001), household wealth index (p < 0.001), state of residence (p < 0.001), residence (rural/urban) (p = 0.0013), diversified dietary pattern (p < 0.001) and traditional dietary pattern (p = 0.0013). Overweight/obesity had significant statistical relationships with age (p < 0.001), gender (p < 0.001), ethnicity (p < 0.001), state of residence (p < 0.001), residence (rural/urban) (p < 0.001) and physical activity (p = 0.001).
Figure 1 shows the diversified and traditional dietary patterns, and their rotated factor loadings using a radar chart. The diversified dietary pattern was characterized by a high intake (i.e., factor loading ≥ 0.4) of all listed food groups, while the traditional pattern had a high intake of starchy foods/cereals, legumes and sugars, and very low intake (i.e., factor loading ≤ 0.4) of fish, desserts and snacks. The diversified dietary pattern explained 44.1% of the variance, while the traditional dietary pattern explained 11.5% of the variance.
The socio-demographic characteristics, physical activity, food insecurity and dietary diversity across the quartiles of the two dietary patterns is presented in Table 2. All the considered variables, except age (p = 0.926) and sex (p = 0.571), had statistically significant association with the diversified dietary pattern (p ≤ 0.001). The traditional dietary pattern had a statistically significant association with all the considered variables (p < 0.05) except pubertal staging (p = 0.637) and food insecurity (0.403).
Table 3 shows adjusted odds ratios and 95% CIs from the associations of food insecurity and dietary diversity, with thinness (under-nutrition) and overweight/obesity (over-nutrition) among the respondents. There were no statistically significant associations across all the models for both food insecurity and dietary diversity.
The adjusted odds ratios and 95% CIs from the associations of the diversified and traditional dietary patterns with thinness (under-nutrition) and overweight/obesity (over-nutrition) among the respondents is shown in Table 4. With respondents in the first quartile being the reference, respondents in all other quartiles had a statistically significant association with under-nutrition (thinness) at the crude/empty model level; the diversified dietary pattern was inversely associated (ptrend = 0.009) while the traditional dietary pattern was positively associated (ptrend = 0.002). However, only those in the second quartile of the diversified dietary pattern retained the statistically significant association after controlling for all the independent variables (i.e., in the full model/Model 3) (OR: 0.44; p = 0.007; 95% CI: 0.24 to 0.80). For the association between dietary patterns and over-nutrition (overweight/obesity), there was no significant associations at the crude model level, but the full models of Quartile 2 (OR: 2.06; p = 0.009; 95% CI: 1.20 to 3.55) and 4 (OR: 2.50; p = 0.001; 95% CI: 1.43 to 4.35) of the traditional dietary pattern showed statistically significant positive association. The Ptrend was 0.007, which indicates a statistically significant linear association.

4. Discussion

Few scattered small-scale studies exist regarding diet-related factors among school-aged children and adolescents in Nigeria, but no study was found that considered these factors together and related them to under-and over-nutrition among older children. Addressing these factors together is important so as to assess and control for any potential confounding effects in explaining the associations between the explanatory and outcome variables. Existing studies also have methodological limitations of unrepresentative study populations and/or unconventional methodologies that make comparisons of the results difficult. The current study has the advantage of avoiding these limitations: in particular, it was based on representative populations from two states of Nigeria that are diverse geographically, socio-culturally, and economically, and used well established approaches, with rigorous analysis in addressing the association of diet related factors with under- and over-nutrition.
Nearly half of the households were moderately or severely food insecure. Previous studies on household security in Nigeria have similarly reported rates of moderate/severe food insecurity in excess of 50% [18,40]. These findings are disturbing, especially as this was found to be significantly associated with the nutritional status of the children or adolescents living in such households. [40] The median DD score for the present study was 7 out of a total possible score of 14, with two-thirds of the respondents scoring 7 or below. Other previous studies on dietary patterns among children or adolescents reported similar findings with the mean/median DD score being about half of the total DD score [20,22,41]. The present study found that half of the respondents had dietary diversity scores less than 7, which is just half of the maximum value of 14. This indicates sub-optimum dietary diversity among half of the respondents.
Two dietary patterns were identified in the present study, which were named diversified and traditional DP. The only other study on dietary pattern among adolescents in Nigeria using the principal component analysis/factor analysis had very similar findings. The authors reported two patterns also, with one characterized by a high intake of all the food groups that were considered while the other was characterized by a high intake of roots/tubers and legumes, and they called these the healthy and unhealthy DPs, respectively [26]. A study from Ghana also reported two DPs, but with very different food group loadings from the present study and the previous Nigerian study [26]. The DPs described for adolescents from other countries [42,43] outside Africa were also quite different from those found among school-aged children or adolescents in Nigeria and Ghana [26,44].
The diversified dietary pattern had an inversely significant association with thinness, even after adjusting for all independent variables, i.e, showing 56% lower odds of thinness in those in the fourth as compared to those in the first quartile. The inverse relationship between the diversified dietary pattern and thinness is expected because the diversified diet reflects a healthier dietary pattern. Even though not statistically significant, it may be important to also note that that the diversified dietary pattern was also inversely related to overweight/obesity. This underscores the importance of a healthy or diversified dietary pattern for better health (i.e., lower odds for thinness and overweight/obesity).
The traditional dietary pattern had a positively significant association with overweight/obesity, such that those in the second and fourth quartiles of the traditional dietary pattern had 2 times higher odds of being overweight/obese than those in the first quartile. The traditional dietary pattern also had a positive association with thinness, although the relationship was only statistically significant in the crude model. Overall, the traditional dietary pattern seems to increase the odds of thinness and overweight/obesity, therefore, contributing to the double burden of malnutrition. This may not be unexpected because the traditional dietary pattern is characterized by higher intake of starchy foods/cereals and sugars. This finding further underscores the importance of a healthy dietary pattern in combating the double burden of malnutrition among school-aged children and adolescents in these two states, and probably the whole of Nigeria.
Similarly, different studies carried out in other countries have reported associations between dietary patterns and under- or over-nutrition [42,43,45], though the pattern of association is inconsistent. The most diversified DP in a study among Spanish adolescents had lower odds for overweight/obesity [43], while a study carried out in Bangladesh found that the diversified DPs were significantly and positively associated with overweight/obesity [42]. Alangea et al. [44] in Ghana found a significant association between the energy-dense DP and childhood overweight/obesity. Meanwhile, studies by Abizari et al. [46] and Samuel et al. [26] in Ghana and Nigeria, respectively, found no association between the dietary patterns and nutritional status of the adolescents. This lack of consensus on the nature of the relationship between dietary patterns and body mass index was previously noted [43]. This may not be un-expected because of the multi-factorial and complex nature of the determinants of nutritional status. The role cultural, ethnic and religious factors [47,48,49,50], and influence of contextual factors such as household level and community level factors [51,52] cannot be ruled out. Furthermore, the role of indirect associations can also not be ruled out, in the present study as an example, the indirect association with food insecurity and dietary diversity are also important. More research is thus needed to understand the mechanism underlying the associations.
The relationships between food insecurity, dietary diversity and thinness and overweight/obesity were not statistically significant. However, indirect associations cannot be ruled out because of the significant associations that existed between the dietary patterns and both food insecurity and dietary diversity at the bivariate analysis level. School-aged children and adolescents who came from food insecure homes, and those who had low dietary diversity were significantly less likely to have a diversified dietary pattern, while a third of those in the fourth quartile, and more than half of those in the third and fourth quartiles of the traditional dietary pattern were food insecure. This shows a possible relationship between food insecurity and the unhealthy (i.e., traditional) dietary pattern which had a positive association with the double burden of malnutrition.
Thinness and overweight/obesity among the school-aged children and adolescents in this present study were significantly associated with variables that were not diet-related. The variables who had significant associations with both dietary patterns in this study were ethnicity, household wealth index, state and residence. These relationships underscore the importance of the social determinants of health. Social determinants have a major influence on health and health related behavior, and especially on diet and/or nutrition of people [53,54,55]. Religion, for instance, dictates some food that are to be eaten, and others that should be avoided, and this is irrespective of other variables including the wealth index of such households. Similarly, previous researchers have found that ethnicity, culture and other social determinants influence dietary patterns [47,48]. In the present study, those in the high household wealth index category, for example, were more likely to have a diversified diet, and this may indicate that household financial means determines affordability of food and hence determines dietary patterns.
While the present study involved a representative sample from two states, the findings may not be generalizable to the entire country of 36 states, particularly granted the social diversity, cultural plurality, and multi-ethnic nature of Nigeria. Additionally, the assessment of dietary diversity and dietary patterns was dependent on the recall of food taken in the last 24 h and the last 30 days respectively, which makes them prone to recall bias [56,57]. The aetiology of under- and over-nutrition is complex, and this study could not assess all possible explanatory variables, hence the possibility of residual confounding could not be ruled out.

5. Conclusions

A traditional dietary pattern (containing mainly cereals/starchy food and legumes) significantly increased the odds for both thinness and overweight/obesity, while a diversified dietary pattern (containing all food groups) significantly reduced the odds for thinness in school-aged children and adolescents in Nigeria. Dietary patterns were the only diet-related factors that had direct associations with under- and over-nutrition, while food insecurity and dietary diversity had indirect associations. DBM was also associated with socio-demographic and socio-economic variables, underscoring the importance of the social determinants of health. Nutrition education programmes to promote a healthy diversified dietary pattern that will reduce the burden of under- and over-nutrition among age 6–19 years needs to be intensified in Nigeria for school-aged children, adolescents and their parents.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nu14040789/s1. Table S1: List of food types and their groups used for the assessment of dietary patterns.

Author Contributions

All the authors were involved in the conceptualization of the research idea and topic, the design of the methodology and the proposal. A.A.A. carried out the study as part of his PhD work, while A.F. and K.K.-G. supervised, provided useful suggestions and the mentorship that helped to shape the study into the present form. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research work was supported by the Consortium for Advanced Research Training in Africa (CARTA). CARTA is jointly led by the African Population and Health Research Center and the University of the Witwatersrand and funded by the Carnegie Corporation of New York (Grant No—G-19-57145), Sida (Grant No:54100113), Uppsala Monitoring Centre and the DELTAS Africa Initiative (Grant No: 107768/Z/15/Z). The DELTAS Africa Initiative is an independent funding scheme of the African Academy of Sciences (AAS)’s Alliance for Accelerating Excellence in Science in Africa (AESA) and supported by the New Partnership for Africa’s Development Planning and Coordinating Agency (NEPAD Agency) with funding from the Wellcome Trust (UK) and the UK government. The statements made and views expressed are solely the responsibility of the Fellow.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa, (certificate No: M190514), and the Ministry of Health in Osun State, Nigeria (certificate No: OSHREC/PRS/569T/155) and Gombe State, Nigeria (certificate No: MOH/ADM/621/1/142).

Informed Consent Statement

Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to ethical considerations.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to appreciate the study participants, the research assistants and their supervisors, and the community leaders for their involvement and support that made this study possible.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Speiser, P.W.; Rudolf, M.C.J.; Anhalt, H.; Camacho-Hubner, C.; Chiarelli, F.; Eliakim, A.; Freemark, M.; Gruters, A.; Hershkovitz, E.; Iughetti, L.; et al. Consesus Statement: Childhood Obesity. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2005, 90, 1871–1887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Abarca-Gómez, L.; Abdeen, Z.A.; Hamid, Z.A.; Abu-Rmeileh, N.M.; Acosta-Cazares, B.; Acuin, C.; Adams, R.J.; Aekplakorn, W.; Afsana, K.; Aguilar-Salinas, C.A.; et al. Worldwide trends in body-mass index, underweight, overweight, and obesity from 1975 to 2016: A pooled analysis of 2416 population-based measurement studies in 128.9 million children, adolescents, and adults. Lancet 2017, 390, 2627–2642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. De Onis, M.; Blössner, M. Prevalence and trends of overweight among preschool children in developing countries. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2000, 72, 1032–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Popkin, B.M.; Corvalan, C.; Grummer-Strawn, L.M. Dynamics of the double burden of malnutrition and the changing nutrition reality. Lancet 2019, 6736, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wariri, O.; Akhimienho, K.I.; Albin, J.; Alhassan, K. Population and individual-level double burden of malnutrition among adolescents in two emerging cities in Northern and Southern Nigeria: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study. Ann. Glob. Health 2020, 86, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  6. Walker, J.L.; Ardouin, S.; Burrows, T. The validity of dietary assessment methods to accurately measure energy intake in children and adolescents who are overweight or obese: A systematic review. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2018, 72, 185–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Esimai, O.A.; Ojofeitimi, E. Nutrition and Health Status of Adolescents in a Private Secondary School in Port Harcourt. Health Sci. J. 2015, 9, 2–6. [Google Scholar]
  8. Aigbiremolen, A.; Duru, C.; Awunor, N.; Abejegah, C.; Abah, S.; Asogun, A.; Eguavoen, O. Knowledge and Application of Infectious Disease Control Measures among Primary Care Workers in Nigeria: The Lassa fever example. Int. J. Basic Appl. Innov. Res. 2012, 1, 122–129. [Google Scholar]
  9. Ekpo, U.F.; Omotayo, A.M.; Dipeolu, M.A. Prevalence of malnutrition among settled pastoral Fulani children in Southwest Nigeria. BMC Res. Notes 2008, 1, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Winpenny, E.M.; Corder, K.L.; Jones, A.; Ambrosini, G.L.; White, M.; van Sluijs, E.M.F. Changes in diet from age 10 to 14 years and prospective associations with school lunch choice. Appetite 2017, 116, 259–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Popkin, B.M. The nutrition transition: An overview of world patterns of change. Nutr. Rev. 2004, 62, S140–S143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Popkin, B.M.; Horton, S.; Kim, S.; Mahal, A.; Shuigo, J. Trends in diet, nutritional status and diet related communicable diseases in China and India: The economic costs of the nutrition transition. Nutr. Rev. 2001, 59, 379–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ajao, K.; Ojofeitimi, E.; Adebayo, A.; Fatusi, A.; Afolabi, O. Influence of family size, household food security status, and child care practices on the nutritional status of under-five children in Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Afr. J. Reprod. Health 2010, 14, 123–132. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kennedy, G.; Ballard, T.; Marie Claude, D. Guidelines for Measuring Household and Individual Dietary Diversity; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2010; ISBN 978-92-5-106749-9. [Google Scholar]
  15. Hu, F.B. Dietary pattern analysis: A new direction in nutritional epidemiology. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 2002, 13, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Oldewage-Theron, W.H.; Abu, B.A.Z. Is there an association between food insecurity and dietary diversity among seniors in Lubbock? J. Aging Res. Lifestyle 2017, 6, 238–245. [Google Scholar]
  17. Morales, M.E.; Berkowitz, S.A. The Relationship Between Food Insecurity, Dietary Patterns, and Obesity. Curr. Nutr. Rep. 2016, 5, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Nnakwe, N.; Onyemaobi, G. Prevalence of Food Insecurity and Inadequate Dietary Pattern Among Households with and without Children in Imo State Nigeria. Int. J. Sociol. Anthropol. 2013, 5, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Akindola, R. Household food insecurity and nutritional status: Implications for child’s survival in South-western Nigeria. Asian J. Agric. Rural Dev. 2020, 10, 120–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Olumakaiye, M.F. Dietary Diversity as a Correlate of Undernutrition Among School-Age Children in Southwestern Nigeria. J. Child. Nutr. Manag. 2013, 37, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ajani, S. An Assessment of Dietary Diversity in Six Nigerian States. Afr. J. Biomed. Res. 2010, 13, 161–167. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ayogu, R. Energy and Nutrient Intakes of Rural Nigerian Schoolchildren: Relationship with Dietary Diversity. Food Nutr. Bull. 2019, 40, 241–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ogunsile, S.E. The Effect of Dietary Pattern and Body Mass Index on the Academic Performance of In-school Adolescents. Int. Educ. Stud. 2012, 5, 65–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Bamidele, B.; Oyenike, E.; Olusegun, T.A. Dietary pattern and nutritional status of primary school pupils in a South Western Nigerian state: A rural urban Comparison. Afr. J. Food Sci. 2016, 10, 203–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Agofure, O.; Odjimogho, S.; Okandeji-Barry, O.; Moses, V. Dietary Pattern and Nutritional Status of Female Adolescents in Amai Secondary School, Delta State, Nigeria. Available online: https://www.panafrican-med-journal.com//content/article/38/32/full%0D (accessed on 27 June 2021).
  26. Samuel, F.O.; Adenekan, R.A.; Adeoye, I.A.; Okekunle, A.P. Nutritional Status, Dietary Patterns and associated factors among out-of-school Adolescents in Ibadan, Nigeria. World Nutr. 2021, 12, 51–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. National Population Commission (NPC), The Federal Republic of Nigeria. Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey; ICF: Rockville, MA, USA, 2018.
  28. United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). Primary Education. Available online: https://data.unicef.org/topic/education/primary-education/ (accessed on 20 October 2021).
  29. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Guideline on School Health Services. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240029392 (accessed on 20 October 2021).
  30. Dean, A.; Arner, T.; Sunki, G.; Friedman, R.; Lantinga, M.; Sangam, S.; Zubieta, J.C.; Sullivan, K.M.; Brendel, K.A.; Gao, Z.; et al. Epi InfoTM. A Database and Statistics Program for Public Health Professionals; CDC: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2011.
  31. United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). Children in a Digital World. Available online: https://www.unicef.org/publications/files/UNICEF_SOWC_2016.pdf (accessed on 19 May 2018).
  32. Adeomi, A.; Fatusi, A.; Klipstein-Grobusch, K. Double burden of malnutrition among school-aged children and adolescents: Evidence from a community-based cross- sectional survey in two Nigerian States. AAS Open Res. 2021, 4, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Harris, P.A.; Taylor, R.; Thielke, R.; Payne, J.; Gonzalez, N.; Conde, J.G. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J. Biomed. Inf. 2009, 42, 377–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry (ISAK). International Standards for Anthropometric Assessment; International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry: Potchefstroom, South Africa, 2001; pp. 53–55. [Google Scholar]
  35. De Onis, M.; Onyango, A.W.; Borghi, E.; Siyam, A.; Siekmann, J. Development of a WHO growth reference for school-aged children and adolescents. Bull. World Health Organ. 2007, 85, 660–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Coates, J.; Swindale, A.; Bilinsky, P. Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS) for Measurement of Food Access: Indicator Guide; FANTA: Washington, DC, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  37. Aryeetey, R.; Lartey, A.; Marquis, G.S.; Nti, H.; Colecraft, E.; Brown, P. Prevalence and predictors of overweight and obesity among school-aged children in urban Ghana. BMC Obes. 2017, 4, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Emmanuel, M.; Bokor, B. Tanner Stages; StatPearls Publishing: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2017. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470280/ (accessed on 4 March 2021).
  39. Kowalski, K.C.; Crocker, P.R.; Donen, R.M. The Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children (PAQ-C) and Adolescents (PAQ-A) Manual; College of Kinesiology, University of Saskatchewan: Saskatoon, SK, Canada, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  40. Ijarotimi, O.S.; Oyeneyin, O.O. Effect of economy restructuring on household food security and nutritional status of Nigerian children. J. Food Agric. Environ. 2005, 3, 27–32. [Google Scholar]
  41. Olumakaiye, M.F. Adolescent Girls with Low Dietary Diversity Score Are Predisposed to Iron Deficiency in Southwestern. Infant Child Adolesc. Nutr. 2013, 5, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Thorne-Lyman, A.L.; Shaikh, S.; Mehra, S.; Wu, L.S.F.; Ali, H.; Alland, K.; Schultze, K.J.; Mitra, M.; Hur, J.; Christian, P.; et al. Dietary patterns of >30,000 adolescents 9–15 years of age in rural Bangladesh. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2020, 1468, 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Bodega, P.; Fernández-Alvira, J.M.; Santos-Beneit, G.; de Cos-Gandoy, A.; Fernández-Jiménez, R.; Moreno, L.A.; de Miguel, M.; Orrit, X.; Carvajal, I.; Storniolo, C.E.; et al. Dietary Patterns and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Spanish Adolescents: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the SI! Program for Health Promotion in Secondary Schools. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Ogum Alangea, D.; Aryeetey, R.N.; Gray, H.L.; Laar, A.K.; Adanu, R.M.K. Dietary patterns and associated risk factors among school age children in urban Ghana. BMC Nutr. 2018, 4, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Boateng, D.; Galbete, C.; Nicolaou, M.; Meeks, K.; Beune, E.; Smeeth, L.; Osei-Kwasi, H.A.; Bahendeka, S.; Agyei-Baffour, P.; Mockenhaupt, F.P.; et al. Dietary patterns are associated with predicted 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease among Ghanaian populations: The Research on Obesity and Diabetes in African Migrants (RODAM) study. J. Nutr. 2019, 149, 755–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Abizari, A.-R.; Ali, Z. Dietary patterns and associated factors of schooling Ghanaian adolescents. J. Health Popul. Nutr. 2019, 38, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Pestoni, G.; Krieger, J.P.; Sych, J.M.; Faeh, D.; Rohrmann, S. Cultural differences in diet and determinants of diet quality in switzerland: Results from the national nutrition survey menuch. Nutrients 2019, 11, 126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Petrenya, N.; Rylander, C.; Brustad, M. Dietary patterns of adults and their associations with Sami ethnicity, sociodemographic factors, and lifestyle factors in a rural multiethnic population of northern Norway—The SAMINOR 2 clinical survey. BMC Public Health 2019, 19, 1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bronfenbrenner, U. Ecology of the Family as a Context for Human Development: Research Perspectives. Dev. Psychol. 1986, 22, 723–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ettekal, A.; Mahoney, J.L. Ecological Systems Theory. In The SAGE Encyclopedia of Out-of-School Learning; Peppler, K., Ed.; SAGE Publications, Inc.: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2017; pp. 239–241. ISBN 978-1-48338-519-8. [Google Scholar]
  51. Adekanmbi, V.T.; Kayode, G.A.; Uthman, O.A. Individual and contextual factors associated with childhood stunting in Nigeria: A multilevel analysis. Matern. Child Nutr. 2013, 9, 244–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Uthman, O.A. A multilevel analysis of individual and community effect on chronic childhood malnutrition in rural Nigeria. J. Trop. Pediatr. 2009, 55, 109–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Muthuri, S.K.; Francis, C.E.; Wachira, L.J.M.; LeBlanc, A.G.; Sampson, M.; Onywera, V.O.; Tremblay, M.S. Evidence of an overweight/obesity transition among school-aged children and youth in Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e92846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Gupta, N.; Goel, K.; Shah, P.; Misra, A. Childhood obesity in developing countries: Epidemiology, determinants, and prevention. Endocr. Rev. 2012, 33, 48–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Omigbodun, O.O.; Adediran, K.I.; Akinyemi, J.O.; Omigbodun, A.O.; Adedokun, B.O.; Esan, O. Gender and rural-urban differences in the nutritional status of in-school adolescents in south-western Nigeria. J. Biosoc. Sci. 2010, 42, 653–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Naska, A.; Lagiou, A.; Lagiou, P. Dietary assessment methods in epidemiological research: Current state of the art and future prospects. F1000Research 2017, 6, 926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Lissner, L.; Troiano, R.P.; Midthune, D.; Heitmann, B.L.; Kipnis, V.; Subar, A.F.; Potischman, N. OPEN about obesity: Recovery biomarkers, dietary reporting errors and BMI. Int. J. Obes. 2007, 31, 956–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Radar chart showing the two dietary patterns, the 15 food groups and their factor loadings among school-aged children and adolescents in two States in Nigeria.
Figure 1. Radar chart showing the two dietary patterns, the 15 food groups and their factor loadings among school-aged children and adolescents in two States in Nigeria.
Nutrients 14 00789 g001
Table 1. Description of the study population in Gombe and Osun States (n = 1200).
Table 1. Description of the study population in Gombe and Osun States (n = 1200).
VariablesStates
f Gombe
n (%)
f Osun
n (%)
Total
n (%)
Age of the child (IR)12.0 (7.0)11.0 (5.0)11.0 (6.0)
a BMI-for-age
Thinness83 (13.8)40 (6.7)123 (10.3)
Normal476 (79.3)464 (77.3)940 (78.3)
Overweight/Obesity41 (6.8)96 (16.0)137 (11.4)
Sex
Male323 (53.8)278 (46.3)601 (50.1)
Female277 (46.2)322 (53.7)599 (49.9)
Pubertal staging
Early puberty379 (63.2)355 (59.2)734 (61.2)
Mid puberty 221 (36.8)245 (40.8)466 (38.8)
Ethnicity
Yoruba65 (10.8)574 (95.7)639 (53.3)
Igbo23 (3.8)15 (2.5)38 (3.2)
Hausa150 (25.0)0 (0.0)150 (12.5)
Fulani144 (24.0)3 (0.5)147 (12.3)
Minorities218 (36.3)8 (1.3)226 (18.8)
b Household wealth index
Low205 (34.2)195 (32.5)400 (33.3)
Middle189 (31.5)211 (35.2)400 (33.3)
High206 (34.3)194 (32.3)400 (33.3)
Residence
Rural300 (50.0)300 (50.0)600 (50.0)
Urban300 (50.0)300 (50.0)600 (50.0)
c Food security
Food secure320 (53.3)312 (52.0)632 (52.7)
Food insecure280 (46.7)288 (48.0)568 (47.3)
d Dietary diversity
Low244 (41.1)341 (57.0)585 (49.1)
High350 (58.9)257 (43.0)607 (50.9)
e Diversified dietary pattern
Quartile 1249 (41.5)52 (8.7)301 (25.1)
Quartile 2150 (25.0)149 (24.8)299 (24.9)
Quartile 3112 (18.7)188 (31.3)300 (25.0)
Quartile 489 (14.8)211 (35.2)300 (25.0)
e Traditional dietary pattern
Quartile 132 (5.3)268 (44.7)300 (25.0)
Quartile 2165 (27.5)135 (22.5)300 (25.0)
Quartile 3195 (32.5)105 (17.5)300 (25.0)
Quartile 4208 (34.7)92 (15.3)300 (25.0)
IR—interquartile range; BMI—body mass index. a Categorized using BMI-for-age Z-scores; thinness (<−2), normal (−2 to 1) and overweight/obesity (>1) b Household wealth index scores were derived from scoring the possession of household commodities using principal component analysis, which were then categorized into three (low/middle/high) c Measured using HFIAS, “food secure” represents those that were food secure and mildly food insecure, while “food insecure” represents moderately and severely food insecure) d Those with a dietary diversity score lower than the median score of 7 were grouped as “low”, while others (≥7) were regarded as high. e Dietary pattern scores derived using principal component analysis were categorized into quartiles. f The number of respondents in each of Gombe and Osun States is 600.
Table 2. Demographic variables, physical activity, food insecurity and dietary diversity across the quartiles of the two dietary patterns.
Table 2. Demographic variables, physical activity, food insecurity and dietary diversity across the quartiles of the two dietary patterns.
VariablesDiversified Dietary Pattern p-ValueTraditional Dietary Patternp-Value
Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4
a Age 11.0 (6.0)11.0 (5.0)12.0 (7.0)12 (6.0)0.92610.0 (5.0)11.0 (6.0)11.5 (6.0)12.0 (6.0)<0.001 *
a Physical Activity Scores2.1 (1.0)2.0 (1.0)2.4 (1.1)2.6 (0.9)<0.001 *2.2 (1.2)2.4 (1.0)2.2 (1.1)2.3 (0.9)0.034 *
Sex 0.571 <0.001 *
Male152 (25.3)159 (26.5)143 (23.8)147 (24.5)121 (20.1)158 (26.3)151 (25.1)171 (28.5)
Female 149 (24.9)140 (23.4)157 (26.2)153 (25.5)179 (29.9)142 (23.7)149 (24.9)129 (21.5)
Pubertal Staging 0.001 * 0.637
Early Puberty211 (28.7)184 (25.1)168 (22.9)171 (23.3)187 (25.5)187 (25.5)186 (25.3)174 (23.7)
Mid Puberty 90 (19.3)115 (24.7)132 (28.3)129 (27.7)113 (24.2)113 (24.2)114 (24.5)126 (27.0)
Ethnicity <0.001 * <0.001 *
Yoruba65 (10.2)159 (24.9)203 (31.8)212 (33.2)264 (41.3)139 (21.8)125 (19.6)111 (17.4)
Igbo3 (7.9)11 (28.9)9 (23.7)15 (39.5)7 (18.4)18 (47.4)2 (5.3)11 (28.9)
Hausa62 (41.3)35 (23.3)28 (18.7)25 (16.7)12 (8.0)51 (34.0)37 (24.7)50 (33.3)
Fulani83 (56.5)25 (17.0)23 (1.6)16 (10.9)7 (4.8)42 (28.6)48 (32.7)50 (34.0)
Minorities 88 (38.9)69 (30.5)37 (16.4)32 (14.2)10 (4.4)50 (22.1)88 (38.9)78 (34.5)
Household Wealth Index <0.001 * <0.001 *
Low170 (42.5)68 (17.0)75 (18.8)87 (21.8)75 (18.8)125 (31.3)94 (23.5)106 (26.5)
Middle88 (22.0)115 (28.7)116 (29.0)81 (20.3)116 (29.0)86 (21.5)122 (30.5)76 (19.0)
High 43 (10.8)116 (29.0)109 (27.3)132 (33.0)109 (27.3)89 (22.3)84 (21.0)118 (29.5)
State <0.001 * <0.001 *
Gombe249 (41.5)150 (25.0)112 (18.7)89 (14.8)32 (5.3)165 (27.5)195 (32.5)208 (34.7)
Osun52 (8.7)149 (24.8)188 (31.3)211 (35.2)268 (44.7)135 (22.5)105 (17.5)92 (15.3)
Residence <0.001 * <0.001 *
Rural109 (18.2)123 (20.5)181 (30.2)187 (31.2)174 (29.0)135 (22.5)129 (21.5)162 (27.0)
Urban 192 (32.0)176 (29.3)119 (19.8)113 (18.8)126 (21.0)165 (27.5)171 (28.5)138 (23.0)
Food Security <0.001 * 0.403
Food Secure291 (26.3)259 (23.4)271 (24.5)286 (25.8)280 (25.3)278 (25.1)279 (25.2)270 (24.4)
Food Insecure10 (10.8)40 (43.0)29 (31.2)14 (15.1)20 (21.5)22 (23.7)21 (22.6)30 (32.3)
Dietary Diversity <0.001 * <0.001 *
Low198 (33.8)153 (26.2)130 (22.2)104 (17.8)175 (29.9)171 (29.2)150 (15.6)89 (15.2)
High 97 (16.0)146 (24.1)168 (27.7)196 (32.3)125 (20.6)127 (20.9)144 (23.7)211 (34.8)
a Dietary Diversity Score5.0 (4.0)6.0 (3.0)7.0 (4.0)8.0 (7.0)<0.001 *6.0 (3.0)6.0 (4.0)6.0 (5.0)9.0 (6.0)<0.001 *
Q—quartiles; *—statistically significant; a—Kruskal–Wallis test was used because the variables were not normally distributed, and median (inter-quartile range) was used to describe the data.
Table 3. The associations of food insecurity and dietary diversity, with thinness (under-nutrition) and overweight/obesity (over-nutrition) among school-aged children and adolescents in two Nigerian states, using binary logistic regression (n = 1200).
Table 3. The associations of food insecurity and dietary diversity, with thinness (under-nutrition) and overweight/obesity (over-nutrition) among school-aged children and adolescents in two Nigerian states, using binary logistic regression (n = 1200).
a Modelsb RefOR95% CIp-Value
Food Insecurity
Model 0 (Empty/Crude)11.330.71, 2.510.381
Model 111.350.72, 2.570.351
Model 211.340.70, 2.580.377
Model 311.340.70, 2.570.382
Dietary Diversity
Model 0 (Empty/Crude)10.850.58, 1.230.378
Model 110.830.57, 1.210.324
Model 210.910.61, 1.360.645
Model 310.910.61, 1.350.637
Food Insecurity
Model 0 (Empty/Crude)10.710.34, 1.510.376
Model 110.70.33, 1.500.358
Model 210.790.37, 1.700.546
Model 310.730.33, 1.600.433
Dietary iversity
Model 0 (Empty/Crude)11.040.73, 1.490.822
Model 111.230.85, 1.770.275
Model 211.310.90, 1.920.158
Model 311.340.91, 1.960.134
OR–odds ratio; CI–confidence interval; a Model 1–adjusted for age and sex; Model 2: Model 1 + household wealth index and state; Model 3: full model (i.e., Model 2 + physical activity scores); b represents the food secure category and the category with low dietary diversity which served as reference values for food insecurity and dietary diversity respectively.
Table 4. The associations of the diversified and traditional dietary patterns, with thinness (under-nutrition) and overweight/obesity (over-nutrition) among school-aged children and adolescents in two Nigerian states, using binary logistic regression (n = 1200).
Table 4. The associations of the diversified and traditional dietary patterns, with thinness (under-nutrition) and overweight/obesity (over-nutrition) among school-aged children and adolescents in two Nigerian states, using binary logistic regression (n = 1200).
a ModelsQ1
(Ref)
Q2 Q3 Q4 p-Trend
ORp-Value95% CIORp-Value95% CIORp-Value95% CI
Thinness
Diversified Dietary Pattern
Model 0 (Empty/Crude)10.28<0.001 *0.16, 0.490.510.006 *0.31, 0.820.36<0.001 *0.21, 0.610.009 *
Model 110.27<0.001 *0.15, 0.480.510.006 *0.32, 0.820.36<0.001 *0.21, 0.610.008 *
Model 210.440.007 *0.24, 0.800.890.6750.52, 1.530.720.2850.40, 1.310.915
Model 310.440.007 *0.24, 0.800.910.7370.53, 1.570.750.3430.41, 1.370.827
Traditional Dietary Pattern
Model 0 (Empty/Crude)12.960.001 *1.57, 5.592.610.004 *1.37, 4.972.870.001 *1.52, 5.440.002 *
Model 112.980.001 *1.57, 5.632.630003 *1.38, 5.042.910.001 *1.52,5.550.002 *
Model 211.940.0590.97, 3.861.630.1770.80, 3.321.950.0650.96, 3.960.114
Model 311.990.0511.00, 3.981.640.1710.81, 3.981.980.0590.97, 4.030.106
Overweight/Obesity
Diversified Dietary Pattern
Model 0 (Empty/Crude)11.010.9780.60, 1.701.420.1660.86, 2.321.080.7810.64, 1.810.871
Model 111.010.9570.60, 1.731.390.1930.84, 2.301.090.7420.65, 1.850.935
Model 210.660.1640.36, 1.190.830.5290.47, 1.480.60.10.33, 1.100.1
Model 310.620.1190.34, 1.130.920.780.51, 1.650.780.4210.42, 1.440.581
Traditional Dietary Pattern
Model 0 (Empty/Crude)10.970.9010.59, 1.580.70.1880.42, 1.19110.61, 1.630.865
Model 111.140.6060.69, 1.880.830.4880.49, 1.411.310.290.79, 2.170.444
Model 211.70.048 *1.01, 2.871.330.3160.76, 2.342.140.006 *1.24, 3.670.017 *
Model 312.060.009 *1.20, 3.551.50.1690.84, 2.662.50.001 *1.43, 4.350.007 *
Ref—reference value; OR—odds ratio; CI—confidence interval; *—statistically significant Q—represent quartiles, which were derived from the principal component analysis scores for both the diversified and traditional dietary patterns a Model 1—adjusted for age and sex; Model 2—Model 1 + household wealth index and state; Model 3: full model (i.e., Model 2 + physical activity scores).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Adeomi, A.A.; Fatusi, A.; Klipstein-Grobusch, K. Food Security, Dietary Diversity, Dietary Patterns and the Double Burden of Malnutrition among School-Aged Children and Adolescents in Two Nigerian States. Nutrients 2022, 14, 789. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14040789

AMA Style

Adeomi AA, Fatusi A, Klipstein-Grobusch K. Food Security, Dietary Diversity, Dietary Patterns and the Double Burden of Malnutrition among School-Aged Children and Adolescents in Two Nigerian States. Nutrients. 2022; 14(4):789. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14040789

Chicago/Turabian Style

Adeomi, Adeleye Abiodun, Adesegun Fatusi, and Kerstin Klipstein-Grobusch. 2022. "Food Security, Dietary Diversity, Dietary Patterns and the Double Burden of Malnutrition among School-Aged Children and Adolescents in Two Nigerian States" Nutrients 14, no. 4: 789. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14040789

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop