Journals Library

An error occurred retrieving publication content to display, please try again.

Page not found (404)

Sorry - the page you requested could not be found.

Please choose a page from the navigation or try a website search above to find the information you need.

For adolescents with unipolar major depression, cognitive behaviour therapy, short-term psychoanalytic psychotherapy and brief psychosocial intervention were as likely as each other to maintain lowered depressive symptoms at one year after treatment.

{{author}}{{author}}{{($index > metadata.AuthorsAndEtalArray.length-1) ? ',' : '.'}}

Ian M Goodyer, Shirley Reynolds, Barbara Barrett, Sarah Byford, Bernadka Dubicka, Jonathan Hill, Fiona Holland, Raphael Kelvin, Nick Midgley, Chris Roberts, Rob Senior, Mary Target, Barry Widmer, Paul Wilkinson & Peter Fonagy.

Ian M Goodyer 1,*, Shirley Reynolds 2, Barbara Barrett 3, Sarah Byford 3, Bernadka Dubicka 4, Jonathan Hill 5,6, Fiona Holland 7, Raphael Kelvin 1,8, Nick Midgley 9,10, Chris Roberts 7, Rob Senior 11, Mary Target 10, Barry Widmer 1, Paul Wilkinson 1, Peter Fonagy 10

1 Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
2 Charlie Waller Institute, University of Reading, Reading, UK
3 David Goldberg Centre, King’s College London, London, UK
4 Institute of Brain, Behaviour and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
5 Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
6 School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, UK
7 Centre for Biostatistics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
8 Cambridge and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
9 Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, London, UK
10 Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
11 Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
* Corresponding author Email: ig104@cam.ac.uk

Funding: {{metadata.Funding}}

{{metadata.Journal}} Volume: {{metadata.Volume}}, Issue: {{metadata.Issue}}, Published in {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'MMMM yyyy'}}

https://doi.org/{{metadata.DOI}}

Citation:{{author}}{{ (($index < metadata.AuthorsArray.length-1) && ($index <=6)) ? ', ' : '' }}{{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length <= 6) ? '.' : '' }} {{(metadata.AuthorsArray.length > 6) ? 'et al. ' : ''}}. {{metadata.JournalShortName}} {{metadata.PublicationDate | date:'yyyy'}};{{metadata.Volume}}({{metadata.Issue}})

Crossmark status check

Report Content

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

The full text of this issue is available as a PDF document from the Toolkit section on this page.

If you would like to receive a notification when this project publishes in the NIHR Journals Library, please submit your email address below.

Responses to this report

No responses have been published.

 

If you would like to submit a response to this publication, please do so using the form below:

Comments submitted to the NIHR Journals Library are electronic letters to the editor. They enable our readers to debate issues raised in research reports published in the Journals Library. We aim to post within 14 working days all responses that contribute substantially to the topic investigated, as determined by the Editors.  Non-relevant comments will be deleted.

Your name and affiliations will be published with your comment.

Once published, you will not have the right to remove or edit your response. The Editors may add, remove, or edit comments at their absolute discretion.

By submitting your response, you are stating that you agree to the terms & conditions

An error has occurred in processing the XML document