Worker's compensation and return-to-work following orthopaedic injury to extremities.

Authors

  • Wen-Hsuan Hou
  • Jau-Yih Tsauo
  • Ching-Hua Lin
  • Huey-Wen Liang
  • Chung-Li Du

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0194

Keywords:

return to work, occupational injuries, workers' compensation.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the influence of workers' compensation coverage on injury patterns and return-to-work outcome in orthopaedic injuries of the extremities. DESIGN: Prospective and follow-up study. SUBJECTS: A total of 154 subjects were recruited and 37.7% of the injuries were covered by workers' compensation. METHODS: Baseline data were obtained by questionnaire and chart review. The main outcome variable was time of first return to work. Subjects were followed up at 1, 3 and 6 months after initial interview. Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyse associations between potential predictors and return-to-work. RESULTS: The workers' compensation group were most likely to be men employed in labour occupations and were most likely to sustain crushing injuries, or injuries from being struck by objects. The 6-month return-to-work rates for the workers' compensation and non-workers' compensation groups were 70.7% and 71.9%. Early return-to-work was associated with more years in higher education, and increased self-efficacy in both groups. Moreover, age older than 45 years and hospitalization less than 14 days were associated with early return-to-work in the non-workers' compensation group. CONCLUSION: The injury patterns of workers' compensation and non-workers' compensation groups differed, but the likelihood of return-to-work at 6-month follow-up was similar. More years of education and self-efficacy were positive predictors of return-to-work.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2008-06-05

How to Cite

Hou, W.-H., Tsauo, J.-Y., Lin, C.-H., Liang, H.-W., & Du, C.-L. (2008). Worker’s compensation and return-to-work following orthopaedic injury to extremities. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 40(6), 440–445. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0194

Issue

Section

Original Report