Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Quality of life of breast cancer patients and types of surgery for breast cancer — Current status and unresolved issues —

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 01 April 2007

Abstract

Since standard radical mastectomy was established by Halsted for breast cancer, surgical procedures for breast cancer have been changed according to the results of randomized controlled trials. Breast-conserving treatment is now regarded as a standard local treatment for early breast cancer. More recently, sentinel node biopsy is becoming popular as an alternative procedure to axillary node dissection for nodal staging. These new procedures have been believed to be better in terms of patients’ quality of life in comparison with previous surgical procedures without impairing prognosis.

Many studies regarding the quality of life (QOL) of patients after such procedures have been reported. Here we review those data, especially of studies comparing quality of life of patients after mastectomy and breast-conserving treatment, and of those after axillary node dissection and sentinel node biopsy. Viewpoints and issues on surgical treatment-related QOL are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

QOL:

quality of life

RCT:

randomized controlled trial

LES:

less extensive surgery

BCT:

breast-conserving treatment

SNB:

sentinel node biopsy

ALND:

axillary lymph node dissection

ROM:

Range of motion

BDI:

Beck Depression Inventory

BSI:

Breif Symptom Inventory

MAC:

Mental Adjustment to Cancer Scale

SF-36:

Short Form 36

STAI:

State-Trait Anxiety Inventory

FACT:

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale

References

  1. Veronesi U, Marubini E, Mariani L, Valagussa P, Zucali R: The dissection of internal mammary nodes does not improve the survival of breast cancer patients. 30-year results of a randomised trial.Eur J Cancer 35:1320–1325, 1999.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lacour J, Le M, Caceres E, Koszarowski T, Veronesi U, Hill C: Radical mastectomy versus radical mastectomy plus internal mammary dissection. Ten year results of an international cooperative trial in breast cancer.Cancer 51:1941–1943, 1983.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Turner L, Swindell R, Bell WG, Hartley RC, Tasker JH, Wilson WW, Alderson MR, Leck IM: Radical versus modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer.Ann R Coll Surg Engl 63:239–243, 1981.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Maddox WA, Carpenter JT Jr, Laws HL, Soong SJ, Cloud G, Urist MM, Balch CM: A randomized prospective trial of radical (Halsted) mastectomy versus modified radical mastectomy in 311 breast cancer patients.Ann Surg 198:207–212, 1983.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER, Jeong JH, Wolmark N: Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer.N Engl J Med 347:1233–1241, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jacobson JA, Danforth DN, Cowan KH, d’Angelo T, Steinberg SM, Pierce L, Lippman ME, Lichter AS, Glatstein E, Okunieff P: Ten-year results of a comparison of conservation with mastectomy in the treatment of stage I and II breast cancer.N Engl J Med 332:907–911, 1995.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kiebert GM, de Haes JCJM, van de Velde CJH: The impact of breast-conserving treatment and mastectomy on the quality of life of early-stage breast cancer patients: A review.J Clin Oncol 9:1059–1070, 1991.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Irwig L, Bennetts A: Quality of life after breast conservation or mastectomy: A systematic review.Aust NZ J Surg 67:750–754, 1997.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fallowfield LJ, Baum M, Maguire GP: Effects of breast conservation on psychological morbidity associated with diagnosis and treatment of early breast cancer.Br Med J 293:1331–1334, 1986.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. de Haes JC, van Oostrom MA, Welvaart K: The effect of radical and conserving surgery on the quality of life of early breast cancer patients.Eur J Surg Oncol 12:337–342, 1986.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lasry JC, Margolese RG, Poisson R, Shibata H, Fleischer D, Lafleur D, Legault S, Taillefer S: Depression and body image following mastectomy and lumpectomy.J Chronic Dis 40:529–534, 1987.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kemeny MM, Wellisch DK, Schain WS: Psychosocial outcome in a randomized surgical trial for treatment of primary breast cancer.Cancer 62:1231–1237, 1988.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee MS, Love SB, Mitchell JB, Parker EM, Rubens RD, Watson JP, Fentiman IS, Hayward JL: Mastectomy or conservation for early breast cancer: psychological morbidity.Eur J Cancer. 28A:1340–1344, 1992.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Schain WS, d’Angelo TM, Dunn ME, Lichter AS, Pierce LJ: Mastectomy versus conservative surgery and radiation therapy. Psychosocial consequences.Cancer 73:1221–1228, 1994.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Poulsen B, Graversen HP, Beckmann J, Blichert-Toft M: A comparative study of post-operative psychosocial function in women with primary operable breast cancer randomized to breast conservation therapy or mastectomy.Eur J Surg Oncol 23:327–334, 1997.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Curran D, van Dongen JP, Aaronson NK, Kiebert G, Fentiman IS, Mignolet F, Bartelink H: Quality of life of early-stage breast cancer patients treated with radical mastectomy or breast-conserving procedures: results of EORTC Trial 10801. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC), Breast Cancer Co-operative Group (BCCG).Eurl Cancer 34:307–314, 1998.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ganz PA, Schag AC, Lee JJ, Polinsky ML: Tan S-J. Breast conservation versus mastectomy. Is there a difference in psychological adjustment or quality of life in the year after surgery.Cancer 69:1729–1738, 1992.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Engel J, Kerr J, Schlesinger-Raab A, Sauer H, Holzel D: Quality of life following breast-conserving therapy or mastectomy: Results of a 5-year prospective study.Breast J 10:223–231, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dorval M, Maunsell E, Deschênes L, Brisson J: Type of mastectomy and quality of life for long term breast carcinoma survivors.Cancer 83:2130–2138, 1998.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Janni W, Rjosk D, Dimpfl TH, Haertl K, Strobl B, Hepp F, Hanke A, Bergauer F, Sommer H: Quality of life influenced by primary surgical treatment for stage I-III breast cancer — Long-term follow-up of a matched-pair analysis.Ann Surg Oncol 8:542–548, 2001.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Krag D, Weaver D, Ashikaga T, Moffat F, Himberg VS, Shriver C, Feldman S, Kusminsky R, Gadd M, Kuhn J, Harlow S, Beitsch P: The sentinel node in breast cancer. A multicenter validation study.N Engl J Med 339:941–946, 1998.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schrenk P, Rieger R, Shamiyeh A, Wayand W: Morbidity following sentinel lymph node biopsy versus axillary lymph node dissection for patients with breast carcinoma.Cancer 88:608–614, 2000.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Swenson KK, Nissen MJ, Ceronsky C, Swenson L, Lee MW, Turtle TM: Comparison of side effects between sentinel lymph node and axillary lymph node dissection for breast cancer.Ann Surg Oncol 9:745–753, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rietman JS, Dijkstra PU, Geertzen JHB, Baas P, de Vries J, Dolsma W, Groothoff JW, Eisma WH, Hoekstra HJ: Short-term morbidity of the upper limb after sentinel lymph node biopsy or axillary lymph node dissection for stage I or II breast carcinoma.Cancer 98:690–696, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G, Luini A, Zurrida S, Galimberti V, Intra M, Veronesi P, Robertson C, Maisonneuve P, Renne G, De Cicco C, De Lucia F, Gennari R: A randomized comparison of sentinel-node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer.N Engl J Med 349:546–553, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Purushotham AD, Upponi S, Klevesath MB, Bobrow L, Miller K, Myles JP, Duffy SW: Morbidity after sentinel lymph node biopsy in primary breast cancer: Results from a randomized controlled trial.J Clin Oncol 23:4312–4321, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mansel RE, Fallowfield L, Kissin M, Goyal A, New-combe RG, Dixon JM, Yiangou C, Horgan K, Bundred N, Monypenny I, England D, Sibbering M, Abdullah TI, Barr L, Chetty U, Sinnet DH, Fleissig A, Clarke D, Ell PJ: Randomized multicenter trial of sentinel node biopsy versus standard axillary treatment in operable breast cancer: The ALMNAC Trial.J Natl Cancer Inst 98:599–609, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Peintinger F, Reitsamer R, Stranzl H, Ralph G: Comparison of quality of life and complaints after axillary lymph node dissection vs sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients.Br J cancer 89:648–652, 2003.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Breast Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, 160 Kou Minamiumemoto-machi, 791-0288, Matsuyama, Japan

    Shozo Ohsumi

  2. Department of Healthcare and Social Services, University of Marketing and Distribution Sciences, Japan

    Kojiro Shimozumai

  3. Division of Surgery and Breast Oncology, Nyuwakai Oikawa Hospital, Japan

    Katsumasa Kuroi

  4. Department of Health Science and Social Welfare, School of Human Sciences, Waseda University, Japan

    Michikazu Ono

  5. Department of Epidemiology, National Institute of Public Health, Japan

    Hirohisa Imai

Authors
  1. Shozo Ohsumi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kojiro Shimozumai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Katsumasa Kuroi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michikazu Ono
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hirohisa Imai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shozo Ohsumi.

Additional information

A correction to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02966587

About this article

Cite this article

Ohsumi, S., Shimozumai, K., Kuroi, K. et al. Quality of life of breast cancer patients and types of surgery for breast cancer — Current status and unresolved issues —. Breast Cancer 14, 66–73 (2007). https://doi.org/10.2325/jbcs.14.66

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2325/jbcs.14.66

Key words

Search

Navigation