Skip to main content
Log in

Patient and Public Involvement in Developing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

Indispensable, Desirable, Challenging

  • Commentary
  • Published:
The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Staniszewska S, Haywood KL, Brett J, et al. Patient and public involvement in patient-reported outcome measures: evolution not revolution. Patient 2012; 5(2): 79–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales. 3rd edition. New York (NY): Oxford University Press, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boivin A, Currie K, Fervers B, et al. Patient and public involvement in clinical guidelines: international experiences and future perspectives. Qual Saf Health Care 2010; 19(5): e22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. World Health Organization. Patients for patient safety — statement of case: how patient engagement became a priority. Geneva: WHO, 2011 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.who.int/patientsafety/patients_for_patient/statement/en/index.html [Accessed 2011 Sep 1]

    Google Scholar 

  5. Conway J. Patients and families: powerful new partners for healthcare and caregivers. Healthc Exec 2008; 23: 60–2

    Google Scholar 

  6. Levinson W, Kao A, Kuby A, et al. Not all patients want to participate in decision making: a national study of public preferences. J Gen Intern Med 2005; 20: 531–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Institute for Family-Centered Care. Developing and sustaining a patient and family advisory council. Washington, DC: IFCC, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hildon ZH, Allwood D, Black N. Impact of format and content of visual display of data on comprehension, choice and preference: a systematic review. Int J Qual Health Care 2012; 24(1): 55–64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Peters E, Hibbard J, Slovic P, et al. Numeracy skill and the communication, comprehension, and use of risk-benefit information. Health Aff (Millwood) 2007; 26: 741–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Marcus EN. The silent epidemic: the health effects of illiteracy. New Engl J Med 2006; 355: 339–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lipkus IM, Samsa G, Rimer BK. General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Med Decis Making 2001; 21: 37–44

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sunstein CR, Thaler RH. Libertarian paternalism is not an oxymoron. U Chicago Law Rev 2003; 70: 1159–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work only reflects the author’s views. It is not linked to the ongoing collaboration of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine with the UK Department of Health on patient-reported outcomes. The author has no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this article.

The author would like to thank Dr Zoe Hildon for discussions on the topic and for sharing data from a systematic review on issues in the visual display of data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oliver Groene PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Groene, O. Patient and Public Involvement in Developing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Patient 5, 75–77 (2012). https://doi.org/10.2165/11597370-000000000-00000

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/11597370-000000000-00000

Navigation