Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Non-Surgical and Surgical Treatment of Tarsal Navicular Stress Fractures

  • Current Opinion
  • Published:
Sports Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Stress fractures of the tarsal navicular, first described in 1970, were initially thought to be rare injuries. Heightened awareness and increased participation in athletics has resulted in more frequent diagnosis and more aggressive treatment. The vascular supply of the tarsal navicular results in a relatively avascular zone in the central one-third, which experiences severe compressive forces during explosive manoeuvers such as jumping and sprinting. Repetitive activities can result in stress reactions or even fracture. Patients often initially complain of vague midfoot pain localized to the medial border of the foot. The pain is usually exacerbated by activity and relieved with rest. The diagnosis of tarsal navicular stress fracture is challenging because of the high false negative rate of plain radiographs. Additional diagnostic testing with bone scan, CT and MRI are often required for diagnosis. The proper treatment of tarsal navicular stress fractures has become a topic of debate as surgical intervention for these injuries has increased. In a recent meta-analysis, Torg et al. found that 96% of tarsal navicular stress fractures treated with non-weight-bearing (NWB) conservative treatment for 5 weeks went on to successful outcomes. However, only 44% of patients treated with weight-bearing (WB) conservative treatment had successful outcomes. Surgical treatment resulted in successful outcome in 82% of patients. Interestingly, the meta-analysis also found that fracture type did not correlate with outcomes, regardless of treatment. The meta-analysis also found no difference in time to return to activity between patients treated surgically and those who underwent NWB conservative treatment. The recent literature indicates that patients are undergoing surgery or are receiving WB conservative management as a first-line treatment option with the expectation that they will return to their activity more quickly. Although surgical treatment seems increasingly common, the results statistically demonstrate an inferior trend to conservative NWB management. Conservative NWB management is the standard of care for initial treatment of both partial and complete stress fractures of the tarsal navicular. WB conservative treatment and surgical intervention are not recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Table I
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Towne LC, Blazina ME, Cozen LN. Fatigue fracture of the tarsal navicular. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1970 Mar; 52 (2): 376–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Coris EE, Lombardo JA. Tarsal navicular stress fractures. Am Fam Physician 2003 Jan 1; 67 (1): 85–90

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Khan KM, Brukner PD, Kearney C, et al. Tarsal navicular stress fracture in athletes. Sports Med 1994 Jan; 17 (1): 65–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Brukner P, Bradshaw C, Khan KM, et al. Stress fractures: a review of 180 cases. Clin J Sport Med 1996 Apr; 6 (2): 85–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Burne SG, Mahoney CM, Forster BB, et al. Tarsal navicular stress injury: long-term outcome and clinicoradiologicalcorrelation using both computed tomography and magneticresonance imaging. Am J Sports Med 2005 Dec; 33 (12): 1875–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bennell KL, Malcolm SA, Thomas SA, et al. The incidence and distribution of stress fractures in competitive track and field athletes: a twelve-month prospective study. Am J Sports Med 1996 Mar-Apr; 24 (2): 211–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Torg JS, Moyer J, Gaughan JP, et al. Management of tarsal navicular stress fractures: conservative versus surgical treatment. A meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 2010 May; 38 (5): 1048–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mann JA, Pedowitz DI. Evaluation and treatment of navicular stress fractures, including nonunions, revision surgery,and persistent pain after treatment. Foot Ankle Clin 2009 Jun; 14 (2): 187–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Golano P, Farinas O, Saenz I. The anatomy of the navicular and periarticular structures. Foot Ankle Clin 2004 Mar; 9 (1): 1–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jones MH, Amendola AS. Navicular stress fractures. Clin Sports Med 2006 Jan; 25 (1): 151–8, x-xi

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Torg JS, Pavlov H, Cooley LH, et al. Stress fractures of the tarsal navicular: a retrospective review of twenty-one cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982 Jun; 64 (5): 700–12

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Khan KM, Fuller PJ, Brukner PD, et al. Outcome of conservative and surgical management of navicular stressfracture in athletes: eighty-six cases proven with computerizedtomography. Am J Sports Med 1992 Nov-Dec; 20 (6): 657–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Fitch KD, Blackwell JB, Gilmour WN. Operation for nonunion of stress fracture of the tarsal navicular. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1989 Jan; 71 (1): 105–10

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bojanic I, Pecina MM. Conservative treatment of stress fractures of the tarsal navicular in athletes. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 1997; 83 (2): 133–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Saxena A, Fullem B, Hannaford D. Results of treatment of 22 navicular stress fractures and a new proposed radiographicclassification system. J Foot Ankle Surg 2000 Mar-Apr; 39 (2): 96–103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Saxena A, Fullem B. Navicular stress fractures: a prospective study on athletes. Foot Ankle Int 2006 Nov; 27 (11): 917–21

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Potter NJ, Brukner PD, Makdissi M, et al. Navicular stress fractures: outcomes of surgical and conservative management. Br J Sports Med 2006 Aug; 40 (8): 692–5; discussion 695

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Roper RB, Parks RM, Haas M. Fixation of a tarsal navicular stress fracture: a case report. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1986 Sep; 76 (9): 521–4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ostlie DK, Simons SM. Tarsal navicular stress fracture in a young athlete: case report with clinical, radiologic, andpathophysiologic correlations. J Am Board Fam Pract 2001 Sep-Oct; 14 (5): 381–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Alfred RH, Belhobek G, Bergfeld JA. Stress fractures of the tarsal navicular: a case report. Am J Sports Med 1992 Nov-Dec; 20 (6): 766–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Murray SR, Reeder M, Ward T, et al. Navicular stress fractures in identical twin runners: high-risk fractures requirestructured treatment. Phys Sportsmed 2005 Jan; 33 (1): 28–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Goergen TG, Venn-Watson EA, Rossman DJ, et al. Tarsal navicular stress fractures in runners. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1981 Jan; 136 (1): 201–3

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ariyoshi M, Nagata K, Kubo M, et al. MRI monitoring of tarsal navicular stress fracture healing: a case report. Kurume Med J 1998; 45 (2): 223–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Miller JW, Poulos PC. Fatigue stress fracture of the tarsal navicular: a case report. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1985 Aug; 75 (8): 437–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ting A, King W, Yocum L, et al. Stress fractures of the tarsal navicular in long-distance runners. Clin Sports Med 1988 Jan; 7 (1): 89–101

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Dennis L, Lombardi CM. Stress fracture of the tarsal navicular: two unusual case reports. J Foot Surg 1988 Nov–Dec; 27 (6): 511–4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Helstad PE, Ringstrom JB, Erdmann BB, et al. Bilateral stress fractures of the tarsal navicular with associated avascular necrosis in a pole vaulter. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1996 Nov; 86 (11): 551–4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors disclose no funding related to this study and no potential conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph S. Torg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fowler, J.R., Gaughan, J.P., Boden, B.P. et al. The Non-Surgical and Surgical Treatment of Tarsal Navicular Stress Fractures. Sports Med 41, 613–619 (2011). https://doi.org/10.2165/11590670-000000000-00000

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/11590670-000000000-00000

Keywords

Navigation