Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Occupational Contact Dermatitis

Recognition and Management

  • Therapy in Practice
  • Published:
American Journal of Clinical Dermatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Occupational contact dermatitis (OCD) represents 90 to 95% of all occupational dermatoses. The incidence rate of OCD is estimated to be around 0.5 to 1.9 cases per full-time worker per year. However, epidemiologic data are lacking and incidence is probably underestimated, especially in the US. Over the past 20 years, OCD has been the most frequently reported occupational disorder to German social insurance institutions.

Critical factors in the management of OCD are recognition of clinical features, knowledge of allergens and irritants present in different occupational fields, knowledge of suitable protection, interpretation of patch test results, and awareness of medicolegal aspects. Management of OCD should be carried out by dermatologists and patch test clinics in cooperation with physicians specialized in industrial medicine.

Individuals at high risk of OCD are hairdressers, dental laboratory technicians, other healthcare workers, construction industry workers, metal workers, leather and shoe manufacturers, florists and gardeners, and bakers, caterers, confectioners and cooks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Table I
Table II
Table III
Table IV

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rycroft R.J.G. Occupational contact dermatitis. In: Rycroft R.J.G., Menné T., Frosch P.G. Textbook of Contact Dermatitis. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1995: 343–400

    Google Scholar 

  2. Diepgen T.L., Coenraads P.J. The epidemiology of occupational contact dermatitis. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1999; 72: 496–506

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mathias C.T., Morrison J.H. Occupational skin diseases, United States: results from the Bureau of Labor Statistics Annual Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses, 1973 through 1984. Arch Dermatol 1988; 124: 1519–1524

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Van der Walle H.B. Dermatitis in hairdressers (II). Management and prevention. Contact Dermatitis 1994; 30: 265–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Uter W., Pfahlberg A., Gefeller O., et al. Hand dermatitis in a prospective-followed cohort of hairdressing apprentices: final results of the POSH study. Contact Dermatitis 1999; 41: 280–286

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bjórkner B. Plastic materials. In: Rycroft R.J.G., Menné T., Frosch P.G. Textbook of contact dermatitis. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1995: 537–572

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schnuch A., Lehmacher W. Zur epidemiologischen Überwachung des Kontaktekzems/Darstellung des Projektes Informationsverbund Dermatologischer Kliniken (IVDK) in Anlehnung an die Guidelines for Evaluating Surveillance Systems des Center of Disease Control (CDC). Dermatosen 1992; 40: 177–189

    Google Scholar 

  8. Uter W., Gefeller O., Schwanitz H.J. Occupational dermatitis in hairdressing apprentices: early onset of irritant skin damage. Curr Probl Dermatol 1995; 23: 49–55

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Straube M., Uter W., Schwanitz H.J. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis from thiolactic acid contained in ‘ester-free’ permanent-waving solutions. Contact Dermatitis 1996; 34: 229–230

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fisher A.A. Contact dermatitis from food additives and dyes. In: Rietschel R.L., Fowler J.F., editors. Fisher’s contact dermatitis. 4th ed. Baltimore (PA): Williams & Wilkins, 1995: 693

    Google Scholar 

  11. Frosch P.J., Burrows D., Camarasa J.G., et al. Allergic reactions to a hairdressers’ series: results from 9 European centres. Contact Dermatitis 1993; 28: 180–183

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Van der Walle H.B., Brusveld V.M. Latex allergy among hairdressers. Contact Dermatitis 1995; 32: 177–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Freeman S., Lee M.S. Contact urticaria to hair conditioner. Contact Dermatitis 1996; 35: 195–196

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Estlander T., Rajaniemi R., Jolanki R. Hand dermatitis in dental technicians. Contact Dermatitis 1984; 10: 201–205

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mürer A.J.L., Poulsen O.M., Roed-Petersen J., et al. Skin problems among Danish dental technicians. A cross-sectional study. Contact Dermatitis 1995; 33: 42–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rustemeyer T., Frosch P.J. Occupational skin diseases in dental laboratory technicians. (I) Clinical pictures and causative factors. Contact Dermatitis 1996; 34: 125–133

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fisher A.A. Contact dermatitis in health personnel. In: Rietschel R.L., Fowler J.F., editors. Fisher’s contact dermatitis. 4th ed. Baltimore (PA): Williams & Wilkins, 1995: 595

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kanerva L., Jolanki R., Estlander T. 10 years of patch testing with the (meth)acrylate series. Contact Dermatitis 1997; 37: 255–258

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Andersson T., Bruze M., Bjórkner B. In vivo testing of the protection of gloves against acrylates in dentin-bonding systems on patients with known contact allergy to acrylates. Contact Dermatitis 1999; 41: 254–259

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Peiler D., Rustemeyer Th., Pflug B., et al. Allergic contact dermatitis in dental laboratory technicians. Part II: major allergens and their clinical relevance. Dermatol Beruf Umwelt 2000; 48: 48–54

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hogan D.J. Contact dermatoses in healthcare workers. In: Menné T., Maibach H.I., editor. Exogenous dermatoses: environmental dermatitis. Boston: CRC Press, 1991: 389–400

    Google Scholar 

  22. Schnuch A., Uter W., Geier J., et al. Contact allergies in healthcare workers. Results form the IVDK. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1998; 78: 358–363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Baur X., Allmers H., Raulf-Heimsoth M., et al. Naturlatex-Allergie. Empfehlungen der interdisziplinären Arbeitsgruppe. Allergologie 1996; 19: 248–251

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wilkinsson S.M., Burt R. Latex: a cause of allergic contact eczema in users of natural latex gloves. J Am Acad Dermatol 1998; 39: 36–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wakelin S.H., Jenkins R.E., Rycroft R.J.G., et al. Patch testing with natural rubber latex. Contact Dermatitis 1999; 40: 89–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Fuchs Th., Meinert A., Aberer W., et al. Benzalkoniumchlorid — relevantes Kontaktallergen oder Irritans? Hautarzt 1993; 44: 699–702

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Fisher, A.A. Antiseptics and disinfectants. In: Rietschel R.L., Fowler J.F., editors. Fisher’s Contact Dermatitis. 4th ed. Baltimore (PA): Williams & Wilkins, 1995: 194

    Google Scholar 

  28. De Groot A.C. Unwanted effects of cosmetics and drugs used in Dermatology. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1985: 522

    Google Scholar 

  29. Schnuch A., Geier J., Uter W., et al. Patch testing with preservatives, antimicrobials and industrial biocides. Results from a multicentre study. Br J Dermatol 1998; 138: 467–476

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Olivieri J., Eigenmann P.A., Hauser C. Severe anaphylaxis to a new disinfectant: polyhexanide, a chlorhexidine polymer. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 1998; 128: 1508–1511

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Autegarden J.E., Pecquet C., Huet S., et al. Anaphylactic schock after application of chlorhexidine to unbroken skin. Contact Dermatitis 1999 Apr; 40 (4): 215

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Snellman E., Rantanen T. Severe anaphylaxis after a chlorhexidine bath. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999; 40: 771–772

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Majoie I.M.L., Van Ginkel C.J.W. The biocide iodopropynyl butylcarbamate (IPBC) as an allergen in cutting oils. Contact Dermatitis 2000; 43: 238–240

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Bryld L.E., Agner T., Rastogi S.C., et al. Iodopropynyl butylcarbamate: a new contact allergen. Contact Dermatitis 1997; 36: 156–158

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Pazzaglia M., Tosti A. Allergic contact dermatitis from iodo-2-propynylbutylcarbamate in a cosmetic cream. Contact Dermatitis 1999; 41: 290

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Rustemeyer T., Pilz B., Frosch P.J. Kontaktallergien in medizinischen Berufen. Hautarzt 1994; 45: 834–844

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Le Coz C.J., Coninx D., Van Rengen A., et al. An epidemic of occupational contact dermatitis from an immersion oil for microscopy in laboratory personnel. Contact Dermatitis 1999; 40: 79–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Fisher A.A. Paresthesia due to contactants. In: Rietschel R.L., Fowler J.F., editors. Fisher’s contact dermatitis. 4th ed. Baltimore (PA): Williams & Wilkins, 1995: 547

    Google Scholar 

  39. Fisher A.A. Contact dermatitis and reactions to metals. In: Rietschel R.L., Fowler J.F., editors. Fisher’s contact dermatitis. 4th ed. Baltimore (PA): Williams & Wilkins, 1995: 829

    Google Scholar 

  40. Avnstorp C.H. Risk factors for cement eczema. Contact Dermatitis 1991; 25: 81–88

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Koch P. Brûlures, nécroses et ulcérations cutanées dues au ciment. Ann Dermatol Vénéréol 1996; 123: 832–836

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Condé-Salazar L., Gonzalez de Domingo M.A., Guimaraens D. Sensitization to epoxy resin systems in special flooring workers. Contact Dermatitis 1994; 31: 157–160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Jolanki R., Estlander T., Kanerva L. Occupational contact dermatitis and contact urticaria caused by epoxy resins. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1987; 134: 90–94

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Geier J., Brehler R., Eck E., et al. Berufsspezifische Epikutantestung bei Maurern und Angehórigen verwandter Berufe. Dermatosen 1999; 47: 29–33

    Google Scholar 

  45. De Boer E.M., Van Ketel W.G., Bruynzeel D.P. Dermatoses in metal workers. (I). Irritant contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1989; 20: 212–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Weidenbach T., Rakoski J. Gehäuftes Auftreten von dyshidrosiformen Handekzemen durch eine Öl-in-Wasser-Emulsion bei Metallarbeitern. Dermatosen 1985; 33: 121–124

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Koch P. Kontaktallergien bei Metallarbeitern. Berufliche und allergologische Relevanz der Epikutantestung bei 17 Patienten. Dermatosen 1996; 44: 62–67

    Google Scholar 

  48. De Boer E.M., Van Ketel W.G., Bruynzeel D.P. Dermatoses in metal workers. (II). Allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1989; 20: 280–286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Geier J., Lessmann H., Schumacher T.H., et al. Vorschlag für die Epikutantestung bei Verdacht auf Kontaktallergie durch Kühlschmierstoffe. Dermatosen 2000; 48: 232–236

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Haudrechy P., Foussereau J., Mantout B., et al. Nickel release from nickel-plated metals and stainless steels. Contact Dermatitis 1994; 31: 249–255

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Mancuso G., Reggiani M., Berdondini R.M. Occupational dermatitis in shoemakers. Contact Dermatitis 1996; 34: 17–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Podmore P. Shoes. In: Rycroft R.J.G., Menné T., Frosch P.G. Textbook of Contact Dermatitis. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1995: 522

    Google Scholar 

  53. Koch P., Nickolaus G., Geier J. Kontaktallergien bei Lederherstellern, Lederverarbeitern und in der Schuhindustrie. Fünfjahresanalyse auf der Grundlage von Daten des Informationsverbundes Dermatologischer Kliniken (IVDK). Dermatosen 1996; 44: 257–262

    Google Scholar 

  54. Paulsen E., Søgaard J., Andersen K.E. Occupational dermatitis in Danish gardeners and greenhouse workers. (I). Prevalence and possible risk factors. Contact Dermatitis 1997; 37: 263–270

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Merrick C., Fenney J., Clark E.C., et al. A survey of skin problems in floristry. Contact Dermatitis 1991 Apr; 24 (4): 306

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Paulsen E., Stahl Skov P., Andersen K.E. Immediate skin and mucosal symptoms from pot plants and vegetables in gardeners and greenhouse workers. Contact Dermatitis 1998; 39: 166–170

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Mitchell J.C., Dupuis G. Allergic contact dermatitis from sesquiterpenoids of the Compositae family of plants. Br J Dermatol 1971; 84: 139–150

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Lamminpää A., Estlander T., Jolanki R., et al. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by decorative plants. Contact Dermatitis 1996; 34: 330–335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Paulsen E., Andersen K.E. Occupational dermatitis in a Danish dermatology department in 1 year. (II). Clinical features in patients with Compositae allergy. Contact Dermatitis 1993; 29: 195–201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Fisher A.A. Toxicodendron plants and spices. In: Rietschel R.L., Fowler J.F., editors. Fisher’s contact dermatitis. 4th ed. Baltimore (PA): Williams & Wilkins, 1995: 488

    Google Scholar 

  61. Murphy G.M., White I.R., Hawk J.L.M. Allergic airborne contact dermatitis to Compositae with photosensitivity — chronic actinic dermatitis in evolution. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 1990; 7: 38–39

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Green C., Ferguson J. Sesquiterpene lactone mix is not an adequate screen for Compositae allergy. Contact Dermatitis 1994; 31: 151–153

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Lepoittevin J.P., Tomb R. Sesquiterpene lactone mix is not an adequate screen for Compositae allergy. Contact Dermatitis 1995; 32: 254

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Paulsen E., Søgaard J., Andersen K.E. Occupational dermatitis in Danish gardeners and greenhouse workers. (III). Compositae-related symptoms. Contact Dermatitis 1998; 38: 140–146

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. White I.R. Photopatch testing. In: Rycroft R.J.G., Menné T., Frosch P.G. Textbook of Contact Dermatitis. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1995: 297

    Google Scholar 

  66. Bruynzeel D.P., De Boer E.M., Brouwer E.J., et al. Dermatitis in bulb growers. Contact Dermatitis 1993; 29: 11–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Kanerva L., Estlander T., Jolanki R. Minimal alstroemeria exposure during skin testing causing an allergic contact dermatitis reaction. Eur J Dermatol 1994; 4: 616–617

    Google Scholar 

  68. Piirilä P., Keskinen H., Leino T., et al. Occupational asthma caused by decorative flowers: review and case reports. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1994; 6: 131–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Julian C.G., Browers P.W. The nature and distribution of daffodil picker’s rash. Contact Dermatitis 1997; 37: 259–262

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Hausen B.M. Allergiepflanzen. Pflanzenallergene. Landsberg: Ecomed Verlag, 1988: 177–178

    Google Scholar 

  71. Ducombs G., Schmidt R.J. Plants and plant products. In: Rycroft R.J.G., Menné T., Frosch P.G. Textbook of Contact Dermatitis. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1995: 609–610

    Google Scholar 

  72. Kuligowski M.E., Chang A., Leemreize J.H.M. Allergic contact dermatitis from hydrangea: report of a 10th case. Contact Dermatitis 1992; 26: 269–270

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Hausen B.M. Allergiepflanzen. Pflanzenallergene. Landsberg: Ecomed Verlag, 1988: 146

    Google Scholar 

  74. Mark K.A., Brancaccio R.R., Soter N.A., et al. Allergic contact and photoallergic dermatitis to plant and pesticide allergens. Arch Dermatol 1999; 135: 67–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Tacke J., Schmidt A., Fartasch M., et al. Occupational contact dermatitis in bakers, confectioners and cooks. A population-based study. Contact Dermatitis 1995; 33: 112–117

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Bauer A., Kelterer D., Stadeler M., et al. The prevention of occupational hand dermatitis in bakers, confectioners and employees in the catering trades. Preliminary results of a skin prevention program. Contact Dermatitis 2001; 44: 85–88

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Morren M.A., Janssens V., Dooms-Goosens A., et al. Alpha-amylase, a flour additive: an important cause of protein contact dermatitis in bakers. J Am Acad Dermatol 1993; 29: 723–728

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Straube M., Szliska Ch., Schwanitz H.J. Allergene und Irritanzien im Bäckerhandwerk. Allergologie 1996; 19: 494–499

    Google Scholar 

  79. Acciai M.C., Brusi C., Francalanci S., et al. Allergic contact dermatitis in caterers. Contact Dermatitis 1993 Jul; 29 (1): 48

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Cronin E. Dermatitis of the hands in caterers. Contact Dermatitis 1987; 17: 265–269

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Mathias C.T. The cost of occupational skin diseases. Arch Dermatol 1985; 121: 322–324

    Google Scholar 

  82. Diepgen T.L., Schmidt A., Berg A., et al. Medizinische Hinweise für die berufliche Rehabilitation von hautkranken Beschäftigten. Dt Ärztebl 1995; 92: A31–A40

    Google Scholar 

  83. Frosch P.J., Kurte A. Efficacy of skin barrier creams. (IV). The repetitive irrritation test (RIT) with a set of 4 standard irritants. Contact Dermatitis 1994; 31: 161–168

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Frosch P.J., Schulze-Dirks A., Hoffmann M., et al. Efficacy of skin barrier creams. (II). Inefectiveness of a popular skin protector against various irritants in the repetitive irrritation test in the guinea pig. Contact Dermatitis 1993; 29: 74–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Dermatology, University of Saarland, D-66421, Homburg/Saar, Germany

    Patrick Koch

Authors
  1. Patrick Koch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Koch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koch, P. Occupational Contact Dermatitis. Am J Clin Dermatol 2, 353–365 (2001). https://doi.org/10.2165/00128071-200102060-00002

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00128071-200102060-00002

Keywords

Search

Navigation