Abstract
Introduction: Asia will be at the forefront of the current epidemic of diabetes mellitus. Quality of life (QOL) is an important outcome measure in the assessment of diabetes care. However, few QOL instruments are culturally suitable for use in Asian countries. The Audit of Diabetes-Dependent Quality-of-Life (ADDQoL) questionnaire is a third-generation individualised QOL instrument. Individualised instruments such as the ADDQoL have the potential to be useful and less costly alternatives to computerised adaptive testing (CAT), which may not be practical in developing countries.
Objective: To evaluate and validate the ADDQoL questionnaire in Englishspeaking patients with diabetes in Singapore, a multi-ethnic Asian country.
Methods: The ADDQoL and EQ-5D were administered to English-speaking respondents with type 1 or 2 diabetes (aged ≥18 years) recruited from a tertiary acute-care referral hospital by convenience sampling. The usefulness of the key design features of the ADDQoL were assessed by measuring the number of zeroimportance responses, the change in item ranking with and without weighting for importance, and the frequency of utilisation of the ‘not applicable’ (NA) options. The acceptability, factor structure and internal consistency (Cronbach’s α) of the ADDQoL were also assessed. Data were subjected to unforced factor analysis with oblimin rotation and then the condition was set to force a one-factor solution.
The validity of the ADDQoL was tested with the following hypotheses: those with moderate or severe problems on the EQ-5D would have worse ADDQoL average weighted impact (AWI) scores than those with a perfect health rating on the EQ-5D; those with better Present QOL scores on the ADDQoL would have better EQ-5D utility and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores; on the ADDQoL, AWI scores would correlate better with diabetes-dependent QOL than with Present QOL scores; and female respondents, those who required insulin or had longer duration of known diabetes would have worse ADDQoL AWI scores (known-group validity).
Results: We analysed data from 152 respondents (49% Chinese, 34% Indian; 45% female; mean age 52 years, range 18–80; mean duration of known diabetes 10 years, range 0–62). There were few missing data. Weighted scoring and NA options were shown to be necessary, thus supporting the usefulness of individualised health-related QOL measures. Factor structure of the ADDQoL was supported and internal consistency was high (α = 0.94). All hypotheses were fulfilled except for one that was partially fulfilled; respondents with longer duration of known diabetes did not report worse ADDQoL AWI scores.
Conclusions: The ADDQoL is culturally appropriate, valid, reliable and well accepted among Singaporean patients with diabetes. Individualised measures such as the ADDQoL allow one to obtain precise score estimates and may offer developing countries a useful alternative to CAT.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The ADDQoL may be obtained from the developer and copyright holder, Clare Bradley, Professor of Health Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, Egham, Surrey, TW20 OEX, UK, c.bradley@rhul.ac.uk.
References
King H, Aubert RE, Herman WH. Global burden of diabetes, 1995–2025: prevalence, numerical estimates, and projections. Diabetes Care 1998 Sep; 21 (9): 1414–1431
Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, United Nations [online]. Available from URL: http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/wpp2002/wpp2002wc.htm [Accessed 2004 Aug 15]
Zhang GC. Migration of highly skilled Chinese to Europe: trends and perspective. Int Migr 2003; 41 (3): 73–97
Kaplan RM. The significance of quality of life in health care. Qual Life Res 2003; 12 Suppl. 1: 3–16
Hart HE, Bilo HJ, Redekop WK, et al. Quality of life of patients with type I diabetes mellitus. Qual Life Res 2003 Dec; 12 (8): 1089–1097
Polonsky WH. Emotional and quality-of-life aspects of diabetes management. Curr Diab Rep 2002 Apr; 2 (2): 153–159
Bradley C, Speight J. Patient perceptions of diabetes and diabetes therapy: assessing quality of life. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2002 Sep–Oct; 18 Suppl. 3: S64–S69
Koopmanschap M, CODE-2 Advisory Board. Coping with type II diabetes: the patient’s perspective. Diabetologia 2002 Jul; 45 (7), 518–522
Hornquist JO, Wikby A, Stenstrom U, et al. Type II diabetes and quality of life: a review of the literature. Pharmacoeconomics 1995; 8 Suppl. 1: 12–16
Rubin RR, Peyrot M. Quality of life and diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 1999 May–Jun; 15 (3): 205–218
Lyons RA, Perry HM, Littlepage BN. Evidence for the validity of the short-form 36 questionnaire (SF-36) in an elderly population. Age Ageing 1994 May; 23 (3): 182–184
Thumboo J, Chan SP, Machin D, et al. Measuring health-related quality of life in Singapore: normal values for the English and Chinese SF-36 health survey. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2002 May; 31 (3): 366–374
Lam CL, Lauder II. The impact of chronic diseases on the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of Chinese patients in primary care. Fam Pract 2000 Apr; 17 (2): 159–166
Choe MA, Padilla GV, Chae YR, et al. Quality of life for patients with diabetes in Korea: I. The meaning of health-related quality oflife. Int J Nurs Stud 2001 Dec; 38 (6): 673–682
Wang X, Matsuda N, Ma H, et al. Comparative study of quality of life between the Chinese and Japanese adolescent populations. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2000 Apr; 54 (2): 147–152
Herdman M, Fox-Rushby J, Badia X. A model of equivalence in the cultural adaptation of HRQoL instruments: the universalist approach. Qual Life Res 1998 May; 7 (4): 323–335
Ware Jr JE, Kosinski M, Bjorner JB, et al. Applications of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) to the assessment of headache impact. Qual Life Res 2003 Dec; 12 (8): 935–952
Bessette L, Sangha O, Kuntz KM, et al. Comparative responsiveness of generic versus disease-specific and weighted versus unweighted health status measures in carpal tunnel syndrome. Med Care 1998 Apr; 36 (4): 491–502
Patrick DL, Deyo RA. Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life. Med Care 1989 Mar; 27 (3 Suppl.): S217–S232
Bradley C, Todd C, Gorton T, et al. The development of an individualized questionnaire measure of perceived impact of diabetes on quality of life: the ADDQoL. Qual Life Res 1999; 8 (1–2): 79–91
The EuroQol Group. EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990 Dec; 16 (3): 199–208
Dolan P. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 1997 Nov; 35 (11): 1095–1108
Luo N, Chew LH, Fong KY, et al. Validity and reliability of the EQ-5D self-report questionnaire in English-speaking Asian patients with rheumatic diseases in Singapore. Qual Life Res 2003 Feb; 12 (1): 87–92
Kind P, Dolan P, Gudex C, et al. Variations in population health status: results from a United Kingdom national questionnaire survey. BMJ 1998; 316 (7133): 736–741
Gandek B, Ware Jr JR. Methods for validating and nanning translations of health status questionnaires: the IQOLA Project approach. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol 1998 Nov; 51 (11): 953–959
Redekop WK, Koopmanschap MA, Stolk RP, et al. Health-related quality of life and treatment satisfaction in Dutch patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2002 Mar; 25 (3): 458–463
Coffey IT, Brandle M, Zhou H, et al. Valuing health-related quality of life in diabetes. Diabetes Care 2002 Dec; 25 (12): 2238–2243
Matza LS, Swensen AR, Flood EM, et al. Assessment of health-related quality of life in children: a review of conceptual, methodological, and regulatory issues. Value Health 2004 Jan–Feb; 7 (1): 79–92
Chong LY, Neo SB, Tan AL, et al. A comparison of asthma knowledge and medication compliance between general clinic and specialist clinic [abstract]. Proceedings of the 14th Singapore Pharmacy Congress and 9th Pan Pacific Conference; 2000 Aug 6; Singapore
Singapore Department of Statistics. Literacy and language. In: Census of Population 2000 [online]. Available from URL: http://www.singstat.gov.sg/keystats/c2000/literacy.pdf [Accessed 2005 Nov 9]
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Dr Peter Eng, Director of the Diabetes Centre, and the nurses and staff at the Diabetes Centre, Singapore General Hospital for their invaluable contributions to the study. We would also like to thank Associate Professor Julian Thumboo, Senior Consultant, Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Singapore General Hospital for his valuable comments on the manuscript.
All authors participated in the concept and design of the study. H.L. Wee performed the statistical analyses. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
There are no potential conflicts of interest and no sources of funding were used to assist in the preparation of this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wee, HL., Tan, CE., Goh, SY. et al. Usefulness of the Audit of Diabetes-Dependent Quality-of-Life (ADDQoL) Questionnaire in Patients with Diabetes in a Multi-Ethnic Asian Country. Pharmacoeconomics 24, 673–682 (2006). https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200624070-00006
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200624070-00006