Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of anaemia and its treatment on employee disability and medical costs

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
PharmacoEconomics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: Anaemia is a common haematological complication of cancer and cytotoxic treatment. The incremental economic burden associated with medical care and short-term disability of anaemia in patients with malignancy and receiving chemotherapy has not been well documented. This study evaluates the effect of anaemia on the costs associated with cancer treated with chemotherapy.

Methods: Patients receiving chemotherapy within 6 months of their initial cancer diagnosis were identified in a commercial claims database for 1999–2000. Data for these individuals were linked to their employers’ short-term disability records via unique encrypted personal identification numbers provided by employers. Patients with anaemia were identified by a diagnosis of anaemia or treatment with transfusion or erythropoietin alfa (EPO). Healthcare expenditure and short-term disability leave were observed for up to 6 months following initial cancer diagnosis and were summarised into monthly averages. Exponential conditional mean models and zero-inflated negative binomial models were used to analyse mean monthly healthcare expenditures and short-term disability days.

Results: Twenty-five percent of the 619 newly diagnosed cancer patients treated with chemotherapy had anaemia. The presence of anaemia and longer length of transfusion therapy were associated with increased expenditures, while longer length of EPO treatment was associated with lower expenditures. The incremental costs due to anaemia among patients receiving chemotherapy were $US5538 (year 2001 values) per month in the first 6 months following cancer diagnosis, 10.8% of which were costs related to short-term disability leave.

Conclusion: Anaemia in patients undergoing chemotherapy presents a substantial burden to employers and payers. The findings also suggest that patients with anaemia treated with erythropoietin alfa can achieve expenditure levels similar to those patients without anaemia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Table I
Table II
Fig. 1
Table III
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bron D, Meuleman N, Mascaux C. Biological basis of anemia. Semin Oncol 2001; 28 (2 Suppl. 8): 1–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Groopman JE, Itri LM. Chemotherapy-induced anemia in adults: incidence and treatment. J Nall Cancer Inst 1999; 91: 1616–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ziegler J. When cancer comes to work. Business and Health 1998; 16 (7): 34–7

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carelle N, Piotto E, Bellanger A, et al. Changing patient perceptions of the side effects of cancer chemotherapy. Cancer 2002; 95: 155–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Berndt E, Kallich J, McDermot A et al. Reductions in anaemia and fatigue are associated with improvements in productivity. Pharmacoeconomics. In press.

  6. Broadhead WE, Blazer DG, George LK, et al. Depression, disability days, and days lost from work in a prospective epidemiologic survey. JAMA 1990; 264: 2524–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Comstock GW, Stone RW, Tonascia JA, et al. Respiratory survey findings as predictors of disability from respiratory diseases. Am Rev Respir Dis 1981; 124 (4): 367–71

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Crystal-Peters J, Crown WH, Goetzel RZ, et al. The cost of productivity losses associated with allergic rhinitis. Am J Manag Care 2000; 6: 373–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Persson U. The indirect costs of morbidity in type II diabetic patients. Pharmacoeconomics 1995; 8 Suppl. 1: 28–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Guo HR, Tanaka S, Halperin WE, et al. Back pain prevalence in US industry and estimates of lost workdays. Am J Public Health 1999; 89 (7): 1029–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rapoport AM, Adelman JU. Cost of migraine management: a pharmacoeconomic overview. Am J Manag Care 1998; 4 (4): 531–45

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Michel P, Dartigues IF, Duru G, et al. Incremental absenteeism due to headaches in migraine: results from the Mig-Access French national cohort. Cephalalgia 1999; 19 (5): 503–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hu XH, Markson LE, Lipton RB, et al. Burden of migraine in the United States: disability and economic costs. Arch Intern Med 1999; 1999: 813–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Oxterhaus IT, Gutterman DL, Plachetka JR. Healthcare resource and lost labor costs of migraine headache in the US. Pharmacoeconomics 1992; 2 (1): 67–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cremieux PY, Slavin MB, Fendrick M, et al. The costs of cancer: cancer-related conditions can add dramatically to overall costs of care. J Manag Care Med 2002; 6 (1): 12–9

    Google Scholar 

  16. D’Hoore W, Bouckaert A, Tilquin C. Practical considerations on the use of the Charlson comorbidity index with administrative data bases. J Clin Epidemiol 1996; 49: 1429–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Goetzel RZ, Hawkins K, Ozminkowski RJ, et al. The health and productivity cost burden of the `top 10’ physical and mental health conditions affecting six large U.S. employers in 1999. J Occup Environ Med 2003; 45: 5–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pauly MV, Nicholson S, Xu J, et al. A general model of the impact of absenteeism on employers and employees. Health Econ 2002; 11: 221–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Manning WG, Newhouse JP, Duan N, et al. Health insurance and the demand for medical care: evidence from a randomized experiment. Am Econ Rev 1987; 77: 251–77

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Duan N, Manning W, Morris C, et al. A comparison of alternative models for the demand for medical care. KIES 1983; 2 (1): 115–26

    Google Scholar 

  21. Duan N. Smearing estimate: a nonparametric retransformation method. J Am Stat Assoc 1983; 78: 605–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cameron AC, Trivedi PK. Regression analysis of count data. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Barnett A, Cremieux PY, Fendrick AM, et al. Anemia-related costs for cancer patients. J Manag Care Med 2002; 6 (1): 20–8

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schrag D. The price tag on progress: chemotherapy for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 317–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Varmus H. Disease-specific estimates of direct and indirect costs of illness and NIH support. Bethesda (MD): US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, 1997 Sep

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Amgen, Inc. Ernst Berndt, William Crown and Joel Kallich all participated in the design, execution and analysis of the study Ernst Berndt is a consultant to both Amgen and Medstat, William Crown is an employee of Ingenix and Joel Kallich is an employee of Amgen.

Stacey Long and Xue Song were responsible for the statistical analysis and have no individual conflicts of interest. Their employer, Medstat, received funding from Amgen to conduct the study. Gary Lyman participated in the study design, analysis and the review and editing of the final manuscript. He is on the Speaker’s Bureau for Amgen and has previously received grant funding from Amgen.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ernst Berndt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berndt, E., Crown, W., Kallich, J. et al. The impact of anaemia and its treatment on employee disability and medical costs. Pharmacoeconomics 23, 183–192 (2005). https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200523020-00009

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-200523020-00009

Keywords

Navigation