References
Launois R, Reboul-Marty J, Henry B, at al. A cost-utility analysis of second-line chemotherapy in metastatic cancer: docetaxel versus paclitaxel versus vinorelbine. Pharmacoeconomics 1996; 10(5): 504–21
Reboul-Marty J, Henry B, Aussage P, et al. Metastatic breast cancer management in France: a representative survey [abstract]. 12th International Conference on Pharmacoepidemiology. Amsterdam. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 1996; 5 Suppl. 1: S70
Weber B, Vogel C, Jones S. Intravenous vinorelbine as first line and second line therapy in advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1995; 13(11): 2722–30
Jones S, Winer E, Vogel C, et al. Randomized comparison of vinorelbine and melphalan in anthracycline-refractory advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1995; 13(10): 2567–74
Degardin M, Bonneterre J, Hecquet B, et al. Vinorelbine (navelbine) as a salvage treatment of advanced breast cancer. Ann Oncol 1994; 5: 423–6
Goa K, Faulds D. Vinorelbine: a review of its pharmacological properties and clinical use in cancer chemotherapy. Drugs Aging 1994; 5(3): 200–34
Cook DJ, Sackett DL, Spitzer WO. Methodologic guidelines for systematic review of randomized control trials in health care from the Postdam consultation on meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 1995; 48(1): 161–71
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Launois, R., Reboul-Marty, J., Henry, B. et al. Cost Utility in Second-Line Metastatic Breast Cancer: The Authors’ Reply. PharmacoEconomics 11, 495–497 (1997). https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199711050-00013
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00019053-199711050-00013