Abstract
Psyching-up refers to self-directed cognitive strategies used immediately prior to or during skill execution that are designed to enhance performance. This review focuses on research that has investigated the effect of psyching-up on force production; specifically, strength, muscular endurance and power. Although firm conclusions are not possible, the research tentatively suggests that psyching-up may enhance performance during dynamic tasks requiring strength and/or muscular endurance. However, more research is required. Power has received scant empirical attention and there are not enough data to support any conclusions. Preparatory arousal appears to be the most effective strategy although other strategies like imagery, self-talk and attentional focus also have empirical support. The range of tasks that have been used to measure force production have been limited tomovements such as handgrip, leg extension, bench press, sit-ups, pressups, pull-ups, and the standing broad jump. Additionally, most studies have used undergraduate and/or untrained samples. Only a very small number of studies have examined well-trained individuals. Currently, no explanation for why psyching-up may influence force production has any substantive support. Although a small number of studies have examined moderating and mediating variables, few consistent patterns have emerged and knowledge in this area is somewhat restricted. Given the importance that many athletes place on their mental preparation just prior to performance this is an area that warrants further examination. Research needs to examine a range of complex sport-specific tasks and use well-trained samples. Additionally, research needs to further examine why psyching-up may enhance force production.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The study by Pierce et al.[17] does not strictly count as an examination of psyching-up because the interventions were not self-directed. The arousal intervention consisted of exposure to a video containing aggressive football footage while the relaxation intervention consisted of instructor-led progressive muscular relaxation. However, the study does provide evidence that undertaking relaxation prior to skill execution leads to reduced performance.
References
Shelton TO, Mahoney MJ. The content and effect of “psyching up” strategies in weight lifters. Cognit Ther Res 1978; 2: 275–84
Brody EB, Hatfield BD, Spalding TW, et al. The effect of a psyching strategy on neuromuscular activation and force production in strength-trained men. Res Q Exerc Sport 2000; 71: 162–70
Hardy L, Jones G, Gould D. Understanding psychological preparation for sport: theory and practice of elite performers. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1996
Harman E, Garhammer J, Pandorf C. Administration, scoring, and interpretation of selected tests. In: Baechle TR, Earle RW, editors. Essentials of strength training and conditioning. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 2000: 287–317
Kraemer WJ, Fry AC. Strength training: development and evaluation of methodology. In: Maud PJ, Foster C, editors. Physiological assessment of human fitness. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1995: 115–38
Abernethy P, Wilson G, Logan P. Strength and power assessment: issues, controversies and challenges. Sports Med 1995; 19: 401–17
Elko K, Ostrow AC. The effects of three mental preparation strategies on strength performance of young and older adults. J Sport Behav 1992; 15: 34–41
Gould D, Weinberg RS, Jackson A. Mental preparation strategies, cognitions and strength performance. J Sport Psychol 1980; 2: 329–39
Theodorakis Y, Weinberg R, Natsis P, et al. The effects of motivational versus instructional self-talk on improving motor performance. Sport Psychol 2000; 14: 253–72
Tynes LL, McFatter RM. The efficacy of “psyching” strategies on a weight-lifting task. Cognit Ther Res 1987; 11: 327–36
Weinberg RS, Gould D, Jackson A. Cognition and motor performance: effect of psyching-up strategies on three motor tasks. Cognit Ther Res 1980; 4: 239–45
Weinberg RS, Gould D, Jackson A. Relationship between the duration of the psych-up interval and strength performance. J Sport Psychol 1981; 3: 166–70
Whelan JP, Epkins CC, Meyers AW. Arousal interventions for athletic performance: influence of mental preparation and competitive experience. Anxiety Res 1990; 2: 293–307
Wilkes RL, Summers JJ. Cognitions, mediating variables, and strength performance. J Sport Psychol 1984; 6: 351–9
Tod D, Iredale F, McGuigan M, et al. Psyching-up increases force production in the bench press exercise [abstract]. Sports Science Conference, Annual Conference, Sport Science New Zealand; 2002 Oct 31-Nov 2; Wellington, 109
Murphy SM, Woolfolk RL, Budney AJ. The effects of emotive imagery on strength performance. J Sport Exerc Psychol 1988; 10: 334–45
Pierce EF, McGowan RW, Eastman NW, et al. Effects of progressive relaxation on maximal muscle strength and power. J Strength Cond Res 1993; 7: 216–8
Tenenbaum G, Bar-Eli M, Hoffman JR, et al. The effects of cognitive and somatic psyching-up techniques on isokinetic leg strength performance. J Strength Cond Res 1995; 9: 3–7
Blazevich A, Newton R, Gill N. Reliability and validity of two isometric squat tests. J Strength Cond Res 2002; 16: 298–304
Murphy AJ, Wilson GJ. Poor correlations between isometric tests and dynamic performance: relationship to muscle activation. Eur J Appl Physiol 1996; 73: 353–7
Wilson GJ, Murphy AJ. The use of isometric tests of muscular function in athletic assessment. Sports Med 1996; 22: 19–37
Schmidt RA, Wrisberg CA. Motor learning and performance. 2nd ed. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 2000
Caudill D, Weinberg RS. The effects of varying the length of the pysch-up interval on motor performance. J Sport Behav 1983; 6: 86–91
Lee C. Psyching up for a muscular endurance task: effects of image content on performance and mood state. J Sport Exerc Psychol 1990; 12: 66–73
Weinberg RS, Jackson A, Seaboune T. The effects of specific vs nonspecific mental preparation strategies on strength and endurance performance. J Sport Behav 1985; 8: 175–80
Biddle SJH. Mental preparation, mental practice and strength tasks: a need for clarification. J Sports Sci 1985; 3: 67–74
Nisbett RE, Wilson TD. Telling more than we can know: verbal reports on mental processes. Psychol Rev 1977; 84: 231–59
Perkins D, Wilson GV, Kerr JH. The effects of elevated arousal and mood on maximal strength performance in athletes. J Appl Sport Psychol 2001; 13: 239–59
Berntson GG, Cacioppo JT, Quigley KS. Respiratory sinus arrhythmia: autonomic organs, physiological mechanisms, and psychophysiological implications. Psychophysiology 1993; 30: 183–96
Bigland-Ritichie R. EMG/force relations and fatigue of human voluntary contractions. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 1981; 9: 75–117
Carroll TJ, Riek S, Carson RG. Neural adaptations to resistance training. Sports Med 2001; 31: 829–40
Green HJ. What do tests measure? In: MacDougall JD, Wenger HA, Green HJ, editors. Physiological testing of the high-performance athlete. 2nd ed. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1991: 7–20
Enoka RM. Neuromechanical basis of kinesiology. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1994
Geiger PC, Cody MJ, Sieck GC. Force-calcium relationship depends on myosin heavy chain and troponin isoforms in rat diaphragm muscle fibers. J Appl Physiol 1999; 87: 1894–900
Luttgens K, Hamilton N. Kinesiology: scientific basis of human motion. 9th ed. Boston (MA): WCB McGraw-Hill, 1997
Bray JJ, Cragg PA, MacKnight ADC, et al. Lecture notes on human physiology. 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 1994
Atha J. Strengthening muscle. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 1981; 9: 1–73
Thomas JR, Nelson JK. Research methods in physical activity. 3rd ed. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics, 1996
Murphy SM, Woolfolk RL. The effects of cognitive interventions on competitive anxiety and performance on a fine motor skill accuracy task. Int J Sport Psychol 1987; 18: 152–66
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Dr Michael McGuigan from the University of Wisconsin-La Crosse, Mr Graeme Thomas from the Waikato Institute of Technology and the two independent reviewers for their helpful comments. The authors received funding from the Waikato Institute of Technology to assist in the preparation of this manuscript. The authors have no conflicts of interest directly relevant to the content of this review.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tod, D., Iredale, F. & Gill, N. ‘Psyching-Up’ and Muscular Force Production. Sports Med 33, 47–58 (2003). https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200333010-00004
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200333010-00004