Improving Ecological Behavior in Outdoor Recreation Through Mindfulness Interventions: A Mixed Methods Inquiry

Authors

  • S. Anthony Deringer Texas State University
  • Adam W. Hanley University of Utah
  • Jan S. Hodges Texas State University
  • L. Kent Griffin Texas State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18666/JOREL-2020-V12-I2-9802

Keywords:

mindfulness, outdoor education, ecological behavior, nature connectedness

Abstract

Outdoor recreation professionals have long sought to impact environmental behavior of participants. Mindfulness and nature connection have recently been explored as possible constructs to impact environmental behavior. The purpose of this study was to better understand the impact of mindful outdoor recreation trips on college students’ nature connectedness and ecological behavior. We used explanatory mixed methods approach to explore the relationship between mindfulness, nature connection, and ecological behavior. Quantitative findings suggest that being mindfully outdoors has a positive effect on the degree to which nature is included in the sense of self and on ecological behavior. Qualitative findings support the quantitative findings and suggest that students use mindfulness to connect with nature and to care more for the environment. These findings suggest that the use of mindfulness interventions in outdoor education programming may improve nature connection and ecological behavior.

Subscribe to JOREL

Author Biographies

S. Anthony Deringer, Texas State University

Health and Human Performance

Assistant Professor of Recreation Administration

Adam W. Hanley, University of Utah

Research Assistant Professor

Jan S. Hodges, Texas State University

Associate Professor

L. Kent Griffin, Texas State University

Associate Professor

References

Ambrose-Oji, B. (2013). Mindfulness practice in woods and forests: an evidence review. Report to the Mersey Forest. Retrieved from https://www.merseyforest.org.uk/files/documents/1248/Mindfulness and Woods Evidence Review BAO October 2013 CORRECTED.pdf

Amel, E. L., Manning, C. M., & Scott, B. A. (2009). Mindfulness and sustainable behavior: Pondering attention and awareness as means for increasing green behavior. Ecopsychology, 1(1), 14–25. doi:10.1089/eco.2008.0005

Barbaro, N., & Pickett, S. M. (2016). Mindfully green: Examining the effect of connectedness to nature on the relationship between mindfulness and engagement in pro-environmental behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 93, 137–142. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2015.05.026

Bell, B. J., Seaman, J., & Trautvein, N. (2017). Outdoor education academic programs in the United States. Journal of Outdoor Recreation, Education, and Leadership, 9(2), 251–253. doi:10.18666/jorel-2017-v9-i2-8264

Berry, W. (1999). A timbered choir: The sabbath poems 1979-1997. Washington D.C.: Counterpoint.

Brown, K .W., Ryan, R. M., & Creswell, J. D. (2007). Mindfulness: Theoretical foundations and evidence for its salutary effects. Psychological Inquiry, 18(4), 211–237. doi:10.1080/10478400701598298

Brown, Kirk W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822–848. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822

Charmaz, K. (2005). Grounded theory in the 21st century: Applications for advancing social justice studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 507–535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Charmaz, K., Thornberg, R., & Keane, E. (2018). Evolving grounded theory and social justice inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, Ca: Sage.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, Ca: Sage.

Duerden, M. D., & Witt, P. A. (2010). The impact of direct and indirect experiences on the development of environmental knowledge, attitudes, and behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 379–392. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.03.007

Ferguson, M. A., & Branscombe, N. R. (2010). Collective guilt mediates the effect of beliefs about global warming on willingness to engage in mitigation behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(2), 135–142. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.11.010

Frumkin, H., & Louv, R. (2007). The powerful link between conserving land and preserving health. Land Trust Alliance Special Anniversary Report.

Hanley, A. W., Deringer, S. A., & Hanley, R. T. (2017). Dispositional mindfulness may be associated with deeper connections with nature. Ecopsychology, 9(4), 225–231. doi:10.1089/eco.2017.0018

Hanna, G. (1995). Wilderness-related environmental outcomes of adventure and ecology education programming. Journal of Environmental Education, 27(1), 21–32. doi:10.1080/00958964.1995.9941968

Howell, A. J., Dopko, R. L., Passmore, H. A., & Buro, K. (2011). Nature connectedness: Associations with well-being and mindfulness. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(2), 166–171. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.03.037

Kabat-Zinn, J. (1994). Wherever you go, there you are : Mindfulness meditation in everyday life. New York : Hyperion, c1994.

Kaiser, F. G., & Wilson, M. (2004). Goal-directed conservation behavior: The specific composition of a general performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(7), 1531–1544. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2003.06.003

Kennedy, E. H., Beckley, T. M., McFarlane, B. L., & Nadeau, S. (2009). Why we don’t “walk the talk”: Understanding the environmental values/behaviour gap in Canada. Human Ecology Review, 16(2), 151–160. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24707539

Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research. doi:10.1080/13504620220145401

Leopold, A. (1949). A sand county almanac. New York: Oxford University Press.

Mayer, F. S., Frantz, C., Bruehlman-Senecal, E., & Dolliver, K. (2009). Why is nature beneficial?: The Role of connectedness to nature. Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 607–643. doi:10.1177/0013916508319745

Mayer, F. S., & Frantz, C. M. P. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(4), 503–515. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001

Miles, M., Huberman, M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analaysis. In Sage publications (3rd ed.). doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Muir, J. (1894). The mountains of California. New York, NY: The De Vinne Press.

Nash, R. (1973). Wilderness and the American mind. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2009). With nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 715–740. doi:10.1177/0013916508318748

NVivo 12 [Computer software]. (2018). QSR International.

Obery, A., & Bangert, A. (2017). Exploring the Influence of nature relatedness and perceived science knowledge on proenvironmental behavior. Education Sciences, 7(1), 17. doi:10.3390/educsci7010017

Orr, D. W. (2004). Earth in mind : On education, environment, and the human prospect. Washington, DC: Island Press.

Outward Bound. (1968). Outward bound ... Into the mainstream of education. Retrieved from Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED031339)

Richardson, M., Hallam, J., & Lumber, R. (2015). One thousand good things in nature: Aspects of nearby nature associated with improved connection to nature. Environmental Values, 24(5), 603–619. doi:10.3197/096327115X14384223590131

Rosa, C. D., Profice, C. C., & Collado, S. (2018). Nature experiences and adults’ self-reported pro-environmental behaviors: The role of connectedness to nature and childhood nature experiences. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(JUN), 1–10. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01055

Ryan, R. M., Weinstein, N., Bernstein, J., Brown, K. W., Mistretta, L., & Gagné, M. (2010). Vitalizing effects of being outdoors and in nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(2), 159–168. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.10.009

Schutte, N. S., & Malouff, J. M. (2018). Mindfulness and connectedness to nature: A meta-analytic investigation. Personality and Individual Differences, 127(February), 10–14. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2018.01.034

Sheeran, P., & Webb, T. L. (2016). The intention–behavior gap. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(9), 503–518. doi:10.1111/spc3.12265

Shultz, P. W. (2001). Inclusion with nature: The psychology of human-nature relations. In P. Schmuck & W. P. Schultz (Eds.), Psychology of sustainable development. (pp. 61–78). doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-0995-0_4

Smith, B., & McGannon, K. R. (2018). Developing rigor in qualitative research: Problems and opportunities within sport and exercise psychology. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11(1), 101–121. doi:10.1080/1750984X.2017.1317357

Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 309–317. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004

Wamsler, C. (2017). Stakeholder involvement in strategic adaptation planning: Transdisciplinarity and co-production at stake? Environmental Science and Policy, 75(June), 148–157. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2017.03.016

Wang, J., Geng, L., Schultz, P. W., & Zhou, K. (2017). Mindfulness increases the belief in climate change: The mediating role of connectedness with nature. Environment and Behavior, 001391651773803. doi:10.1177/0013916517738036

Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

Wolsko, C., & Lindberg, K. (2013). Experiencing connection with nature: The matrix of psychological well-being, mindfulness, and outdoor recreation. Ecopsychology, 5(2), 80–91. doi:10.1089/eco.2013.0008

Yang, Y., Hu, J., Jing, F., & Nguyen, B. (2018). From awe to ecological behavior: The mediating role of connectedness to nature. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(7). doi:10.3390/su10072477

Downloads

Published

2020-05-18

Issue

Section

Regular Papers