Skip to main content
Log in

Marriage amendments and lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals in the 2006 election

  • Same-Sex Marriage Supplement
  • Published:
Sexuality Research & Social Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

More than half of U.S. states have passed amendments to their constitutions excluding same-sex couples from civil marriage. The impact of these ballot initiatives and debates on lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) individuals has been underresearched. Extending research on racial and ethnic minority groups, as well as research on LGB groups, the study discussed in this article hypothesized that LGB individuals would encounter more negative messages, be at risk for negative psychological effects, and increase their political activities, including voting, during elections with marriage amendments on the ballot. A national cross-sectional online survey of 1,824 LGB participants conducted postelection in November 2006 confirmed these hypotheses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andresen, E. M., Malmgren, J. A., Carter, W. B., & Patrick, D. L. (1994). Screening for depression in well older adults: Evaluation of a short form of the CES-D (Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale).American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 10, 77–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Avery, J. M. (2006). The sources and consequences of political mistrust among African Americans.American Politics Research, 34, 653–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badgett, M. V. L. (2001).Money, myths, and change: The economic lives of lesbians and gay men. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, D., Gates, G., Sanders, S. G., & Taylor, L. (2000). Demographics of the gay and lesbian population in the United States: Evidence from available systematic data sources.Demography, 37, 139–154.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cahill, S. (2007). The anti-gay marriage movement. In C. Rimmerman & C. Wilcox (Eds.),The politics of same-sex marriage (pp. 155–192). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, W. T., & Cain, B. E. (2001). Asian Americans as the median voters: An exploration of attitudes and voting patterns on ballot initiatives. In G. H. Chang (Ed.),Asian Americans and politics: Perspectives, experiences, prospects. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press & Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, S. D. (2001). Emerging issues in research on lesbians’ and gay men’s mental health: Does sexual orientation really matter?American Psychologist, 56, 931–947.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S., & Williamson, G. (1988). Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States. In S. Spacapan & S. Oskamp (Eds.),The social psychology of health: Claremont Symposium on Applied Social Psychology (pp. 31–67). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, T., Wenzel, J., & Bowler, S. (2000). Direct democracy and gay rights initiatives after Romer. In C. A. Rimmerman, K. D. Wald, & C. Wilcox (Eds.),The politics of gay rights (pp. 161–191). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, M. (1993). Understanding the gay and lesbian vote in ’92.Public Perspectives, 4(3), 32–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, D. (2007). Gay power. Retrieved June 13, 2008, fromhttp://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/ 2007/08/gay-power.html

  • Gamble, B. S. (1997). Putting civil rights to a popular vote.American Journal of Political Science, 41, 245–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haider-Markel, D. P., Querze, A., & Lindaman, K. (2007). Lose, win, or draw? A reexamination of direct democracy and minority rights.Political Research Quarterly, 60, 304–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, A., Madison, J., & Jay, J. (1961).The federalist papers. New York: New American Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertzog, M. (1996).The lavender vote: Lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals in American electoral politics. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, C. J., & Lee, T. (2001). Interracial politics: Asian Americans and other communities of color.PS: Political Science & Politics, 34, 631–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leighley, J. E., & Vedlitz, A. (1999). Race, ethnicity, and political participation: Competing models and contrasting explanations.The Journal of Politics, 61, 1092–1114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, H. M., Ovrebo, E., Anderson-Cleveland, M. B., Leone, C., Jeong, J. Y., Arm, J. R., et al. (2009). Balancing dangers: GLBT experience in a time of anti-GLBT legislation.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56, 67–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, I. H. (1995). Minority stress and mental health in gay men.Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36, 38–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: Conceptual issues and research evidence.Psychological Bulletin, 129, 674–697.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pinello, D. (2006).America’s struggle for same-sex marriage. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggle, E. D. B., & Rostosky, S. S. (2007). The consequences of marriage policy for same-sex couples’ well-being. In C. Rimmerman & C. Wilcox (Eds.),The politics of same-sex marriage (pp. 65–84). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggle, E. D. B., Rostosky, S. S., & Reedy, C. S. (2005). Online surveys for BGLT research: Issues and techniques.Journal of Homosexuality, 49(2), 1–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riggle, E. D. B., Thomas, J. D., & Rostosky, S. S. (2005). The marriage debate and minority stress.PS: Political Science and Politics, 38, 221–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimmerman, C., & Wilcox, C. (Eds.). (2007).The politics of same-sex marriage. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rippey, P. F. (2008, April).What makes it right(s)?Same-sex marriage bans and putting rights to a vote. Paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Chicago, IL.

  • Rostosky, S. S., Riggle, E. D. B., Home, S. G., & Miller, A. D. (2009). Marriage amendments and psychological distress in lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) adults.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56, 56–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothblum, E. D. (2007, August).Same-sex couples in legalized relationships: I do, or do I? Paper presented at the 63rd annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, CA.

  • Russell, G. M. (2000).Voted out: The psychological consequences of anti-gay politics. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, G. M. (2004). The dangers of a same-sex marriage referendum for community and individual well-being: A summary of research and findings.Angles: The Policy Journal of the Institute for Gay and Lesbian Strategic Studies, 7(1), 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, G. M., & Richards, J. A. (2003). Stressor and resilience factors for lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals confronting antigay politics.American Journal of Community Psychology, 31, 313–328.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saito, L. T., & Park, E. J. W. (2000). Multiracial collaborations and coalitions. In P. M. Ong (Ed.),The state of Asian Pacific America, vol. TV: Transforming race relations (pp. 631–637). Los Angeles: UCLA Asian American Studies Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, G. R. (2006). The role of group consciousness in political participation among Latinos in the United States.American Politics Research, 34, 427–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaffner, B., & Senic, N. (2006). Rights or benefits? Explaining the sexual identity gap in American political behavior.Political Research Quarterly, 59, 123–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segura, G. M. (2005). A symposium on the politics of same-sex marriage: An introduction and commentary.PS: Political Science and Politics, 38, 189–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. A. (2001). The contingent effects of ballot initiatives and candidate races on turnout.American Journal of Political Science, 45, 700–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tadlock, B. L., Gordon, C. A., & Popp, E. (2007). Framing the issue of same-sex marriages: Traditional values vs. equal rights. In C. Rimmerman & C. Wilcox (Eds.),The politics of same-sex marriage (pp. 193–214). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegan, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, J. S., Lien, P., & Conway, M. M. (2005). Group-based resources and political participation among Asian Americans.American Politics Research, 33, 545–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, J. F. (1986).Participatory democracy: Populism revived. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ellen D. B. Riggle.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Riggle, E.D.B., Rostosky, S.S. & Horne, S.G. Marriage amendments and lesbian, gay, and bisexual individuals in the 2006 election. Sex Res Soc Policy 6, 80–89 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1525/srsp.2009.6.1.80

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/srsp.2009.6.1.80

Key words

Navigation