Abstract
Background: Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) is becoming a pillar in the rehabilitative efforts for many living with HIV/AIDS. A community-based research program called the Living Well Lab (LWL) was established in 2007, operating out of Friends For Life (FFL), a non-profit wellness center in Vancouver, Canada offering free CAM therapies to people living with HIV/AIDS. Therapies range from naturopathy to yoga. The LWL partnered with academic and community organizations to evaluate CAM use and changes in health and quality of life outcomes of FFL’s HIV+ members.
Methods: A longitudinal, combined methods approach assessed the health- and quality-of-life-related outcomes and experiences of CAM users. Participants completed outcome packages (5 time points) over 18 months, which focused on changes in physical and emotional states, satisfaction with services and social support. Interviews were conducted at baseline, 9- and 18-month time points. Quantitative analyses were descriptive while content analysis and thematic coding were used in the qualitative analysis.
Results: Two hundred and seven members enrolled in the LWL. Quantitative data demonstrated improvement in mental and physical wellbeing, social support and patient satisfaction specifically: SF-12, Arizona Integrative Outcomes Scale and three visual analog scales (stress, pain and energy). Participants felt several factors contributed to these changes such as managing anxiety, accepting their illness, learning to relax, an increased capacity for self-care and social support.
Conclusions: CAM use may be associated with changes to physical, social and mental wellbeing. Issues throughout the study provided important lessons for future research.
Acknowledgments
Research support for the project was provided by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
Conflict of interest statement
Authors’ conflict of interest disclosure: The authors stated that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article. Research funding played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report or in the decision to submit the report for publication.
Research funding: None declared.
Employment or leadership: None declared.
Honorarium: None declared.
References
1. ScandlynJ. When AIDS became a chronic disease. West J Med2000;172:130–3.10.1136/ewjm.172.2.130Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
2. SwendemanD, IngramB, Rotheram-BorusMJ. Commonelements in self-management of HIV and other chronic illnesses: an integrative framework. AIDS Care2009;21:1321–34.10.1080/09540120902803158Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
3. Foote-ArdahCE. The meaning of complementary and alternative medicine practices among people with HIV in the United States: strategies for managing everyday life. Sociol Health Illn2003;25:481–500.10.1111/1467-9566.00355Search in Google Scholar PubMed
4. FurlerM, EinarsonT, WalmsleyS, MillsonM, BendayanR. Use of complementary and alternative medicine by HIV-infected outpatients in Ontario, Canada. AIDS Patient Care STDs2003;17:155–68.10.1089/108729103321619764Search in Google Scholar PubMed
5. Website: National Centre for Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Definition of complementary and alternative medicine. Available at: http://nccam.nih.gov/health/whatiscam. Accessed:6 Sep 2013.Search in Google Scholar
6. BicaI, TangAM, SkinnerS, SpiegelmanD, KnoxT, GorbachS, WilsonIB. Use of complementary and alternative therapies by patients with human immunodeficiency virus disease in the era of highly active antiretroviral therapy. J Altern Complement Med2003;9:65–76.10.1089/107555303321222955Search in Google Scholar PubMed
7. ChangBL, van ServellenG, LombardiE. Factors associated with complementary therapy use in people living with HIV/AIDS receiving antiretroviral therapy. J Altern Complement Med2003;9:695–710.10.1089/107555303322524544Search in Google Scholar PubMed
8. ChoM, YeX, DobsA, Cofrancesco Jr J. Prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine use among HIV patients for perceived lipodystrophy. J Altern Complement Med2006;12:475–82.10.1089/acm.2006.12.475Search in Google Scholar PubMed
9. FleishmanJA, GaistP, GeboKA. Use of complementary and alternative medicines among a multistate, multisite cohort of people living with HIV/AIDS. HIV Med2007;8:300–5.10.1111/j.1468-1293.2007.00474.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
10. MilanFB, ArnstenJH, KleinRS, SchoenbaumEMoskalevaG, BuonoD, WebberMP. Use of complementary and alternative medicine in inner-city persons with or at risk for HIV infection. AIDS Patient Care STDS2008;22:811–16.10.1089/apc.2007.0159Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
11. MulkinsA, MorseJM, BestA. Complementary therapy use in HIV/AIDS. Can J Public Health2002;93:308–12.10.1007/BF03405023Search in Google Scholar
12. LittlewoodRA, VanablePA. Complementary and alternative medicine use among HIV-positive people: research synthesis and implications for HIV care. AIDS Care2008;20:1002–18.10.1080/09540120701767216Search in Google Scholar
13. MikhailIS, DiClementeR, PersonS, DaviesS, ElliottE, WingoodG, et al. Association of complementary and alternative medicines with HIV clinical disease among a cohort of women living with HIV/AIDS. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr2004;37:1415–22.10.1097/01.qai.0000130549.65946.3dSearch in Google Scholar
14. GraffyJ. Building research capacity: lessons from North America. Prim Health Care Res Dev2003;4:191–2.10.1191/1463423603pc149oaSearch in Google Scholar
15. IsraelBA, EngE, SchulzAJ, ParkerEA. Methods in community-based participatory research for health. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2005:82–97.Search in Google Scholar
16. BellI, CunninghamV, CaspiO, MeekP, FerroL. Development and validation of a new global well-being outcomes rating scale for integrative medicine research. BMC Complement Altern Med2004;4:1.10.1186/1472-6882-4-1Search in Google Scholar
17. WareJE, KosinskiM, KellerSD. 12-Item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care1996;34:220–33.10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003Search in Google Scholar
18. JenkinsonC, CoulterA, ReevesR, BrusterS, RichardsN. Properties of the picker patient experience questionnaire in a randomized controlled trial of long versus short form survey instruments. J Pub Health Med2003;25:197–201.10.1093/pubmed/fdg049Search in Google Scholar
19. Website: IN-CAM Outcomes Database. Transformative outcome profile (MYTOP). Available at: http://www.outcomesdatabase.org/show/element/id/274. Accessed:23 Mar 2013.Search in Google Scholar
20. KondrackiNL, WellmanNS. Content analysis: review of methods and their applications in nutrition education. J Nutr Educ Behav2002;34:224–30.10.1016/S1499-4046(06)60097-3Search in Google Scholar
21. HsiehHF, ShannonS. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res2005;15:1277–88.10.1177/1049732305276687Search in Google Scholar PubMed
22. TeschR. Qualitative research: analysis types and software tools. New York, Philadelphia, London: Falmer Press, 1990:127–34.Search in Google Scholar
23. MilesMB, HubermanAM. Qualitative data analysis, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1994:58.Search in Google Scholar
24. MorganDL. Qualitative content analysis: a guide to paths not taken. Qual Health Res1993;1:112–21.10.1177/104973239300300107Search in Google Scholar PubMed
25. MorseJM, FieldPA. Qualitative research methods for health professionals. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1995:139–40.Search in Google Scholar
26. PattonM. Qualitative research & evaluation methods, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2002:82–3.Search in Google Scholar
27. LincolnYS, GubaEG. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1985:314.Search in Google Scholar
28. NVivo qualitative data analysis software; QSR International Pty Ltd. version 8, 2008.Search in Google Scholar
©2014 by De Gruyter
