Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter October 11, 2013

Body image satisfaction and self-esteem in Thai female adolescents: the moderating role of self-compassion

  • Kullaya Pisitsungkagarn EMAIL logo , Nattasuda Taephant and Ploychompoo Attasaranya

Abstract

Aim: Body image satisfaction significantly influences self-esteem in female adolescents. Increased reports of lowered satisfaction in this population have raised concerns regarding their compromised self-esteem. This research study, therefore, sought to identify a culturally significant moderator of the association between body image satisfaction and self-esteem in Thai female adolescents. Orientation toward self-compassion, found to be particularly high in Thailand, was examined.

Materials and methods: A total of 302 Thai female undergraduates from three large public and private universities in the Bangkok metropolitan area responded to a set of questionnaires, which measured demographic information, body image satisfaction, self-compassion, and self-esteem. Data were analyzed using correlation and multiple regression analyses. Self-compassion was tested as a moderator of the relationship between body image satisfaction and self-esteem.

Results: Although its effect was relatively small, self-compassion significantly moderated the positive relationship between body image satisfaction and self-esteem. The relationship became less stringent for those with high self-compassion.

Discussion: The cultivation of self-compassion was recommended in female adolescents. In addition to moderating the association between body image satisfaction and self-esteem, the benefits to health and well-being of generalizing this cultivation are discussed.


Corresponding author: Kullaya Pisitsungkagarn, PhD, DPsych, Faculty of Psychology, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand, E-mail:

References

1. Thompson JK, Heinberg LJ, Altabe M, Tantleff-Dunn S. Exacting beauty: theory, assessment, and treatment of body image disturbance. Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association, 1999.Search in Google Scholar

2. Shaffer DR. Social and personality development, 6th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 2009:648.Search in Google Scholar

3. Rubino KM, Twenge JM, Fredrickson BL. Trait self-objectification in women: affective and personality correlates. J Res Pers 2002;36:147–72.10.1006/jrpe.2001.2343Search in Google Scholar

4. Fredrickson BL, Roberts TA. Objectification theory: toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychol Women Quart 2006;21:173–206.Search in Google Scholar

5. Irving LM, Dupen, J, Berel S. A media literacy program for high school females. Eating Disord J Treatment Prev 1998;6:119–31.10.1080/10640269808251248Search in Google Scholar

6. Thompson KJ, Smolak L. Introduction: body image, eating disorders, and obesity in youth. The future is now. In: Thompson KL, Smolak L, editors. Body image, eating disorders, and obesity in youth: assessment, prevention, and treatment. Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association, 2001:1–22.Search in Google Scholar

7. LePage ML, Crowther JH, Harrington EF, Engler P. Psychological correlates of fasting and vigorous exercise as compensatory strategies in under-graduate women. Eat Behav 2009;9:423–9.10.1016/j.eatbeh.2008.06.002Search in Google Scholar

8. Moradi B, Dirks D, Matteson VA. Roles of sexual objectification experiences and internalization of standards of beauty in eating disorder symptomatology: a test and extension of objectification theory. J Couns Psychol 2005;52:420–8.10.1037/0022-0167.52.3.420Search in Google Scholar

9. Rodin J, Silberstein L, Striegel-Moore R. Women and weight: a normative discontent. In: Sonderegger TB, editor. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 32). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1985:267–307.Search in Google Scholar

10. Smolak L. Body image in children and adolescents: where do we go from here? Body Image 2004;1:15–28.10.1016/S1740-1445(03)00008-1Search in Google Scholar

11. An J, An K, O’Connor L, Wexler S. Life satisfaction, self-esteem, and perceived health status among elder Korean women: focus on living arrangements. J Trans Nurs 2008;19:151–60.10.1177/1043659607313070Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Lyubomirsky S, Tkach C, DiMatteo MR. What are the differences between happiness and self-esteem? Soc Indic Res 2006;78:363–404.10.1007/s11205-005-0213-ySearch in Google Scholar

13. Pyszczynski T, Greenberg J, Solomon S, Arndt J, Schimel J. Why do people need self-esteem? A theoretical and empirical review. Psychol Bull 2004;130:435–68.10.1037/0033-2909.130.3.435Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Harter S. Self and identity development. In: Feldman SS, Elliott G, editors. At the threshold: the developing adolescent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990:352–87.Search in Google Scholar

15. McVey Gl, Kirsh G, Maker D, Walker KS, Mullane J, et al. Promoting positive body image among university students: a collaborative pilot study. Body Image 2010;7:200–4.10.1016/j.bodyim.2010.02.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Lawrence D. Enhancing self-esteem in the classroom. Thousand Oak, CA: SAGE, 2006.10.4135/9781446213513Search in Google Scholar

17. Neff KD. Self–compassion: an alternative conceptualization of a healthy attitude toward oneself. Self Identity 2003;2:85–102.10.1080/15298860309032Search in Google Scholar

18. Neff KD, Pisitsungkagarn K, Hsieh Y. Self-compassion and self-construal in the United States, Thailand, and Taiwan. J Cross Cult Psych 2008;39:267–85.10.1177/0022022108314544Search in Google Scholar

19. Neff KD, Vonk R. Self-compassion versus global self-esteem: two different ways of relating to oneself. J Pers 2009;77:23–50.10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00537.xSearch in Google Scholar

20. Markus H, Kitayama S. Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychol Rev 1991;98:224–53.10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224Search in Google Scholar

21. World Health Organization. Appropriate body mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet 2004;363:157–63.10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15268-3Search in Google Scholar

22. Avalos L, Tylka TL, Wood-Barcalow N. The body appreciation scale: development and psychometric evaluation. Body Image 2005;2:285–97.10.1016/j.bodyim.2005.06.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

23. Rosenberg M. Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Press, 1965.10.1515/9781400876136Search in Google Scholar

24. Neff KD. The development and validation of a scale to measure self-compassion. Self Identity 2003;2:223–50.10.1080/15298860309027Search in Google Scholar

25. Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC. Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2009.Search in Google Scholar

26. Holmbeck GN. Post-hoc probing of significant moderational and meditational effects in studies of pediatric population. J Pediatr Psychol 2002;27:87–96.10.1093/jpepsy/27.1.87Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Linehan MM, Dimeff L. Dialectical behavior therapy in a nutshell. Calif Psychol 2001;34:10–3.Search in Google Scholar

28. Hayes SC, Kirk DS, Kelly GW. Acceptance and commitment therapy: an experiential approach to behavior change. New York: The Guilford Press, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2013-6-2
Accepted: 2013-8-26
Published Online: 2013-10-11
Published in Print: 2014-8-1

© 2014 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 23.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/ijamh-2013-0307/html
Scroll to top button