Abstract
Background: Bullying is common among young students, and cyberbullying has increased due to the use of technology. This study investigates the prevalence of bullying and cyberbullying among high school students and the emotional effects of bullying on students.
Methods: Students at East Chapel Hill High School, Chapel Hill, North Carolina completed the Gatehouse Bullying Scale and the Peer Relations Questionnaire. They answered questions regarding how often they had experienced certain types of bullying in school and the emotional effects the bullying had on them.
Results: The combined results from both surveys indicated that the prevalence of bullying was 55% with 18% of respondents reporting cyberbullying. Teasing and name-calling were the most common types of bullying, as 40% of students reported having been teased or called names. The most serious type of bullying, being threatened with harm, hit, or kicked, occurred in 20% of boys and 8% of girls, with 25% of respondents reported “quite upset” by the experience. The majority (79%) of students who had been bullied did not share with anyone about being bullied, and of those who did, only 50% were taken seriously.
Conclusions: Bullying is still prevalent among high school students, and cyberbullying is becoming more widespread. Most victims do not share their bullying experience, and if they did, only half believe they are taken seriously. Both bullying among students in school and cyberbullying deserve attention due to their potentially devastating effects on victims.
References
1. Bond L, Carlin JB, Thomas L, Rubin K, Patton G. Does bullying cause emotional problems? A prospective study of young teenagers. Br Med J 2001;323:480–4.10.1136/bmj.323.7311.480Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
2. Rigby K. Peer victimisation at school and the health of secondary school students. Br J Educ Psychol 1999;69 (Pt 1):95–104.10.1348/000709999157590Search in Google Scholar PubMed
3. Smith PK, Morita Y, Junger-Tas J, Olweus D, Catalano R, et al. The nature of school bullying. London: Routledge, 1999.Search in Google Scholar
4. Ybarra ML, Mitchell KJ, Wolak J, Finkelhor D. Examining characteristics and associated distress related to Internet harassment: findings from the Second Youth Internet Safety Survey. Pediatrics 2006;118:e1169–77.10.1542/peds.2006-0815Search in Google Scholar PubMed
5. Nansel TR, Overpeck MD, Pilla RS, Ruan WJ, Simons-Morton BG, et al. Bullying behaviors among US youth: prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. J Am Med Assoc 2001;285:2094–100.10.1001/jama.285.16.2094Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
6. Olweus D. Bullying at school: what we know and what we can do. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers, 1993.Search in Google Scholar
7. Pellegrini AD, Long JD. A longitudinal study of bullying, dominance, and victimization during the transition from primary school through secondary school. Br J Dev Psychol 2002;20:259–80.10.1348/026151002166442Search in Google Scholar
8. Olweus D. Bullying at school: basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 1994;35:1171–90.10.1111/j.1469-7610.1994.tb01229.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
9. Arora C. Defining bullying. School Psychol Int 1996;17:317–29.10.1177/0143034396174002Search in Google Scholar
10. Madsen K. Differing perceptions of bullying and their practical implications. Educ Child Psychol 1996;13:14–22.Search in Google Scholar
11. Pellegrini A, Bartini M. An empirical comparison of methods of sampling aggression and victimisation in school settings. J Educ Psychol 2000;92:360–6.10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.360Search in Google Scholar
12. Smith PK, Cowie H, Olafsson RF, Liefooghe AP, Almeida A, et al. Definitions of bullying: a comparison of terms used, and age and gender differences, in a fourteen-country international comparison. Child Dev 2002;73:1119–33.10.1111/1467-8624.00461Search in Google Scholar PubMed
13. Smith Pk, Levan S. Perceptions and experiences of bullying in younger pupils. Br J Educ Psychol 1995;65(Pt 4):489–500.10.1111/j.2044-8279.1995.tb01168.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
14. Guerin S, Hennessy E. Pupils’ definitions of bullying. Eur J Psychol Educ 2002;17:249–61.10.1007/BF03173535Search in Google Scholar
15. Pergolizzi F, Pergolizzi J 3rd, Gan Z, Macario S, Pergolizzi JV Jr, et al. Bullying in middle school: results from a 2008 survey. Int J Adolesc Med Health 2011;23:11–8.10.1515/ijamh.2011.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed
16. Kowalski RM, Limber SP. Electronic bullying among middle school students. J Adolesc Health 2007;41:S22–30.10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.08.017Search in Google Scholar PubMed
17. Bond L, Wolfe S, Tollit M, Butler H, Patton G. A comparison of the Gatehouse Bullying Scale and the peer relations questionnaire for students in secondary school. J Sch Health 2007;77:75–9.10.1111/j.1746-1561.2007.00170.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
18. Sharp S. How much does bullying hurt? The effects of bullying on the personal wellbeing and educational progress of secondary aged students. Educ Child Psychol 1995;12:81–8.Search in Google Scholar
19. Friedman E. Victim of secret dorm sex tape posts Facebook goodbye, jumps to his death. ABC News 2010. Available at: http://abcnews.go.com/US/victim-secret-dorm-sex-tape-commits-suicide/story?id=11758716#.ULevooU6VhI. Accessed on 29 November 2012.Search in Google Scholar
©2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston
