Original Article
Metacarpal Index by Digital X-ray Radiogrammetry: Normative Reference Values and Comparison with Dual X-ray Absorptiometry

https://doi.org/10.1385/JCD:4:4:299Get rights and content

Abstract

Metacarpal index (MCI), the combined cortical midmetacarpal thickness divided by the outer midmetacarpal diameter, fell into oblivion when dual photon absorptiometry was introduced a quarter of a century ago. Modern PC-based digital X-ray radiogrammetry (DXR) with multiple, automated thickness and diameter measurements offers a unique opportunity for precise and accurate measurements of MCI (DXR-MCI). We hypothesize that DXR-MCI in contrast to projected areal bone mineral density (DXA-BMD) is independent of bone size and studied 384 normal women by measuring DXR-MCI and DXA-BMD of the lumbar spine, hip, and distal radius. A normative MCI database for women is presented. It has its maximum in the third decade, and a moderate biologic variation that seems to decline with age. It was found that DXR-MCI was independent of body weight and body surface area, whereas all DXA-BMD values were significantly dependent on them. Body height was significantly correlated with DXA-BMD at all sites, but less so with DXR-MCI. The latter was correlated with metacarpal bone length. It is suggested that the moderate correlation between MCI and body height would be abolished if the region of interest used for calculation of MCI be adjusted according to individual metacarpal bone length. DXR-MCI correlated significantly with DXA-BMD at the sites measured, and particularly well with that of the distal radius (r = 0.67; p < 0.0001).

References (20)

  • E Barnett et al.

    The radiological diagnosis of osteoporosis

    Clin Radiol

    (1960)
  • J Iwamoto et al.

    Age-related changes in cortical bone in women: metacarpal bone mass measurement study

    J Orthop Sci

    (1998)
  • O Johnell et al.

    Better short-time in vivo precision with digital X-ray radiogrammetry compared to DXA

    J Bone Miner Res

    (2000)
  • S Pors Nielsen et al.

    Diagnosis of osteoporosis by planar bone densitometry: can body size be disregarded?

    Br J Radiol

    (1998)
  • RJ Caroll et al.

    Transformation and weighting in regression

    (1988)
  • RC Littell et al.

    SAS system for mixed models

    (1996)
  • CC Glüer et al.

    Accurate assessment of precision errors: how to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques

    Osteoporos Int

    (1995)
  • World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. 1996 Recommendations guiding physicians in biomedical research...
  • S Cummings et al.

    Normative reference curves for the Pronosco X-posure system™ established in five ethnic groups

    J Bone Miner Res

    (2000)
  • BEC Nordin

    Clinical Physiology and Diagnostic Procedures

    Calcium, Phosphate and Magnesium Metabolism

    (1976)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text