Chest
Volume 77, Issue 4, April 1980, Pages 499-505
Journal home page for Chest

Commentary
Mechanism and Time Course of the Early Electrical Changes During Acute Coronary Artery Occlusion: An Attempt to Correlate the Early ECG Changes in Man to the Cellular Electrophysiology in the Pig

https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.77.4.499Get rights and content

A comparison is made between precordial ECG leads recorded during the first minutes of acute myocardial infarction in man, and transmembrane potentials and local DC-extracellular electrograms recorded during the first minutes following coronary artery occlusion in isolated pig hearts. In the pig heart, the electrical changes are as follows: (1) a decrease in resting potential, resulting in depression of the TQ segment of the DC extracellular electrogram; (2) a decrease in amplitude of the action potential, leading to true ST elevation of the extracellular complex; (3) decrease in upstroke velocity, and thus a delayed activation of ischemic cells, giving rise to a late intrinsic deflection in the extracellular signal; (4) a transient period of alternation with respect to amplitude and duration of the transmembrane action potential leading to alternation in ST elevation and T wave; (5) unresponsiveness of ischemic cells after 5 to 10 minutes at a membrane potential around −65 mV, which produces a monophasic extracellular complex; and (6) a transient increase between 20 to 40 minutes in resting potential and reappearance of action potentials, resulting in decrease in TQ and ST deflection and reappearance of intrinsic deflection. In the precordial leads in the patient, the configuration of the complexes and the time course of the changes was very similar to the configuration of the extracellular signals in the pig, suggesting that cellular changes in man are similar to those in the pig.

Section snippets

Case Report

A 41-year-old diabetic man was admitted to the Ciudad Sanitaria de Barcelona because of two successive episodes of chest pain four hours previously. They were related to minimal exercise and lasted 2 and 20 minutes respectively. On admission, the ECG showed normal sinus rhythm with slight ST-segment depression (1 to 2 mm) in leads 2, 3, and aVF. The T waves were positive and symmetrical in leads V3 to V5. Serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT) value was 32, creatine Phosphokinase (CPK)

Discussion

It has been established long ago that “injury” to the heart, usually by locally applying concentrated potassium chloride solutions to the epicardium, resulted in “elevation” of the ST segment, which in reality, was due to a depression of the baseline.5, 6, 7 More recent studies4 and the present report show that in acute myocardial ischemia, the ST elevation as recorded with AC-coupled amplifiers is, in fact, caused by a combination of depression of the TQ segment and true elevation of the ST

References (16)

  • RL Hamlin et al.

    Ventricular activation process in minipigs

    J Electrocardiol

    (1975)
  • HEB Pardee

    An electrocardiographic sign of coronary artery obstruction

    Arch Intern Med

    (1920)
  • E Braunwald et al.

    ST-segment mapping: realistic and unrealistic expectations

    Circulation

    (1976)
  • E Downar et al.

    The effect of coronary artery occlusion on subepicardial transmembrane potentials in the intact porcine heart

    Circulation

    (1977)
  • AG Kléber et al.

    Mechanism and time course of S-T and T-Q segment changes during acute regional myocardial ischemia in the pig heart determined by extracellular and intracellular recordings

    Circ Res

    (1978)
  • H Sugarman et al.

    Observations on the genesis of the electrical currents established by injury to the heart

    Am J Physiol

    (1940)
  • LH Nahum et al.

    The injury current in the electrogram

    Am J Physiol

    (1945)
  • Sodi Pallares D: Nuevas bases de la electrocardiografia. Mexicana, Mexico, La Orensa Medica, 1951, Fig 120, p...
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (71)

View all citing articles on Scopus

Manuscript received February 15; revision accepted July 2.

View full text