Chest
Volume 129, Issue 3, March 2006, Pages 624-631
Journal home page for Chest

Original Research: ASTHMA
Quality of Life and Inflammatory Markers in Mild Asthma

https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.129.3.624Get rights and content

Study objectives

The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between quality of life and measures of asthma, such as lung function, reversibility to bronchodilation, exhaled nitric oxide (NO), and bronchial responsiveness to direct and indirect stimulus in patients with mild asthma in a primary care setting.

Patients and measurements

Seventy-seven asthmatic patients not treated with glucocorticosteroids completed the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire. Spirometry was performed before and after bronchodilation, and bronchial challenges with methacholine and eucapnic dry air hyperventilation were conducted on separate days. NO in exhaled air and serum IgE were also analyzed.

Results

We found no correlation between quality of life and any of the other parameters. There was a significant covariation between exhaled NO and bronchial responsiveness to methacholine and dry air, and also between FEV1 (percentage of predicted) and reversibility to a bronchodilator. The levels of exhaled NO were higher in the asthmatic subjects with atopy than in the nonatopic asthmatics.

Conclusions

The measures used in our study do not reflect health-related quality of life in subjects with mild asthma. We conclude that in the clinical situation, quality of life and other measures of asthma provide complementary information.

Section snippets

Subjects

All patients with previous symptoms diagnosed as asthma by a general practitioner were invited to participate in the study. However, it was not possible to assess whether the diagnosis of asthma had been based on peak expiratory flow variability, a reversibility test, bronchial challenges, or on a seasonal variability of asthma symptoms. The patients visited one of four health-care centers in downtown Stockholm, Sweden, and were included in the study after having been identified in the primary

Results

Seventy-seven patients were included in the study (Table 1). Results were based on the assumption that the symptoms of asthma (that had led to diagnosis of asthma by a physician), in combination with one positive test result (bronchial responsiveness, exhaled NO, reversibility test) were sufficient to confirm the diagnosis of asthma. All test results, including methacholine challenge, dry air challenge, levels of NO in exhaled air, and reversibility to bronchodilator drugs, were normal in 8 of

Discussion

In the present study, we found no correlation between quality of life as assessed by the AQLQ and parameters such as lung function, reversibility to a bronchodilator, bronchial hyperresponsiveness to a direct and an indirect stimulus, and exhaled NO in steroid-free subjects with mild asthma. Patients were included according to three criteria: asthma diagnosed by a physician, mild disease according to a VAS (< 30 mm), and no treatment with steroids (inhaled or oral) during the last 3 months

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors wish to thank Professor Hans Åberg for valuable comments. The technical assistance of Kicki Olsson, RN is gratefully acknowledged.

References (28)

  • WilsonN

    Measurement of airway inflammation in asthma

    Curr Opin Pulm Med

    (2002)
  • LundbackB

    Asthma, chronic bronchitis and respiratory symptoms: prevalence and important determinants

    Umeå University Medical Dissertations New Series No. 387

    (1993)
  • American Thoracic Society.. Standardization of spirometry, 1994 update

    Am J Respir Crit Care Med

    (1995)
  • HedenströmH et al.

    Reference values for lung function tests in females: regression equations with smoking variables

    Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir

    (1985)
  • Cited by (30)

    • Feasibility and interpretation of FE<inf>NO</inf> measurements in asthma patients in general practice

      2008, Respiratory Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      According to our data, more advanced age (above 61 years) and low actual FEV1 volume (below 1.5 L), not asthma symptoms may have some limitations towards the ability of patients to perform the standardised FENO test. The significant, although weak, positive correlations that were found between FENO levels and FEV1 results may be due to the wider spectrum of patient severity in the current study in comparison with mild asthmatics only, when no correlations were found between FENO and total asthma symptoms8 or quality of life.13 More interestingly, multiple stepwise forward regression analysis on mean FENO revealed that FEV1 (% pred.)

    • The use of fraction of exhaled nitric oxide in pulmonary practice

      2008, Chest
      Citation Excerpt :

      Because FeNO increases quickly once medication is stopped,10 it has been used to monitor adherence to antiinflammatory medication.7576 There is no correlation between FeNO and quality of life as measured by the asthma quality of life questionnaire in steroid-naïve asthmatic patients.77 The literature prior to the 1999 ATS recommendations78 can be difficult to interpret because of the different methodologies employed in measuring the FeNO.

    • Perceived triggers of asthma: Evaluation of a German version of the Asthma Trigger Inventory

      2008, Respiratory Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Convergent information from additional tests such as allergen provocation or total serum IgE could improve the association between patients’ perception and actual somatic responses. However, low associations are also typically found for other aspects of self-report and somatic markers in asthma, such as symptom report and lung function measurements,18,19 perceived airway obstruction and levels of experimentally induced obstruction,20 report of asthma-specific quality of life and airway inflammation,21 or more generally between variables of the self-report domain and physiological data.22 In practice, it is important to take into account such weak associations between self-report and somatic response.

    • Allergic diseases and their impact on quality of life

      2006, Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This study was supported by the Centre for Allergy Research at Karolinska Institutet, the Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation, and the Swedish Asthma and Allergy Association.

    Reproduction of this article is prohibited without written permission from the American College of Chest Physicians (www.chestjournal.org/misc/reprints.shtml).

    View full text