Chest
Volume 123, Issue 1, Supplement, January 2003, Pages 89S-96S
Journal home page for Chest

The Solitary Pulmonary Nodule*

https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.123.1_suppl.89SGet rights and content

More than 150,00 patients a year present to their physicians with the diagnostic dilemma of a solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN) found either on chest radiography or chest CT. A thoughtful and timely workup of this finding is essential if lung cancer is to be recognized early and the chance for cure optimized. Based on the literature to date, recommendations are made for appropriate imaging modalities and diagnostic testing, as well as indications for obtaining preoperative tissue diagnosis for the patient with an SPN.

Section snippets

Differential Diagnosis

The differential diagnosis of an SPN includes neoplastic, infectious, inflammatory, vascular, traumatic, and congenital lesions.2 Other benign etiologies for SPNs are rheumatoid nodules, intrapulmonary lymph nodes, plasma cell granulomas, and sarcoidosis. Although most SPNs are benign,25 primary malignancy may be found in approximately 35% of SPNs, and solitary metastases can account for another 23%.678 Clinical characteristics such as older age, a history of cigarette smoking, and a previous

Radiologic Diagnostics: CXRs

Since the SPN is by definition a radiographic finding, radiologic imaging is intrinsic to the diagnostic workup. Essentially all SPN are found on CXRs or incidentally on CT. The CXR is an excellent initial imaging study for patients with symptoms, or as routine follow-up for patients with known pulmonary lesions. The indications and efficacy of CXRs for routine cancer surveillance are beyond the scope of this chapter and are discussed in the chapter on “Follow-up and Surveillance” in these

Radiographic Diagnostics: Chest CT

Spiral CT with IV contrast enhancement is the imaging modality of choice for the SPN and should be obtained on all newly diagnosed SPNs. CT provides ideal imaging for characterizing the nodule and its location. The CT scan can also be used to identify synchronous lung lesions or metastatic liver or adrenal lesions or mediastinal lymph nodes. Chest CT is also helpful for assessment of chest wall, mediastinal, or diaphragmatic invasion or for evaluation of superior sulcus (Pancoast) tumors. Of

Radiologic Diagnostics: MRI

MRI has a very limited role in the evaluation of the SPN. It may be beneficial in the patient who cannot tolerate IV contrast. MRI may also allow better anatomic evaluation of the lung apices, thoracic inlet, chest wall, or diaphragm due to its ability to provide sagittal, coronal, and oblique images. In general, the cost of MRI is not worth the lower risk of contrast-induced toxicity for most patients, as the imaging accuracy of CT is as good for most locations of SPNs. With the exception of

Tissue Diagnosis: TTNA

Obtaining a tissue diagnosis via TTNA is somewhat less invasive than bronchoscopy and Wang needle biopsy and does not require IV sedation. Certainly, it is much less invasive than surgery, but a nonmalignant diagnosis may not be believed and TTNA and bronchoscopy can at best only be diagnostic, not therapeutic. The sensitivity for malignancy is 64 to 100%.3940 Unfortunately, the sensitivity of TTNA for a specific benign diagnosis is 12 to 68% but only 12% in a number of studies.41 Adding

Tissue Diagnosis: Bronchoscopy

Bronchoscopy may be an good approach for obtaining a tissue diagnosis in the large, central lung mass or in those with endobronchial encroachment, as diagnostic yield is 70% and 90%, respectively.4546474849 The best application of bronchoscopy and TBNA is for staging of NSCLC by aspirating enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes. The discovery of metastatic disease will change patient management and obviates any further surgical staging. However, for the patient with a peripheral lung nodule, there is

Surgery

The patient with an SPN that is new and does not have benign appearing calcifications should be considered to have a malignancy until proven otherwise. Surgical resection is the ideal approach, as it is both diagnostic and therapeutic. If it is believed that based on patient history that the SPN may not be NSCLC but rather metastatic disease, then thoracoscopy and wedge resection is an accepted initial surgical approach. The specimen should be sent for frozen section, so that conversion to a

Follow-up

The patient with an SPN who does not have a tissue diagnosis and who is deemed acceptable for observation should be followed up closely for a minimum of 2 years. This should include an initial CXR, and CT scanning at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months for best monitoring for nodule growth. There is very little objective evidence for frequency of surveillance monitoring.

Summary of Recommendations

  • 1.

    For patients with an SPN that is visible on CXR, all previous CXRs should be reviewed. Level of evidence, poor; benefit, substantial; grade of recommendation, C

  • 2.

    For all patients with previous CXRs, an SPN that is unchanged for > 2 years does not require further diagnostic evaluation. Level of evidence, fair; benefit, substantial; grade of recommendation, B

  • 3.

    For patients with an SPN visible on CXR in which benign central calcification is present, no further diagnostic evaluation is necessary. Level

References (55)

  • KG Torrington et al.

    The utility of fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the evaluation of solitary pulmonary nodules

    Chest

    (1993)
  • K Suzuki et al.

    Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for small indeterminate pulmonary nodules

    Chest

    (1999)
  • WI Tuddenham

    Glossary of terms for thoracic radiology: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee of the Fleischner Society

    Am J Roentgenol

    (1984)
  • MD Abeloff et al.

    Clinical oncology

    (2000)
  • DF Yankelvitz et al.

    Lung cancer: small solitary pulmonary nodules

    Radiol Clin North Am

    (2000)
  • RT Greenlee et al.

    Cancer statistics, 2001

    CA Cancer J Clin

    (2001)
  • A Jemal et al.

    Cancer statistics, 2002

    CA Cancer J Clin

    (2002)
  • SI Swenson et al.

    The probability of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules: application to small radiologically indeterminate nodules

    Arch Intern Med

    (1997)
  • IW Gurney

    Determining the likelihood of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules with Bayesian analysis: Part I. Theory

    Radiology

    (1993)
  • CT Henske et al.

    Neural networks for the analysis of small pulmonary nodules

    Clin Imaging

    (1997)
  • K Nakamura et al.

    Computerized analysis of the likelihood of malignancy in solitary pulmonary with use of artificial neural networks

    Radiology

    (2000)
  • GA Lillington

    Management of solitary pulmonary nodules: how to decide when resection is required

    Postgrad Med

    (1997)
  • El Potchen et al.

    When is it malpractice to miss lung cancer on chest radiographs?

    Radiology

    (1990)
  • FP Stitik et al.

    Radiologic screening in the early detection of lung cancer

    Radiol Clin North Am

    (1978)
  • RT Heenan et al.

    Non-small cell lung cancer: results of the New York screening program

    Radiology

    (1984)
  • JR Muhm et al.

    Lung cancer detected during a screening program using 4-month chest radiographs

    Radiology

    (1983)
  • LW Guiss et al.

    retrospective review of survey photofluorograms of persons with lung cancer

    Cancer

    (1960)
  • Cited by (280)

    • Bronchoscopy

      2021, A Medication Guide to Internal Medicine Tests and Procedures
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text