Chest
Volume 138, Issue 2, Supplement, August 2010, Pages 31S-37S
Journal home page for Chest

Airway Hyperresponsiveness in Asthma: Its Measurement and Clinical Significance
Bronchial Challenges and Respiratory Symptoms in Elite Swimmers and Winter Sport Athletes: Airway Hyperresponsiveness in Asthma: Its Measurement and Clinical Significance

https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.09-1689Get rights and content

This study was aimed at the following: (1) the prevalence of airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) in swimmers and winter sport athletes according to the previously recommended regulatory sport agencies criteria, (2) the relationship between respiratory symptoms and AHR/EIB, (3) the impact of the chosen cutoff value for AHR on its prevalence, and (4) the effect on the prevalence of the positive eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea (EVH) test of using the highest vs the lowest spirometric post-EVH values to calculate the magnitude of the airway response. We compared the prevalence of respiratory symptoms with responses to methacholine challenge and EVH in 45 swimmers, 45 winter sport athletes, and 30 controls. Two methacholine challenge cutoffs for AHR were analyzed: ≤ 4 mg/mL (the sport agencies' criteria for AHR) and ≤ 16 mg/mL. Sixty percent of swimmers, 29% of winter sport athletes, and 17% of controls had evidence of EIB or AHR (with the ≤ 4 mg/mL criteria). Among athletes with a methacholine provocative concentration inducing a 20% decrease in the FEV1 between 4 and 16 mg/mL, 43% of swimmers and 100% of winter sport athletes were symptomatic (P < .05). Prevalence of positive EVH tests were 39% in swimmers, 24% in winter sport athletes, and 13% in controls when the highest FEV1 value measured at each time point post-EVH was used to identify maximal response for calculation of airway response, although these prevalences were higher if we used the lowest value. This study suggests that AHR/EIB is frequent in swimmers, whereas the frequently reported respiratory symptoms in winter sport athletes are often not related to AHR/EIB. Furthermore, the choice of methods for assessing methacholine challenge and EVH responses influences the prevalences of AHR and EIB.

Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov; Identifier NCT 00686491 and NCT 00686452.

Section snippets

Study Subjects

Swimmers, winter sport athletes, and nonathlete controls were recruited. Athletes and controls had to be nonsmokers, nonobese, and free of any disease that may interfere with the study. Controls taking asthma medication were excluded. To be included, swimmers and winter sport athletes had to be active competitors and train at least 10 h per week in a chlorinated swimming pool and outside in winter, respectively. Winter sport athletes were not exposed to chlorinated environments and all athletes

Subjects' Characteristics

The characteristics of the subjects included in the study are presented in Table 1. Swimmers (11 synchronized swimmers, 32 swimmers, and two divers) and winter sport athletes (seven biathletes, 22 cross-country skiers, and 16 speed-skaters training outdoors) were competing at national to Olympic levels. Eleven percent of swimmers and 9% of winter sport athletes had asthma diagnosed during their childhood before beginning their sport career. All athletes taking ICS for > 1 month had also been

Discussion

Using the IOC-MC criteria, we found that 60% of swimmers and 29% of winter sport athletes had AHR or EIB, and therefore could be allowed to use certain types of asthma medication. Interestingly, our study underlines that the elite swimmer population is characterized by a high prevalence of symptomatic and asymptomatic AHR and/or EIB, whereas winter sport athletes often report exercise-induced cough but with a prevalence of AHR and/or EIB similar to controls. Furthermore, among athletes with a

Acknowledgments

Authors contributions: Dr Bougault: contributed to conceiving the study, performing the tests, coordinating the study, drafting the manuscript, and reading and approving the final manuscript.

Dr Turmel: contributed to conceiving the study, performing the tests, and reading and approving the final manuscript.

Dr Boulet: contributed as the main investigator of the study; he helped with the conception of the study, performed the medical examination of all subjects, helped to draft the manuscript,

References (24)

  • RO Crapo et al.

    Guidelines for methacholine and exercise challenge testing-1999. This official statement of the American Thoracic Society was adopted by the ATS Board of Directors, July 1999

    Am J Respir Crit Care Med

    (2000)
  • JL Malo et al.

    Reference values of the provocative concentrations of methacholine that cause 6% and 20% changes in forced expiratory volume in one second in a normal population

    Am Rev Respir Dis

    (1983)
  • Cited by (76)

    • Chlorine exposure and intensive exercise induces airway hyperreactivity in a 3-week murine exercise model

      2022, Science of the Total Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      In elite competitive swimmers, the prevalence of airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and/or exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB), defined as acute narrowing of the airways during or immediately after exercise, reaches up to 76 % of the athletes with a positive provocation test (Bougault et al., 2010).

    • Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction and the Air We Breathe

      2018, Immunology and Allergy Clinics of North America
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Funding/Support: Valérie Bougault was supported in part by a grant from the Groupe de recherche en santé respiratoire de l'Université Laval (GESER), Québec, QC, Canada.

    Reproduction of this article is prohibited without written permission from the American College of Chest Physicians (http://www.chestpubs.org/site/misc/reprints.xhtml).

    View full text