Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T22:02:34.458Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Recruitment and Attrition in Twin Register Studies of Childhood Behavior: The Example of the Australian Twin ADHD Project

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2012

David A. Hay*
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, Curtin University, Perth, Australiad.hay@curtin.edu.au.
Michael McStephen
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, Curtin University, Perth, Australia; Mental Health Research Institute, Parkville,Victoria, Australia
Florence Levy
Affiliation:
School of Psychiatry, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
Jillian Pearsall-Jones
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
*
*Address for correspondence: Prof David A. Hay, School of Psychology, Curtin University, PO Box U 1987, Perth, WA 6845, Australia.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

There are a growing number of large-scale initiatives for twin registers of children. The Australian Twin ADHD Project (ATAP) is used to illustrate two key limitations which may arise with such studies, namely (1) the importance of including or possibly excluding families in which one or both twins have significant developmental disability, and (2) the selective failure to recruit and/or the selective attrition of families in which parents and children share behavioral difficulties. Initially ATAP excluded 1 in 6 of families whose twins were enrolled in the volunteer-based Australian Twin Registry (ATR), and as more children with significant problems were identified, these families were sequentially excluded. With longitudinal data over ten years, two points about retention were identified: the difficulty of retaining the twins in late adolescence, and the loss of the families whose twins had more ADHD symptoms. We discuss strategies for limiting the loss of families and for ensuring comparability of data across registers with similar interests but different methods of recruitment and exclusion.

Type
Articles/Australia
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2002