Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Health-related quality of life in South African patients with pulmonary tuberculosis

  • Tanja Kastien-Hilka †,

    † Deceased.

    Affiliations Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (Swiss TPH), Basel, Switzerland, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland, Health Economics Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa

  • Bernd Rosenkranz,

    Affiliations Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa, Fundisa African Academy of Medicines Development, Cape Town, South Africa

  • Edina Sinanovic,

    Affiliation Health Economics Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa

  • Bryan Bennett ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Bryan Bennett, Matthias Schwenkglenks

    Affiliation Patient Centered Outcomes, Adelphi Values, Bollington, United Kingdom

  • Matthias Schwenkglenks

    Contributed equally to this work with: Bryan Bennett, Matthias Schwenkglenks

    m.schwenkglenks@unibas.ch

    Affiliations University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland, Institute of Pharmaceutical Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland

Abstract

Background

The evaluation of patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) contributes to a comprehensive understanding of the burden associated with this disease. The aim of this study was to assess the overall impact of TB on the health status and on single health domains identified in the WHO definition of health, including physical, mental and social health aspects.

Methods

Four instruments for HRQOL evaluation were applied in a longitudinal multicentre study during six-month standard TB treatment in South Africa. These included the generic SF-12 and EQ-5D-5L, the disease-specific St. George´s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and the condition-specific Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Statistical analysis included significance testing, univariable and multivariable analysis, and repeated measures ANOVA. Change over time in the physical component score (PCS) of SF-12 was defined as primary endpoint. A target sample size of 96 patients was estimated.

Results

HRQOL of the study participants was impaired in all physical, mental and psycho-social health domains at treatment start. HRQOL improved significantly and in a clinically meaningful manner during the course of standard TB treatment, over the period of the study. The greatest improvement (95%) was observed in mental health. Younger patients with higher education and who were employed had a better HRQOL.

Discussion

This study demonstrates the need for an integrative understanding of TB with HRQOL as core element to inform gaps in current TB management. Improvements in the management of TB following an integrative patient-centred approach will contribute towards meeting the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 3 (SDG3) target and will support the End TB strategy of the WHO.

Introduction

At the beginning of 2016, the United Nations (UN) introduced the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to replace the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) established in 2000 [1]. The third goal of the SDGs (SGD3) aims to ensure healthy lives and promote well-being at all ages [1]. One target of SGD3 focuses on universal health coverage, including access to safe, effective, high quality and affordable essential medicines [2]. Access to medicines requires sponsors to demonstrate that the medicine is safe, effective and affordable. The evidence of the real benefit of a treatment is usually evaluated based on clinical trials and real world data evidence. Only after this evidence has been provided, can medicines be made accessible through healthcare organizations. The World Health Organization (WHO) claims that patient involvement in their healthcare is a social, economic and technical necessity [3]. The evaluation of a patient-reported perspective of a disease and treatment contributes to a comprehensive understanding of the benefit and risk associated with that disease. This is important as some concepts cannot be measured objectively. One specific patient-reported outcome (PRO) is health-related quality of life (HRQOL). HRQOL is a PRO which refers to the multi-dimensional nature of health, and usually includes physical, mental and social health domains [4].

A further target of the UN SDG 3 includes an end to the epidemic of tuberculosis by 2030 [5]. Tuberculosis (TB) places a significant burden on the health system of South Africa, which has the highest prevalence and incidence rates of all 22 countries with a high burden of TB worldwide [6].

The impact of TB on HRQOL has been reported in a systematic literature review (Kastien-Hilka et al 2016). This systematic review found that TB had a negative impact on patients' HRQOL and overall wellbeing. The review further identified several factors associated with HRQOL in TB which included socio-demographic (age, gender) and socio-economic (income, education, housing, social security) characteristics, disease-related (symptoms) and therapy-related (side effects, adverse events) factors, and psycho-social aspects (isolation and stigmatization, psycho-social burden) [728]. Significant physical impairment caused by somatic symptoms and consequences of TB has also been reported [14, 23, 27, 29].

Although TB treatment results in a significant improvement in HRQOL, especially in physical and psychological dimensions [9, 10, 1315, 18, 19, 23, 24, 26] the treatment regimen can be difficult for patients due to adverse drug reactions, the quantity of pills and treatment duration. This may have a significant impact on levels of adherence in this patient population. There is also some published evidence to suggest that amongst TB patients, psycho-social burden may have a greater impact than clinical symptoms. Specifically, anxiety and depression are the most frequently reported mental disorders reported in TB patients [30, 31]. It is believed that psychological distress may be caused by social stigmatization because of public misconception that a TB patient suffers from HIV co-infection [32, 33]. This association with HIV/AIDS may lead to a perception of social isolation during TB treatment and further impacted by the poor financial situation of many patients [27, 30, 34].

The impact of TB on HRQOL in South African populations was assessed in two studies only, [18, 35, 36]. As most other published studies addressing HRQOL in TB patients, both studies followed a cross-sectional study design. Data about longitudinal changes in HRQOL which were assessed in South African TB patients were not available when our study was planned and initiated. Since information on HRQOL contributes to efficient decision making, product approval, pricing and reimbursement as well as health policy making, HRQOL data will support the identification of sustainable health innovations in TB. A recognized reliable and validated TB-specific HRQOL measure has not been available, however all relevant HRQOL aspects of TB need to be captured to assess the achievement of the WHO´s End TB Strategy pillars.

The aim of this research was to evaluate patient-reported HRQOL in pulmonary TB in South Africa. The study sought to understand the overall impact of TB on the health status and on single health domains identified in the WHO definition of health, including physical, mental and social health aspects. The study addressed the impairment in HRQOL associated with TB, prior to treatment and longitudinal changes in HRQOL over the course of a six-month standard TB treatment.

Methods

A detailed description of the study design and methodology has been published previously (Kastien-Hilka et al 2016). Briefly, the study followed an observational longitudinal design including prospective, repeated measures of HRQOL per study participant.

Patient population and participant recruitment

Study participants were recruited between November 2014 and May 2015 at six selected primary health care clinics with the highest TB caseloads per month in Cape Town. Four of these facilities are run by the local government, and two by the provincial government, and are located in the Khayelitsha sub-district of the Cape Town Metro district. The sub-district has the highest TB burden in Cape Town, based on latest available caseloads from 2012 provided through the Western Cape Province. The study population comprised of patients diagnosed with active pulmonary TB. TB patients who were 18 years or older and were not diagnosed with TB before were eligible. Patients were excluded if they were diagnosed with multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) and extensively drug-resistant TB (XDR-TB), and/or had HIV co-infection. Patients underwent HIV testing when diagnosed with TB before starting treatment. The TB nurses of each study site provided to the study team access to the HIV test results during the recruitment process to ensure a negative HIV status. HIV testing was not repeated during the treatment and any change in the HIV status was therefore unknown. The eligibility status of each patient was subject to verification by the nurse dedicated to TB patients of each health facility. Based on a patient information document, eligible patients were informed about the nature, purpose, potential risks and benefits of the study. Patients had the opportunity to decline their participation or to withdraw from the study at any time point. Patients who agreed to participate in the study signed a written informed consent.

Recruitment of new TB cases without HIV co-infection was difficult as a high proportion of TB patients are also HIV co-infected in South Africa. In order to meet the sample size in the pre-determined time frame, one additional clinic in a neighboring district was included in the study.

Study procedures

Eligible participants received a six month standard TB treatment with rifampicin, isoniazid, ethambutol and pyrazinamide. Standard treatment comprised the intensive treatment phase over the first two months where all four antibiotic drugs were applied, and the continuous treatment phase with isoniazid and rifampicin only over at least additional 4 month. This standard treatment was not influenced by the study design. HRQOL was evaluated during the treatment course. The data collection regimen to monitor changes in HRQOL included five different time points over the six-month treatment period: beginning of treatment (baseline) and at follow-up visits after 4, 8, 16 weeks and after six-month treatment. The last data collection point at six months was selected as this time point represents the minimum treatment time for standard TB treatment. Data collection at treatment start and after six-months of treatment allowed the identification of HRQOL impairment caused by TB and any changes in HRQOL due to treatment. Since standard treatment comprised two treatment phases, data were collected at the switch between both phases (after 8 weeks) as well as in the middle of each treatment phase (after 4 weeks and 16 weeks). Data collection started when TB patients visited the study sites for treatment initiation; four HRQOL measures and one socio-demographic questionnaire were applied at baseline (treatment start). These four HRQOL measures were re-applied at all follow up visits. All HRQOL measures were applied in English language and have been validated for English for South Africa. No other languages or translations of these measures were applied. Data were collected based on completion of paper questionnaires during face-to-face interviews conducted by trained field workers. Field workers were trained and quality of data was ensured based on a Standard Operating Procedure, and details were published previously. Questionnaires were scanned by the field worker for any missing responses during the interviews.

Study materials.

The rationale for the selection of HRQOL measures has been described previously (Kastien-Hilka et al 2016). Two generic (European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 5 levels; EQ-5D-5L and Short-Form 12 items; SF-12), one disease-specific (St. George´s Respiratory Questionnaire; SGRQ) and one condition-specific (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; HADS) HRQOL measures were used. All HRQOL measures have been validated in TB populations: SF-12 [18], EQ-5D-5L [37], SGRQ [38], and HADS [39].

EQ-5D-5L.

EQ-5D-5L [40] is widely used as a utility index for estimating QALYs in cost-effectiveness studies [40, 41]. It comprises five items/domains (5D) (Mobility, Self Care, Usual Activities, Pain/Discomfort, and Anxiety/Depression) with each domain having five levels (5L): no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems; The EQ-5D-5L includes further one vertical visual analogue scale (VAS 20 cm). Index-based values (utilities) are calculated from EQ-5D-5L by applying country-specific valuation algorithms. No South African specific valuation algorithms were available. Therefore, algorithms developed for the UK and for Zimbabwe, the only African country with an available algorithm, were used in this study. The EQ-5D-5L utilities range from 0 to 1, with higher scores indicating better health. A minimally important difference (MID) is only known for the 3 level version of EQ-5D, with a MID of 0.074 (range -0.011–0.140) and a MID of 7 for VAS scores [42]. EQ-5D-5L has an improved sensitivity compared to the 3 level version and its MID is also assumed for the 5 level version.

SF-12.

Short-Form 12 (SF-12) is an abbreviated version of SF-36 containing 12 items representing eight domains (physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional, and mental health) [41, 43]. Domains are aggregated into composite summary scores, Physical Component Score (PCS-12) and Mental Component Sore (MCS-12). Scoring ranges from 0 to 100 with greater scores representing better HRQOL. A score between 47 and 53 reflects normal scores for both PCS and MCS based on US population norms [44, 45]. No population norms for South Africa or other African countries are available. A MID of at least 3 points has been suggested for the SF-36 [44] and can also be used for SF-12v2 [46].

St. George´s Respiratory Questionnaire.

St. George´s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) is a disease-specific instrument designed to assess patients with respiratory tract and immune system diseases, especially asthma, pulmonary diseases, and chronic obstructive disease [41, 47]. SGRQ comprises 50 items in three domains (Symptoms, Activity, and Impacts on daily life). Scores are scaled from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating worse HRQOL. A MID for SGRQ is defined as an improvement of 4 points in the domain scores and the total score [48].

Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.

Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a condition-specific instrument applied in psychology and psychiatry to detect states of anxiety and depression [49]. HADS comprises 14 items in two domains, Anxiety domain and Depression domain. The scores of each subscale range from 0–21 (8–10 mild, 11–14 moderate, 15–21 severe). A MID for HADS is not available from the developer. A MID of 1.5 points has been estimated for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), corresponding to a change from baseline of 20% and informed by both anchor- and distribution-based methods [50].

Sample size

The primary endpoint was defined as change in mean score of PCS-12 between baseline and six-month treatment. As SF-12 and SF-36 are comparable measures, sample size determination was based on the change in mean score of PCS-36 as reported by Walter [51]. We assumed a 4.0 point change in PCS-12 mean score (higher than the MID of 3 points) between baseline and visit 4 (six-months treatment) [45, 52], and a corresponding standard deviation (SD) of 7.0 for the mean score after six-months treatment [45], resulting in a standardized effect size of 0.57. Using the standardized effect size with a two-sided 5% level of significance and a 95% power yielded in an estimated sample size of n = 80 participants. We estimated an attrition rate of 20% resulting in a final sample size of n = 96 participants.

Ethics

The study adhered to the International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) guidelines, the Declaration of Helsinki and South African Good Clinical Practice (GCP). The study was approved by the institutional review commission of the Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute in Basel, Switzerland. Ethical approval was obtained from the ethical commission of North-West and Central Switzerland (EKNZ) and the ethics committee of the University of Cape Town. City Health of the City of Cape Town and the Western Cape Government of South Africa gave institutional approval of the study.

Statistical analysis

Missing interviews were recorded as the absence of the study participant at the appointed interview time frame. Missing data were recorded when the interviewed participant did not complete HRQOL measures, or only insufficiently, hindering calculation of a domain or total score. Significance testing (paired-samples t-test), multivariable analysis and repeated measures ANOVA were based on observations that contained all data points required for a specific analysis.

All HRQOL responses were transferred to an excel-based database and all measures were scored according to each measure´s instructions.

EQ-5D-5L utility scores were calculation based on valuation algorithms for the UK and Zimbabwe, applying the EQ-5D calculator [40]. SF-12 component scores PCS-12 and MCS-12 as well as SGRQ domain and total score were calculated applying specific scoring software provided through the measure´s developer. HADS was scored based on an excel worksheet according to the instructions in the HADS manual [53].

Interpretation of EQ-5D-5L domain scores and HADS Anxiety and Depression domains were both based on categories: EQ-5D-5L on its five levels (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems) and both HADS domains on three levels (mild, moderate, severe). The SF-12 component scores and EQ-5D VAS were both interpreted based on a range from 0 (worst health) to 100 (best health), the EQ-5D-5L utility index on a range from 0 (worst health) to 1 (best health). The SGRQ domains and total score were interpreted based on a range between 0 (best health) to 100 (worst health) and compared to scores derived from a population with no history of respiratory disease [47].

Descriptive statistics were applied to socio-demographic data; further to all HRQOL data at baseline and at all follow-up visits to understand the HRQOL impairment of TB patients. Descriptive statistics were conducted including frequencies (N, N missing, %), central tendency (mean, median), and confidence interval (set at 95%). Distribution of data was examined by standard deviation (SD), minimum and maximum values, and frequency plots.

Overall changes in HRQOL between baseline and six-month treatment (visit 4) were calculated as frequencies (%). Longitudinal changes were determined by the change in mean scores between all follow-up visits and baseline. The change in mean scores was examined by paired-samples t-test with a statistical significance (2-tailed) set a priori at P < 0.05. Changes in mean scores in the intensive treatment phase (baseline to visit 2) were compared to changes in the continuous treatment phase (visit 2 to visit 4) based on paired-samples t-test with a statistical significance (2-tailed) set a priori at P < 0.05. The change in mean scores at each time point from baseline was also compared to the reported minimally important difference (MID) for each measure to understand if the longitudinal changes in HRQOL were clinically meaningful. Paired-samples t-test was applied to examine the difference between changes in mean scores and MID at a significance level of P< 0.05.

Differences in HRQOL mean scores among all HRQOL measures over time (baseline and follow-up visit 1–4) were examined by repeated measures ANOVA. Bonferroni correction was applied to repeated measures ANOVA for multiplicity of tests.

Responsiveness over time for each HRQOL was measured as an effect size partial eta squared providing information of the effect of time on changes in HRQOL aspects. The time effects were based on tests of within-subjects effects. When Mauchly´s test of sphericity was not met (significance < 0.05), both partial eta squared and observed power were derived from the Greenhouse-Geisser correction.

The impact of socio-demographic factors including age, gender, educational status and work status were elaborated. At baseline univariable analysis was applied to understand which factors might be associated with HRQOL, by using a cut off of P = 0.2. Resulting candidate factors were further assessed in multivariable models to understand the impact of socio-demographic factors over time (change from baseline to six month treatment (visit 4)). The univariable and multivariable analysis included a general linear model and an analysis of variance (ANOVA). The time effect of socio-demographic factors based on an effect size partial eta squared was further included by applying repeated measures ANOVA. Threshold values for the effect size were derived from Cohen [54]: 0.1 was interpreted as small, 0.3 as medium, 0.5 as large and 0.8 as very large.

Robustness of the findings was assessed by sensitivity analyses by excluding HRQOL data from visit 3. Further, the assessment of longitudinal changes of HRQOL over time including baseline and all follow-up data as described above was repeated by excluding data from visit 3, which was affected by a very low number of available observations. Results were checked for consistency.

Results

In total, 131 eligible patients were recruited and agreed to participate in the study. Overall, 444 interviews were conducted over the duration of the study with questionnaires completed for data analysis.

From 131 participants who had baseline interviews conducted, 84 (64%) participated in the follow-up interview at visit 1, 85 (64%) participated at visit 2, 48 (36%) participated at visit 3 and 96 (70%) participated at visit 4. Only 20% of participants completed all HRQOL questionnaires at all time points during treatment as per protocol (Table 1).

During the course of treatment a total of 47, 46, 83, and 35 patients did not participate in follow-up interviews 1 to 4, respectively. In the majority of cases the reason for absence of participants was unknown. Of those participants who attended an appointment during the study period, none refused to participate in the interview. However, four patients were unable to participate at follow-up interviews as they had been transferred to a different hospital not included in this study and one patient received a custodial sentence. The lowest attendance rate to interviews was observed after 16 weeks of treatment (visit 3). The reasons why participants did not attend their clinic appointments, and hence the low response rate, was unknown. Although Direct Observed Treatment (DOT) is officially implemented to ensure patient compliance in South Africa, patients did not take medication under DOT; patients only visited the clinics once a month to collect their medication in advance. The interviews for HRQOL evaluation were taken, when a patient planned to visit the clinic for medication collection. When a patient did not visit the clinic at the scheduled medication collection date, the patient collected the medication at a different day. As communication to patients in this socio-demographic environment was very restricted due to the availability of mobile phones, a new interview appointment could only be re-scheduled in some cases.

In total, nine questionnaires were not completed by patients during the fieldwork. Whilst completing the sections on HRQOL measures, two patients did not answer the socio-demographic questionnaire, but all HRQOL measures; these two patients were still included in the data analysis. One of each measure was not answered during the data collection: SF-12 at baseline and at visit 1; EQ-5-D-5L at baseline and at visit 4; SGRQ at baseline, and HADS visit 1 and visit 2.

Description of the study population

Table 2 describes the study population. Of 131 study participants, two participants did not provide information on socio-demographic data; 129 participants were included in the description of the study population. Study participants who provided socio-demographic data (n = 129) comprised 64% (n = 82) men and 36% (n = 47) women, age ranged from 18 years to 80 years, with the majority of participants being between 20 and 40 years and with a mean age of 36 years. The majority of participants were black (90%), living alone (i.e. not married nor co-habitation; 82%), and high school education attainment (68%). The majority of the study participants (73%) were unemployed, students or pensioners. Only 21% of the study participants were aware about existing co-morbidities impacting their health, most of them reporting to be diagnosed with other respiratory diseases or diabetes.

thumbnail
Table 2. Socio-demographic description of study population.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174605.t002

The characteristics of the full study population were similar to the characteristics of those patients who provided information at the last visit, after six months of treatment.

HRQOL impairment of TB patients at treatment start

Based on each measure´s score interpretation the HRQOL of the study participants was impaired in all physical, mental and psycho-social health domains at treatment start (baseline) (Table 3).

thumbnail
Table 3. Baseline impairment of HRQOL in TB patients at treatment start.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174605.t003

Development of HRQOL during TB treatment

All scores of HRQOL domains improved during the course of standard TB treatment, and over the period of the study (Fig 1). These changes were statistically significant. The largest improvement was observed in domains relating to mental health (increase in mean score between baseline and six month treatment of 59% - 95%), with the highest change observed in the HADS Anxiety and Depression domains, followed by improvements in the physical health domains and the social health domains. The primary endpoint defined as change in mean score of PCS-12 between baseline and six months from treatment initiation (visit 4) showed a change of 20 points (from 35.93 to 55.21) which was statistically significant (P <0.005) (Fig 2). The change in mean score was also greater than the published MID threshold to be considered clinically meaningful (Fig 3)

thumbnail
Fig 1. The development of HRQOL over six-month treatment.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174605.g001

thumbnail
Fig 2. Histograms of PCS-12 at baseline and after six-month treatment.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174605.g002

The change in HRQOL over time was statistically significant based on average mean scores. The change was greater than published MID thresholds for each HRQOL measure and thereby clinically meaningful. The MCS-12 mean score showed a greater relative improvement by +67% over six month treatment than the PCS-12 (+54%). Both component scores changed to a value of 55 points for PCS-12 and 60 points for MCS-12 and these values were above U.S. population norms (47 points for PCS-12 and 53 points for MCS-12) [44, 45]. All EQ-5D-5L average domain scores changed from an average state of “moderate health problems” to a state reporting “no problems” (+57–59%). The total index of EQ-5D reflected the same change as was observed on domain level. The total index calculated using the UK valuation algorithm changed by +94%. However, the total index value based on the Zimbabwe valuation algorithm changed by only +44%. The health status of the TB patients measured with the EQ-5D VAS changed by +78%.

The three SGRQ domains showed the greatest change in the physical symptoms domain with +90% improvement. Both domains of HADS (anxiety and depression) changed by +95% from a state of “moderate problems” to a state of reporting “no problems”.

The changes in mean scores during the intensive treatment phase were significant and (baseline to visit 2) higher than during the continuous treatment phase (visit 2 to visit 4). The changes in mean scores of the SGRQ Activities and Impact domains as well as in the SGRQ total score were non-significant during the continuous phase (S1 Table).

Changes in mean scores increased constantly until six month treatment for SF-12, EQ-5D VAS and HADS. The change in EQ-5D and SGRQ mean scores also increased significantly but with a peak after 16 weeks of treatment (visit 3) and changes in mean scores decreased until six month of treatment. Repeated measures ANOVA confirmed that the overall improvement in all HRQOL measures was associated with a statistically significant time effect ranging between 58% and 85%, with the highest effect observed on the health status (EQ-5D VAS) (S2 Table). Sensitivity analysis applied to repeated measure by leaving out data from visit 3 confirmed the robustness of the findings (S2 Table).

The Influence of socio-demographic factors on baseline HRQOL and longitudinal changes in HRQOL

Significant results from the univariable analysis including the socio-demographic factors gender, age, educational level and work status were further assessed in a multivariable model.

The univariable analysis showed that HRQOL at baseline was more impacted in older patients with low educational background and without work. Age and education were significant factors in mental health domains, with younger patients with higher education reporting better HRQOL; work status played no major role in the mental health. With exception of MCS-12, gender played no role in HRQOL. Only in MCS-12 women reported a lower HRQOL than men. The multivariable model confirmed that younger patients (SGRQ Impacts domain, SGRQ total score, HADS Anxiety and Depression domains) with higher education (EQ-5D total index, HADS Anxiety and Depression domains) and with work (EQ-5D total index, SGRQ Symptoms domain) had a better HRQOL at baseline. These effects were only seen at baseline for all HRQOL measures (Table 4) and not after six months of treatment. PCS-12 mean scores at six months were not significantly different for gender, age, educational background and employment status.

thumbnail
Table 4. Associations between HRQOL and socio-demographic factors at baseline.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174605.t004

Results from the repeated measures ANOVA showed no statistically significant effect of gender and age on the overall HRQOL improvement. However, education and work status showed significant effects. Patients with higher education and with work reported better HRQOL. Education (df = 1.000, F = 6.632, P = 0.012, eta = 0.074) and work status (df = 1.000, F = 7.789, P = 0.007, eta = 0.086) had a statistically significant but small effect on the HRQOL improvement with regard to PCS-12 (physical health). Similar effects were observed for the EQ5D utility indices (UK valuation algorithm: education df = 1.000, F = 7.071, P = 0.009, eta = 0.078; work status df = 1.000, F = 7.799, P = 0.006, eta = 0.085); Zimbabwe valuation algorithm: education df = 1.000, F = 6.821, P = 0.011, eta = 0.075; work status df = 1.000, F = 7.438, P = 0.008, eta = 0.081). Further, work status showed a statistically significant (df 1.000, F = 7.654, P = 0.007, eta = 0.081) but small effect on the overall improvement of the HRQOL domain SGRQ Symptoms (physical health) (S3 Table).

Discussion

The increasing prevalence of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and communicable diseases such as TB in South Africa leads to an increased pressure on healthcare resources. More importantly, from the patient perspective it also has an impact on the general well-being and HRQOL of patients.

This study was designed to evaluate changes in HRQOL in South African patients recently diagnosed with TB (without HIV co-infection) during the course of standard TB treatment over a six-month period. Two generic HRQOL measures (SF-12 and EQ-5D), a disease-specific measure (SGRQ) for respiratory diseases and a condition-specific measure for anxiety and depression, the HADS were used to assess HRQOL [55]. These four HRQOL measure captured relevant health aspects of TB in the physical, mental and psychosocial domains. The study population was recruited from the Cape Town district Khayelitsha, a socio-economically disadvantaged area. The majority of TB patients were in the productive years of their lives. However, more than 70% were not in employment. At the start of treatment, HRQOL domains and total scores on all measures indicated significant impairment in HRQOL. The results demonstrate that HRQOL improved significantly over treatment time, with the greatest improvement observed during the intensive phase of treatment and with greatest improvement in mental health domains.

Socio-demographic predictors for HRQOL at baseline included age, educational background and work status. Younger TB patients with a higher education, and who were in employment reported better HRQOL at baseline. A significant effect of educational background and work status has been reported before [56, 57]. It can be assumed that a better education increases the chances for work and financial security which might have a positive effect on HRQOL by improved self-care, improved social interactions, less psycho-social distress and less financial burden. Gender differences showed no significant effect on most HRQOL domains at baseline; only in the MCS-12 women reported a lower HRQOL than men. These effects of age, education and work status were not found after six months of treatment.

Gender and age were no predictors for positive changes in HRQOL over the treatment course. A recent study from Louw et al 2016 confirmed our findings of a non-effect of gender and age on HRQOL in TB patients after six month treatment in other Provinces in South Africa [58]. However, the same study reported that higher education was significantly associated with an improvement in mental health (MCS-12) after six month of treatment. Our study confirmed the effect of education on mental health aspects (anxiety and depression) only at baseline.

All changes over treatment time were statistically significant and were also clinically meaningful. The greatest improvements in physical health were measured with the respiratory-specific measure SGRQ. The primary endpoint defined as overall change in PCS-12 did not reflect the greatest improvements. It can be assumed that the Symptoms domain of SGRQ captures physical impairment due to TB in more detail and thereby being more sensitive to any changes in HRQOL than generic measures such as SF-12 and EQ-5D.

The study results revealed that the greatest improvement in all HRQOL domains was seen in the mental health of TB patients. The condition-specific HADS measure showed a similar impact on mental health at treatment start as reported from a study in Pakistan [59]. These results confirm previous findings suggesting that mental health is an important aspect in the treatment of TB. About 46–80% of TB patients in South Africa report common mental disorders [32, 35]. This psychological distress is associated with physiological TB symptoms, perceived health status, adverse events through anti-TB treatment and treatment outcome [30]. Furthermore, psychological distress may be caused by social stigmatization (HIV co-infection) followed by social isolation during TB treatment and impacted financial situation including fear of dying and disease transmission [27, 3032, 34]. Special focus on reduction of stigmatization should be given in the management of TB to reduce the psychological distress [60]. This may suggest that patients perceive a positive outlook suffering less from the depression and anxiety associated with TB in South Africa. This again, is something that should be considered in the light of non-adherence. Inclusion of psychological support and treatment of mental disorders in the management of TB should be considered as well as interventions to reduce the stigmatization related to TB to improve the overall treatment outcome.

The physical and mental impairment seen in the South African patient population in this study is confirmed by studies in other countries applying the same HRQOL measures. The generic SF-12 measure indicated at treatment start a similar impairment in both the PCS-12 and MCS-12 with a score of 36, presenting defective physical functioning and a high risk for depression. A similar HRQOL impairment was reported in a study with TB affected immigrants in the UK [61] and from a study in Yemen [62]. Other studies which measured HRQOL by SF-36 or SF-12 in TB patients reported higher scores between 40 and 61 and thereby a better HRQOL at treatment start in Canada, Uganda, and Malaysia [24, 25, 37, 45, 52, 63]. Measuring the HRQOL in TB with the generic measure EQ-5D, our TB patients in South Africa reported a more impaired HRQOL and health status than in other countries (Malaysia, the UK, Canada) [14, 37, 61]. The same effect was found with the respiratory-specific measure SGRQ showing that our study population had a more impacted HRQOL than TB patients from Indonesia [64]. The SGRQ total score still showed some impairment with a score of 14 compared to a value of 5–7 reported by people from Spain with no respiratory history [47].

The phenomenon of an initial worsening in HRQOL after treatment start reported previously could not be confirmed by our observations [65]. Our study confirmed that the greatest improvement in HRQOL was seen during the intensive phase and this observation was reported before [9, 14, 15, 19, 26]. It is expected that monitoring of adherence during this treatment phase should be implemented to ensure that patients continue with their medication regime as many may perceive this improvement in their HRQOL as a sign of ‘cure’ and therefore no need to continue with their medication.

Comparing the results from the EQ-5D VAS and EQ-5D utility index based on value sets from UK with value sets from Zimbabwe clearly showed some cultural differences in HRQOL changes over time and its interpretation, and highlight the need for specific population norms for South Africa. The EQ-5D VAS reached a higher value of 97 than that of the general population in the UK of 82.5 and in Zimbabwe of 79.8 [66]. At baseline the utility index derived from the UK value set was by 0.115 points lower than the utility index derived from the Zimbabwean value set and this difference was greater than the MID for EQ-5D-5L. This is critically important in the context of the increasing request for cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) from health systems in the allocation of resources. The EQ-5D is the preferred instrument to estimate population-based utilities for the calculation of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) to provide a cost per QALY outcome in CEA. In 2013, the South African Department of Health published the Guidelines for Pharmacoeconomic Submissions which requests the use of QALYs for CEA [67]. The development towards pharmacoeconomic evaluations in South Africa for efficient decision making would require data acquisition to establish South African population norms for the EQ-5D.

Limitations

This study had several limitations. HRQOL was only evaluated in patients with newly diagnosed pulmonary TB and patients with other forms of TB including multi-drug resistance (MDR-)TB were not included. If MDR-TB was diagnosed during treatment monitoring the patient had to change the treatment and was excluded from the study. If and at which time point drug susceptibility testing was performed at the different study sites was unknown. Furthermore, this study did not include testing of drug intolerance or drug sensitivity and the impact of drug intolerance and drug sensitivity on HRQOL was not known.

Our sample size was difficult to reach in one restricted district due to the low number of TB patients without HIV co-infection, as well as due to time and resource limitations in this study. In South Africa the high majority of TB patients are HIV co-infected; this study did exclude HIV co-infection to understand the isolated TB impact on HRQOL. Further, this study did not include a comparison or control group from the general population, for time and resource limitations. Our study did not apply a mixed method approach and was limited to a quantitative approach; patient perspectives about TB in a South African cultural background were not qualitatively assessed. Such data might have enriched the quantitative findings for HRQOL in this study. HRQOL was only assessed in a specific district of the Western Cape Province with a specific socio-demographic and –economic situation. Results from this study may not be generalizable to the rest of the South African population which is very diverse. Receiving treatment for their condition may have put an increased economic pressure on these participants as they may have been unable to take on work or consider their working options due to the travel distance between a health clinic they get the treatment from and workplace, but also due to the disease induced worsening of their physical condition [12, 27, 29].

Additionally, there is an increased risk of tuberculosis when diagnosed with diabetes [68], therefore we expected diabetes to be a major co-morbidity in our TB patients. We included questions about NCDs in our study, however it was apparent that only a small portion of TB patients were aware of any co-morbidity they may have, including diabetes. We assume that other health issues are unknown to a majority of TB patients. These unknown co-morbidities are assumed to have an additional impact on the HRQOL in TB patients at baseline which we could not distinguish.

Conclusions

TB negatively impacts the HRQOL of patients, with specific impairment reported in physical, mental and psycho-social health aspects, however with treatment HRQOL improves significantly. Different aspects of health (HRQOL domains) are impacted differently and it would appear that the rate of improvement in each domain may also be different. HRQOL reveals different outcomes depending on the type of measure applied and depending on the cultural background and the study setting, making comparison of HRQOL outcomes difficult. Generic HRQOL PROs may not adequately capture all relevant aspects of TB, and thus a disease-specific HRQOL measure is required. This study also demonstrates the need for an integrative understanding of TB with HRQOL as core element to inform gaps in current TB management. Improvements in the management of TB following an integrative patient-centred approach will contribute towards meeting the UN SDG3 target and will support the End TB strategy of the WHO.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Changes in HRQOL in the intensive and continuous treatment phase.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174605.s001

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Overall treatment time effect on HRQOL (test of within-subjects effects).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174605.s002

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Effects of socio-demographic factors on overall HRQOL improvement.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174605.s003

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

The co-authors wish to express their heartfelt gratitude to Tanja Kastien-Hilka, PhD, the lead author of this publication, who deceased in March 2017, unexpected by us. We deeply admire Tanja for the outstanding fervour, dedication and braveness with which she pursued her academic activities, focused on public health in South Africa, while facing an incurable disease. We will always commemorate her as an outstanding colleague and friend.

This study is part of the Swiss South African bilateral cooperation and was mainly financed by the Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (Basel, Switzerland) and supported by the University of Cape Town (Cape Town, South Africa).

Author Contributions

  1. Conceptualization: TKH MS ES.
  2. Formal analysis: TKH MS BB.
  3. Investigation: TKH ES.
  4. Methodology: TKH MS ES BB BR.
  5. Validation: TKH.
  6. Visualization: TKH.
  7. Writing – original draft: TKH MS BB.
  8. Writing – review & editing: TKH MS ES BB BR.

References

  1. 1. World Health Organization (WHO). From MDGs to SDGs, WHO launches new report. 2015. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2015/mdg-sdg-report/en/.
  2. 2. World Health Organization (WHO). Health in 2015: from MDGs, Millennium Development Goals to SDGs, Sustainable Development Goals. 2015. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/200009/1/9789241565110_eng.pdf?ua=1.
  3. 3. Doward LC, Gnanasakthy A, Baker MG. Patient reported outcomes: looking beyond the label claim. Health and quality of life outcomes. 2010;8: 89. pmid:20727176
  4. 4. World Health Organization (WHO). Constitution of WHO: principles. http://www.who.int/about/mission/en/.
  5. 5. World Health Organization (WHO). The End TB Strategy. 2015. http://www.who.int/tb/post2015_strategy/en/.
  6. 6. World Health Organization (WHO). Global Tuberculosis Report 2015. 2015. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/191102/1/9789241565059_eng.pdf.
  7. 7. Adeyeye OO, Ogunleye OO, Coker A, Kuyinu Y, Bamisile RT, Ekrikpo U, et al. Factors influencing quality of life and predictors of low quality of life scores in patients on treatment for pulmonary tuberculosis: a cross sectional study. Journal of public health in Africa. 2014;5(2): 366. pmid:28299129
  8. 8. Masumoto S, Yamamoto T, Ohkado A, Yoshimatsu S, Querri AG, Kamiya Y. Factors associated with health-related quality of life among pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Manila, the Philippines. Quality of life research. 2014;23(5): 1523–33. pmid:24264802
  9. 9. Aggarwal AN, Gupta D, Janmeja AK, Jindal SK. Assessment of health-related quality of life in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis under programme conditions. International journal of tuberculosis and lung disease. 2013;17(7): 947–53. pmid:23743314
  10. 10. Bauer M, Leavens A, Schwartzman K. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of tuberculosis on health-related quality of life. Quality of life research. 2013;22(8): 2213–35. pmid:23232952
  11. 11. Deribew A D K, Reda AA, Tesfaye M, Hailmichael Y, Maja T, Colebunders R. Change in quality of life: a follow up study among patients with HIV infection with and without TB in Ethiopia. BMC public health. 2013;13: 408. pmid:23627925
  12. 12. Dias AA, de Oliveira DM, Turato ER, de Figueiredo RM. Life experiences of patients who have completed tuberculosis treatment: a qualitative investigation in southeast Brazil. BMC public health. 2013;13: 595. pmid:23782670
  13. 13. Ralph AP, Kenangalem E, Waramori G, Pontororing GJ, Sandjaja , Tjitra E, et al. High morbidity during treatment and residual pulmonary disability in pulmonary tuberculosis: under-recognised phenomena. PloS one. 2013;8(11): e80302. pmid:24312209
  14. 14. Awaisu A, Haniki Nik Mohamed M, Noordin NM, Muttalif AR, Aziz NA, Syed Sulaiman SA, et al. Impact of connecting tuberculosis directly observed therapy short-course with smoking cessation on health-related quality of life. Tobacco induced diseases. 2012;10: 2. pmid:22373470
  15. 15. Balgude A, Sontakke S. Study of impact of antitubercular therapy on quality of life. Indian journal of medical sciences. 2012;66(3–4): 71–7. pmid:23603624
  16. 16. Chung WS, Lan YL, Yang MC. Psychometric testing of the short version of the world health organization quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaire among pulmonary tuberculosis patients in Taiwan. BMC public health. 2012;12: 630. pmid:22877305
  17. 17. Kittikraisak W, Kingkaew P, Teerawattananon Y, Yothasamut J, Natesuwan S, Manosuthi W, et al. Health related quality of life among patients with tuberculosis and HIV in Thailand. PloS one. 2012;7(1): e29775. pmid:22253777
  18. 18. Louw J, Peltzer K, Naidoo P, Matseke G, McHunu G, Tutshana B. Quality of life among tuberculosis (TB), TB retreatment and/or TB-HIV co-infected primary public health care patients in three districts in South Africa. Health and quality of life outcomes. 2012;10: 77. pmid:22742511
  19. 19. Othman Q. Health related quality of life of pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis patients in Yemen. African journal of pharmacy and pharmacology. 2011;5(4): 547–53.
  20. 20. Aggarwal AN. Health-related quality of life: A neglected aspect of pulmonary tuberculosis. Lung India. 2010;27(1): 1–3. pmid:20539762
  21. 21. Guo N, Marra CA, Marra F. Responses to comments of Weis. Health and quality of life outcomes. 2010;8: 6. pmid:20074383
  22. 22. Dhuria M, Sharma N, Narender Pal S, Ram Chander J, Saha R, Gopal Krishan I. A study of the impact of tuberculosis on the quality of life and the effect after treatment with DOTS. Asia-Pacific journal of public health. 2009;21(3): 312–20. pmid:19443879
  23. 23. Guo N, Marra F, Marra CA. Measuring health-related quality of life in tuberculosis: a systematic review. Health and quality of life outcomes. 2009;7: 14. pmid:19224645
  24. 24. Guo N M C, Marra F, Moadebi S, Elwood RK, FitzGerald JM Health state utilities in latent and active tuberculosis. Value in health 2008;11(7): 1154–61. pmid:18489493
  25. 25. Marra CA, Marra F, Colley L, Moadebi S, Elwood RK, Fitzgerald JM. Health-related quality of life trajectories among adults with tuberculosis: differences between latent and active infection. Chest. 2008;133(2): 396–403. pmid:18198260
  26. 26. Chamla D. The assessment of patients' health-related quality of life during tuberculosis treatment in Wuhan, China. The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease. 2004;8(9): 1100–6. pmid:15455595
  27. 27. Hansel NN W A, Chang B, Diette GB. Quality of life in tuberculosis: patient and provider perspectives. Quality of life research 2004;13(3): 639–52. pmid:15130027
  28. 28. Marra CA, Marra F, Cox VC, Palepu A, Fitzgerald JM. Factors influencing quality of life in patients with active tuberculosis. Health and quality of life outcomes. 2004;2: 58. pmid:15496227
  29. 29. Chang B W A, Hansel NN, Diette GB Quality of life in tuberculosis: A review of the English literature. Quality of life research 2004;13: 1633–42. pmid:15651535
  30. 30. Peltzer K N P, Matseke G, Louw J, McHunu G, Tutshana B. Prevalence of psychological distress and associated factors in tuberculosis patients in public primary care clinics in South Africa. BMC psychiatry 2012;12(89): 1–10.
  31. 31. Aamir S, Aisha . Co-morbid anxiety and depression among pulmonary tuberculosis patients. Journal of the college of physicians and surgeons Pakistan 2010;20(10): 703–4 pmid:20943121
  32. 32. Naidoo P, Mwaba K. Helplessness, depression, and social support among people being treated for tuberculosis in South Africa. Social behavior and personality. 2010;38(10): 1323–33.
  33. 33. Van Rie A, Sengupta S, Pungrassami P, Balthip Q, Choonuan S, Kasetjaroen Y, et al. Measuring stigma associated with tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS in southern Thailand: exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of two new scales. Tropical medicine & international health. 2008;13(1): 21–30.
  34. 34. Issa BA Y A, Kuranga SI. Depression comorbidity among patients with tuberculosis in a university teaching hospital outpatient clinic in Nigeria. Mental health in family medicine 2009;6(3): 133–8. pmid:22477903
  35. 35. Westaway MS, Rheeder P., Gumede T. The effect of type 2 Diabetes Mellitus on health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Curationis. 2001;24(1): 74–8. pmid:11885150
  36. 36. Westaway MS, Wolmarans L. Depression and self-esteem: rapid screening for depression in black, low literacy, hospitalized tuberculosis patients. Social science & medicine. 1992;35(10): 1311–5.
  37. 37. Dion MJ, Tousignant P, Bourbeau J, Menzies D, Schwartzman K. Feasibility and reliability of health-related quality of life measurements among tuberculosis patients. Quality of life research. 2004;13(3): 653–65. pmid:15130028
  38. 38. Pasipanodya JG, Miller TL, Vecino M, Munguia G, Bae S, Drewyer G, et al. Using the St. George respiratory questionnaire to ascertain health quality in persons with treated pulmonary tuberculosis. Chest. 2007;132(5): 1591–8. pmid:17890471
  39. 39. Duko B, Gebeyehu A., Ayano G. Prevalence and correlates of depression and anxiety among patients with tuberculosis at WolaitaSodo University Hospital and Sodo Health Center, WolaitaSodo, South Ethiopia, cross sectional study. BMC psychiatry. 2015;15: 214. pmid:26370894
  40. 40. Euroqol. EQ-5D-5L. http://www.euroqol.org/eq-5d-products/eq-5d-5l.html.
  41. 41. Mapi Research Institute. www.proqolid.org (12 Feb 2014).
  42. 42. Walters SJ, Brazier JE. Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D. Quality of life research. 2005;14(6): 1523–32. pmid:16110932
  43. 43. Ware JE. SF-12v2. https://campaign.optum.com/optum-outcomes/what-we-do/health-surveys/sf-12v2-health-survey.html.
  44. 44. Maruish ME, Kosinski M. A guide to the development of certified short form survey interpretation and reporting capabilities. Quality Metrics Incorporated; 2009.
  45. 45. Atif M, Sulaiman SA, Shafie AA, Asif M, Sarfraz MK, Low HC, et al. Impact of tuberculosis treatment on health-related quality of life of pulmonary tuberculosis patients: a follow-up study. Health and quality of life outcomes. 2014;12: 19. pmid:24528499
  46. 46. Maruish ME, Kosinski M. A guide to the development of certified short form survey interpretation and reporting capabilities. Quality Metrics Incorporated; 2009.
  47. 47. Jones PW. St George's respiratory questionnaire manual. St George´s University of London; 2009.
  48. 48. Jones PW. St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire: MCID. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. 2005;2(1): 75–9.
  49. 49. El Achhab Y, Nejjari C, Chikri M, Lyoussi B. Disease-specific health-related quality of life instruments among adults diabetic: A systematic review. Diabetes research and clinical practice. 2008;80(2): 171–84. pmid:18279993
  50. 50. Puhan MA, Frey M, Buchi S, Schunemann HJ. The minimal important difference of the hospital anxiety and depression scale in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Health and quality of life outcomes. 2008;6: 46. pmid:18597689
  51. 51. Walters SJ. Sample size and power estimation for studies with health related quality of life outcomes: a comparison of four methods using the SF-36. Health and quality of life outcomes. 2004;2: 26. pmid:15161494
  52. 52. Babikako HM, Neuhauser D, Katamba A, Mupere E. Feasibility, reliability and validity of health-related quality of life questionnaire among adult pulmonary tuberculosis patients in urban Uganda: cross-sectional study. Health and quality of life outcomes. 2010;8: 93. pmid:20813062
  53. 53. Snaith RP, Zigmond AS. The hospital anxiety and depression scale: manual. 1994.
  54. 54. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ, USA: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates; 1988.
  55. 55. Kastien-Hilka T, Rosenkranz B., Bennett B., Sinanovic E., Schwenkglenks M. How to evaluate health-related quality of life and its association with medication adherence in pulmonary tuberculosis—designing a prospective observational study in South Africa. Frontiers in pharmacology. 2016;7: 125. pmid:27303294
  56. 56. Kastien-Hilka T, Abulfathi A, Rosenkranz B, Bennett B, Schwenkglenks M, Sinanovic E. Health-related quality of life and its association with medication adherence in active pulmonary tuberculosis- a systematic review of global literature with focus on South Africa. Health and quality of life outcomes. 2016;14(1): 42.
  57. 57. Darvishpoor Kakhki A, Masjedi MR. Factors associated with health-related quality of life in tuberculosis patients referred to the National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease in Tehran. Tuberc Respir Dis (Seoul). 2015;78(4): 309–14.
  58. 58. Louw JS, Mabaso M, Peltzer K. Change in health-related quality of life among pulmonary tuberculosis patients at primary health care settings in South Africa: a prospective cohort study. PloS one. 2016;11(5): e0151892. pmid:27137914
  59. 59. Husain MO D S, Chaudhry IB, Rizvi N, Waheed W. The relationship between anxiety, depression and illness perception in tuberculosis patients in Pakistan. Clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health. 2008;4(4): 1–5.
  60. 60. Cremers AL, de Laat MM, Kapata N, Gerrets R, Klipstein-Grobusch K, Grobusch MP. Assessing the consequences of stigma for tuberculosis patients in urban Zambia. PloS one. 2015;10(3): e0119861. pmid:25806955
  61. 61. Kruijshaar ME, Lipman M, Essink-Bot ML, Lozewicz S, Creer D, Dart S, et al. Health status of UK patients with active tuberculosis. International journal of tuberculosis and lung disease. 2010;14(3): 296–302. pmid:20132620
  62. 62. Jaber AA, Khan AH, Syed Sulaiman SA, Ahmad N, Anaam MS. Evaluation of Health-Related Quality of Life among Tuberculosis Patients in Two Cities in Yemen. PloS one. 2016;11(6): e0156258. pmid:27257990
  63. 63. Bauer M, Ahmed S, Benedetti A, Greenaway C, Lalli M, Leavens A, et al. Health-related quality of life and tuberculosis: a longitudinal cohort study. Health and quality of life outcomes. 2015;13: 65. pmid:26012563
  64. 64. Maguire GP, Anstey NM, Ardian M, Waramori G, Tjitra E, Kenangalem E, et al. Pulmonary tuberculosis, impaired lung function, disability and quality of life in a high-burden setting. International journal of tuberculosis and lung disease. 2009;13(12): 1500–6. pmid:19919767
  65. 65. Chung W, Li C. Can DOTS improve quality of life among patients with pulmonary tuberculosis? International journal of tuberculosis and lung disease. 2013;17(3): 425–6.
  66. 66. Jelsma J, Hansen K, de Weedrt W, de Cock P, Kind P. How do Zimbabweans value health states? Population health metrics. 2003;1: 10.
  67. 67. National Department of Health South Africa (NDoH). Guidelines for pharmacoeconomic submissions 2012. In: Africa DoHS, editor. Government Gazette 2013.
  68. 68. Ottermann B. Prevalence of diabetes in South Africa 2013. http://www.health24.com/Medical/Diabetes/About-diabetes/Diabetes-tsunami-hits-South-Africa-20130210.