Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Predicting Stroop Effect from Spontaneous Neuronal Activity: A Study of Regional Homogeneity

  • Congcong Liu,

    Affiliation Key laboratory of Cognition and Personality of Ministry of Education, Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China

    ⨯
  • Zhencai Chen,

    Affiliation Key laboratory of Cognition and Personality of Ministry of Education, Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China

    ⨯
  • Ting Wang,

    Affiliations Key laboratory of Cognition and Personality of Ministry of Education, Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China, Laboratory of Cognition and Mental Health, Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences, Chongqing, China

    ⨯
  • Dandan Tang,

    Affiliation Key laboratory of Cognition and Personality of Ministry of Education, Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China

    ⨯
  • Glenn Hitchman,

    Affiliation Key laboratory of Cognition and Personality of Ministry of Education, Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China

    ⨯
  • Jiangzhou Sun,

    Affiliation Key laboratory of Cognition and Personality of Ministry of Education, Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China

    ⨯
  • Xiaoyue Zhao,

    Affiliation Key laboratory of Cognition and Personality of Ministry of Education, Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China

    ⨯
  • Lijun Wang,

    Affiliation Key laboratory of Cognition and Personality of Ministry of Education, Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China

    ⨯
  • Antao Chen

    xscat@swu.edu.cn

    Affiliation Key laboratory of Cognition and Personality of Ministry of Education, Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China

    ⨯

Abstract

The Stroop effect is one of the most robust and well-studied phenomena in cognitive psychology and cognitive neuroscience. However, little is known about the relationship between intrinsic brain activity and the individual differences of this effect. In the present study, we explored this issue by examining whether resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) signals could predict individual differences in the Stroop effect of healthy individuals. A partial correlation analysis was calculated to examine the relationship between regional homogeneity (ReHo) and Stroop effect size, while controlling for age, sex, and framewise displacement (FD). The results showed positive correlations in the left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG), the left insula, the ventral anterior cingulate cortex (vACC), and the medial frontal gyrus (MFG), and negative correlation in the left precentral gyrus (LPG). These results indicate the possible influences of the LIFG, the left insula, and the LPG on the efficiency of cognitive control, and demonstrate that the key nodes of default mode network (DMN) may be important in goal-directed behavior and/or mental effort during cognitive control tasks.

Citation: Liu C, Chen Z, Wang T, Tang D, Hitchman G, Sun J, et al. (2015) Predicting Stroop Effect from Spontaneous Neuronal Activity: A Study of Regional Homogeneity. PLoS ONE 10(5): e0124405. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124405

Academic Editor: Bart Rypma, University of Texas at Dallas, UNITED STATES

Received: August 13, 2014; Accepted: March 13, 2015; Published: May 4, 2015

Copyright: © 2015 Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited

Data Availability: The data has been uploaded to the Dryad (doi:10.5061/dryad.1632h).

Funding: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31170980, 81271477), the Foundation for the Author of National Excellent Doctoral Dissertation of PR China (201107), New Century Excellent Talents in University (NCET-11-0698), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (SWU1009001).

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

The ability to focus resources on goal-relevant information while filtering out or inhibiting irrelevant information is crucial for academic and career successes. However, there are large individual differences in this ability. For example, some people can control their game impulsion when they are working, whereas others cannot suppress their craving, despite being aware of the danger of losing their jobs. From the viewpoint of cognitive psychology, such variation refers to the inter-individual differences in cognitive control, and a massive amount of evidence suggests that this function is attributed to the purview of the frontal lobes [1–4]. One elegant probe of the integrity and neural underpinnings of cognitive control is provided by the conflict effect on interference tasks, such as the Stroop task [5].

In a typical Stroop task, participants are required to name the font color of a given word that spells a color name. The responses to incongruent stimuli (I, e.g., the word RED printed in blue) are slower and less accurate in comparison to congruent stimuli (C, e.g., the word RED printed in red). This decline in performance is termed the Stroop effect, which is thought to reflect the cost of recruitment of cognitive control resources necessary for resolving the interference from conflicting stimulus information [6]. This effect has been applied in clinical neuropsychology to explore specific cognitive and neural dysfunction in psychiatric patients [4,7]. For example, individual differences in the Stroop effect have been demonstrated to predict future development of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [8]. For the researchers in the basic cognitive neuroscience, it offers the opportunity to study interference and attention control [6,7,9–11]. Pursuing this approach, numerous neuroimaging studies have investigated the neural basis of the conflict resolution process in Stroop tasks and have found that cognitive control is linked to multiple brain regions associated with attention, response inhibition and motor control [12–16]. The most consistent activations have been observed in the dorsal anterior cortex (dACC), the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) and the response organization regions, including the supplementary motor areas (SMA) and the pre-supplementary motor areas [12–16]. It has been suggested that the LIFG appeared to be associated with the function of selection of semantic knowledge among competing alternatives via biasing or gating relevant information for posterior areas [17–19]. Most existing studies indicate that the dACC is involved in conflict monitoring in the Stroop task [1,20–22]. The SMA and pre-SMA are associated with the selection and execution of responses [23, 24]

Though informative, the previous studies often ignored the importance of variability across individuals. However, the data of individual differences may provide novel insights into the neural substrates of the Stroop effect [25, 26]. In addition, when dealing with abnormal neural and psychological processes in clinical settings, an understanding of such individual differences can offer more information than the commonalities in function across individuals [27]. Recently, some researchers have suggested that it is important for understanding brain function to explore intrinsic brain activity which consumes more than 90% of the brain’s energy [28,29]. A huge number of positives have been attributed to functional activation paradigms. However, from the brain energy metabolism perspective, the task-evoked activity may reveal only a small fraction of the actual functional activity performed by our brain [28]. In addition, a sole focus on task-evoked activity may ignore the alternative possibility that brain’s operations are mainly intrinsic [28] and existing studies have shown that individual variability in behaviors can be predicted from intrinsic activity [30–34]. For example, Wang et al. (2014) found that intrinsic activity could predict subjects’ conflict adaption performance in a Flanker task. Furthermore, as there is no task during image acquisition, studies may avoid concerns about differences in experiment design and task strategy [35].

To date, only one study has examined intrinsic neural basis of individual variability in the Stroop effect [31]. Nevertheless, this study used region of interest (ROI) analysis and the analyses were limited a set of 31 predefined ROIs. Therefore, they may ignore some critical brain areas. In addition, they took the average correlation within the network as the index of the status of the network. Thus, it is sometimes difficult to reveal the regions whose properties within the network are especially important to the performance of a particular cognitive task. Therefore, the present study attempted to explore the intrinsic functional underpinnings of individual differences in the Stroop effect at the whole brain level.

It has been suggested that the analysis of rs-fMRI signals is useful for elucidating the “intrinsic” functional architectures of human brain [28,35,36]. Regional homogeneity (ReHo) analysis is a profitable method for investigating regional properties of the intrinsic brain dynamics at the whole brain level [37]. It indexes the similarities between the time series of a given voxel and its nearest neighbors. Previous investigations have indicated that the ReHo has biological relevance: the ReHo of large portion of the grey matter in the brain is very stable across time and can naturally reflect the functional organization of the cortex [38], and individuals with cognitive brain disorders show abnormal ReHo in the regions important to corresponding cognitive processes [39–42]. Furthermore, several recent studies have demonstrated that ReHo-behavior correlation analysis can be useful to explore the neural basis of individual variations in behavior [30,32–34]. For instance, Wang et al. [34] observed significant correlations between the conflict adaption effect and the ReHo values in the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Thus, it appears that the regional properties of intrinsic brain dynamics can reliably reflect aspects of cognitive function.

In the present study, we attempted to investigate the special brain regions which could predict individual differences in the Stroop effect using rs-fMRI. For the regional properties, brain ReHo was calculated during resting state, which indexes the local synchronization within a brain region [37]. We performed a correlation analysis between participants’ performance in the Stroop task and their ReHo values to uncover potential core regions that could account for individual variations in the Stroop effect. Researchers have suggested that ReHo variations can reflect individual differences in cognition and behavior [43]. Moreover, it has been suggested that resting state brain activity reflects task-evoked activity of brain network [44]. Therefore, we predicted that the ReHo values of voxels in the regions subserving conflict resolution (e.g., the dACC, IFG, SMA and/or pre-SMA) may be significantly correlated with the Stroop effect.

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

Approval of the study was made by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Southwest University of China, and all participants provided written informed consent

Subjects

Forty-four healthy, right-handed college students (34 females; mean age = 18.9 years, SD = 0.8) from Southwest University, China, were recruited for this study as paid participants. All of them were Chinese native speakers and naive to the purposes of the experiment. All subjects had normal or corrected-to-normal vision, without achromatopsia or color weakness. Firstly, each subject underwent a brief resting- state scan during which they were required to relax with their eyes closed. Each subject then performed a Stroop task outside the scanner. The data of three subjects was excluded due to excessive head movement artifacts (which exceeded 2 mm in transition or 2 degrees in rotation).

Apparatus and Procedure

The experiment was carried out on a PC connected to a VGA color monitor, operating at a frame rate of 85 Hz with a spatial resolution of 1,024 × 768 pixels. The stimuli were presented using E-Prime Software (Psychology Software Tools, Inc. Pittsburgh, PA). RTs and error rates were recorded by computer. The viewing distance was approximately 60 cm. Stimuli were the standard Stroop color words, consisting of four Chinese characters “Hong” (red), “Huang” (yellow), “Lan” (blue) and “Lv” (green). Each character was presented in one of the four colors (i.e., red (255, 0, 0), yellow (255, 255, 0), green (0, 255, 0), blue (0, 0, 255); 16 stimuli altogether). The display background was always black.

Each trial started with a white fixation in the center of the screen for 300 ms. Next, the character printed in color was displayed for 1400 ms or until a response was made, which was followed by a black interval for 200~400 ms randomly. Then the next trial started. Subjects were instructed to respond according to the printed color of the character by pressing the ‘D’ key with their left middle finger if the color word was printed in red, the ‘F’ key with the left index finger if the color word was printed in green, the ‘J’ key with the right index finger if the color word was printed in yellow, and the ‘K’ key with the right middle finger if the color word was printed in blue. A familiarization session was conducted to allow subjects to adapt the task, which consisted of 24 trials of the same type as in the main experiment. In the main experiment, 240 trials were presented in 2 blocks of 120 trials, with a mandatory 30-second break for rest between two blocks. Each block consisted of 60 congruent trials and 60 incongruent trials, which were presented randomly.

Behavioral data analysis

Firstly, we calculated mean RTs and accuracies for each condition(C, I); the calculation of mean RTs excluded data from error trials and outlier trials (more than 2.5 standard deviations [SDs] from the mean, calculated for each condition separately). Then, the mean RT (the average of I and C separately) and the Stroop effect (I minus C) were computed for each subject. Finally, the ratio of the Stroop effect over mean RT was computed to control for general response latency differences, and we named this ratio as the Stroop effect corrected. The Stroop effect corrected was thought to be capable of providing a more suitable behavioral index than the original Stroop effect when a brain-behavior correlation analysis was conducted [45].

Image acquisition and analysis

Images were acquired with a Siemens (3.0 Tesla) scanner. An Echo-Planar imaging (EPI) sequence was used for data collection, and 240 T2-weighted images were recorded per run (TR = 2000 ms; TE = 30 ms; flip angle = 90°; FoV = 200 × 200 mm2; matrix size = 64 × 64; 33 interleaved 3 mm-thick slices; in-plane resolution = 3.13 × 3.13 mm2; interslice skip = 0.6 mm). T1-weighted images were recorded with a total of 128 slices at a thickness of 1.33 mm (TR = 2530 ms; TE = 3.39 ms; flip angle = 7°; FoV = 256 × 256 mm2). During the resting state, subjects were told to keep awake with their eyes open and as motionless as possible and not concentrate on anything in particular.

Data preprocessing

SPM8 (Wellcome Department of Cognitive Neurology, London, UK, http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/spm8) was used to pre-process the functional images [46]. The first 5 images were discarded to ameliorate the magnetization equilibrium and adapt subjects to the environment. The remaining functional images were corrected for interleaved acquisition, and then realigned to estimate and modify the six parameters for head movement. A mean functional image was then obtained for each subject. To normalize functional images, each subject’s T1-weighted images were co-registered to the mean functional images and were subsequently segmented into gray matter (GM), white matter (WM) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). The parameters obtained in segmentation were used to normalize each participant’s functional images onto the Montreal Neurological Institute space in 3 × 3 × 3 mm3 resolution.

To further exclude the residual effect of motion on the relationship between ReHo and Stroop effect corrected, the mean framewise displacement (FD) proposed by Jenkinson was firstly computed for 41 subjects separately. Subjects with excessive motion (more than 3 SDs from the mean FD; mean FD: 0.056 ± 0.021) were excluded as outliers. No subjects were excluded due to extreme FD.

ReHo analysis

Before ReHo calculation, through linear regression, the influences of linear trends were removed from the normalized EPI images and then the low frequency drift and high-frequency noise were also filtered out by a band-pass filter (0.01–0.08 Hz) [36,47]. In addition, nuisance correction was conducted by regressing out 6 motion signals as well as whiter matter and cerebrospinal fluid signals. Then, following Zang et al. [37], ReHo was performed on a voxel-by-voxel basis by calculating Kendall’s coefficient of concordance [48] of the time series of a given cluster of neighboring voxels. Here, cubic clusters of 27 voxels (corner connection) were used and the ReHo value of every cubic cluster was assigned to the central voxel [37]. The ReHo images were then smoothed with a full width at half maximum (FWHM) of 6 × 6 × 6 mm3. The larger ReHo value for a given voxel, the higher local synchronization of rs-fMRI signals among neighboring voxels was. All of these procedures were performed using the Resting-state fMRI date analysis Toolkit (REST) and Data Processing Assistant for Resting-State fMRI (DPARSF) software [37,49] (http://www.restfmri.net/forum/).

ReHo-Stroop effect correlation analysis

A partial correlation analysis was carried out in a voxel-wise manner to examine the relationship between ReHo values and the Stroop effect corrected, while controlling for age, sex and FD. In order to correct for multiple comparisons, Monte Carlo simulations were performed. The parameters were as follows: individual voxel threshold probability = 0.01, 1,000 simulations, 2 sided, FWHM estimated by 6 mm FWHM, cluster connection radius = 5 mm (edge connected), with a grey matter mask. These procedures were performed using the AlphaSim program in the REST software. The AlphaSim correction was achieved by setting the cluster size and individual voxel height threshold. For example, according to the simulations, the activation clusters showing a corrected significant correlation (p < 0.05) between ReHo and the Stroop effect corrected were extracted from statistic images with cluster size > 34 voxels and a voxelwise p value of < 0.01.

Results

Behavioral performance

The discarded trials occupied 9.63% of the all trials (error trials: 7.32% and outlier trials: 2.31%). In order to testing whether there existed speed-accuracy trade-off, we performed a correlation analysis between general RT and general accuracy rates. If there existed speed-accuracy trade-off,subjects would produce faster response but make more errors. That is to say, if there existed speed-accuracy trade-off, a significant positive correlation between general RT and general accuracy rates would be observed. The correlation analysis revealed a significant negative correlation (r = -0.372, p < 0.05) between general RT and general accuracy rates. This meant that there was minimal trade-off between speed and accuracy rates.

The mean RTs and accuracies are shown in Fig 1. A paired-samples t-test revealed that responses were significantly faster in the congruent condition (668ms, SD = 49 ms) than in the incongruent condition (763 ms, SD = 60 ms; t(40) = -17.9, p < 0.001; see Fig 1A). The accuracies were higher in the congruent condition (94.06%, SD = 3.69%) than in the incongruent condition (91.30%, SD = 5.84%; t(40) = 3.44, p < 0.01; see Fig 1B). Thus, the results indicated a significant Stroop effect. However, as shown in Fig 1C, there was a large amount of individual variability in this effect.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 1. The behavioral results.

Pane lA illustrates the mean RT as a function of congruency (C, I). It indicates a significant Stroop effect (I-C), with some subjects exhibiting a larger Stroop effect than others. Pane lB illustrates that the mean accuracy rate as a function of congruency (C, I). Error bars represent standard errors, respectively. N = 41. RT = response time. (*** P < 0.001; * * P < 0.01). Pane lC represents individual differences related to Stroop effect (ratio of Stroop effect over mean RT). Note: each circle represents a subject’s Stroop effect score.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124405.g001

ReHo-Stroop effect correlation analysis

At a threshold of p < 0.05 (corrected), significant positive correlations between ReHo and the Stroop effect corrected were observed in the left IFG, the left insula, the ventral anterior cingulate cortex (vACC) and medial frontal gyrus (MFG). Significant negative ReHo-Stroop effect corrected correlations were observed in the left precentral gyrus (LPG) (Table 1 and Fig 2). We conducted a partial correlation analysis between accuracy rates and ReHo values of the mentioned brain regions above while controlling gender, age and FD. None significant correlation between accuracy rates and ReHo values was found in the mentioned areas (for more information, see S1 Text). There may be a celling effect in the accuracy rates, which made it difficult to find any correlation in the present study.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 2. Brain regions which exhibit significant correlations between ReHo and participants’ cognitive control efficiency [expressed as (I-C)/mean RT] in the Stroop task.

The numbers at the bottom of each image refer to the y-coordinates of the Montreal Neurological institute (MNI). The threshold was set at p < 0.05 (corrected). Each scatter plot shows the correlation between the cognitive control efficiency and averaged ReHo in the corresponding region with gender, age and FD controlled. x-axis, ReHo value; y-axis, Stroop effect. Each dot represents data from one participant.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124405.g002

thumbnail
Download:
Table 1. Brain regions which exhibit significant correlations between ReHo and Stroop effect.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124405.t001

Recent studies have suggested that the task conflict and information conflict exist in the Stroop task [10]. Task conflict was defined as the latency difference between color words and non-letter neutrals. Informational conflict was defined as the latency difference between incongruent and congruent trials. Furthermore, these two types of conflicts are processed differently [50,51]. In order to examine whether only one of these processes is correlated with the regions found in the ReHo-behavior correlation analysis, a partial correlation analysis was conducted between the Stroop congruent and Stroop incongruent (separately) RT and ReHo values of the mentioned brain regions above while controlling gender, age and FD. None significant correlation was found in the mentioned areas (For more information, see S2 Text).

Discussion

The present study adopted the ReHo approach to investigate the intrinsic functional underpinnings of individual differences in the Stroop effect corrected at the whole brain level. Behavioral results showed that there were individual differences in the Stroop effect corrected. Further, the individual differences could be predicted by functional homogeneity within the local region. Unsurprisingly, the ReHo values of voxels in the regions subserving conflict resolution (the LIFG, the left insula, and the LPG) were significantly correlated with the Stroop effect corrected. Less expectedly, the significant correlations were observed in the regions (vACC and MFG) exhibiting task-induced deactivations during goal-directed behaviors. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the association between the individual differences in the whole-brain intrinsic functional architecture and the Stroop effect corrected.

The ReHo in the LIFG was significantly correlated with the Stroop effect corrected, which was consistent with the results from task-based fMRI studies. For instance, the activation in the LIFG has been reported as being greater in the incongruent trials than in the congruent trials [52], indicatingj that the LIFG was involved in the conflict resolution. In addition, in the lesion study by Hamilton and Martin [53], the patients with circumscribed LIFG lesions exhibited especially higher error rates in the incongruent condition compared to healthy individuals and other frontal lobe lesion patients whose LIFGs were undamaged. These studies consistently suggest that the LIFG is critical for cognitive control. Regarding the specific role of the LIFG in the Stroop effect, it has been suggested that the LIFG facilitates the selection of semantic knowledge among competing alternatives based on task demands via biasing or gating relevant information from posterior areas (e.g., temporal lobe, occipital lobe) [17–19]. Together, it seems that the LIFG contributes to resolving the Stroop interference effect through influencing the semantic processing. However, other researchers have speculated that the LIFG may play an important role in response inhibition via its indirect connection to the motor system in the response selection and execution phase [54]. Further elucidation of the role of the LIFG will require exploring the functional circuits associated with the LIFG by calculating the intrinsic functional connectivity of LIFG.

The ReHo values in the left insula also had a significant correlation with the Stroop effect size. This result suggests that the left insula plays an important role in facilitating conflict resolution. A related study by Leung et al. [55] showed that the left insula was more active in the incongruent trials than in the congruent trials, indicating that the Stroop interference was linked to increased activity in the insula. In another study, it has been found that the left insula was activated in the Go/no go and stop-signal tasks, which require subjects to inhibit the prepotent but inappropriate responses [56,57]. Furthermore, a structural MRI study found that the insula thickness was positively correlated with impulsivity and impaired planning capacity [58]. Overall, the evidence suggests that ReHo-behavior correlation in the left insula may reflect the individual differences in inhibiting responses to the task-irrelevant information.

The correlation between the ReHo values in the PG and the Stroop effect corrected may be due to its important role in the motor system. It is part of the primary motor cortex that is a natural focus for the investigation of changes associated with motor skill acquisition [59]. Furthermore, it has consistently been observed to be interconnected with the SMA [60–63], which have been considered to be involved in response selection and the execution of responses [23,24], indicating the important position of the PG in the motor control circuits. A neuroimaging study found that along with a reduction in behavioral RT, the activity within the motor cortex including the PG increased after a 4–2 mapping practice-related Stroop task [64]. Thus, the involvement of the PG during the Stroop task may be related to motor skill learning of task-relevant S–R mapping, which would affect the efficiency of response execution.

Less expectedly, ReHo values in the vACC and the MFG were significantly positively correlated with the Stroop effect corrected. The previous task-based studies found that the vACC is involved in conflict resolution on some tasks [65–67]. Nevertheless, these studies always employed the emotional interference task. Recently, some studies have showed that the vACC and MFG are key nodes of the DMN [68–71], which has been associated with spontaneous cognition [72]. In terms of cognitive control, the DMN facilitates the processing of internal mental noise, which is an interference source in attention-demanding tasks [73]. Therefore, the significant positive correlations between the Stroop effect and the ReHo values in the vACC and the MFG may mean that the individuals with higher synchronization of spontaneous activity in the vACC and the MFG will suffer stronger interference from internal noise.

Intriguingly, there was no significant correlation between ReHo and the Stroop effect corrected in the dACC that is most frequently associated with cognitive control [10]. Certain methodological factors may have contributed to these negative results. First, the differences of experimental materials may offer an explanation. In our study, the lexical control conditions were employed. However, the most of studies that have found dACC activation in the Stroop task have employed nonverbal conditions (e.g. Colored crosses or colored blocks), which have different stimulus attributes and processing requirements, when compared with a verbal interference condition [13,74–77]. But lexical control conditions often do not produce increased dACC activation [16]. Second, the proportion of congruence may affect the results. Some researchers found that the dACC was selectively activated only on the incongruent trials during high expectancy congruent blocks [12]. This result was attributed to the putative role of the dACC in anticipating response conflict or brokering strategy shifts. However, in our design format, the proportion of the two experimental conditions was equal, thereby minimizing the effects of expectancies. Additional studies are needed to elucidate the role of the dACC.

Taken together, the ReHo index-Stroop effect correlation analysis suggests that the cognitive control is linked to multiple brain regions associated with attention, response inhibition and motor control. These findings are consistent with previous task-based fMRI studies [12–16] but also extend imaging studies on cognitive control in important ways. Most of previous task-based fMRI studies focus on the regions that are more active in the incongruent trials than in the congruent trials, but our findings suggest that individuals’ behavioral performance in cognitive tasks may be affected by the regions exhibiting task-induced deactivations during goal-directed behaviors.

Notwithstanding its implications, there were several limitations in this study. First, the Stroop effect is rather complicated, which has been identified to consist of multiple components, such as task conflict and information conflict (semantic and response conflicts) [50]. Therefore, although the present results provide some insights for the individual differences of this effect, the corresponding interpretations are not exclusive. In the future work, more attention should be paid on the spontaneous brain activtiy associated with these subcomponents of the Stroop effect. Second, this study only focused on college-age group. The inclusion of other age groups in the further work would help to clarify whether findings generalize to other groups. Finally, numerous studies have found that the cognitive control were associated with two relatively separate networks of multiple brain regions: the adaptive (frontoparietal) and stable (cingulo-opercular) network [78–80] and these two networks obviously have good overlap with regions subserving conflict resolution. But the long-distance interregional connectivity patterns within and across these two networks were not assessed and should be addressed in future work.

Conclusion

In summary, we employed the ReHo method to investigate the intrinsic functional underpinnings of individual differences in Stroop effect at the whole brain level. Significant correlations were observed between Stroop effect size and ReHo values in the LIFG, the left insula, the vACC, the MFG and the LPG. The present findings indicate that: 1) multiple brain regions are involved in the Stroop task; 2) the ReHo index of rs-fMRI signals could be used to predict individuals’ cognitive task performance; 3) the key nodes of DMN may be important in goal-directed behavior and/or mental effort during cognitive tasks. Finally, our findings have implications in clinical settings by examining the brain’s intrinsic functional architecture in the identification of biomarkers for AD, and in the assessment of AD.

Supporting Information

S1 Text. Correlation analysis between ReHo and accuracy rates.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124405.s001

(DOCX)

S2 Text. Correlation analysis between ReHo and the RT in the incongruent and congruent trials (separately).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124405.s002

(DOCX)

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: AC CL TW. Performed the experiments: CL XZ LW. Analyzed the data: CL ZC. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: ZC. Wrote the paper: CL. Proofread the manuscript: GH DT JS.

References

  1. 1. Botvinick MM, Braver TS, Barch DM, Carter CS, Cohen JD (2001) Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review 108: 624–652. pmid:11488380
  2. 2. Floden D, Vallesi A, Stuss DT (2011) Task context and frontal lobe activation in the Stroop task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23: 867–879. pmid:20350183
  3. 3. Miller EK, Cohen JD (2001) An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience 24: 167–202. pmid:11283309
  4. 4. Stuss D, Floden D, Alexander M, Levine B, Katz D (2001) Stroop performance in focal lesion patients: dissociation of processes and frontal lobe lesion location. Neuropsychologia 39: 771–786. pmid:11369401
  5. 5. Stroop JR (1935) Studies of Interference in Serial Verbal Reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 18: 643–662
  6. 6. MacLeod CM (1991) Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. Psychological Bulletin 109: 163–203. pmid:2034749
  7. 7. Melcher T, Falkai P, Gruber O (2008) Functional brain abnormalities in psychiatric disorders: neural mechanisms to detect and resolve cognitive conflict and interference. Brain Research Reviews 59: 96–124. pmid:18621078
  8. 8. Balota DA, Tse C-S, Hutchison KA, Spieler DH, Duchek JM, Morris JC (2010) Predicting conversion to dementia of the Alzheimer’s type in a healthy control sample: The power of errors in stroop color naming. Psychology and Aging 25: 208–218. pmid:20230140
  9. 9. Kornblum S, Stevens GT, Whipple A, Requin J (1999) The effects of irrelevant stimuli: 1. The time course of stimulus–stimulus and stimulus–response consistency effects with Stroop-like stimuli, Simon-like tasks, and their factorial combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25: 688–714.
  10. 10. MacLeod CM, MacDonald PA (2000) Interdimensional interference in the Stroop effect: Uncovering the cognitive and neural anatomy of attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4: 383–391. pmid:11025281
  11. 11. Pardo JV, Pardo PJ, Janer KW, Raichle ME (1990) The anterior cingulate cortex mediates processing selection in the Stroop attentional conflict paradigm. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 87: 256–259. pmid:2296583
  12. 12. Carter CS, Macdonald AM, Botvinick M, Ross LL, Stenger VA, Noll D, et al. (2000) Parsing executive processes: strategic vs. evaluative functions of the anterior cingulate cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 97: 1944–1948. pmid:10677559
  13. 13. George M, Ketter T, Parekh P, Rosinsky N, Ring H, Casey BJ, et al. (1993) Regional brain activity when selecting a response despite interference: an H215O PET study of the Stroop and an emotional Stroop. Human Brain Mapping 1: 194–209.
  14. 14. Laird AR, McMillan KM, Lancaster JL, Kochunov P, Turkeltaub PE, Pardo JV et al. (2005) A comparison of label‐based review and ALE meta‐analysis in the Stroop task. Human Brain Mapping 25: 6–21. pmid:15846823
  15. 15. Mead LA, Mayer AR, Bobholz JA, Woodley SJ, Cunningham JM, Hammeke TA,et al. (2002) Neural basis of the Stroop interference task: response competition or selective attention? Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 8: 735–742. pmid:12240737
  16. 16. Taylor SF, Kornblum S, Lauber EJ, Minoshima S, Koeppe RA (1997) Isolation of specific interference processing in the Stroop task: PET activation studies. Neuroimage 6: 81–92. pmid:9299382
  17. 17. Thompson-Schill SL, D’Esposito M, Aguirre GK, Farah MJ (1997) Role of left inferior prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: A reevaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 94: 14792–14797. pmid:9405692
  18. 18. Thompson-Schill SL, Swick D, Farah MJ, D’Esposito M, Kan IP, Knight RT (1998) Verb generation in patients with focal frontal lesions: A neuropsychological test of neuroimaging findings. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 95: 15855–15860. pmid:9861060
  19. 19. Thompson-Schill SL, D'Esposito M, Kan IP (1999) Effects of repetition and competition on activity in left prefrontal cortex during word generation. Neuron 23: 513–522. pmid:10433263
  20. 20. Botvinick M, Nystrom LE, Fissell K, Carter CS, Cohen JD (1999) Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex. Nature 402: 179–181. pmid:10647008
  21. 21. Carter CS, Botvinick MM, Cohen JD (1999) The contribution of the anterior cingulate cortex to executive processes in cognition. Reviews in the Neurosciences 10: 49–58. pmid:10356991
  22. 22. Carter CS, Braver TS, Barch DM, Botvinick MM, Noll D, Cohen JD (1998) Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science 280: 747–749. pmid:9563953
  23. 23. Nachev P, Kennard C, Husain M (2008) Functional role of the supplementary and pre-supplementary motor areas. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 9: 856–869. pmid:18843271
  24. 24. Rushworth MF, Buckley MJ, Behrens TE, Walton ME, Bannerman DM (2007) Functional organization of the medial frontal cortex. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 17: 220–227. pmid:17350820
  25. 25. Forstmann BU, Jahfari S, Scholte HS, Wolfensteller U, van den Wildenberg WP, Ridderinkhof KR (2008) Function and structure of the right inferior frontal cortex predict individual differences in response inhibition: a model-based approach. The Journal of Neuroscience 28: 9790–9796. pmid:18815263
  26. 26. Forstmann BU, van den Wildenberg WP, Ridderinkhof KR (2008) Neural mechanisms, temporal dynamics, and individual differences in interference control. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20: 1854–1865. pmid:18370596
  27. 27. Egner T (2011) Right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex mediates individual differences in conflict-driven cognitive control. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23: 3903–3913. pmid:21568631
  28. 28. Raichle ME (2010) Two views of brain function. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14: 180–190. pmid:20206576
  29. 29. Sokoloff L, Mangold R, Wechsler RL, Kennedy C, Kety SS (1955) The effect of mental arithmetic on cerebral circulation and metabolism. Journal of Clinical Investigation 34: 1101–1108. pmid:14392225
  30. 30. Hu S, Xu D, Peterson B, Wang Q, He X, Hu J, et al. (2013) Correction: Association of Cerebral Networks in Resting State with Sexual Preference of Homosexual Men: A Study of Regional Homogeneity and Functional Connectivity. PLoS ONE 8.
  31. 31. Duchek JM, Balota DA, Thomas JB, Snyder AZ, Rich P, Benzinger TL, et al. (2013) Relationship between Stroop performance and resting state functional connectivity in cognitively normal older adults. Neuropsychology 27: 516–528. pmid:24040929
  32. 32. Tian L, Ren J, Zang Y (2012) Regional homogeneity of resting state fMRI signals predicts stop signal task performance. Neuroimage 60: 539–544. pmid:22178814
  33. 33. Wang L, Song M, Jiang T, Zhang Y, Yu C (2011) Regional homogeneity of the resting-state brain activity correlates with individual intelligence. Neuroscience Letters 488: 275–278. pmid:21108990
  34. 34. Wang T, Chen Z, Zhao G, Hitchman G, Liu C, Zhao X, et al. (2014) Linking Inter-individual Differences in the Conflict Adaptation Effect to Spontaneous Brain Activity. NeuroImage 90: 146–152. pmid:24398332
  35. 35. Fox MD, Raichle ME (2007) Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 8: 700–711. pmid:17704812
  36. 36. Biswal B, Zerrin Yetkin F, Haughton VM, Hyde JS (1995) Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 34: 537–541. pmid:8524021
  37. 37. Zang Y, Jiang T, Lu Y, He Y, Tian L (2004) Regional homogeneity approach to fMRI data analysis. Neuroimage 22: 394–400. pmid:15110032
  38. 38. Zuo X-N, Xu T, Jiang L, Yang Z, Cao X-Y, He Y, et al. (2013) Toward reliable characterization of functional homogeneity in the human brain: preprocessing, scan duration, imaging resolution and computational space. Neuroimage 65: 374–386. pmid:23085497
  39. 39. Yin Y, Jin C, Eyler LT, Jin H, Hu X, Duan L, et al. (2012) Altered regional homogeneity in post-traumatic stress disorder: a restingstate functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuroscience Bulletin 28: 541–549. pmid:22961475
  40. 40. Qiu C, Liao W, Ding J, Feng Y, Zhu C, Nie X, et al. (2011) Regional homogeneity changes in social anxiety disorder: A resting-state fMRI study. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging 194: 47–53. pmid:21831605
  41. 41. Liu X, Wang Y, Liu H, Liu Z, Zhou W (2010) [Diffusion tensor imaging and resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging on young patients with major depressive disorder]. Zhong nan da xue xue bao Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University Medical sciences 35: 25–31.
  42. 42. Cao Q, Zang Y, Sun L, Sui M, Long X, Zou Q, et al. (2006) Abnormal neural activity in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuroreport 17: 1033–1036. pmid:16791098
  43. 43. Jiang L, Xu T, He Y, Hou X-H, Wang J, Cao X-Y, et al. (2014) Toward neurobiological characterization of functional homogeneity in the human cortex: regional variation, morphological association and functional covariance network organization. Brain Structure and Function: 1–23.
    • 44. Smith SM, Fox PT, Miller KL, Glahn DC, Fox PM, Mackay CE, et al. (2009) Correspondence of the brain's functional architecture during activation and rest. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106: 13040–13045. pmid:19620724
    • 45. Davidson DJ, Zacks RT, Williams CC (2003) Stroop interference, practice, and aging. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition 10: 85–98. pmid:17203134
    • 46. Friston KJ, Holmes AP, Worsley KJ, Poline JP, Frith CD, Frackowiak RS, et al. (1994) Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: a general linear approach. Human Brain Mapping 2: 189–210.
    • 47. Biswal BB (2012) Resting state fMRI: a personal history. Neuroimage 62: 938–944. pmid:22326802
    • 48. Kendall M, Gibbons JD (1990) Rank Correlation Methods Edward Arnold. A division of Hodder & Stoughton, A Charles Griffin title, London: 29–50.
      • 49. Chao-Gan Y, Yu-Feng Z (2010) DPARSF: a MATLAB toolbox for “pipeline” data analysis of resting-state fMRI. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 4: 1–7. pmid:20204156
      • 50. Kalanthroff E, Goldfarb L, Henik A (2013) Evidence for interaction between the stop signal and the Stroop task conflict. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 39: 579–592. pmid:22390293
      • 51. Steinhauser M, Hübner R (2009) Distinguishing response conflict and task conflict in the Stroop task: evidence from ex-Gaussian distribution analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 35: 1398–1412. pmid:19803645
      • 52. Milham MP, Banich MT, Barad V (2003) Competition for priority in processing increases prefrontal cortex's involvement in top-down control: an event-related fMRI study of the stroop task. Cognitive Brain Research 17: 212–222. pmid:12880892
      • 53. Hamilton AC, Martin RC (2005) Dissociations among tasks involving inhibition: A single-case study. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 5: 1–13.
      • 54. Swick D, Ashley V, Turken U (2008) Left inferior frontal gyrus is critical for response inhibition. BMC neuroscience 9: 102–112. pmid:18939997
      • 55. Leung H-C, Skudlarski P, Gatenby JC, Peterson BS, Gore JC (2000) An event-related functional MRI study of the Stroop color word interference task. Cerebral Cortex 10: 552–560. pmid:10859133
      • 56. Aron AR, Robbins T. W., Poldrack R. A. (2004) Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8: 170–177. pmid:15050513
      • 57. Aron AR, Poldrack RA (2006) Cortical and subcortical contributions to Stop signal response inhibition: role of the subthalamic nucleus. The Journal of Neuroscience 26: 2424–2433. pmid:16510720
      • 58. Churchwell JC, Yurgelun-Todd DA (2013) Age-related changes in insula cortical thickness and impulsivity: Significance for emotional development and decision-making. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience 6: 80–86. pmid:23921157
      • 59. Hluštík P, Solodkin A, Noll DC, Small SL (2004) Cortical plasticity during three-week motor skill learning. Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 21: 180–191. pmid:15375348
      • 60. Dum RP, Strick PL (1991) The origin of corticospinal projections from the premotor areas in the frontal lobe. The Journal of Neuroscience 11: 667–689. pmid:1705965
      • 61. He S-Q, Dum R, Strick P (1993) Topographic organization of corticospinal projections from the frontal lobe: motor areas on the lateral surface of the hemisphere. The Journal of Neuroscience 13: 952–980. pmid:7680069
      • 62. Johansen-Berg H, Behrens T, Robson M, Drobnjak I, Rushworth M, Brady JM (2004) Changes in connectivity profiles define functionally distinct regions in human medial frontal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101: 13335–13340. pmid:15340158
      • 63. Muakkassa KF, Strick PL (1979) Frontal lobe inputs to primate motor cortex: evidence for four somatotopically organized ‘premotor’areas. Brain Research 177: 176–182. pmid:115545
      • 64. Chen Z, Lei X, Ding C, Li H, Chen A (2013) The neural mechanisms of semantic and response conflicts: An fMRI study of practice-related effects in the Stroop task. NeuroImage 66: 577–584. pmid:23103691
      • 65. Bishop S, Duncan J, Brett M, Lawrence AD (2004) Prefrontal cortical function and anxiety: controlling attention to threat-related stimuli. Nature Neuroscience 7: 184–188. pmid:14703573
      • 66. Bush G, Luu P, Posner MI (2000) Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4: 215–222. pmid:10827444
      • 67. Whalen PJ, Bush G, McNally RJ, Wilhelm S, McInerney SC, Jenike MA, et al. (1998) The emotional counting Stroop paradigm: a functional magnetic resonance imaging probe of the anterior cingulate affective division. Biological Psychiatry 44: 1219–1228. pmid:9861465
      • 68. Greicius MD, Krasnow B, Reiss AL, Menon V (2003) Functional connectivity in the resting brain: a network analysis of the default mode hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100: 253–258. pmid:12506194
      • 69. Mazoyer B, Zago L, Mellet E, Bricogne S, Etard O, Houde O, et al. (2001) Cortical networks for working memory and executive functions sustain the conscious resting state in man. Brain Research Bulletin 54: 287–298. pmid:11287133
      • 70. Shulman GL, Fiez JA, Corbetta M, Buckner RL, Miezin FM, Raichle ME, et al. (1997) Common blood flow changes across visual tasks: II. Decreases in cerebral cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 9: 648–663. pmid:23965122
      • 71. Zhu X, Wang X, Xiao J, Liao J, Zhong M, Wang W, et al. (2012) Evidence of a dissociation pattern in resting-state default mode network connectivity in first-episode, treatment-naive major depression patients. Biological Psychiatry 71: 611–617. pmid:22177602
      • 72. Buckner RL, Andrews‐Hanna JR, Schacter DL (2008) The brain's default network. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1124: 1–38. pmid:18400922
      • 73. Bressler SL, Menon V (2010) Large-scale brain networks in cognition: emerging methods and principles. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14: 277–290. pmid:20493761
      • 74. Bench C, Frith C, Grasby P, Friston K, Paulesu E, Frackowiak RSJ (1993) Investigations of the functional anatomy of attention using the Stroop test. Neuropsychologia 31: 907–922. pmid:8232848
      • 75. Brown GG, Kindermann SS, Siegle GJ, Granholm E, Wong EC, Buxton RB (1999) Brain activation and pupil response during covert performance of the Stroop Color Word task. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 5: 308–319. pmid:10349294
      • 76. George MS, Ketter TA, Parekh PI, Rosinsky N, Ring HA, Pazzaglia PJ, et al. (1997) Blunted left cingulate activation in mood disorder subjects during a response interference task (the Stroop). The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences.
        • 77. Takeuchi H, Taki Y, Sassa Y, Hashizume H, Sekiguchi A, Nagase C, et al. (2012) Regional gray and white matter volume associated with Stroop interference: evidence from voxel-based morphometry. Neuroimage 59: 2899–2907. pmid:21988892
        • 78. Dosenbach NU, Fair DA, Miezin FM, Cohen AL, Wenger KK, Dosenbach RAT, et al. (2007) Distinct brain networks for adaptive and stable task control in humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104: 11073–11078. pmid:17576922
        • 79. Seeley WW, Menon V, Schatzberg AF, Keller J, Glover GH, Kenna H, et al. (2007) Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control. The Journal of Neuroscience 27: 2349–2356. pmid:17329432
        • 80. Power JD, Cohen AL, Nelson SM, Wig GS, Barnes KA, Church JA, et al. (2011) Functional network organization of the human brain. Neuron 72: 665–678. pmid:22099467