Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Long-term Results of Rectal Cancer Surgery with a Systematical Operative Approach

  • Colorectal Cancer
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Variabilities of both oncologic and functional outcomes are major problems after rectal cancer treatment. Standardized techniques might produce more consistent surgical quality. This study reports outcomes during a 20-year period resulting from a systematically applied surgical approach.

Methods

Between 1990 and 2010, 368 rectal cancer patients, treated with total mesorectal excision conducted in a standardized, stepwise approach, were prospectively entered into a database. Influence of time period, surgeon, tumor and anastomotic height, and resection type was evaluated with multivariable regression analyses adjusting for age, disease stage, diversion, and (neo)adjuvant treatment. Function outcome questionnaires were sent to 50 patients at least 5 years after surgery.

Results

Five-year overall survival was 76.4 %. Local and distant recurrence rates were 5.2 % and 22.1 %. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 5.4 % of patients treated with low anterior resection (n = 259). Time period, surgeon, tumor and anastomotic height, diversion, and abdominoperineal resection were not independent risk factors for any of these outcome measures. Both preoperative and postoperative radiotherapy were independently associated with increased risk of metastases (P = 0.035, hazard ratio (HR) = 3.04; and P = 0.029, HR = 3.59). Function questionnaires were completed by 38 of 50 patients (76 %). One of 13 nonirradiated patients reported mild fecal incontinence compared with 20 of 25 irradiated patients reporting mostly moderate-severe incontinence (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Systematically applied surgical dissection results consistently in excellent oncologic outcomes with enhanced function outcomes. The findings suggest that in the presence of highly disciplined surgery, radiotherapy might make a smaller contribution to oncologic outcome, while leading to serious adverse effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Heald RJ. A new approach to rectal cancer. Br J Hosp Med. 1979;22(3):277–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hermanek P, Hermanek PJ. Role of the surgeon as a variable in the treatment of rectal cancer. Semin Surg Oncol. 2000;19(4):329–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Martling A, Cedermark B, Johansson H, Rutqvist LE, Holm T. The surgeon as a prognostic factor after the introduction of total mesorectal excision in the treatment of rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2002;89(8):1008–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mack LA, Temple WJ. Education is the key to quality of surgery for rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2005;31(6):636–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sant M, Allemani C, Santaquilani M, Knijn A, Marchesi F, Capocaccia R. EUROCARE-4. Survival of cancer patients diagnosed in 1995–1999. Results and commentary. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(6):931–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Giacomantonio CA, Temple WJ. Quality of cancer surgery: challenges and controversies. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2000;9(1):51–60, vii.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hermanek P, Wiebelt H, Staimmer D, Riedl S. Prognostic factors of rectum carcinoma–experience of the german multicentre study SGCRC. German Study Group Colo-Rectal Carcinoma. Tumori. 1995;81(3 Suppl):60–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Leonard D, Penninckx F, Fieuws S, Jouret-Mourin A, Sempoux C, Jehaes C, Van Eycken E. Factors predicting the quality of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2010;252(6):982–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nagtegaal ID, van de Velde CJ, Marijnen CA, van Krieken JH, Quirke P. Low rectal cancer: a call for a change of approach in abdominoperineal resection. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(36):9257–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Marr R, Birbeck K, Garvican J, Macklin CP, Tiffin NJ, Parsons WJ, Dixon MF, Mapstone NP, Sebag-Montefiore D, Scott N, Johnston D, Sagar P, Finan P, Quirke P. The modern abdominoperineal excision: the next challenge after total mesorectal excision. Ann Surg. 2005;242(1):74–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pahlman L, Bohe M, Cedermark B, Dahlberg M, Lindmark G, Sjodahl R, Ojerskog B, Damber L, Johansson R. The Swedish Rectal Cancer Registry. Br J Surg. 2007;94(10):1285–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Alberts JC, Parvaiz A, Moran BJ. Predicting risk and diminishing the consequences of anastomotic dehiscence following rectal resection. Colorectal Dis. 2003;5(5):478–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Paun BC, Cassie S, MacLean AR, Dixon E, Buie WD. Postoperative complications following surgery for rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2010;251(5):807–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Peeters KC, van de Velde CJ, Leer JW, Martijn H, Junggeburt JM, Kranenbarg EK, Steup WH, Wiggers T, Rutten HJ, Marijnen CA. Late side effects of short-course preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: increased bowel dysfunction in irradiated patients–a Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group study. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(25):6199–206.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lange MM, den Dulk M, Bossema ER, Maas CP, Peeters KC, Rutten HJ, Klein KE, Marijnen CA, van de Velde CJ. Risk factors for faecal incontinence after rectal cancer treatment. Br J Surg. 2007;94(10):1278–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bretagnol F, Troubat H, Laurent C, Zerbib F, Saric J, Rullier E. Long-term functional results after sphincter-saving resection for rectal cancer. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2004;28(2):155–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wallner C, Lange MM, Bonsing BA, Maas CP, Wallace CN, Dabhoiwala NF, Rutten HJ, Lamers WH, DeRuiter MC, van de Velde CJ. The role of damage to the levator ani nerve during rectal cancer surgery in the development of fecal and urinary incontinence. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:4466–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lindsetmo RO, Delaney CP. A standardized technique for laparoscopic rectal resection. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13(11):2059–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Enker WE. Potency, cure, and local control in the operative treatment of rectal cancer. Arch Surg. 1992;127(12):1396–401.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Enker WE, Thaler HT, Cranor ML, Polyak T. Total mesorectal excision in the operative treatment of carcinoma of the rectum. J Am Coll Surg. 1995;181(4):335–46.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Enker WE. Total mesorectal excision–the new golden standard of surgery for rectal cancer. Ann Med. 1997;29(2):127–33.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Engstrom PF, Arnoletti JP, Benson AB III, Chen YJ, Choti MA, Cooper HS, Covey A, Dilawari RA, Early DS, Enzinger PC, Fakih MG, Fleshman J Jr, Fuchs C, Grem JL, Kiel K, Knol JA, Leong LA, Lin E, Mulcahy MF, Rao S, Ryan DP, Saltz L, Shibata D, Skibber JM, Sofocleous C, Thomas J, Venook AP, Willett C. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Rectal cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2009;7(8):838–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sato K, Sato T. The vascular and neuronal composition of the lateral ligament of the rectum and the rectosacral fascia. Surg Radiol Anat. 1991;13(1):17–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hida J, Yasutomi M, Maruyama T, Fujimoto K, Uchida T, Okuno K. Lymph node metastases detected in the mesorectum distal to carcinoma of the rectum by the clearing method: justification of total mesorectal excision. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;184(6):584–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Enker WE. Cancer of the rectum: primary and adjuvant therapy. Fazio VW (ed) Current therapy in colon and rectal cancer. Philadelphia: Decker, B.C., 1990;120–30.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Adam IJ, Mohamdee MO, Martin IG, Scott N, Finan PJ, Johnston D, Dixon MF, Quirke P. Role of circumferential margin involvement in the local recurrence of rectal cancer. Lancet. 1994;344(8924):707–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. National workgroup for gastrointestinal tumours. Dutch National Guideline for Rectal Cancer (Version 2.0). www oncoline nl 2008.

  28. Adjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer: a systematic overview of 8,507 patients from 22 randomised trials. Lancet. 2001;358(9290):1291–304.

  29. Figueredo A, Zuraw L, Wong RK, Agboola O, Rumble RB, Tandan V. The use of preoperative radiotherapy in the management of patients with clinically resectable rectal cancer: a practice guideline. BMC Med. 2003;1:1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Roh MS, Colangelo LH, O’Connell MJ, Yothers G, Deutsch M, Allegra CJ, Kahlenberg MS, Baez-Diaz L, Ursiny CS, Petrelli NJ, Wolmark N. Preoperative multimodality therapy improves disease-free survival in patients with carcinoma of the rectum: NSABP R-03. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(31):5124–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, Rodel C, Wittekind C, Fietkau R, Martus P, Tschmelitsch J, Hager E, Hess CF, Karstens JH, Liersch T, Schmidberger H, Raab R. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(17):1731–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Mathis KL, Larson DW, Dozois EJ, Cima RR, Huebner M, Haddock MG, Nelson H, Pemberton JH. Outcomes following surgery without radiotherapy for rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2012;99:137–143.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Taylor FG, Quirke P, Heald RJ, Moran B, Blomqvist L, Swift I, Sebag-Montefiore DJ, Tekkis P, Brown G. Preoperative high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging can identify good prognosis stage I, II, and III rectal cancer best managed by surgery alone: a prospective, multicenter, European study. Ann Surg 2011;253(4):711–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Fisher B, Wolmark N, Rockette H, Redmond C, Deutsch M, Wickerham DL, Fisher ER, Caplan R, Jones J, Lerner H. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy for rectal cancer: results from NSABP Protocol R-01. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1988;80(1):21–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Inoue Y, Ojima E, Watanabe H, Hiro J, Toiyama Y, Kobayashi M, Miki C, Kusunoki M. Does preoperative chemo-radiotherapy enhance the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in patients with rectal cancer? Oncol Rep. 2007;18(2):369–75.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Park JS, Qiao L, Su ZZ, Hinman D, Willoughby K, McKinstry R, Yacoub A, Duigou GJ, Young CS, Grant S, Hagan MP, Ellis E, Fisher PB, Dent P. Ionizing radiation modulates vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression through multiple mitogen activated protein kinase dependent pathways. Oncogene. 2001;20(25):3266–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Nozue M, Isaka N, Fukao K. Over-expression of vascular endothelial growth factor after preoperative radiation therapy for rectal cancer. Oncol Rep. 2001;8(6):1247–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Pollack J, Holm T, Cedermark B, Altman D, Holmstrom B, Glimelius B, Mellgren A. Late adverse effects of short-course preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2006;93(12):1519–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Marijnen CA, Kapiteijn E, van de Velde CJ, Martijn H, Steup WH, Wiggers T, Kranenbarg EK, Leer JW. Acute side effects and complications after short-term preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision in primary rectal cancer: report of a multicenter randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(3):817–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Vuong T, Devic S, Podgorsak E. High-dose rate endorectal brachytherapy as a neoadjuvant treatment for patients with resectable rectal cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2007;19(9):701–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of Beth Israel Medical Center and was supported by the Dorothy and Lawrence Kryger Surgical Oncology Research Fund.

Conflicts of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marilyne M. Lange MD, PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lange, M.M., Martz, J.E., Ramdeen, B. et al. Long-term Results of Rectal Cancer Surgery with a Systematical Operative Approach. Ann Surg Oncol 20, 1806–1815 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2832-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2832-2

Keywords

Navigation