Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Quality of Life Among Five-Year Survivors After Treatment for Very Low Rectal Cancer With or Without a Permanent Abdominal Stoma

  • Gastrointestinal Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Low rectal cancers situated less than 5 cm from the anal margin are still usually treated with abdomino-perineal excision (APE). Our aim is to compare the quality of life (QOL) of five-year survivors treated for low or very low rectal cancer with an advanced/complex coloanal procedure with the QOL of patients submitted to a standard APE with a definitive abdominal stoma.

Methods

Sixty-two patients, operated on radically for low or very low rectal cancer, who came for their fifth year follow-up visit and were free from cancer, were studied. Thirty patients (group 1) had an APE with permanent abdominal stoma. Thirty-two patients (group 2) had undergone a radical advanced and complex procedure to avoid the abdominal stoma. The patients received the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QOL-30 generic and the CR38 colorectal cancer QOL questionnaires with the recommendation to return the questionnaire to the hospital. The Mann–Whitney U-test and χ 2 Fisher test were employed for statistical analysis.

Results

All questionnaires were returned. Patients without a terminal abdominal stoma had a better score in six categories of the QOL 30 and in two categories of the CR38. No differences were observed in the other variables examined.

Conclusions

After five years, cancer-free patients operated on for low or very low rectal cancer have a better QOL if a definitive terminal abdominal stoma was avoided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nicholls RJ, Dozois RR, editors. Surgery of the colon and rectum. Churchill Livingstone; 1997

  2. Sprangers MA, Taal BG, Aaronson NK. Quality of life in colorectal cancer: Stoma vs. nonstoma patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:361–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Camilleri-Brennan J, Steele RJ. Quality of life after treatment for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1998;85:1036–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Koller M, Lorenz W. Quality of life research in patients with rectal cancer: Traditional approaches vs. a problem-solving oriented perspective. Langenbecks Arch Surg 1998;383:427–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sprangers MA, Te Velde A, Aaransun NK. The construction and testing of EORTC colorectal cancer-specific: Quality of life questionnaire module (qLq-CR 38). Eur J Cancer 1999;35:238–47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Grumann MM, Noack EM, Hoffmann IA. Comparison of quality of life in patients undergoing abdominoperineal extirpation or anterior resection for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 2001;233:157–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jess P, Christiansen J, Bech P. Quality of life after anterior resection vs. abdominoperineal extirpation for rectal cancer. Scand J Gastroenterol 2002;37:1201–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Engel J, Kerr J, Schlesinger-Raab A. Quality of life in rectal cancer patients: A four year prospective study. Ann Surg 2003;238:2003–13

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sideris L, Zenasni F, Vernerey D, Dauchy S, Lasser P, Pignon JP, Elias D, Di Palma M, Pocard M. Quality of life of patients operated on for low rectal cancer: Impact of the type of surgery and patients’ characteristics. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:2180–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Harisin R, Bodoky G, Borsodi M, et al. Rectal cancer therapy: decision making on basis of quality life? Zentralbl Chir 2004;129:139–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pachler J, Wille-Jorgensen P. Quality of life after rectal resection for cancer, with or without permanent colostomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;3:CD004323

    Google Scholar 

  12. Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Nadalin W. Operative versus nonoperative treatment for stage 0 distal rectal cancer following chemoradiation therapy: Long-term results. Ann Surg 2004;240:711–7; discussion 717–8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schiessel R, Karner-Hanusch, Herbst F et al. Inter-sphincteric resection for low rectal tumors. Br J Surg 1994;81:1376–8

  14. Fucini C, Elbetti C, Petrolo A, et al. Excision of the levator muscles with external sphincter preservation in the treatment of selected low T4 rectal cancers. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:1697–705

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Williams NS, Hallan RI, Koeze TH, et al. Restoration of gastrointestinal continuity and continence after abdominoperineal excision of the rectum using an electrically stimulated neoanal sphinter. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33:561–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rosen HR, Novi G, Zoech G, et al. Restauration of anal sphincter function by single stage dynamic graciloplasty with a modified (split sling) technique. Am J Surg 1998;175:187–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Cavina E, Seccia M, Banti P, et al. Anorectal recostruction after abdominoperineal resection. Experience with double wrap graciloplasty supported by low-frequency electrostimulation. Dis Colon Rectum 1998;41:1010–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Schiessel R, Novi G, Holzer B, et al. Technique and long-term results of intersphinteric resection for low rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:1858–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993;85:365–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mc Lachlan SA, Devins GM, Goodwin PJ. Validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) as a measure of psychosocial function in breast cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 1998;34:510–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Osoba D, Aaronson N, Zee B. Modification of the EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 2.0) based on content validity and reliability testing in large samples of patients with cancer. The Study Group on Quality of Life of the EORTC and the Symptom Control and Quality of life Committees of the NCI of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Qual Life Res 1997;6:103–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cull AM. Cancer-specific quality of life questionnaires: the state of the art in Europe. Eur J Cancer 1997;33:S3–S7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sprangers MAG, Te Velde A, Aaronson NK. The construction and testing of the EORTC colorectal cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire module (QLQ-CR38). Eur J Cancer 1999;35:238–47

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Fayers P, Aaronson N, Bjordal K. On behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Study Group.QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual, 1st Ed. Brussels: 1995

  25. Schaube J, Scharf P, Herz R. The quality of life after extirpation of the rectum for carcinoma. Dtsch Med – Wochenschr 1996;121:153–7, discussion 158

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hallbook O, Hass U, Wanstrom A. Quality of life measurement after rectal excision for cancer. Comparison between straight and colonic J-pouch anastomosis. Scand J Gastroenterol 1997;32:490–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Guren MG, Eriksen MT, Wii GN. Quality of life and functional outcome following anterior or abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2005;31:735–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Rauch P, Miny J, Conroy T, et al. Quality of life among disease-free survivors of rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:354–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Schmidt E. Continent colostomy. Helv Chir Acta 1982;48:855–62

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Da Silva AL. Abdominoperineal excision of the rectum and anal canal with perianal colostomy. Eur J Surg 1995;161:761–4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Velitchkov NG, Kirov GK, Losanoff JE, et al. Abdominoperineal resection and perineal colostomy for low rectal cancer. The Lazaro Da Silva Technique. Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:530–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Gamagami RA, Chiotasso P, Lazorthes F. Continent perineal colostomy after abdominoperineal resection: Outcome after 63 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 1999;42:626–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Farroni N, Van den Bosch A, Haustermans K, et al. Perineal colostomy with appendicostomy as an alternative for an abdominal colostomy:symptoms, functional status, quality of life, and perceived health. Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50:817–24

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Altomare DF, Rinaldi M, Rubini D, et al. Long-term functional assessment of antegrade colonic enema for combined incontinence and constipation using a modified Marsh and Kiff technique. Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50:1023–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial support: funded by the Local Research Budget of the University of Florence

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical and Surgical Critical Care, Section of General and Oncological Surgery, University of Florence, Viale Morgagni, 85, 50134, Firenze, Italy

    C. Fucini MD, R. Gattai MD, C. Urena MD, L. Bandettini MD & C. Elbetti MD

Authors
  1. C. Fucini MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Gattai MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C. Urena MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. L. Bandettini MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. C. Elbetti MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Fucini MD.

Additional information

The paper has been partially presented at the 9th International Meeting of Coloproctology, Stresa, Italy, March 27–29, 2006

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fucini, C., Gattai, R., Urena, C. et al. Quality of Life Among Five-Year Survivors After Treatment for Very Low Rectal Cancer With or Without a Permanent Abdominal Stoma. Ann Surg Oncol 15, 1099–1106 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-007-9748-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-007-9748-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation