Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Short-Term and Long-Term Psychosocial Adjustment and Quality of Life in Women Undergoing Different Surgical Procedures for Breast Cancer

  • Breast Oncology
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The various surgical procedures for early-stage breast cancer are equivalent in terms of survival. Therefore, other factors, such as the procedures’ effect on psychosocial adjustment and quality of life (QOL), take on great importance. The aim of the current study was to prospectively examine the short- and long-term effects of mastectomy with reconstruction, mastectomy without reconstruction, and breast conservation therapy on aspects of psychosocial adjustment and QOL in a sample of 258 women with breast cancer.

Methods

Participants completed questionnaires before surgery and then again 1, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Questionnaires assessed depressive symptoms, anxiety, body image, sexual functioning, and QOL.

Results

Adjustment patterns differed throughout the 2-year period after surgery. Some short-term changes in adjustment (less anxiety, less overall body satisfaction) were similar across surgery groups, whereas others (satisfaction with chest appearance, QOL in physical health domain) were higher for women who had breast conservation therapy. However, women who had mastectomy with reconstruction reported greater satisfaction with their abdominal area. During the long-term follow-up period (6 months to 2 years after surgery), women in all three groups experienced marked improvements in psychosocial adjustment (depressive symptoms, satisfaction with chest appearance, sexual functioning) and QOL in physical and mental health domains. In fact, the level for most variables returned to baseline levels or higher.

Conclusions

Overall, the general patterns of psychosocial adjustment and QOL are similar among the three surgery groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

FIG. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures 2006. Available at: http://www.cancer.org/. Accessed December 3, 2006

  2. Veronesi U, Saccozzi R, Del Vecchio M, et al. Comparing radical mastectomy with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection, and radiotherapy in patients with small cancers of the breast. N Engl J Med 1981;305:6–11

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1227–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McCready D, Holloway C, Shelley W, et al. Surgical management of early stage invasive breast cancer: a practice guideline. Can J Surg 2005;48:185–94

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Fisher B, Redmond C, Poisson R, et al. Eight-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 1989;320:822–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Handel N. Current status of breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Oncology (Huntington) 1991;5:73–84

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Harcourt D, Rumsey N. Psychological aspects of breast reconstruction: a review of the literature. J Advanced Nurs 2001;35:477–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Harcourt DM, Rumsey NJ, Ambler NR, et al. The psychological effect of mastectomy with or without breast reconstruction: a prospective, multicenter study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003;111:1060–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wilkins EG, Cederna PS, Lowery JC, et al. Prospective analysis of psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: one-year postoperative results from the Michigan breast reconstruction outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;106:1014–25; discussion 26–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ganz PA, Schag AC, Lee JJ, Polinsky ML, Tan SJ. Breast conservation versus mastectomy. Is there a difference in psychological adjustment or quality of life in the year after surgery? Cancer 1992;69:1729–38

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cocquyt VF, Blondeel PN, Depypere HT, Van De Sijpe KA, Daems KK, Monstrey SJ, Van Belle SJ. Better cosmetic results and comparable quality of life after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate autologous breast reconstruction compared to breast conservative treatment. Br J Plast Surg 2003;56:462–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fallowfield LJ, Hall A, Maguire GP, Baum M. Psychological outcomes of different treatment policies in women with early breast cancer outside a clinical trial. BMJ 1990;301:575–80

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Janni W, Rjosk D, Dimpfl TH, et al. Quality of life influenced by primary surgical treatment for stage I–III breast cancer—long-term follow-up of a matched-pair analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2001;8:542–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kiebert GM, de Haes JC, van de Velde CJ. The impact of breast-conserving treatment and mastectomy on the quality of life of early-stage breast cancer patients: a review. J Clin Oncol 1991;9:1059–70

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kissane DW, Clarke DM, Ikin J, Bloch S, Smith GC, Vitetta L, McKenzie DP. Psychological morbidity and quality of life in Australian women with early-stage breast cancer: a cross-sectional survey. Med J Aust 1998;169:192–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fallowfield LJ. Psychosocial adjustment after treatment for early breast cancer. Oncology (Huntington) 1990;4:89–97; discussion 97–8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hartl K, Janni W, Kastner R, et al. Impact of medical and demographic factors on long-term quality of life and body image of breast cancer patients. Ann Oncol 2003;14:1064–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gendy RK, Able JA, Rainsbury RM. Impact of skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate reconstruction and breast-sparing reconstruction with miniflaps on the outcomes of oncoplastic breast surgery. Br J Surg 2003;90:433–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wellisch DK, DiMatteo R, Silverstein M, et al. Psychosocial outcomes of breast cancer therapies: lumpectomy versus mastectomy. Psychosomatics 1989;30:365–73

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rowland JH, Desmond KA, Meyerowitz BE, Belin TR, Wyatt GE, Ganz PA. Role of breast reconstructive surgery in physical and emotional outcomes among breast cancer survivors. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:1422–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rowland JH, Dioso J, Holland JC, Chaglassian T, Kinne D. Breast reconstruction after mastectomy: who seeks it, who refuses? Plast Reconstr Surg 1995;95:812–22

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Nissen MJ, Swenson KK, Ritz LJ, Farrell JB, Sladek ML, Lally RM. Quality of life after breast carcinoma surgery: a comparison of three surgical procedures. Cancer 2001;91:1238–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Al-Ghazal SK, Fallowfield L, Blamey RW. Comparison of psychological aspects and patient satisfaction following breast conserving surgery, simple mastectomy and breast reconstruction. Eur J Cancer 2000;36:1938–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Yurek D, Farrar W, Andersen BL. Breast cancer surgery: comparing surgical groups and determining individual differences in postoperative sexuality and body change stress. J Consult Clin Psychol 2000;68:697–709

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Al-Ghazal SK, Fallowfield L, Blamey RW. Does cosmetic outcome from treatment of primary breast cancer influence psychosocial morbidity? Eur J Surg Oncol 1999;25:571–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sneeuw KC, Aaronson NK, Yarnold JR, et al. Cosmetic and functional outcomes of breast conserving treatment for early stage breast cancer. 2. Relationship with psychosocial functioning. Radiother Oncol 1992;25:160–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Arndt V, Merx H, Stegmaier C, Ziegler H, Brenner H. Persistence of restrictions in quality of life from the first to the third year after diagnosis in women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:4945–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cohen L, Hack TF, de Moor C, Katz J, Goss PE. The effects of type of surgery and time on psychological adjustment in women after breast cancer treatment. Ann Surg Oncol 2000;7:427–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ganz PA, Rowland JH, Desmond K, Meyerowitz BE, Wyatt GE. Life after breast cancer: understanding women’s health-related quality of life and sexual functioning. J Clin Oncol 1998;16:501–14

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Broeckel J, Jacobsen P, Balducci L, Horton J, Lyman G. Quality of life after adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2000;62:141–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Arora NK, Gustafson DH, Hawkins RP, et al. Impact of surgery and chemotherapy on the quality of life of younger women with breast carcinoma: a prospective study. Cancer 2001;92:1288–98

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Shimozuma K, Ganz PA, Petersen L, Hirji K. Quality of life in the first year after breast cancer surgery: rehabilitation needs and patterns of recovery. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1999;56:45–57

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Radloff L. The CES-D Scale: a new self report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement 1977;1:385–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Spielberger C, Gorsuch R, Lushene R. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1970

    Google Scholar 

  35. Cash T. User’s Manual for the Multidimensional Body-Self Relations Questionnaire. Norfolk, VA: Old Dominion University, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mock V. Body image in women treated for breast cancer. Nurs Res 1993;42:153–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Thirlaway K, Fallowfield L, Cuzick J. The Sexual Activity Questionnaire: a measure of women’s sexual functioning. Qual Life Res 1996;5:81–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. McWayne J, Heiney SP. Psychologic and social sequelae of secondary lymphedema: a review. Cancer 2005;104:457–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ware J, Sherbourne C. The MOS 36 item short-form health survey. Med Care 1992;30:473–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ware J, Snow K, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Survey Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston: Health Institute, New England Medical Centre Hospitals Inc., 1993

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ganz PA, Greendale GA, Petersen L, Kahn B, Bower JE. Breast cancer in younger women: reproductive and late health effects of treatment. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:4184–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Pusic A, Thompson TA, Kerrigan CL, et al. Surgical options for the early-stage breast cancer: factors associated with patient choice and postoperative quality of life. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;104:1325–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Girotto JA, Schreiber J, Nahabedian MY. Breast reconstruction in the elderly: preserving excellent quality of life. Ann Plast Surg 2003;50:572–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Beaulac SM, McNair LA, Scott TE, LaMorte WW, Kavanah MT. Lymphedema and quality of life in survivors of early-stage breast cancer. Arch Surg 2002;137:1253–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Parker PA, Baile WF, de Moor C, Lenzi R, Kudelka AP, Cohen L. Breaking bad news about cancer: patients’ preferences for communication. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:2049–56

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Lobb EA, Butow PN, Kenny DT, Tattersall MH. Communicating prognosis in early breast cancer: do women understand the language used? Med J Aust 1999;171:290–4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Butow PN, Maclean M, Dunn SM, Tattersall MH, Boyer MJ. The dynamics of change: cancer patients’ preferences for information, involvement and support. Ann Oncol 1997;8:857–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Arora NK. Interacting with cancer patients: the significance of physicians’ communication behavior. Soc Sci Med 2003;57:791–806

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Roberts CS, Cox CE, Reintgen DS, Baile WF, Gibertini M. Influence of physician communication on newly diagnosed breast patients’ psychologic adjustment and decision-making. Cancer 1994;74:336–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Beth Notzon, from the Office of Scientific Publications, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, for her comments on this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 1330, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, Texas, 77020, USA

    Patricia A. Parker PhD, Karen Basen-Engquist PhD, MPH, Lorenzo Cohen PhD, Ellen R. Gritz PhD & Qi X. Wei MS

  2. Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, 77230, USA

    Adel Youssef MD, Sue Walker RN & Geoff L. Robb MD

  3. Department of Palliative Care and Rehabilitation Medicine, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, 77230, USA

    Lorenzo Cohen PhD

Authors
  1. Patricia A. Parker PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Adel Youssef MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sue Walker RN
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Karen Basen-Engquist PhD, MPH
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lorenzo Cohen PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ellen R. Gritz PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Qi X. Wei MS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Geoff L. Robb MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patricia A. Parker PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parker, P.A., Youssef, A., Walker, S. et al. Short-Term and Long-Term Psychosocial Adjustment and Quality of Life in Women Undergoing Different Surgical Procedures for Breast Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 14, 3078–3089 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-007-9413-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-007-9413-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation