Skip to main content
Log in

Self-efficacy effects on feeling states in women

  • Published:
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, exercise self-efficacy was manipulated in a laboratory setting and its effects on feeling state responses were examined. A sample consisting largely of Non-Latina White and Latina women (N = 59) were randomly assigned to a low- or high-efficacy condition, and efficacy was manipulated by provision of false feedback and computer data. Feeling state responses were assessed before and after exercise. Efficacy was successfully manipulated, and participants in the high-efficacy condition reported more positive well-being and energy and less psychological distress and fatigue than those in the low-efficacy condition. There wereno significant differences between the two ethnic groups for self-efficacy and feeling state responses. In addition, no clear pattern of relations emerged between efficacy and feeling state responses. The results support structuring exercise treatments in such a way that mastery experiences and positive feedback are maximized to enhance self-efficacy and improve subjective experiences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg, G. (1985). An introduction to Borg’s RPE-Scale. Ithaca, NY: Mouvement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dishman, R. K., & Sallis, J. F. (1994). Determinants and interventions for physical activity and exercise. In C. Bouchard, R. J. Shephard, & Stephens, T. (Eds.), Physical activity, fitness, and health: International proceedings and consensus statement (pp. 214–238). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauvin, L., & Rejeski, W. J. (1993). The Exercise-Induced Feeling Inventory: Development and initial validation. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 15, 403–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAuley, E. (1993). Self-efficacy and the maintenanceofexercise participationin older adults. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 16, 103–113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McAuley, E., & Blissmer, B. (2000). Self-efficacy determinants and consequences of physical activity. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 28, 85–88.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McAuley, E., Blissmer, B., Katula, J., & Duncan, T. E.(2000). Exercise environment, self-efficacy, and affective responses to acute exercise in older adults. Psychology and Health, 15, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAuley, E., & Courneya, K. S. (1992). Self-efficacy relationships with affective and exertion responses to exercise. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 312–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAuley, E., & Courneya, K. S. (1994). The Subjective Exercise Experiences Scale (SEES): Development and preliminary validation. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 16, 163–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAuley, E., Pena, M. M., & Jerome, G. J. (2001). Self-efficacyas adeterminant and an outcomeof exercise. In G. C. Roberts (Ed.), Advances in motivation in sport and exercise (pp. 235–261). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAuley, E., Talbot, H. M., & Martinez, S. (1999). Manipulating self-efficacy in the exercise environment in women: Influences on affective responses. Health Psychology, 18, 288–294.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rejeski, W. J., Best, D., Griffith, P., & Kenney, E. (1987). Sex-role orientation and the responses of men to exercise stress. Research Quarterly, 58, 200–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thayer, R. E. (1978). Toward a theory of multidimensional activation (arousal). Motivation and Emotion, 2, 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thayer, R. E. (1986). Activation—deactivation adjective check list: Current overview and structural analysis. Psychological Reports, 58, 607–614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thayer, R. E. (1989). The biopsychology of mood and arousal. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, S., Reading, J., & Shephard, R. J. (1992). Revision of the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PAR-Q). Canadian Journal of Sport Sciences, 17, 338–345.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Treasure, D. C., & Newberry, D. M. (1998). Relationship between self-efficacy, exercise intensity, and feeling states in a sedentary population during and following an acute bout of exercise. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 20, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, E. E., Rejeski, W. J., & Brawley, L. R. (1997). Psychological benefitsof physical activity are influenced by the social environment. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 19, 119–130.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerald J. Jerome.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jerome, G.J., Marquez, D.X., McAuley, E. et al. Self-efficacy effects on feeling states in women. Int. J. Behav. Med. 9, 139–154 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327558IJBM0902_05

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327558IJBM0902_05

Key words

Navigation