Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effective Strategies for Maintaining Research Participation in Clinical Trials

  • Data Management — Missing Data
  • Published:
Drug information journal : DIJ / Drug Information Association Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Achieving high protocol adherence is essential for ensuring the overall success and scientific merit of clinical trials. Strategies for maximizing recruitment and treatment adherence have been previously explored in the literature. There has been less focus, however, on effective methods for maintaining participants in research follow-up. This article examines factors associated with poor follow-up rates as well as strategies for facilitating research commitment and addressing sources of nonadherence. Special attention is devoted to alcohol- and substance-dependent populations, groups known to have poor adherence rates. Examples are drawn from the COMBINE Study, an NIAAA-funded, nationwide, multisite, combined behavioral and pharmacotherapy trial for alcohol problems that achieved high one-year follow-up rates. The important role of coordinating centers in facilitating research retention is also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sibbald B, Roland M. Understanding controlled trials: why are randomised controlled trials important? Br Med J. 1998;316(7126):201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cramer J, Spilker B. Patient Compliance in Medical Practice and Clinical Trials. New York: Raven Press; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Friedman L, Furburg C, DeMets D. Fundamentals of Clinical Trials. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1998.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Spilker B, Cramer J. Patient Recruitment in Clinical Trials. New York: Raven Press; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Moyer A, Finney J, Swearingen C. Methodological characteristics and quality of alcohol treatment outcome studies, 1970–1998: an expanded evaluation. Addiction. 2002;97(3):253–263.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pich J, Carne X, Arnaiz J, Gomez B, Trilla A, Rodes J. Role of a research ethics committee in followup and publication of results. Lancet. 2003;361:1015–1016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wittes R, Friedman M. Accrual to clinical trials. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1988;80(12):884–885.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Easterbrook P, Matthews D. Fate of research studies. J R Soc Med. 1992;85(2):71–76.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Edwards A, Rollnick S. Outcome studies of brief alcohol intervention in general practice: the problem of lost subjects. Addiction. 1997;12:1699–1704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Howard K, Cox W, Saunders S. Attrition in substance abuse comparative research: the illusion of randomization. NIDA Research Monograph. 1990;104:68–79.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mattson M, DelBoca F, Carroll K, et al. Compliance with treatment and follow-up protocols Project MATCH: predictors and relationship to outcome. Alcohol: Clin Exp Res. 1998;22(6):1328–1339.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Thomson C, Morley K, Teesson M, Sannibale C, Haber P. Issues with recruitment to randomised controlled trials in the drug and alcohol field: a literature review and Australian case study. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2008;27(2):115–122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Carroll K, ed. Enhancing Retention in Clinical Trials of Psychosocial Treatments: Practical Strategics. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Onken L, Blaine J, Boren J, eds. Beyond the Therapeutic Alliance: Keeping the Drug-Dependent Individual in Treatment. NIDA Research Monograph No. 165. DHHS Publication No. (ADM) 97–4142; No. 165.

  15. Group PMR. Project MATCH: rationale and methods for a multisite clinical trial matching alcoholism patients to treatment. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1993;17(6):1130–1145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zweben A, Barrett D, Berger L, Murray K. Recruiting and retaining participants in a combined behavioral and pharmacological clinical trial. J Stud Alcohol. 2005;66(Suppl. 15):72–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Flick S. Managing attrition in clinical research. Clin Psychol Rev. 1988;8:499–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Atwood J, Haase J, Rees-McGee S, et al. Reasons related to adherence in community-based field studies. Patient Educ Counsel. 1992;19(3):251–259.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bender B, Ellison M, Gleason M, Murphy J, Sundstrom D, Szefler S. Minimizing attrition in a longterm clinical trial of pediatric asthma. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2003;91:168–176.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cassidy E, Baird E, Sheikh J. Recruitment and retention of elderly patients in clinical trials. Am J Ger Psychiatry. 2001;9:136–140.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Moser D, Dracup K, Doering L. Factors differentiating dropouts from completers in a longitudinal, multicenter clinical trial. Nurs Res. 2000;49(2):109–116.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. May D, Kratochvil C, Puumala S, Silva S, Rezac A, Hallin M. A manual based intervention to address clinical crises and retain patients in the treatment of adolescents with depression study (TADS). J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2006;46(5):573–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cottler L, Compton W, Ben-Abdallah A, Horne M, Claverie D. Achieving a 96.6 percent follow-up rate in a longitudinal study of drug abusers. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1996;41:209–217.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Scott C. A replicable model for achieving over 90% follow-up rates in longitudinal studies of substance abusers. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2004;74:21–36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Callaghan R, Hathaway A, Cunningham J, Vettese L, Wyatt S, Taylor L. Does stage-of-change predict dropout in a culturally diverse sample of adolescents admitted to inpatient substance abuse treatment? A test of the transtheoretical model. Addict Behav. 2005;30:1834–1847.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. DiClemente C, Schlundt D, Gemmell L. Readiness and stages of change in addiction treatment. Am J Addict. 2004;13(2):103–119.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dickert N, Grady C. What’s the price of a research subject? Approaches to payment for research participation. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(3):198–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Fry C, Dwyer R. For love or money? An exploratory study of why injecting drug users participate in research. Addiction. 2001;96:1319–1325.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Koocher G. Questionable methods in alcoholism research. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991;59(2):246–248.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. McGee G. A piece of my mind. Subject to payment? JAMA. 1997;278(3):199–200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. McKeganey N. To pay or not to pay: respondents’ motivation for participating in research. Addiction. 2001;96:1237–1238.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Shaner A, Eckman T, Robert L, et al. Disability income, cocaine use, and repeated hospitalization among schizophrenic cocaine abusers—a government sponsored revolving door? N Engl J Med. 1995;333:777–783.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cunningham J, Sobell L, Chow V. What’s in a label? The effects of substance types and labels on treatment considerations and stigma. J Stud Alcohol. 1993;54(6):693–699.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mark T, Kranzler H, Poole V, Hagen C, McLeod C, Crosse S. Barriers to the use of medications to treat alcoholism. Am J Addict. 2003;12(4):281–294.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Anton R, O’Malley S, Ciraulo D, et al. Combined pharmacotherapies and behavioral interventions for alcohol dependence. The COMBINE Study: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2006;295:2003–2017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Desmond D, Maddux J, Johnson T, Confer B. Obtaining follow-up interviews for treatment evaluation. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1995;12(2):95–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. McCrady B, Bux D. Ethical issues in informed consent with substance abusers. J Clin Invest. 1999;67:186–193.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Grady C. Payment of clinical research subjects. J Clin Invest. 2005;115:1681–1687.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Amass L, Bickel W, Crean J, Higgins S, Badger G. Preferences for clinic privileges, retail items and social activities in an outpatient treatment program. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1996;13(1):43–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kurlander J, Simon-Dack S, Gorelick D. Spending of remuneration by subjects in non-treatment drug abuse research studies. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2006;32:527–540.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Festinger D, Marlowe D, Croft J, et al. Do research payments precipitate drug use or coerce participation? J Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005;78:275–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Miller W. Form 90: A Structured Assessment Interview for Drinking and Related Behaviors Test Manual. NIAAA Project MATCH Monograph Series. NIH Publication No. 96-4944. Vol 5. Bethesda, MD: Department of Health and Human Services; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Barrett D, Morse P, eds. Handling Noncompliance. Bethesda, MD: Department of Health and Human Services; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Zweben A, Barrett D, Carty K, McRee B, Morse P, Rice C, eds. Strategies for Facilitating Protocol Compliance in Alcoholism Treatment Research. NIAAA Project MATCH Monograph Series. NIH Publication No. 98-4144. Bethesda, MD: Department of Health and Human Services; 1998; No. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  45. McRee B, ed. Project MATCH: A Case Study. Bethesda, MD: Department of Health and Human Services; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Allen Zweben DSW.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zweben, A., Fucito, L.M. & O’Malley, S.S. Effective Strategies for Maintaining Research Participation in Clinical Trials. Ther Innov Regul Sci 43, 459–467 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/009286150904300411

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009286150904300411

Key Words

Navigation