Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Reversed-polarity items and scale unidimensionality

  • Research Note
  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A standard procedure in the development of multi-item measurement scales is to incorporate reversed-polarity items to control for and/or identify acquiescence response bias. In spite of the broad acceptance of this approach, very little work has been done to evaluate the impact of reversed-polarity items on the dimensionality of scales. This study empirically evaluates the impact of reversed-polarity items on the unidimensionality of several well-known marketing measures. The authors suggest that use of reversed-polarity items may present a substantive problem for marketing scholars because of the resulting degradation of scale unidimensionality. The existence of this phenomenon is confirmed in a multisurvey, multiscale, binational research design. Implications for marketing scale developers and measurement theoreticians are discussed, theoretical bases that might explain the phenomenon are explored, and further research suggestions are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, James C., David W. Gerbing, and John E. Hunter. 1987. “On the Assessment of Unidimensionality Measurement: Internal and External Consistency, and Overall Consistency Criteria.”Journal of Marketing Research 24 (November): 432–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Norman H. 1965. “Averaging Versus Adding as a Stimulus Combination Rule in Impression Formation.”Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2: 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badovick, Gordon and Ann Thompson. 1994. “Preferred Cognitive Styles and Their Influences Upon Adaptive and Task Related Selling Behaviors.” InProceedings of the National Conference in Sales Management. Ed. Rick E. Ridnour. Dekalb: Northern Illinois University, Department of Marketing, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, Robert, Henrietta Logan, Jeff Lilly, Mary Inman, and Michael Brennan. 1994. “Negative Emotion and Message Processing.”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 30: 181–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, M. H. 1972. “Morality Judgements: Tests of an Averaging Model.”Journal of Experimental Psychology 93: 35–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Gene, Ronald L. Coulter, and Robert E. Widing, II. 1991. “Customer Evaluation of Retail Salespeople Utilizing the SOCO Scale: A Replication, Extension, and Application.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 19 (Fall): 347–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, Barbra M. 1989.A Primer of LISREL: Basic Applications and Programming for Confirmatory Factor Analytic Models. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carman, J. M. 1990. “Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality: An Assessment of the SERVQUAL Dimensions.”Journal of Retailing 66 (Spring): 33–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, Gilbert A., Jr. 1979. “A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs.”Journal of Marketing Research 16 (February): 64–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, Michael, Francois Bonneville, and Roberto DiFazio. 1990. “Consensus and Causal Attributions for Negative Affect.”Journal of Social Psychology 130 (3): 375–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVellis, Robert F. 1991.Scale Development: Theory and Applications. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, Susan P. and C. Samuel Craig. 1983.International Marketing Research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. L. 1957.Techniques of Attitude Scale Construction. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falthzik, Alfred M. and Marvin A. Jolson. 1974. “Statement Polarity in Attitude Studies.”Journal of Marketing Research 11 (February): 102–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, Sheldon. 1966. “Motivational Aspects of Attitudinal Elements and Their Place in Cognitive Interaction.” InCognitive Consistency. Ed. Sheldon Feldman. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T. 1980. “Attention and Weight in Person Perception: The Impact of Negative and Extreme Behavior.”Journal of Psychology and Social Psychology 38: 889–906.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerbing, David W. and James C. Anderson. 1988. “An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and Its Assessment.”Journal of Marketing Research 25 (May): 186–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, Ronald E. and Rene Desborde. 1991. “A Validity Study of a Measure of Opinion Leadership.”Journal of Business Research 22: 11–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, Joseph J., Jr., Rolph E. Anderson, and Ronald L. Tatham. 1987.Multivariate Data Analysis. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, John R. 1985. “Methodology Review: Assessing Unidimensionality of Tests and Items.”Applied Psychological Measurement 9 (June): 139–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, John R., Glen L. Urban, and Bruce D. Weinberg. 1993. “How Consumers Allocate Their Time When Searching for Information.”Journal of Marketing Research 30 (4): 452–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heaven, Patrick C. L. 1983. “Authoritarianism or Acquiescence? South African Findings.”Journal of Social Psychology 119: 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helson, H. 1964.Adaptation-Level Theory. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herche, Joel, Michael J. Swenson, and Willem Verbeke. Forthcoming. “Personal Selling Constructs and Measures: EMIC Versus ETIC Approaches to Cross-National Research.European Journal of Marketing.

  • Jacoby, Jacob. 1978. “Consumer Research: State of the Art Review.”Journal of Marketing 42 (2): 87–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, Bernard J. and Ajay K. Kohli. 1991. “Supervisory Feedback: Alternative Types and Their Impact on Salespeople’s Performance and Satisfaction.”Journal of Marketing Research 28 (2): 190–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E. and K. E. Davis. 1965. “From Acts to Dispositions: The Attribution Process in Person Perception.” InAdvances in Experimental Social Psychology. Vol. 2. Ed. L. Berkowitz. New York: Academic Press, 219–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, Nehemiah. 1965. “The Asymmetry of Liking and Disliking: A Phenomenon Meriting Further Reflection and Research.”Public Opinion Quarterly 29: 315–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalwani, Manohar U., Chi Kin Yim, Heikki J. Rinne, and Yoshi Sugita. 1990. “A Price Expectations Model of Customer Brand Choice.”Journal of Marketing Research 27 (3): 251–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanouse, David E. and L. Reid Hanson, Jr. 1971. “Negativity in Evaluations.” InAttribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior. Eds. Edward E. Jones, David E. Kanouse, Harold H. Kelley, Richard E. Nisbett, Stuart Valins, and Bernard Weiner. Morristown, NJ: General Learning, 47–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klayman, J. and Ha, Y. 1989. “Hypothesis Testing in Rule Discovery: Strategy, Structure, and Content.”Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 15: 596–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, Ajith and William R. Dillon. 1987. “The Interaction of Measurement and Structure in Simultaneous Equation Models With Unobservable Variables.”Journal of Marketing Research 24 (February): 98–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunda, Ziva, Geoffrey T. Fong, Rasyd Sanitioso, and Emily Reber. 1993. “Directional Questions Direct Self-Conceptions.”Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 29: 63–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Likert, R. 1932. “A Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes.”Archives of Psychology 140: 44–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maheswaran, Durairaj and Joan Meyers-Levy. 1990. “The Influence of Message Framing and Issue Involvement.”Journal of Marketing Research 27 (3): 361–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, Roderick P. 1981. “The Dimensionality of Tests and Items.”British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 34 (May): 100–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, Ronald E. and Ralph L. Day. 1985. “Measuring Customer Orientation of Salespeople: A Replication With Industrial Buyers.”Journal of Marketing Research 22 (November): 443–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mowen, John C. and Maryanne M. Mowen. 1991. “Time and Outcome Valuation: Implications for Marketing Decision Making.”Journal of Marketing 55 (4): 54–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Netemeyer, Richard G., Srinivas Durvasula, and Donald R. Lichtenstein. 1991. “A Cross-National Assessment of the Reliability and Validity of the CETSCALE.”Journal of Marketing Research 28 (August): 320–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, Jum C. 1978.Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————— and Ira H. Bernstein. 1994.Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, Richard L. 1993. “Cognitive, Affective and Attribute Bases of the Satisfaction Response.”Journal of Consumer Research 20 (3): 418–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A., Leonard L. Berry, and Valerie A. Zeithaml. 1991. “Refinement and Reassessment of the SERVQUAL Scale.”Journal of Retailing 67 (Winter): 420–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pechmann, Cornelia. 1992. “Predicting When Two-Sided Ads Will Be More Effective Than One-Sided Ads: The Role of Correlational and Correspondent Inferences.”Journal of Marketing Research 24 (4): 441–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray, John J. 1979. “Is the Acquiescent Response Style Problem Not So Mythical After All? Some Results From a Successful Balanced F Scale.”Journal of Personality Assessment 43 (6): 638–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————— 1983. “Reviving the Problem of Acquiescent Response Bias.”Journal of Social Psychology 121: 81–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorer, L. G. 1965. “The Great Response-Style Myth.”Psychological Bulletin 63: 129–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxe, Robert and Barton A. Weitz. 1982. “The SOCO Scale: A Measure of the Customer Orientation of Salespeople.”Journal of Marketing Research 19 (August): 343–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, M. and C. W. Sherif. 1967. “Attitudes as the Individual’s Own Categories: The Social Judgement Approach to Attitude Change.” InAttitude, Ego Involvement and Change. Eds. C. W. Sherif and M. Sherif. New York: John Wiley, 105–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimp, Terence A. and Subhash Sharma. 1987. “Consumer Ethnocentrism: Construction and Validation of the CETSCALE.”Journal of Marketing Research 24 (August): 280–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skowronski, John J. and Donal E. Carlston. 1989. “Negativity and Extremity Biases in Impression Formation: A Review of Explanations.”Psychological Bulletin 105 (1): 131–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spector, Paul E. 1987. “Method Variance as an Artifact in Self-Reported Affect and Perceptions at Work: Myth or Significant Problem?”Journal of Applied Psychology 72: 438–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————— 1992.Summated Rating Scale Construction. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiro, Rosann L. and Barton A. Weitz. 1990. “Adaptive Selling: Conceptualization, Measurement, and Nomological Validity.”Journal of Marketing Research 27 (February): 61–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swenson, Michael J. and Joel Herche. 1994. “Social Values and Salesperson Performance: An Empirical Examination.”Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 22 (Summer): 283–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terborg, James R. and Lawrence H. Peters. 1974. “Some Observations on Wording of Item-Stems for Attitude Questionnaires.”Psychological Reports 35: 463–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitz, Barton A., Harish Sujan, and Mita Sujan. 1986. “Knowledge, Motivation, and Adaptive Behavior: A Framework for Improving Selling Effectiveness.”Journal of Marketing 50 (October): 174–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westbrook, Robert A. 1987. “Product/Consumption-Based Affective Responses and Postpurchase Processes.”Journal of Marketing Research 24: 258–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, George I. 1987. “Children’s Causal Attributions to Self and Other as a Function of Outcome and Task.”Journal of Educational Psychology 79 (2): 192–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, John D., David E. Kanouse, and John E. Ware, Jr. 1983. “Controlling for Acquiescence Response Set in Scale Development.”Journal of Applied Psychology 67 (5): 555–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyer, R. S. 1973. “Category Ratings for ‘Subjective Expected Values’: Implications for Attitude Formation and Change.”Psychological Review 80: 446–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————— 1974.Cognitive Organization and Change: An Information Processing Approach. Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. the Eberhardt School of Business, University of the Pacific, USA

    Joel Herche (assistant professor of marketing and international business)

  2. the University of Evansville in Evansville, Indiana

    Brian Engelland (assistant professor of marketing)

Authors
  1. Joel Herche
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Brian Engelland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

He received his Ph.D. from the University of Oregon in 1989. His current research interests include cross-cultural marketing strategy, sales force management, and psychometrics. He is a previous contributor to theJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science and has also been published in theJournal of Personal Selling and Sales Management, International Marketing Review, andEuropean Journal of Marketing, among others.

Before receiving his D.B.A. from Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, he served in marketing positions for international firms and as marketing chairs for two industry associations. His research interests include product innovation and new product strategy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Herche, J., Engelland, B. Reversed-polarity items and scale unidimensionality. JAMS 24, 366–374 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070396244007

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070396244007

Keywords

Search

Navigation