Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T05:42:14.870Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Transgenerational Model of Status Attainment: the Potential Mediating Role of School Motivation and Education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Ingrid Schoon
Ingrid Schoon*
Affiliation:
Institute of Education, University of London
*
e-mail I.Schoon@ioe.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines the influences of parental social status, childhood cognitive ability, school motivation and education on social status attainment in early adulthood. Using Structural Equation Modelling (SEM), a pathway model of transgenerational status attainment is conceptualised, taking into account the context as well as the timing of individual status transitions. The subjects were 3104 men and 3229 women who participated in the 1958 National Child Development Study and 3049 men and 2692 women from the 1970 British Cohort Study, following their lives from childhood to their mid-thirties. The findings suggest that in both cohorts the number of years spent in full-time education is by far the most important determinant of status attainment among men and women and that there are persistent social inequalities in status attainment. The findings furthermore confirm the hypothesis that social background and cognitive ability are partially mediated through school motivation and education, opening up leverage for possible interventions.

Keywords

cognitive abilityeducationgenderschool motivationgenderstatus attainmentI20J62
Type
Articles
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 205 , July 2008 , pp. 72 - 82
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

∗

The analysis and writing of this article were supported by grants from the UK Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC): L32625306, RES-225-25-2001 and RES-594-28-0001. Data from the Cohort Studies were supplied by the ESRC Data Archive. Those who carried out the original collection of the data bear no responsibility for its further analysis and interpretation.

References

Bentler, P.M. (1990), ‘Comparative fit indexes in structural models’, Psychological Bulletin, 107 (2), pp. 238–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blau, P.M. and Duncan, O.D. (1967), The American Occupational Structure, New York, John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Bollen, K.A. (1989), Structural Equations with Latent Variables, New York, Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, R. and Saunders, P. (1999), ‘Routes of success: influences on the occupational attainment of young British males’, British Journal of Sociology, 50(2), pp. 217–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Breen, R. and Goldthorpe, J.H. (1999), ‘Class inequality and meritocracy: a critique of Saunders and an alternative analysis’, British Journal of Sociology, 50, pp. 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-(2001), ‘Class, mobility and merit - the experience of two British birth cohorts’, European Sociological Review, 17(2), pp. 81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-(2002), ‘Merit, mobility and method: another reply to Saunders’, British Journal of Sociology, 53, pp. 575–82.Google Scholar
Butler, N., Despotidou, S. and Shepherd, P. (1997), 1970 British Cohort Study (BCS70) Ten Year Follow-up: A Guide to the BCS70 10-year Data Available at the Economic and Social Research Unit Data Archive, London, Social Statistics Research Unit, City University.Google Scholar
Bynner, J. (1998), ‘Education and family components of identity in the transition from school to work’, International Journal of Behavioral Development, 22, pp. 29–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bynner, J. and Joshi, H. (2002), ‘Equality and opportunity in education: evidence from the 1958 and 1970 birth cohort studies’, Oxford Review of Education, 28(4), pp. 405–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crompton, R. and Scott, J. (2000), ‘Introduction: the state of class analysis’, in Crompton, R., Devine, F., Savage, M. and Scott, J. (eds), Renewing Class Analysis, Oxford, Blackwell/The Sociological Review, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
Davie, R., Butler, N.R. and Goldstein, H. (1972), From Birth to Seven: The Second Report of the National Child Development Study (1958 cohort), London, Longman in association with the National Children's Bureau.Google Scholar
Deary, I.J., Taylor, M.D., Hart, C.L., Wilson, V., Smith, D.G., Blane, D. and Starr, J.M. (2005), ‘Intergenerational mobility and mid-life status attainment: influences of childhood intelligence, childhood social factors and education’, Intelligence, 33, pp. 455–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, J.W.B. (1967), The Home and the School, London, Panther Books.Google Scholar
Duncan, O.D., Featherman, D.L. and Duncan, B. (1972), Socioeconomic Background and Achievement, New York, Seminar Press.Google Scholar
Elliott, C.D., Murray, D. and Pearson, L. (1978), British Ability Scales, Windsor, National Foundation for Educational Research.Google Scholar
Featherman, D.L. and Hauser, R.M. (1978), Opportunity and Change, New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Fogelman, K. (ed.) (1976), Britain's Sixteen-Year-Olds, London, National Children's Bureau.Google Scholar
Galindo-Rueda, F. and Vignoles, A. (2002), Class Ridden or Meritocratic? An Economomic Analysis of Recent Changes in Britain (Vol. IZA DP no. 677), Bonn, Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (IZA).Google Scholar
-(2005), ‘The declining relative importance of ability in predicting educational attainment’, Journal of Human Resources, 40(2), pp. 335–53.Google Scholar
Gershuny, J. (2000), ‘Social position from narrative data’, in Crompton, R., Devine, F., Savage, M. and Scott, J. (eds), Renewing Class Analysis, Oxford, Blackwell/The Sociological Review, pp. 43–65.Google Scholar
Gregg, P. and Machin, S. (2001), ‘Childhood experiences, educational attainment and adult labor market performance’, in Vleminckx, K. and Smeeding, T. (eds), Child Wellbeing, Child Poverty and Child Policy in Modern Nations: What Do We Know? Bristol, The Policy Press, pp. 129–50.Google Scholar
Halsey, A.H., Heath, A. and Ridge, J. (1980), Opening Wide the Doors of Higher Education, London, National Commission of Education.Google Scholar
Herrnstein, R.J. and Murray, C. (1994), The Bell Curve, New York, NY, Free Press.Google Scholar
Horgan, G. (2007), The Impact of Poverty on Young Children's Experience of School, York, Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
Jencks, C. (1979), Who Gets Ahead? The Determinants of Economic Success in America, New York, Basic Books.Google Scholar
Kerckhoff, A.C. (1976), ‘The status attainment process: socialisation or allocation?’, Social Forces, 55, pp. 368–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-(1993), Diverging Pathways: Social Structure and Career Deflections, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Korenman, S. and Winship, C. (2000), ‘A re-analysis of The Bell Curve: intelligence, family background and schooling’, in Arrow, K., Bowles, S. and Durlauf, S. (eds), Meritocracy and Economic Inequality, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Krieger, N., Williams, D.R. and Moss, N.E. (1997), ‘Measuring social class in US public health research: concepts, methodologies and guidelines’, Annual Review of Public Health, 18, pp. 341–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lampard, R. (1995), ‘Parents' occupation and their children's occupational attainment: a contribution to the debate on the class assignment of families’, Sociology, 29, pp. 715–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leete, R. and Fox, J. (1977), ‘Registrar General's social classes: origins and users, Population Trends, 8, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
Little, R.J.A. and Rubin, D.B. (2002), Statistical Analysis with Missing Data, 2nd edition, Hoboken, Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, C. (1986), ‘Social class and occupation, in Burgess, R.G. (ed), Key Variables in Social Investigation, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
McClendon, M.J. (1976), ‘The occupational status attainment process of males and females’, American Sociological Review, 41, pp. 52–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muthén, L.K. and Muthén, B.O. (2006), Mplus User's Guide. Fourth edition, Los Angeles, CA Muthén and Muthén.Google Scholar
OPCS and Surveys, O. o. P. C. a. (1980), Classification of Occupations and Coding Index, London, H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Pallas, A.M. (2004), ‘Educational transitions, trajectories and pathways, in Mortimer, J.T. and Shanahan, M.J. (eds), Handbook of the Life Course, New York, Springer, pp. 165–184.Google Scholar
Plewis, I., Calderwood, L., Hawkes, D. and Nathan, G. (2004), National Child Development Study and 1970 British Cohort Study. Technical Report: Changes in the NCDS and BCS70 Populations and Samples Over Time, London, Institute of Education, Centre for Longitudinal Studies.Google Scholar
Richards, M., Power, C. and Sacker, A. (2008), ‘Paths to literacy: evidence from two British Birth cohorts’ (forthcoming).Google Scholar
Richards, M. and Sacker, A. (2003), ‘Lifetime antecedents of cognitive reserve’, Journal of Clinical and Experimental Psychology, 25, pp. 614–24.Google ScholarPubMed
Saunders, P. (1997), ‘Social mobility in Britain: an empirical evaluation of two competing theories’, Sociology, 31, pp. 261- 88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
-(2002), ‘Reflections on the meritocracy debate in Britain: a response to Richard Breen and John Goldthorpe’, British Journal of Sociology, 53, pp. 559–74.Google Scholar
Schoon, I. (2006), Risk and Resilience. Adaptations in Changing Times, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoon, I., Bynner, J., Joshi, H., Parsons, S., Wiggins, R.D. and Sacker, A. (2002), ‘The influence of context, timing and duration of risk experiences for the passage from childhood to midadulthood’, Child Development, 73(5), pp. 1486–504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schoon, I., Martin, P. and Ross, A. (2007), ‘Career transitions in times of social change. His and her story’, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 70, pp. 78–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sewell, W.H., Haller, A.O. and Ohlendorf, G.W. (1970), ‘The educational and early occupational status attainment process: replication and revision’, American Sociological Review, 35, pp. 1014–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sewell, W.H., Haller, A.O. and Portes, A. (1969), ‘The educational and early occupational attainment process’, American sociological review, 34(1), pp. 82–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sewell, W.H. and Hauser, R.M. (1975), Education, Occupation and Earnings: Achievement in the Early Career, New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sewell, W.H., Hauser, R.M. and Wolf, W.C. (1980), ‘Sex, schooling and occupational status, The American Journal of Sociology, 86(3), pp. 551–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steedman, H. and Stoney, S. (2004), ‘Disengagement 14-16: context and evidence’, London, LSE CEP Discussion Paper No 654.Google Scholar
Treiman, D.J. and Terrell, K. (1975), ‘Sex and the process of status attainment: a comparison of working women and men’, American Sociological Review, 40, pp. 174–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar