Skip to main content
Log in

Training Physician-Scientists: A Model for Integrating Research Into Psychiatric Residency

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Academic Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The number of physicians engaged in research careers has declined significantly over the past two decades. Physicians with in-depth experience and formal training in research design, development, implementation, statistical analysis, and interpretation of scientific information are rare.

Methods

In response to this shortage, the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) launched an NIH-funded research track in 2006 to address the institutional, financial, and regulatory barriers to research training during residency. The primary aim was to incorporate a research track within a 4-year psychiatric residency program for physicians. A secondary goal was to extend recruitment into earlier phases of medical training by offering summer research fellowships to medical and undergraduate students.

Results

This article describes the program including core mechanisms of training, recruitment, and outcomes to date.

Conclusions

The program provides a model to effectively integrate research training during residency without increasing the number of years of residency training. The training components described herein should be exportable to other psychiatric residency training programs and potentially other specialties of medicine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cech TR, Egan LW, Doyle C, et al: The biomedical research bottleneck. Science 2001; 293:573

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fenton W, James R, Insel T: Psychiatry residency training, the physician-scientist, and the future of psychiatry. Acad Psychiatry 2004; 28:263–266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Abrams MT, Patchan K, Boat TF (eds), Committee on Incorporating Research into Psychiatry Residency Training (Board on Neuroscience and Behavioral Health): Research Training in Psychiatry Residency: Strategies for Reform. Washington, DC, Institute of Medicine, The National Academies Press, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pincus HA, Haviland MG, Dial TH, et al: The relationship of postdoctoral research training to current research activities of faculty in academic departments of psychiatry. Am J Psychiatry 1995; 152:596–601

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yager J, Greden J, Abrams M, et al: The Institute of Medicine’s report on research training in psychiatry residency: strategies for reform—background, results, and follow up. Acad Psychiatry 2004; 28:267–274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rosenberg LE: The physician-scientist: an essential—and fragile—link in the medical research chain. J Clin Invest 1999; 103:1621–1626

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dickler HB, Fang D, Heinig SJ, et al: New physician-investigators receiving national institutes of health research project grants: a historical perspective on the “endangered species.” JAMA 2007; 297:2496–2501

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Roane DM, Inan E, Haeri S, et al: Ensuring research competency in psychiatric residency training. Acad Psychiatry 2009; 33:215–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Balon R, Singh S: Status of research training. Acad Psychiatry 2001; 25:34–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bland CJ, Ruffin MT: Characteristics of a productive research environment: literature review. Acad Med 1992; 67: 385–397

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lambert MT, Garver DL: Mentoring psychiatric trainees’ first paper for publication. Acad Psychiatry 1998; 22: 47–55

    Google Scholar 

  12. Reynolds CF, Martin C, Brent D, et al: Postdoctoral clinical-research training in psychiatry: a model for teaching grant writing and other research survival skills and for increasing clarity of mentoring expectations. Acad Psychiatry 1998; 22:190–196

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kupfer DJ, Schatzberg AF, Grochocinski VJ, et al: The career development institute for psychiatry: an innovative, longitudinal program for physician-scientists. Acad Psychiatry 2009; 33:313–318

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Muslin AJ, Kornfeld S, Polonsky KS: The physician scientist training program in internal medicine at Washington University School of Medicine. Acad Med 2009; 84:468–471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Oxnard GR, Zinkus TM, Bazari H, et al: Integrating research training into residency: tools of human investigation. Acad Med 2009; 84:1295–1300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Guelich JM, Singer BH, Castro MC, et al: A gender gap in the next generation of physician-scientists: medical student interest and participation in research. J Investig Med 2002; 50:412–418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Varma A, Malik M: Research during psychiatry residency: a case for IMGs on visas. Acad Psychiatry 2007; 31:171–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sakamoto KM, Dipple KM: Becoming a woman physician scientist. Acad Med 2009; 84:817

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sudie E. Back Ph.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Back, S.E., Book, S.W., Santos, A.B. et al. Training Physician-Scientists: A Model for Integrating Research Into Psychiatric Residency. Acad Psychiatry 35, 40–45 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.35.1.40

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ap.35.1.40

Keywords

Navigation