Aplicación en España del cuestionario sobre calidad de vida «Minnesota Living With Heart Failure» para la insuficiencia cardíacaUse of the «Minnesota Living With Heart Failure» Quality of Life Questionnaire in Spain

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-8932(04)77078-5Get rights and content

Introducción y objetivos

La calidad de vida es, junto con la mortalidad y las hospitalizaciones, un objetivo importante en los estudios sobre insuficiencia cardíaca. El cuestionario «Minnesota Living With Heart Failure» es el instrumento más extensamente utilizado para valorarla en los trabajos de investigación. Nuestro objetivo ha sido conocer la calidad de vida mediante este cuestionario en una población general atendida en una unidad de insuficiencia cardíaca.

Pacientes y método

Se evaluó a 326 pacientes en la primera visita. Hemos analizado la correlación entre la puntuación obtenida y diversos factores clínicos y demográficos.

Resultados

La puntuación global fue relativamente baja (28). Encontramos una fuerte correlación (p < 0,001) con la clase funcional, el sexo (puntuaciones más altas en mujeres) y la diabetes. Hallamos también correlación con el número de ingresos durante el año previo (p < 0,001), la anemia (p < 0,001) y la etiología (p = 0,01), y una débil tendencia a aumentar con la edad (p = 0,04). Las puntuaciones más altas se observaron en pacientes valvulares (43) y las más bajas en pacientes con cardiopatía alcohólica (20) e isquémica (24). No hallamos correlación con el tiempo de evolución ni con la fracción de eyección de ventrículo izquierdo.

Conclusiones

La aplicación del «Minnesota Living With Heart Failure» a una población general con insuficiencia cardíaca ha mostrado puntuaciones relativamente bajas. A pesar de ello, hemos encontrado una correlación importante de la puntuación obtenida con la clase funcional y con el número de ingresos en el año previo, lo que sugiere que el cuestionario refleja correctamente el grado de severidad de la enfermedad.

Introduction and objectives

Quality of life is an important end-point in heart failure studies, as well as mortality and hospitalization rates. The Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire is the instrument used most widely to evaluate quality of life in research studies. We used this questionnaire to evaluate quality of life in a general population attended by a heart failure unit in Spain.

Patients and method

326 patients seen for the first time at the unit were evaluated. We analyzed the relationship between the questionnaire score and different clinical and demographic factors.

Results

The median global score on the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire was relatively low (28). We found a strong correlation (P<.001) between the score and functional class, sex (women had higher scores), and diabetes. We also found a correlation between the score and number of hospital admissions in the previous year (P< .001), anemia (P<.001) and etiology (P=.01), and a weak trend toward higher scores with increasing age (P=.04). The highest scores were observed in patients with valve disease disorders (43), and the lowest were seen in patients with alcoholic cardiomyopathy (20) and ischemic heart disease (24). We found no correlation with time of evolution of heart failure or with left ventricular ejection fraction.

Conclusions

The scores on the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire in a general population attended by a heart failure unit in Spain were relatively low. However, we found a strong correlation between this score and functional class, and also between this score and number of admissions in the previous year. These results suggest that the questionnaire adequately reflects the severity of the disease.

Bibliografía (31)

  • E. Lader et al.

    McSherry. The effect of digoxin on the quality of life in patients with heart failure

    J Cardiac Failure

    (2003)
  • J.J. McMurray et al.

    Epidemiology, aetiology, and prognosis of heart failure

    Heart

    (2000)
  • J.J. McMurray et al.

    Clinical epidemiology of heart failure: public and private health burden

    Eur Heart J

    (1998)
  • M. Hulsmann et al.

    Prediction of outcome by neurohumoral activation, the six-minute walk test and the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire in an outpatient cohort with congestive heart failure

    Eur Heart J

    (2002)
  • F. Alta et al.

    for the EPICAL investigators. Self-rating of quality of live provides additional prognostic information in heart failure. Insights into the EPICAL study

    Eur J Heart Failure

    (2002)
  • Cited by (53)

    • Mini nutritional assessment is a better predictor of mortality than subjective global assessment in heart failure out-patients

      2019, Clinical Nutrition
      Citation Excerpt :

      QoL was assessed with a HF-specific QoL questionnaire, known as the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLWHFQ) [21,22]. We used the Spanish version, which has been widely used and was prospectively validated [23–26]. Consisting of 21 questions, the MLWHFQ evaluates the impact of HF on the physical, psychological, and social aspects of patients' lives.

    • The level of anxiety, depression and quality of life among patients with heart failure in Greece

      2017, Applied Nursing Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      The inclusion criteria for participants were the following: (1) at least 40 years old; (2) ejection fraction (EF) ≤ 35%; (3) presence of typical symptoms of HF (breathlessness, ankle swelling, and fatigue); (4) presence of typical signs of HF (elevated jugular venous pressure, pulmonary crackles, and displaced apex beat); (5) knowledge of the Greek language; (6) ability of verbal communication; (7) written informed consent and (8) patients should not conduct any diagnostic procedure two hours before their enrolment in the study. ( Grady et al., 2001) (Parajon et al., 2004) (Hunt et al., 2001) (Lloyd-Jones et al., 2002) (Bleumink et al., 2001) (Morales, Cunningham, Brown, Liu, & Hays, 1999) The exclusion criteria of the study were (Χριστοδούλου, 2004): (1) existence of depression before the diagnosis of HF; (2) existence of schizophrenia before the diagnosis of HF; (3) existence of chronic respiratory failure; (4) existence of musculoskeletal disease, which affects patients' ability to conduct any physical activity; (5) existence of chronic renal failure at end stage; (6) diagnosis of cancer during the last 5 years. The data collection was taken place from September 2010 to January 2012 in a General Hospital of Athens in Greece.

    • Health-related quality of life in symptomatic postmyocardial infarction patients with left ventricular dysfunction

      2015, Asian Nursing Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Perceptions of overall HRQoL among post-MI patients were moderately low, considering a cut-off score between 24 and 45 on the MLHFQ [25]. The HRQoL of symptomatic post-MI patients in this study was worse than that (31.6 ± 23.0) of outpatients with stable HF (N = 114, NYHA class I/II 83.1%, LVEF 52.9%) [26] and outpatients with ischemic heart disease (MLHFQ = 24) and alcoholic cardiomyopathy (MLHFQ = 20) [19]. However, the HRQoL of participants in this study was better than the HRQoL in hospitalized elderly patients with chronic HF (MLHFQ = 50.4 ± 19.3) [27].

    • Effect of fragility on quality of life in patients with heart failure

      2013, American Journal of Cardiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The investigation conforms to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki. QoL was assessed with an HF-specific QoL questionnaire, the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLWHFQ)7 in its Spanish version, which has been widely used8 and prospectively validated.9,10 Consisting of 21 questions, the MLWHFQ evaluates the impact of HF on the physical, psychological, and social aspects of patients' lives.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text