skip to main content
research-article
Open Access

Building Causal Agency in Autistic Students through Iterative Reflection in Collaborative Transition Planning

Published:04 October 2023Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Transition planning is a collaborative process to promote agency in students with disabilities by encouraging them to participate in setting their own goals with team members and learn ways to assess their progress towards the goals. For autistic young adults who experience a lower employment rate, less stability in employment, and lower community connections than those with other disabilities, successful transition planning is an important opportunity to develop agency towards preparing and attaining success in employment and other areas meaningful to them. However, a failure of consistent information sharing among team members and opportunities for agency in students has prevented successful transition planning for autistic students. Therefore, this work brings causal agency theory and the collaborative reflection framework together to uncover ways transition teams can develop students' agency by collaboratively reflecting on students' inputs related to transition goals and progress. By interviewing autistic students, parents of autistic students, and professionals who were involved in transition planning, we uncovered that teams can better support student agency by accommodating their needs and encouraging their input in annual meetings, building relationships through transparent and frequent communication about day-to-day activities, centering goals on student's interests, and supporting student's skill-building in areas related to their transition goals. However, we found that many teams were not enacting these practices, leading to frustration and negative outcomes for young adults. Based on our findings, we propose a role for autistic students in the collaborative reflection framework that encouraged participation and builds causal agency. We also make design recommendations to encourage autistic students' participation in collaborative reflection around long-term and short-term needs in ways that promote their causal agency.

References

  1. Tawfiq Ammari and Sarita Schoenebeck. 2015. Networked Empowerment on Facebook Groups for Parents of Children with Special Needs. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2805--2814. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702324Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Subini Ancy Annamma, David Connor, and Beth Ferri. 2013. Dis/ability critical race studies (DisCrit): Theorizing at the intersections of race and dis/ability. Race Ethnicity and Education 16, 1 (2013), 1--31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Sandra A Arndt, Moira Konrad, and David W Test. 2006. Effects of the self-directed IEP on student participation in planning meetings. Remedial and Special Education 27, 4 (2006), 194--207.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Michael Arthur-Kelly, Jeff Sigafoos, Vanessa Green, Bernice Mathisen, and Racheal Arthur-Kelly. 2009. Issues in the use of visual supports to promote communication in individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Disability and rehabilitation 31, 18 (2009), 1474--1486.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Microboards Australia. 2016. http://microboard.org.au/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Andrew Begel, John Tang, Sean Andrist, Michael Barnett, Tony Carbary, Piali Choudhury, Edward Cutrell, Alberto Fung, Sasa Junuzovic, Daniel McDuff, Kael Rowan, Shibashankar Sahoo, Jennifer Frances Waldern, Jessica Wolk, Hui Zheng, and Annuska Zolyomi. 2020. Lessons Learned in Designing AI for Autistic Adults. In Proceedings of the 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Virtual Event, Greece) (ASSETS '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 46, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3373625.3418305Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Joseph Bills and Yiu-kai Dennis Ng. 2021. Looking for Jobs? Matching Adults with Autism with Potential Employers for Job Opportunities. In 25th International Database Engineering & Applications Symposium. 212--221.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. LouAnne E Boyd, Saumya Gupta, Sagar B Vikmani, Carlos M Gutierrez, Junxiang Yang, Erik Linstead, and Gillian R Hayes. 2018. VrSocial: Toward immersive therapeutic VR systems for children with autism. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Lal Bozgeyikli, Evren Bozgeyikli, Andrew Raij, Redwan Alqasemi, Srinivas Katkoori, and Rajiv Dubey. 2017. Vocational rehabilitation of individuals with autism spectrum disorder with virtual reality. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS) 10, 2 (2017), 1--25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Kathryn M Burke, Sheida K Raley, Karrie A Shogren, Mayumi Hagiwara, Cristina Mumbardó-Adam, Hatice Uyanik, and Sarah Behrens. 2020. A meta-analysis of interventions to promote self-determination for students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education 41, 3 (2020), 176--188.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Roshini Chandroo, Iva Strnadova, and Therese M Cumming. 2018. A systematic review of the involvement of students with autism spectrum disorder in the transition planning process: Need for voice and empowerment. Research in developmental disabilities 83 (2018), 8--17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. National Research Council et al. 2015. Investing in the health and well-being of young adults. National Academies Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. John W Creswell and J Creswell. 2003. Research design. Sage publications Thousand Oaks, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Maitraye Das, John Tang, Kathryn E Ringland, and Anne Marie Piper. 2021. Towards accessible remote work: Understanding work-from-home practices of neurodivergent professionals. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW1 (2021), 1--30.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Edward L Deci and Richard M Ryan. 2012. Self-determination theory. Handbook of theories of social psychology 1, 20 (2012), 416--436.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Tawanna R. Dillahunt, Nishan Bose, Suleman Diwan, and Asha Chen-Phang. 2016. Designing for Disadvantaged Job Seekers: Insights from Early Investigations. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (Brisbane, QLD, Australia) (DIS '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 905--910. https://doi.org/10.1145/2901790.2901865Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Tawanna R. Dillahunt and Alex Lu. 2019. DreamGigs: Designing a Tool to Empower Low-Resource Job Seekers. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300808Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Marc Fabri and Penny C.S. Andrews. 2016. Human-Centered Design with Autistic University Students: Interface, Interaction and Information Preferences. In Design, User Experience, and Usability: Novel User Experiences, Aaron Marcus (Ed.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 157--166.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Grace L Francis, April Regester, and Alexandra S Reed. 2019. Barriers and supports to parent involvement and collaboration during transition to adulthood. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals 42, 4 (2019), 235--245.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. B.G. Glaser and A.L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine Transaction.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. David Hagner, Alan Kurtz, Janet May, and Heidi Cloutier. 2014. Person-centered planning for transition-aged youth with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Rehabilitation 80, 1 (2014), 4--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Kara A Hirano, Dawn Rowe, Lauren Lindstrom, and Paula Chan. 2018. Systemic barriers to family involvement in transition planning for youth with disabilities: A qualitative metasynthesis. Journal of Child and Family Studies 27, 11 (2018), 3440--3456.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Anurata Prabha Hridi, Anik Saha, Anik Sinha, Ifti Azad Abeer, Nova Ahmed, and Shameem Ahmed. 2021. Understanding the Education of Children with Autism in Bangladesh: Parents' Perspective. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, CSCW1, Article 60 (apr 2021), 30 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3449134Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Maia Jacobs, Galina Gheihman, Krzysztof Z. Gajos, and Anoopum S. Gupta. 2019. "I Think We Know More than Our Doctors": How Primary Caregivers Manage Care Teams with Limited Disease-Related Expertise. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW, Article 159 (nov 2019), 22 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359261Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Eunkyung Jo, Seora Park, Hyeonseok Bang, Youngeun Hong, Yeni Kim, Jungwon Choi, Bung Nyun Kim, Daniel A Epstein, and Hwajung Hong. 2022. GeniAuti: Toward Data-Driven Interventions to Challenging Behaviors of Autistic Children through Caregivers' Tracking. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 6, CSCW1 (2022), 1--27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Julie A Kientz, Sebastian Boring, Gregory D Abowd, and Gillian R Hayes. 2005. Abaris: Evaluating automated capture applied to structured autism interventions. In International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing. Springer, 323--339.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Ha-Kyung Kong and Karrie Karahalios. 2020. Addressing Cognitive and Emotional Barriers in Parent-Clinician Communication through Behavioral Visualization Webtools. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376181Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Ha Kyung Kong, John Lee, and Karrie Karahalios. 2017. A comparative study of visualizations with different granularities of behavior for communicating about autism. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 1, CSCW (2017), 1--16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Traci E. Van Laarhoven-Myers, Toni R. Van Laarhoven, Thomas J. Smith, Heather Johnson, and Justin Olson. 2016. Promoting Self-Determination and Transition Planning Using Technology: Student and Parent Perspectives. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals 39, 2 (2016), 99--110. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143414552518Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Daniel J Laxman, Julie Lounds Taylor, Leann S DaWalt, Jan S Greenberg, and Marsha R Mailick. 2019. Loss in services precedes high school exit for teens with autism spectrum disorder: A longitudinal study. Autism Research 12, 6 (2019), 911--921.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Chung Eun Lee and Jennifer G. Kim. 2022. Person-centered Transition Planning for Youth on the Autism Spectrum: What are We Still Missing? Exceptionality 30, 3 (2022), 173--186. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2021.1938065 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2021.1938065Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Kwangyoung Lee and Hwajung Hong. 2017. Designing for Self-Tracking of Emotion and Experience with Tangible Modality. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (Edinburgh, United Kingdom) (DIS '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 465--475. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064697Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Gonzalo Lorenzo, Jorge Pomares, and Asuncion Lledó. 2013. Inclusion of immersive virtual learning environments and visual control systems to support the learning of students with Asperger syndrome. Computers & Education 62 (2013), 88--101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Julie Maitland and Matthew Chalmers. 2010. Self-Monitoring, Self-Awareness, and Self-Determination in Cardiac Rehabilitation. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Atlanta, Georgia, USA) (CHI '10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1213--1222. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753508Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Gabriela Marcu, Anind K. Dey, and Sara Kiesler. 2014. Designing for Collaborative Reflection. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (Oldenburg, Germany) (PervasiveHealth '14). ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering), Brussels, BEL, 9--16. https://doi.org/10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2014.254987Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Gabriela Marcu, Anind K. Dey, and Sara Kiesler. 2014. Designing for Collaborative Reflection. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (Oldenburg, Germany) (PervasiveHealth '14). ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering), Brussels, BEL, 9--16. https://doi.org/10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2014.254987Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Gabriela Marcu, Allison Spiller, Jonathan Arevalo Garay, James E. Connell, and Laura R. Pina. 2019. Breakdowns in Home-School Collaboration for Behavioral Intervention. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300891Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. James E Martin and Laura Huber Marshall. 1995. ChoiceMaker: A comprehensive self-determination transition program. Intervention in school and clinic 30, 3 (1995), 147--156.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Christine Y Mason, Marcy McGahee-Kovac, Lora Johnson, and Sandy Stillerman. 2002. Implementing student-led IEPs: Student participation and student and teacher reactions. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals 25, 2 (2002), 171--192.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Rachael Maun, Marc Fabri, and Pip Trevorrow. 2021. Adapting Participatory Design Activities for Autistic Adults: A Review. In Design, User Experience, and Usability: Design for Diversity, Well-being, and Social Development, Marcelo M. Soares, Elizabeth Rosenzweig, and Aaron Marcus (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 300--314.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Nvivo. 2022. https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-qualitative-data-analysis-softwareGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. 2020. A Transition Guide to Postsecondary Education and Employment for Students and Youth with Disabilities.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Kyrill Potapov, Asimina Vasalou, Victor Lee, and Paul Marshall. 2021. What Do Teens Make of Personal Informatics? Young People's Responses to Self-Tracking Practices for Self-Determined Motives. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI '21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 356, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445239Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Laurie E Powers, Sarah Geenen, Jennifer Powers, Summer Pommier-Satya, Alison Turner, Lawrence D Dalton, Diann Drummond, Paul Swank, et al. 2012. My Life: Effects of a longitudinal, randomized study of self-determination enhancement on the transition outcomes of youth in foster care and special education. Children and Youth Services Review 34, 11 (2012), 2179--2187.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Jennifer E Prey, Janet Woollen, Lauren Wilcox, Alexander D Sackeim, George Hripcsak, Suzanne Bakken, Susan Restaino, Steven Feiner, and David K Vawdrey. 2014. Patient engagement in the inpatient setting: a systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 21, 4 (2014), 742--750.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Sheida K Raley, Cristina Mumbardó-Adam, Karrie A Shogren, David Simó-Pinatella, and Climent Giné. 2018. Curricula to teach skills associated with self-determination: A review of existing research. Education and training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities 53, 4 (2018), 353--362.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Shaila M Rao and Brenda Gagie. 2006. Learning through seeing and doing: Visual supports for children with autism. Teaching exceptional children 38, 6 (2006), 26--33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Olivia K Richards, Adrian Choi, and Gabriela Marcu. 2021. Shared Understanding in Care Coordination for Children's Behavioral Health. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW1 (2021), 1--25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Caroline E Robertson and Simon Baron-Cohen. 2017. Sensory perception in autism. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 18, 11 (2017), 671--684.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Noah J Sasson, Daniel J Faso, Jack Nugent, Sarah Lovell, Daniel P Kennedy, and Ruth B Grossman. 2017. Neurotypical peers are less willing to interact with those with autism based on thin slice judgments. Scientific reports 7, 1 (2017), 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Noah J Sasson and Kerrianne E Morrison. 2019. First impressions of adults with autism improve with diagnostic disclosure and increased autism knowledge of peers. Autism 23, 1 (2019), 50--59.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Paul T Shattuck, Sarah Carter Narendorf, Benjamin Cooper, Paul R Sterzing, Mary Wagner, and Julie Lounds Taylor. 2012. Postsecondary education and employment among youth with an autism spectrum disorder. Pediatrics 129, 6 (2012), 1042--1049.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Donghoon Shin, Jaeyoon Song, Seokwoo Song, Jisoo Park, Joonhwan Lee, and Soojin Jun. 2020. TalkingBoogie: Collaborative Mobile AAC System for Non-Verbal Children with Developmental Disabilities and Their Caregivers. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376154Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Karrie A Shogren and Anthony J Plotner. 2012. Transition planning for students with intellectual disability, autism, or other disabilities: Data from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2. Intellectual and developmental disabilities 50, 1 (2012), 16--30.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Karrie A Shogren, Michael L Wehmeyer, and Susan B Palmer. 2017. Causal agency theory. In Development of self-determination through the life-course. Springer, 55--67.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Claire Snell-Rood, Lisa Ruble, Harold Kleinert, John H McGrew, Medina Adams, Alexis Rodgers, Jaye Odom, Wing Hang Wong, and Yue Yu. 2020. Stakeholder perspectives on transition planning, implementation, and outcomes for students with autism spectrum disorder. Autism 24, 5 (2020), 1164--1176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361319894827 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361319894827 PMID: 31957461.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Katta Spiel, Christopher Frauenberger, Eva Hornecker, and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2017. When Empathy Is Not Enough: Assessing the Experiences of Autistic Children with Technologies. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2853--2864. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025785Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Katta Spiel, Christopher Frauenberger, Os Keyes, and Geraldine Fitzpatrick. 2019. Agency of autistic children in technology research-A critical literature review. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 26, 6 (2019), 1--40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Katta Spiel and Kathrin Gerling. 2021. The purpose of play: How HCI games research fails neurodivergent populations. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 28, 2 (2021), 1--40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Turid Kristin Bigum Sundar, Knut Løndal, Kirsti Riiser, Per Lagerløv, Kari Glavin, and Sølvi Helseth. 2019. Adolescents with overweight or obesity: A qualitative study of participation in an internet-based program to increase physical activity. SAGE open nursing 5 (2019), 2377960819884786.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Julie Lounds Taylor and Leann Smith DeWalt. 2017. Postsecondary Work and Educational Disruptions for Youth on the Autism Spectrum. J Autism Dev Disord. 47, 12 (2017), 4025--31. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NURSE.0000431150.45307.65Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Julie Lounds Taylor and Marsha Mailick Seltzer. 2011. Employment and post-secondary educational activities for young adults with autism spectrum disorders during the transition to adulthood. Journal of autism and developmental disorders 41, 5 (2011), 566--574.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. TeachersPayTeachers. 2022. TeachersPayTeachers. https://www.teacherspayteachers.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Barbara FC Van Heijst and Hilde M Geurts. 2015. Quality of life in autism across the lifespan: A meta-analysis. Autism 19, 2 (2015), 158--167.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. vFairs. 2022. Virtual career fair platform. https://www.vfairs.com/solutions/virtual-career-fair/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Mary Wagner, Lynn Newman, Renée Cameto, Harold Javitz, and Kathryn Valdes. 2012. A national picture of parent and youth participation in IEP and transition planning meetings. Journal of Disability Policy Studies 23, 3 (2012), 140--155.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. Deborah M. Ward and M. C. Esposito. 2018. Virtual reality in transition program for adults with autism: Self-efficacy, confidence, and interview skills. Contemporary School Psychology 23, 4 (2018), 423--431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-018-0195--9Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. Michael Wehmeyer and Michelle Schwartz. 1997. Self-determination and positive adult outcomes: A follow-up study of youth with mental retardation or learning disabilities. Exceptional children 63, 2 (1997), 245--255.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. ML Wehmeyer and K Webb. 2012. An introduction to adolescent transition education. Handbook of adolescent transition education for youth with disabilities (2012), 3--10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Michael L Wehmeyer. 2004. Beyond self-determination: Causal agency theory. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities 16, 4 (2004), 337--359.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  71. Michael L Wehmeyer. 2020. Self-determination in adolescents and adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Current Opinion in Psychiatry 33, 2 (2020), 81--85.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. Michael L Wehmeyer and Susan B Palmer. 2003. Adult outcomes for students with cognitive disabilities three-years after high school: The impact of self-determination. Education and training in developmental disabilities (2003), 131--144.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Michael L Wehmeyer, Susan B Palmer, Youngsun Lee, Kendra Williams-Diehm, and Karrie Shogren. 2011. A randomized-trial evaluation of the effect of whose future is it anyway? On self-determination. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals 34, 1 (2011), 45--56.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. Michael L Wehmeyer, Susan B Palmer, Karrie Shogren, Kendra Williams-Diehm, and Jane H Soukup. 2013. Establishing a causal relationship between intervention to promote self-determination and enhanced student self-determination. The Journal of special education 46, 4 (2013), 195--210.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. Michael L Wehmeyer, Susan B Palmer, Jane H Soukup, Nancy W Garner, and Margaret Lawrence. 2007. Self- determination and student transition planning knowledge and skills: Predicting involvement. Exceptionality 15, 1 (2007), 31--44.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  76. Michael L Wehmeyer, Susan B Palmer, Kendra Williams-Diehm, Karrie A Shogren, Daniel K Davies, and Steven Stock. 2011. Technology and self-determination in transition planning: The impact of technology use in transition planning on student self-determination. Journal of Special Education Technology 26, 1 (2011), 13--24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  77. Michael L Wehmeyer, Karrie A Shogren, Todd D Little, and Shane J Lopez. 2017. Development of self-determination through the life-course. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Whova. 2022. Whova now supports virtual career fair as universities start. https://whova.com/blog/whova-supports-virtual-career-fair/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. Thomas A Widiger, Allen J Frances, Harold Alan Ed Pincus, Ruth Ed Ross, et al . 1997. DSM-IV sourcebook, Vol. 3. American Psychiatric Publishing, Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Rua M Williams. 2018. Autonomously autistic: Exposing the locus of autistic pathology. Canadian Journal of Disability Studies 7, 2 (2018), 60--82.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  81. Rua M Williams and Juan E Gilbert. 2019. ?Nothing About Us Without Us" Transforming Participatory Research and Ethics in Human Systems Engineering. In Advancing diversity, inclusion, and social justice through human systems engineering. CRC Press, 113--134.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. Rua M Williams and Juan E Gilbert. 2020. Perseverations of the academy: A survey of wearable technologies applied to autism intervention. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 143 (2020), 102485.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  83. Yiran Zhao, Yoojung Kim, Calvin Apodaca, Regina Casanova-Perez, Shefali Haldar, Sonali R Mishra, Julia C Dunbar, Ari Pollack, and Wanda Pratt. 2021. Supporting Goal-Based Collaboration for Hospitalized Children. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW1 (2021), 1--22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  84. Annuska Zolyomi, Andrew Begel, Jennifer Frances Waldern, John Tang, Michael Barnett, Edward Cutrell, Daniel McDuff, Sean Andrist, and Meredith Ringel Morris. 2019. Managing stress: the needs of autistic adults in video calling. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (2019), 1--29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  85. Annuska Zolyomi, Anne Spencer Ross, Arpita Bhattacharya, Lauren Milne, and Sean A Munson. 2018. Values, identity, and social translucence: Neurodiverse student teams in higher education. In Proceedings of the 2018 chi conference on human factors in computing systems. 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Building Causal Agency in Autistic Students through Iterative Reflection in Collaborative Transition Planning

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
      Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 7, Issue CSCW2
      CSCW
      October 2023
      4055 pages
      EISSN:2573-0142
      DOI:10.1145/3626953
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2023 Owner/Author

      This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 October 2023
      Published in pacmhci Volume 7, Issue CSCW2

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader