skip to main content
research-article

Calm Commute: Guided Slow Breathing for Daily Stress Management in Drivers

Authors Info & Claims
Published:18 March 2020Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Commutes provide an opportune time and space for interventions that mitigate stress-particularly stress accumulated during the workday. In this study, we test the efficacy and safety of haptic guided slow breathing interventions of short duration while driving. We also present design and experimental implications for evolving these interventions from prior simulator to moving vehicle scenarios. We ran a controlled study (N=24) testing a haptic guided breathing system in a closed circuit under normal and stressful driving conditions. Results show the intervention to be successful in both user adoption and system effectiveness with an 82% rate of engagement in intervention and clear reduction of breathing rate and physiological arousal, with no effect on driving safety and minimal effect on performance. The haptic intervention received positive acceptance from the participants: all indicated a willingness to engage with the intervention in the future and all rated the intervention as safe for traffic applications. The results of this study encourage further investigations exploring the use of the intervention on public roads and monitoring for longitudinal health benefits.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. American Psychological Association. 2013. Are Teens Adopting Adults' Stress Habits? https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/stress/2013/highlights?fbclid=IwAR3R23r_BBcH9CneQM7W1uerVK9jGz1B8wuwaJpXsw0xu1hBY0ZSFFxF-64Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. APA. 2019. The Different Kinds of Stress. American Psychological Association. https://www.apa.org/helpcenter/stress-kinds Created: 2019-07-11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Stephanie Balters, Elizabeth Murnane, James A. Landay, and Pablo E. Paredes. 2018. Breath Booster! Exploring In-car, Fast-paced Breathing Interventions to Enhance Driver Arousal State. Proceedings of the PervasiveHealth Conference (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Richard Boyatzis. 1998. Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Gary Bradski and Adrian Kaehler. 2008. Learning OpenCV: Computer Vision with the OpenCV Library. "O'Reilly Media, Inc.".Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Richard P Brown and Patricia L Gerbarg. 2005. Sudarshan Kriya Yogic Breathing in the Treatment of Stress, Anxiety, and Depression: Part I Neurophysiologic Model. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 11, 1 (2005), 189--201.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Sheldon Cohen, Denise Janicki-Deverts, and Gregory E Miller. 2007. Psychological Stress and Disease. Jama 298, 14 (2007), 1685--1687.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Joanne L. Harbluk, Y. Ian Noy, Patricia L. Trbovich, and Moshe Eizenman. 2007. An on-road Assessment of Cognitive Distraction: Impacts on Drivers' Visual Behavior and Braking Performance. Accident Analysis & Prevention 39, 2 (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Javier Hernandez, Daniel McDuff, Xavier Benavides, Judith Amores, Pattie Maes, and Rosalind Picard. 2014. AutoEmotive: Bringing Empathy to the Driving Experience to Manage Stress. In Proceedings of the 2014 Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, 53--56.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Rudolph Emil Kalman. 1960. A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems. Journal of Basic Engineering 82, 1 (1960), 35--45.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Clemens Kirschbaum, Karl-Martin Pirke, and Dirk H Hellhammer. 1993. The Trier Social Stress Test-a Tool for Investigating Psychobiological Stress Responses in a Laboratory Setting. Neuropsychobiology 28, 1-2 (1993), 76--81.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Elise Labbé, Nicholas Schmidt, Jonathan Babin, and Martha Pharr. 2007. Coping with Stress: the Effectiveness of Different Types of Music. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback 32, 3-4 (2007), 163--168.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Richard S Lazarus. 1966. Psychological Stress and the Coping Process. (1966).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Gustav Markkula and Johan Engström. 2006. A Steering Wheel Reversal Rate Metric for Assessing Effects of Visual and Cognitive Secondary Task Load. In Proceedings of the 13th ITS World Congress. Leeds.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Robert R McCrae. 1984. Situational Determinants of Coping Responses: Loss, Threat, and Challenge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46, 4 (1984), 919.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Bruce S McEwen. 1998. Stress, adaptation, and disease: Allostasis and allostatic load. Annals of the New York academy of sciences 840, 1 (1998), 33--44.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Brian McKenzie. 2016. 2016 American Community Survey Content Test: Journey to Work. American Community Survey Reports (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Medtronics. 2012. Zephyr Biomodule Device 3.0. https://www.zephyranywhere.com/system/components#Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Gopal K Pal and Velkumary Subramaniyam. 2004. Effect of Short-term Practice of Breathing Exercises on Autonomic Functions in Normal Human Volunteers. Indian Journal of Medical Research 120, 2 (2004), 115.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Pablo E Paredes, Stephanie Balters, Kyle Qian, Elizabeth L Murnane, Francisco Ordóñez, Wendy Ju, and James A Landay. 2018. Driving with the Fishes: Towards Calming and Mindful Virtual Reality Experiences for the Car. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 2, 4 (2018), 184.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Pablo E. Paredes, Nur Al-Huda Hamdan, Dav Clark, Carrie Cai, Wendy Ju, and James A. Landay. 2017. Evaluating In-car Movements in the Design of Mindful Commute Interventions: Exploratory Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 19, 12 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Pablo E. Paredes, Francisco Ordonez, Wendy Ju, and James A. Landay. 2018. Fast & Furious: Detecting Stress with a Car Steering Wheel. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 665.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Pablo E. Paredes, Yijun Zhou, Nur Al-Huda Hamdan, Stephanie Balters, Elizabeth Murnane, Wendy Ju, and James A. Landay. 2018. Just Breathe: In-Car Interventions for Guided Slow Breathing. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 2, 1 (2018), 28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Erik Rosén, Jan-Erik Källhammer, Dick Eriksson, Matthias Nentwich, Rikard Fredriksson, and Kip Smith. 2010. Pedestrian Injury Mitigation by Autonomous Braking. Accident Analysis & Prevention 42, 6 (2010), 1949--1957.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. James A Russell, Anna Weiss, and Gerald A Mendelsohn. 1989. Affect Grid: a Single-item Scale of Pleasure and Arousal. Journal of personality and social psychology 57, 3 (1989), 493.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. David Shinar and Richard Compton. 2004. Aggressive Driving: an Observational Study of Driver, Vehicle, and Situational Variables. Accident Analysis & Prevention 36, 3 (2004), 429--437.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. L Alan Sroufe. 1971. Effects of Depth and Rate of Breathing on Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability. Psychophysiology 8, 5 (1971), 648--655.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. SAE Standards. 2015. Operational Definitions of Driving Performance Measures and Statistics. https://doi.org/10.4271/J2944_201506Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. William J Stein and Timothy R Neuman. 2007. Mitigation Strategies for Design Exceptions. Technical Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. David Sun, Pablo E. Paredes, and John Canny. 2014. MouStress: Detecting stress from mouse motion. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. 61--70. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557243Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Mika P. Tarvainen, J.-P. Niskanen, J. A. Lipponen, P. O. Ranta-aho, and P. A. Karjalainen. 2009. Kubios HRV - A Software for Advanced Heart Rate Variability Analysis. 4th European Conference of the International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 1022--1025 pages. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-89208-3_243.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Ilse Van Diest, Karen Verstappen, André E Aubert, Devy Widjaja, Debora Vansteenwegen, and Elke Vlemincx. 2014. Inhalation/exhalation Ratio Modulates the Effect of Slow Breathing on Heart Rate Variability and Relaxation. Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback 39, 3-4 (2014), 171--180.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Liza Varvogli and Christina Darviri. 2011. Stress Management Techniques: Evidence-based Procedures that Reduce Stress and Promote Health. Health Science Journal 5, 2 (2011), 74.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Mark Vollrath, Tobias Meilinger, and Hans-Peter Krüger. 2002. How the Presence of Passengers Influences the Risk of a Collision with Another Vehicle. Accident Analysis & Prevention 34, 5 (2002), 649--654.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Calm Commute: Guided Slow Breathing for Daily Stress Management in Drivers

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
          Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies  Volume 4, Issue 1
          March 2020
          1006 pages
          EISSN:2474-9567
          DOI:10.1145/3388993
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2020 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 18 March 2020
          Published in imwut Volume 4, Issue 1

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader