Jonathan W. Kelly
Abstract
Distance is commonly underperceived in virtual environments (VEs) compared to real environments. Past work suggests that displaying a replica VE based on the real surrounding environment leads to more accurate judgments of distance, but that work has lacked the necessary control conditions to firmly make this conclusion. Other research indicates that walking through a VE with visual feedback improves judgments of distance and size. This study evaluated and compared those two methods for improving perceived distance in VEs. All participants experienced a replica VE based on the real lab. In one condition, participants visually previewed the real lab prior to experiencing the replica VE, and in another condition they did not. Participants performed blind-walking judgments of distance and also judgments of size in the replica VE before and after walking interaction. Distance judgments were more accurate in the preview compared to no preview condition, but size judgments were unaffected by visual preview. Distance judgments and size judgments increased after walking interaction, and the improvement was larger for distance than for size judgments. After walking interaction, distance judgments did not differ based on visual preview, and walking interaction led to a larger improvement in judged distance than did visual preview. These data suggest that walking interaction may be more effective than visual preview as a method for improving perceived space in a VE.
Supplemental Material
Available for Download
Supplemental movie and image files for, Comparison of Two Methods for Improving Distance Perception in Virtual Reality
- E. Brenner and W. J. van Damme. 1999. Perceived distance, shape and size. Vision Research 39, 5, 975--986.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- L. E. Buck, M. K. Young, and B. Bodenheimer. 2018. A comparison of distance estimation in HMD-based virtual environments with different HMD-based conditions. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
- S. H. Creem-Regehr, J. K. Stefanucci, and W. B. Thompson. 2015a. Perceiving absolute scale in virtual environments: How theory and application have mutually informed the role of body-based perception. In The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, B. Ross (Ed.). Academic Press, Waltham, MA, 195--224.Google Scholar
- S. H. Creem-Regehr, J. K. Stefanucci, W. B. Thompson, N. Nash, and M. McCardell. 2015b. Egocentric distance perception in the occulus rift (DK2). In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Perception. ACM, New York, NY, 47--50. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. H. Creem-Regehr, P. Willemsen, A. A. Gooch, and W. B. Thompson. 2005. The influence of restricted viewing conditions on egocentric distance perception: Implications for real and virtual indoor environments. Perception 34, 2, 191--204.Google ScholarCross Ref
- F. H. Durgin and Z. Li. 2011. Perceptual scale expansion: An efficient angular coding strategy for locomotor space. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics 73, 1856--1870.Google ScholarCross Ref
- W. Epstein, J. Park, and A. Casey. 1961. The current status of the size-distance hypotheses. Psychological Bulletin 58, 6, 491--514.Google ScholarCross Ref
- C. R. Gallistel. 2009. The importance of proving the null. Psychological Review 116, 439--453.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. S. Gilinsky. 1951. Perceived size and distance in visual space. Psychological Review 58, 6, 460--482.Google ScholarCross Ref
- W. C. Gogel, J. M. Loomis, N. J. Newman, and T. J. Sharkey. 1985. Agreement between indirect measures of perceived distance. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics 37, 1, 17--27.Google ScholarCross Ref
- T. Y. Grechkin, T. D. Nguyen, J. M. Plumert, J. F. Cremer, and J. K. Kearney. 2010. How does presentation method and measurement protocol affect distance estimation in real and virtual environments? ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 7, 4, 26. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. J. Hutchison and J. M. Loomis. 2006. Does energy expenditure affect the perception of egocentric distance? A failure to replicate Experiment 1 of Proffitt, Stefanucci, Banton, and Epstein (2003). Spanish Journal of Psychology 9, 332--339.Google ScholarCross Ref
- V. Interrante, L. Anderson, and B. Ries. 2006. Distance perception in immersive virtual environments, revisited. In Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality Conference. IEEE, Los Alamitos, CA. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. W. Kelly, L. A. Cherep, and Z. D. Siegel. 2017. Perceived space in the HTC vive. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 15, 1, 2:1--2:16. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. W. Kelly, L. S. Donaldson, L. A. Sjolund, and J. B. Freiberg. 2013. More than just perception-action recalibration: Walking through a virtual environment causes rescaling of perceived space. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics 75, 1473--1485.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. W. Kelly, W. W. Hammel, Z. D. Siegel, and L. A. Sjolund. 2014. Recalibration of perceived distance in virtual environments occurs rapidly and transfers asymmetrically across scale. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 20, 4, 588--595. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. M. Knapp and J. M. Loomis. 2004. Limited field of view of head-mounted displays is not the cause of distance underestimation in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 13, 5, 572--577. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. R. Kunz, L. Wouters, D. Smith, W. B. Thompson, and S. H. Creem-Regehr. 2009. Revisiting the effect of quality of graphics on distance judgments in virtual environments: A comparison of verbal reports and blind walking. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics 71, 6, 1284--1293.Google ScholarCross Ref
- B. Li, R. Zhang, and S. Kuhl. 2014. Minication affects action-based distance judgments in Oculus Rift HMDs. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Perception. ACM, New York, NY, 91--94. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. Li, R. Zhang, A. Nordman, and S. Kuhl. 2015. The effects of minification and display field of view on distance judgments in real and HMD-based environments. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Perception. ACM, New York, NY, 55--58. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. M. Loomis and J. M. Knapp. 2004. Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments. In Virtual and Adaptive Environments, L. J. Hettinger and M. W. Haas (Eds.). Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 21--46.Google Scholar
- B. J. Mohler, S. H. Creem-Regehr, and W. B. Thompson. 2006. The influence of feedback on egocentric distance judgments in real and virtual environments. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Perception. ACM, New York, NY, 9--14. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Renner, B. M. Velichkovsky, and R. Helmert. 2013. The perception of egocentric distances in virtual environments: A review. ACM Computing Surveys 46, Article No. 23. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. R. Richardson and D. Waller. 2005. The effect of feedback training on distance estimation in virtual environments. Applied Cognitive Psychology 19, 8, 1089--1108.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. R. Richardson and D. Waller. 2007. Interaction with an immersive virtual environment corrects users’ distance estimates. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49, 3, 507--517.Google ScholarCross Ref
- B. E. Riecke, P. A. Behbahani, and C. D. Shaw. 2009. Display size does not affect egocentric distance perception of naturalistic stimuli. In Proceedings of the 6th Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization. ACM, New York, NY, 15--18. Google ScholarDigital Library
- H. A. Sedgewick. 1986. Space perception. In Handbook of Perception and Human Performance, Vol. 1: Sensory Processes and Perception, J. P. Thomas, K. R. Boff, and L. Kaufman (Eds.). Wiley, New York, NY, 21:1--21:57.Google Scholar
- Z. D. Siegel and J. W. Kelly. 2017. Walking through a virtual environment improves perceived size within and beyond the walked space. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics 79, 1, 39--44.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Z. D. Siegel, J. W. Kelly, and L. A. Cherep. 2017. Rescaling of perceived space transfers across virtual environments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 43, 10, 1805--1814.Google ScholarCross Ref
- F. Steinicke, G. Bruder, K. Hinrichs, M. Lappe, B. Ries, and V. Interrante. 2009. Transitional environments enhance distance perception in immersive virtual reality systems. In Proceedings of the 6th Symposium on Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization. ACM, New York, NY. Google ScholarDigital Library
- W. B. Thompson, P. Willemsen, A. A. Gooch, S. H. Creem-Regehr, J. M. Loomis, and A. C. Beall. 2004. Does the quality of the computer graphics matter when judging distance in visually immersive environments? Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 13, 560--571. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Waller and A. R. Richardson. 2008. Correcting distance estimates by interacting with immersive virtual environments: Effects of task and available sensory information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 14, 67--72.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. Willemsen, M. B. Colton, S. H. Creem-Regehr, and W. B. Thompson. 2009. The effects of head-mounted display mechanical properties and field of view on distance judgments in virtual environments. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 6, 2, 8:1--8:14. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. K. Young, G. B. Gaylor, S. M. Andrus, and B. Bodenheimer. 2014. A comparison of two cost-differentiated virtual reality systems for perception and action tasks. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Perception. ACM, New York, NY, 83--90. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. J. Ziemer, J. M. Plumert, J. F. Cremer, and J. K. Kearney. 2009. Estimating distance in real and virtual environments: Does order make a difference?Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics 71, 1095--1106.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Comparison of Two Methods for Improving Distance Perception in Virtual Reality
Recommendations
Perceived Space in the HTC Vive
Underperception of egocentric distance in virtual reality has been a persistent concern for almost 20 years. Modern head-mounted displays (HMDs) appear to have begun to ameliorate underperception. The current study examined several aspects of perceived ...
The effects of virtual reality, augmented reality, and motion parallax on egocentric depth perception
APGV '08: Proceedings of the 5th symposium on Applied perception in graphics and visualizationAs the use of virtual and augmented reality applications becomes more common, the need to fully understand how observers perceive spatial relationships grows more critical. One of the key requirements in engineering a practical virtual or augmented ...
Distance perception in real and virtual environments
We conducted three experiments to compare distance perception in real and virtual environments. In Experiment 1, adults estimated how long it would take to walk to targets in real and virtual environments by starting and stopping a stopwatch while ...
Comments