skip to main content
10.1145/2993148.2993192acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesicmi-mlmiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Discovering facial expressions for states of amused, persuaded, informed, sentimental and inspired

Published:31 October 2016Publication History

ABSTRACT

Facial expressions play a significant role in everyday interactions. A majority of the research on facial expressions of emotion has focused on a small set of "basic" states. However, in real-life the expression of emotions is highly context dependent and prototypic expressions of "basic" emotions may not always be present. In this paper we attempt to discover expressions associated with alternate states of informed, inspired, persuaded, sentimental and amused based on a very large dataset of observed facial responses. We used a curated set of 395 everyday videos that were found to reliably elicit the states and recorded 49,869 facial responses as viewers watched the videos in their homes. Using automated facial coding we quantified the presence of 18 facial actions in each of the 23.4 million frames. Lip corner pulls, lip sucks and inner brow raises were prominent in sentimental responses. Outer brow raises and eye widening were prominent in persuaded and informed responses. More brow furrowing distinguished informed from persuaded responses potentially indicating higher cognition.

References

  1. J. F. Cohn, Z. Ambadar, and P. Ekman. Observer-based measurement of facial expression with the facial action coding system. The handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment, pages 203–221, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. C. Darwin. The expression of emotions in man and animals. Oxford University, New York, NY, 3rd edition, 1872.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. P. Ekman and W. Friesen. Facial action coding system. 1977.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. P. Ekman, E. R. Sorenson, and W. V. Friesen. Pan-cultural elements in facial displays of emotion. Science, 164(3875):86–88, 1969.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. E. C. Evans. Physiognomies in the ancient world. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 59:1–101, 1969.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. W. V. Friesen and P. Ekman. EMFACS-7: Emotional facial action coding system. Unpublished manuscript, University of California at San Francisco, 2(36):1, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. H. Gunes and H. Hung. Is automatic facial expression recognition of emotions coming to a dead end? the rise of the new kids on the block. Image and Vision Computing, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. C. E. Izard. The Maximally Discriminative Facial Movement Coding System (MAX). Instructional Resources Center, University of Delaware, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. C. E. Izard. Innate and universal facial expressions: Evidence from developmental and cross-cultural research. Psychological Bulletin, 115(2):288–299, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. C. E. Izard, L. M. Dougherty, and E. A. Hembree. A system for identifying affect expressions by holistic judgments (AFFEX). Instructional Resources Center, University of Delaware, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. D. Keltner. Signs of appeasement: Evidence for the distinct displays of embarrassment, amusement, and shame. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(3):441, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. P. Lewinski, M. L. Fransen, and E. S. Tan. Predicting advertising effectiveness by facial expressions in response to amusing persuasive stimuli. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 7(1):1, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. D. Matsumoto. Cultural similarities and differences in display rules. Motivation and Emotion, 14(3):195–214, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. D. Matsumoto, H. S. Hwang, and H. Yamada. Cultural differences in the relative contributions of face and context to judgments of emotions. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, page 0022022110387426, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. D. McDuff. Crowdsourcing affective responses for predicting media effectiveness. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. D. McDuff, R. El Kaliouby, J. Cohn, and R. Picard. Predicting ad liking and purchase intent: Large-scale analysis of facial responses to ads. Affective Computing, IEEE Transactions on, 6(3):223–235, July 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. D. McDuff, R. El Kaliouby, E. Kodra, and R. Picard. Measuring voter’s candidate preference based on affective responses to election debates. In Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII), 2013 Humaine Association Conference on, pages 369–374. IEEE, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. D. McDuff, R. El Kaliouby, and R. Picard. Crowdsourcing facial responses to online videos. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 3(4):456–468, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. D. McDuff, A. Mahmoud, M. Mavadati, M. Amr, J. Turcot, and R. e. Kaliouby. Affdex sdk: A cross-platform real-time multi-face expression recognition toolkit. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 3723–3726. ACM, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. H. Oster. Facial expression and affect development. In M. Lewis and L. A. Rosenblum, editors, The development of affect. Plenum Press, New York, NY, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. J. A. Russell. Is there universal recognition of emotion from facial expressions? A review of the cross-cultural studies. Psychological Bulletin, 115(1):102, 1994.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. T. Senechal, D. McDuff, and R. Kaliouby. Facial action unit detection using active learning and an efficient non-linear kernel approximation. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops, pages 10–18, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. T. Teixeira, M. Wedel, and R. Pieters. Emotion-induced engagement in internet video ads. Journal of Marketing Research, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. F. Torre and J. Cohn. Facial expression analysis. Visual Analysis of Humans, pages 377–409, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. P. Viola and M. Jones. Rapid object detection using a boosted cascade of simple features. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2001. Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on, volume 1, pages I–511. IEEE, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. X. Xiong and F. De la Torre. Supervised descent method and its applications to face alignment. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2013 IEEE Conference on, pages 532–539. IEEE, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Discovering facial expressions for states of amused, persuaded, informed, sentimental and inspired

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ICMI '16: Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction
      October 2016
      605 pages
      ISBN:9781450345569
      DOI:10.1145/2993148

      Copyright © 2016 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 31 October 2016

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate453of1,080submissions,42%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader