skip to main content
article

User acceptance of virtual worlds: the Hedonic framework

Published:28 October 2007Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Research on information technology (IT) adoption focuses almost entirely on productivity-oriented IT such as word processing. Little attention has been directed at investigating adoption of entertainment-oriented IT such as virtual worlds. Contending that it is important to better understand adoption of this technology, we develop a theoretical framework that recognizes the potential of imaginal and emotional responses in explaining user acceptance of virtual worlds. With its basis in the hedonic theory, the research framework may benefit the developers and sponsors of virtual worlds as they strive to build and sustain a customer base. The paper also outlines an example to illustrate one way to approach a consideration of the imaginal and emotional variables.

References

  1. Agarwal, R., and Karahanna, E. (2000). "Time Flies When You're Having Fun: Cognitive Absorption and Beliefs About Information Technology Usage," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 24, No.4, pp. 665--694. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Conrad, S.W. (1966). "On Phantasies and Their Functions," Psychoanalytic Quarterly, Vol. 37, No.157, pp. 4--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Davis, F.D. (1989). "Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, No.3, pp. 318--339.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Heijden, H. (2004). "User Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 28, No.4, pp. 695--704. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Hirschman, E.C. (1983). "Predictors of Self-Projection, Fantasy Fulfillment, and Escapism," Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 120, No.1, pp. 63--76.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Hirschman, E.C., and Holbrook, M.B. (1982). "Hedonic Consumption: Emerging Concepts, Methods and Propositions," Journal of Marketing, Vol. 46, No.1, pp. 92--101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Hsu, C.L., and Lu, H.P. (2004). "Why do People Play On-line Games? An Extended TAM with Social Influences and Flow Experience," Information & Management, Vol. 41, No.7, pp. 853--868. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Koufaris, M. (2002). "Applying the Technology Acceptance Model and Flow Theory to Online Consumer Behavior," Information Systems Research, Vol. 13, No.2, pp. 205--223. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Lacher, K. T., and Mizerski, R. (1994). "An Exploratory Study of the Response and Relationships Involved in the Evaluation of, and in the Intention to Purchase New Rock Music," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 21, No.2, pp. 366--380.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Titz, K., Andrus, D., and Miller, J. (2002). "Hedonistic Differences Between Mechanical Game Players and Table Game Players: An Exploratory Investigation on the Road to a Comprehensive Theory for Gambling," UNLV Gaming Research & Review Journal, Vol. 6, No.1, pp. 23--32.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Venkatesh, V. (2000). "Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model," Information Systems Research, Vol. 11, No.4, pp. 342--365. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. User acceptance of virtual worlds: the Hedonic framework

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader