In Focus
Low performance of bleeding risk models in the very elderly with atrial fibrillation using vitamin K antagonists

https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.13361Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

Essentials

  • Under‐treatment of oral anticoagulation in the elderly with atrial fibrillation is common.

  • As bleeding prediction is challenging, we compared HAS‐BLED, ATRIA and HEMORR2HAGES.

  • All three were associated with major bleeding in the elderly, but with poor predictive abilities.

  • Future studies with focus on elderly‐specific risk factors for bleeding are warranted.

Summary: Background

Anticipated bleeding complications contribute to underuse of oral anticoagulants, especially in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Bleeding risk models could provide guidance; however, these were developed in the general AF population.

Objective

To study and compare the performance of the HAS‐BLED, ATRIA and HEMORR2HAGES for major bleeding in very elderly AF patients.

Methods

Subjects were a random sample (N = 1157) of AF patients ≥ 80 years using a vitamin‐K antagonist with prospective clinical follow‐up from 2011 to 2014. The primary outcome was major bleeding (International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria).

Results

Patients aged 84 years (median; 25th–75th 82–87) were classified as low risk by HAS‐BLED (25.2%), ATRIA (59.6%) and HEMORR2HAGES (23.3%). Three‐year rates of major, clinically relevant and any bleeding were 6.7%, 28.3% and 42.3%, respectively. We observed a statistically significant association for all models with major bleeding, but discriminatory abilities were rather poor (C‐statistics < 0.60) without clear superiority for any of the three. Only two (anemia and antiplatelet therapy) of the various classical risk factors were associated with bleeding. An estimated risk–benefit profile indicated a favorable trade‐off for oral anticoagulation in this specific cohort (number needed to treat, 22; number needed to harm, 91).

Conclusions

In this large prospective cohort of very elderly AF patients, the currently used bleeding risk scores were all associated with major bleeding, but with poor predictive abilities. Use of the ATRIA model may inadvertently result in less attention being paid to modifiable risk factors in this particular population. In light of the issues of under‐treatment and the suggested favorable risk–benefit profile, future models with incorporation of elderly‐specific risk factors may provide more guidance in this growing population of AF patients.

Keywords

atrial fibrillation
hemorrhage
registries
risk assessment
stroke
vitamin K antagonists

Cited by (0)

See also Lip GYH, Lane DA. Bleeding risk assessment in atrial fibrillation: observations on the use and misuse of bleeding risk scores. This issue, pp 1711–4.

Manuscript handled by: J.‐B. Hansen

Final decision: F. R. Rosendaal, 17 April 2016