Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Use of handheld computers in medical education

A systematic review

  • Reviews
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Over the past decade, handheld computers (or personal digital assistants [PDAs]) have become a popular tool among medical trainees and physicians. Few comprehensive reviews of PDA use in medicine have been published.

OBJECTIVE: We systematically reviewed the literature to (1) describe medical trainees’ use of PDAs for education or patient care, (2) catalog popular software applications, and (3) evaluate the impact of PDA use on patient care.

DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (1993 to 2004), medical education-related conference proceedings, and hand search of article bibliographies.

REVIEW METHODS: We identified articles and abstracts that described the use of PDAs in medical education by trainees or educators. Reports presenting a qualitative or quantitative evaluation were included.

RESULTS: Sixty-seven studies met inclusion criteria. Approximately 60% to 70% of medical students and residents use PDAs for educational purposes or patient care. Satisfaction was generally high and correlated with the level of handheld computer experience. Most of the studies included described PDA use for patient tracking and documentation. By contrast, trainees rated medical textbooks, medication references, and medical calculators as the most useful applications. Only 1 randomized trial with educational outcomes was found, demonstrating improved learning and application of evidence-based medicine with use of PDA-based decision support software. No articles reported the impact of PDA use on patient outcomes.

CONCLUSION: Most medical trainees find handhelds useful in their medical education and patient care. Further studies are needed to evaluate how PDAs impact learning and clinical outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Menon AS, Moffett S, Enriquez M, Martinez MM, Dev P, Grappone T. Audience response made easy: using personal digital assistants as a classroom polling tool. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004;11:217–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Torre DM, Wright SM. Clinical and educational uses of handheld computers. South Med J. 2003;96:996–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Adatia F, Bedard PL. “Palm reading”: 2. Handheld software for physicians. Can Med Assoc J. 2003;168:727–34.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wiggins RH III Handhelds in radiology. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2003;24:434–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Walpert B. The operating system debate: pocket PC vs. palm. ACP Observer. November 2002.

  6. Adatia FA, Bedard PL. “Palm reading”: 1. Handheld hardware and operating systems. Can Med Assoc J. 2002;167:775–80.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chesanow N. Colleagues rate the leading software. Med Econ. 2000;77:105–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fischer S, Stewart TE, Mehta S, Wax R, Lapinsky SE. Handheld computing in medicine. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10:139–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gillingham W, Holt A, Gillies J. Hand-held computers in healthcare: what software programs are available? NZ Med J. 2002;U115:U185.

  10. Luo J. Portable computing in psychiatry. Can J Psychiatry—Rev Can Psychiatrie. 2004;49:24–30.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Whitsed N. Learning and teaching. Health Inf Libraries J. 2003;20:119–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Anonymous. Medical schools and hospitals adopt handheld personal data assistants. Health Care Strateg Manage. 2001;19:14–5.

  13. Zaroukian MH, Sousa A. Handheld Computing in Resident Education: benefits, barriers, and considerations. Semin Med Prac. 2002;5:33–44.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sousa AC, Zaroukian MH. Handheld computing by resident physicians: enhancing performance and demonstrating competence. Semin Med Prac. 2003;6:21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  15. McLeod TG, Ebbert JO, Lymp JF. Survey assessment of personal digital assistant use among trainees and attending physicians. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003;10:605–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Carroll AE, Christakis DA. Pediatricians’ use of and attitudes about personal digital assistants. Pediatrics. 2004;113:238–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Van Wave TW, Dewey AK. Do medical students need a hand up on palm technology? Minn Med. 2003;86:18–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Moffett SE, Menon AS, Meites EM, et al. Preparing doctors for bedside computing. Lancet. 2003;362:86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Barrett JR, Strayer SM, Schubart JR. Assessing medical residents’ usage and perceived needs for personal digital assistants. Int J Med Inf. 2004;73:25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. McAlearney AS, Schweikhart SB, Medow MA. Doctors’ experience with handheld computers in clinical practice: qualitative study. BMJ. 2004;328:1162.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Brilla R, Wartenberg KE. Introducing new technology: handheld computers and drug databases. A comparison between two residency programs. J Med Syst. 2004;28:57–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Joy S, Benrubi G. Personal digital assistant use in Florida obstetrics and gynecology residency programs. South Med J. 2004;97:430–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Moore L, Richardson BR, Williams RW. The USU medical PDA initiative: the PDA as an educational tool. Proc AMIA Symp. 2002;528–32.

  24. Ho WL, Forman J, Kannry J. Portable digital assistant use in a medicine teaching program. Proc AMIA Symp. 2000;1031. Abstract available at: www.amia.org/pubs/proceedings/symposia/start.html.

  25. Tschopp M, Lovis C, Geissbuhler A. Understanding usage patterns of handheld computers in clinical practice. Proc AMIA Symp. 2002;806–9.

  26. Manning B, Gadd CS. Introducing handheld computing into a residency program: preliminary results from qualitative and quantitative inquiry. Proc AMIA Symp. 2001;428–32.

  27. Criswell DF, Parchman ML. Handheld computer use in U.S. family practice residency programs. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002;9:80–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Beasley BW. Utility of palmtop computers in a residency program: a pilot study. South Med J. 2002;95:207–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rothschild JM, Lee TH, Bae T, Bates DW. Clinician use of a palmtop drug reference guide. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002;9:223–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rao G. Introduction of handheld computing to a family practice residency program. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2002;15:118–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lenga I, Straus S. Evidence based medicine at the point of care. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17(suppl 1):201.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Barrett JR, Strayer SM, Schubart JR. Information needs of residents during inpatient and outpatient rotations: identifying effective personal digital assistant applications. Proc AMIA Symp. 2003;784. Abstract available at: www.amia.org/pubs/proceedings/symposia/start.html.

  33. Briggs B. Pushing data out to PDAs. Health Data Manag. 2002;10:28–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mitchell JL, Sebastian J, Simpson DE. Providing students feedback: opportunity knocks in the ambulatory setting. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17(suppl 1):231.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Torre D, Sebastian J, Simpson DE. High impact learning activities: perceptions of third year medical students. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(suppl 1):257.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Torre D, Sebastian J, Simpson DE, et al. Third-year medical students’ perceptions of high quality learning activities across internal medicine and family medicine clerkships. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;18(suppl 1):227–8.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Torre D, Simpson DE, Sebastian J, Konicek B, Geck R, Schwantes S. Prioritizing you inpatient teaching and feedback activities. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19(suppl 1):198–9.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Bass SG. Wireless computing. Medical students and mobile medicine. MD Comput. 2000;17:27.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Bower DJ, Bertling CJ. Using PalmPilots as a teaching tool during a primary care clerkship. Advanced Education Group. Acad Med. 2000;75:541–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Brooks WB, Zbehlik A, Lurie J, Ross JM. Getting evidence based medicine to the bedside—from journal club to handheld computer. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17(suppl 1):84.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Greenberg R. Use of the personal digital assistant (PDA) in medical education. Med Educ. 2004;38:570–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Helwig AL, Flynn C. Using palm-top computers to improve students’ evidence-based decision making. Acad Med. 1998;73:603–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Johnston JM, Leung GM, Tin KY, Ho LM, Lam W, Fielding R. Evaluation of a handheld clinical decision support tool for evidence-based learning and practice in medical undergraduates. Med Educ. 2004;38:628–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kho A, Kripalani S, Dressler D, et al. Personal digital assistants at the point of care: a training program for medical students. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19(suppl 1):92.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Labkoff SE, Shah S, Bormel J, Lee Y, Greenes RA. The Constellation Project: experience and evaluation of personal digital assistants in the clinical environment. Proc Ann Symp Computer Appl Med Care 1995:678–82.

  46. Leung GM, Johnston JM, Tin KY, et al. Randomised controlled trial of clinical decision support tools to improve learning of evidence based medicine in medical students. BMJ. 2003;327:1090–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. McKenney RR. The next level of distributed learning: the introduction of the personal digital assistant. J Oncol Manag. 2004;13:18–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Nyun M, Aronovitz JR, Khare R, Finkelstein J. Feasibility of a palmtop based interactive education to promote safety. Proc AMIA Symp. 2003;955. Abstract available at: www.amia.org/pubs/proceedings/symposia/start.html.

  49. Speedie S, Pacala J, Vercellotti G, Harris I, Zhou X. PDA support for outpatient clinical clerkships: mobile computing for medical education. Proc AMIA Symp. 2001;632–6. Abstract available at: www.amia.org/pubs/proceedings/symposia/start.html.

  50. Weissman PF. A primary -care curriculum: can clinical practice guidelines be taught using active learning techniques? J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(suppl 1):124.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Bertling CJ, Simpson DE, Hayes AM, Torre D, Brown DL, Schubot DB. Personal digital assistants herald new approaches to teaching and evaluation in medical education. WMJ. 2003;102:46–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Alderson TS, Oswald NT. Clinical experience of medical students in primary care: use of an electronic log in monitoring experience and in guiding education in the cambridge community based clinical course. Med Educ. 1999;33:429–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Bird SB, Zarum RS, Renzi FP. Emergency medicine resident patient care documentation using a hand-held computerized device. Acad Emerg Med. 2001;8:1200–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Carroll AE, Saluja S, Tarczy-Hornoch P. Development of a personal digital assistant (PDA) based client/server NICU patient data and charting system. Proc AMIA Symp. 2001;100:104.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Carroll AE, Tarczy-Hornoch P, O’Reilly E, Christakis DA. The effect of point-of-care personal digital assistant use on resident documentation discrepancies. Pediatrics. 2004;113(part 1):450–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Elkin D, Kerpen H, Mattana J, Tu C. Influence of hospitalists on patient spectrum and length of stay on inpatient teaching service: a palm pilot based study. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17(suppl 1):93.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Engum SA. Do you know your students’ basic clinical skills exposure? Am J Surg. 2003;186:175–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Fischer S, Lapinsky SE, Weshler J, et al. Surgical procedure logging with use of a hand-held computer. Can J Surg. 2002;45:345–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Garvin R, Otto F, McRae MA. Using handheld computers to document family practice resident procedure experience. Fam Med. 2000;32:115–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Jao C, Hier DB, Su J. Evaluating a digital resident diagnosis log: reasons for limited acceptance of a PDA solution. Proc AMIA Symp. 2003;876. Abstract available at: www.amia.org/pubs/proceedings/symposia/start.html.

  61. Kurth RJ, Silenzio V, Irigoyen MM. Use of personal digital assistants to enhance educational evaluation in a primary care clerkship. Med Teach. 2002;24:488–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Lee JS, Sanford S, Sumner W. Validation of electronic encounter logs in an emergency medicine clerkship. Proc AMIA Symp. 2002;425–9. Abstract available at: www.amia.org/pubs/proceedings/symposia/start.html.

  63. MacNeily AE, Nguan C, Haden K, Goldenberg SL. Implementation of a PDA based program to quantify urology resident in- training experience. Can J Urol. 2003;10:1885–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Malan TK, Haffner WH, Armstrong AY, Satin AJ. Hand-held computer operating system program for collection of resident experience data. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96(part 1):792–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Marshall M, Sumner W. Family practice clerkship encounters documented with structured phrases on paper and hand-held computer logs. Proc AMIA Symp 2000:547–50.

  66. Pipas C, Carney P, Eliassen M, et al. Development of a handheld computer documentation system to enhance an integrated primary care clerkship. Acad Med. 2002;77:600–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Rosenthal M, Wolford RW. Resident procedure and resuscitation tracking using a palm. Acad Emerg Med. 2000;7:1171.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Siddiqui KM, Butcher RJ. Nuclear cardiology patient tracking using a palm-based device: methods and clinician satisfaction. J Digit Imaging. 2002;15(suppl 1):242–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Stengel D, Bauwens K, Walter M, Kopfer T, Ekkernkamp A. Comparison of handheld computer-assisted and conventional paper chart documentation of medical records. A randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Jt Surg—Am Volume. 2004;86-A:553–60.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Sullivan L, Halbach JL, Shu T. Using personal digital assistants in a family medicine clerkship. Acad Med. 2001;76:534–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Sumner W II Student documentation of multiple diagnoses in family practice patients using a handheld student encounter log. Proc AMIA Symp. 2001;687–90. Abstract available at: www.amia.org/pubs/proceedings/symposia/start.html.

  72. Thomas SM, Overhage JM, Warvel J, McDonald CJ. A comparison of a printed patient summary document with its electronic equivalent: early results. Proc AMIA Symp 2001:701–5.

  73. Moore RH. Use of a palmtop pocket computer to produce a customised logbook of surgical experience. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1995;77(suppl 2):74–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Vincent C, Kim S, Schneeweiss R, Stevens N. Documenting procedures and deliveries during family practice residency: a survey of graduates’ experiences, preferences, and recommendations. Fam Med. 2003;35:264–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Autry AM, Simpson DE, Bragg DS, et al. Personal digital assistant for “real time” assessment of women’s health in the clinical years. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187(suppl 3):S19-S21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Young RJ, Horsley SD, McKenna M. The potential role of IT in supporting the work of junior doctors. J Roy Coll Physicians Lond. 2000;34:366–70.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Zebrack J, Mitchell J, Davids S, Bragg D. The impact of an on-line women’s health curriculum on OSCE skills and clinical teaching encounters. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(suppl 1):260.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Chen ES, Mendonca EA, McKnight LK, Stetson PD, Lei J, Cimino JJ. PalmCIS: a wireless handheld application for satisfying clinician information needs. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004;11:19–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. James T. Using handheld computers for physician order entry. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17(suppl 1):98.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Mohl VK, Allerheiligen DA, Cassell J, Houston RE, Schoeber JK, Wildman K. Can palmtop computers improve the feasibility of research projects for FM faculty? Fam Med. 1998;30:322–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA

    Anna Kho MD, Laura E. Henderson MS, Daniel D. Dressler MD, MSc & Sunil Kripalani MD, MSc

Authors
  1. Anna Kho MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Laura E. Henderson MS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Daniel D. Dressler MD, MSc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sunil Kripalani MD, MSc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Kho MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kho, A., Henderson, L.E., Dressler, D.D. et al. Use of handheld computers in medical education. J GEN INTERN MED 21, 531–537 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00444.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00444.x

Key words

Search

Navigation