Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and influence of specific attending teaching practices on student evaluations of the quality of attendings’ teaching in the inpatient component of Internal Medicine clerkships.
DESIGN: Nationwide survey using a simple random sample.
SETTING: One hundred and twenty-one allopathic 4-year medical schools in the United States.
PARTICIPANTS: A total of 2,250 fourth-year medical students.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In the spring of 2002, student satisfaction with the overall quality of teaching by attendings in the inpatient component of Internal Medicine clerkships was measured on a 5-point scale from very satisfied to very dissatisfied (survey response rate, 68.3%). Logistic regression was used to determine the association of specific teaching practices with student evaluations of the quality of their attendings’ teaching. Attending physicians’ teaching practices such as engaging students in substantive discussions (odds ratio (OR)=3.0), giving spontaneous talks and prepared presentations (OR=1.6 and 1.8), and seeing new patients with the team (OR=1.2) were strongly associated with higher student satisfaction, whereas seeming rushed and eager to finish rounds was associated with lower satisfaction (OR=0.6).
CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that student satisfaction with attendings’ teaching is high overall but there is room for improvement. Specific teaching behaviors used by attendings affect student satisfaction. These specific behaviors could be taught and modified for use by attendings and clerkship directors to enhance student experiences during clerkships.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Griner PF, Danoff D. Sustaining change in medical education. JAMA. 2000;283:2429–31.
Fields SA, Morrison E, Yoder E, et al. Clerkship directors’ perceptions of the impact of HCFA documentation guidelines. Acad Med. 2002;77:543–6.
Myers KA. Evaluating clinical teachers: does the learning environment matter? Acad Med. 2001;76:286.
Mazor KM, Stone SL, Carlin M, Alper E. What do medicine clerkship preceptors do best? Acad Med. 2002;77:837–40.
Ramsey PG, Gillmore GM, Irby DM. Evaluating clinical teaching in the medicine clerkship: relationship of instructor experience and training setting to ratings of teaching effectiveness. J Gen Intern Med. 1988;3:351–5.
Irby DM. Ideas for medical education. Acad Med. 1997;72:186.
Xu G, Wolfson P, Robeson M, Rodgers JF, Veloski JJ, Brigham TP. Students’ satisfaction and perceptions of attending physicians’ and residents’ teaching role. Am J Surg. 1998;176:46–8.
Marsh H, Roche L. Making students’ evaluations of teaching effectiveness effective: the critical issues of validity, bias, and utility. Am Psychol. 1997;52:1187–97.
National Institutes of Health. NIH Awards to medical schools by rank, fiscal year 2001. Available at: http://grants1.nih.gov/grants/award/rank/medttlnod.htm. Accessed December 30, 2002.
Association of American Medical Colleges. U.S. medical school faculty, 2001, distribution of U.S. medical school faculty by school, table 2. Available at: http://www.aamc.org/data/facultyroster/usmsf01/01table2.pdf. Accessed December 30, 2002.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Authors had no conflicts of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guarino, C.M., Ko, C.Y., Baker, L.C. et al. Impact of instructional practices on student satisfaction with attendings’ teaching in the inpatient component of internal medicine clerkships. J GEN INTERN MED 21, 7–12 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0253.x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0253.x