Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Satisfaction with the outpatient encounter

A comparison of patients’ and physicians’ views

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare patients’ and physicians’ visit-specific satisfaction in an internal medicine outpatient setting, and to explain their respective views.

DESIGN: Patients’ and physicians’ background characteristics were assessed prior to outpatient encounters. Immediately after the encounter, both patients and physicians completed a questionnaire assessing satisfaction with the visit.

SETTING: The outpatient division of an academic teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS: Thirty residents and specialists in general internal medicine, rheumatology, and gastroenterology, and 330 patients having a follow-up appointment with one of these physicians.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients’ and physicians’ visit-specific satisfaction was assessed using 5 Visual Analogue Scales (0 to 100). Patients’ overall satisfaction was higher than physicians’ satisfaction (mean 81 vs. 66), and correlation of patients’ and physicians’ overall satisfaction with the specific visit was medium sized (r=.28, P<.001). Patients’ satisfaction ratings were associated with their previsit self-efficacy in communicating with their physician (P<.001) and with visiting a female physician (P<.01). Physicians’ satisfaction was associated with patients’ higher educational level (P<.05), primary language being Dutch (P<.001), better mental health (P<.05), and preference for receiving less than full information (P<.05).

CONCLUSIONS: In an outpatient setting, patients’ visit-specific satisfaction ratings were substantially higher than, and only moderately associated with, physicians’ ratings of the same visit. The dissimilar predictors explaining patients’ and physicians’ satisfaction suggest that patients and physicians form their opinion about a consultation in different ways. Hence, when evaluating outpatient encounters, physicians’ satisfaction has additional value to patients’ satisfaction in establishing quality of care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Suchman AL, Roter D, Green M, Lipkin MJ. Physician satisfaction with primary care office visits. Collaborative Study Group of the American Academy on Physician and Patient. Med Care. 1993;31:1083–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fairhurst K, May C. Consumerism and the consultation: the doctor’s view. Fam Pract. 1995;12:389–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Orden SR, Collette P, Souchek J, Masover L, Stamler J. Physician and patient assessment of ambulatory care in a university facility. J Community Health. 1978;4:23–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lewis CC, Pantell RH, Sharp L. Increasing patient knowledge, satisfaction, and involvement: randomized trial of a communication intervention. Pediatrics. 1991;88:351–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shore BE, Franks P. Physician satisfaction with patient encounters. Reliability and validity of an encounter-specific questionnaire. Med Care. 1986;24:580–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Roter DL, Stewart M, Putnam SM, Lipkin MJ, Stiles W, Inui TS. Communication patterns of primary care physicians. JAMA. 1997;277:350–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hornberger J, Thom D, McCurdy T. Effects of a self-administered previsit questionnaire to enhance awareness of patients’ concerns in primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12:597–606.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mann S, Sripathy K, Siegler EL, Davidow A, Lipkin M, Roter DL. The medical interview: differences between adult and geriatric outpatients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001;49:65–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Detmar SB, Muller MJ, Schornagel JH, Wever LD, Aaronson NK. Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288:3027–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kurata JH, Nogawa AN, Phillips DM, Hoffman S, Werblun MN. Patient and provider satisfaction with medical care. J Fam Pract. 1992;35:176–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jung HP, Wensing M, Olesen F, Grol R. Comparison of patients’ and general practitioners’ evaluations of general practice care. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002;11:315–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rashid A, Forman W, Jagger C, Mann R. Consultations in general practice: a comparison of patients’ and doctors’ satisfaction. BMJ. 1989;299:1015–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Winefield HR, Murrell TG, Clifford J. Process and outcomes in general practice consultations: problems in defining high quality care. Soc Sci Med. 1995;41:969–75.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Probst JC, Greenhouse DL, Selassie AW. Patient and physician satisfaction with an outpatient care visit. J Fam Pract. 1997;45:418–25.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Weinberger M, Greene JY, Mamlin JJ. The impact of clinical encounter events on patient and physician satisfaction. Soc Sci Med. 1981;15:239–44.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hall JA, Dornan MC. Patient sociodemographic characteristics as predictors of satisfaction with medical care: a meta-analysis. Soc Sci Med. 1990;30:811–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jackson JL, Chamberlin J, Kroenke K. Predictors of patient satisfaction. Soc Sci Med. 2001;52:609–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sitzia J, Wood N. Patient satisfaction: a review of issues and concepts. Soc Sci Med. 1997;45:1829–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kreft I, de-Leeuw J. Introducing Multilevel Modeling. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications, 1998:x, 149.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Blanchard CG, Ruckdeschel JC, Fletcher BA, Blanchard EB. The impact of oncologists’ behaviors on patient satisfaction with morning rounds. Cancer. 1986;58:387–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ong LML, Visser MRM, Lammes FB, de Haes JCJM. Doctor-patient communication and cancer patients’ quality of life and satisfaction. Patient Educ Couns. 2000;41:145–56.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cassileth BR, Zupkis RV, Sutton-Smith K, March V. Information and participation preferences among cancer patients. Ann Intern Med. 1980;92:832–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sutherland HJ, Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Lockwood GA, Tritchler DL, Till JE. Cancer patients: their desire for information and participation in treatment decisions. J R Soc Med. 1989;82:260–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Maly RC, Frank JC, Marshall GN, DiMatteo MR, Reuben DB. Perceived efficacy in patient-physician interactions (PEPPI): validation of an instrument in older persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998;46:889–94.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ware JJ, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34:220–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. de Monchy C, Richardson R, Brown RA, Harden RM. Measuring attitudes of doctors: the doctor-patient (DP) rating. Med Educ. 1988;22:231–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Batenburg, V. Medical students’ attitudes: attitude development in a medical school. PhD Thesis, Utrecht: Elinkwijk BV; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Miller KI, Stiff JB, Ellis BH. Communication and empathy as precursors to burn-out among human service workers. Commun Monogr. 1988;55:250–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hox JJ. Multilevel Analysis. Techniques and Applications. London, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  30. SPSS Inc. SPSS 11.5 Syntax Reference Guide: Base System, Advanced Models, Regression Models. Chicago, Ill: SPSS Inc.; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rashbash J, Browne W, Goldstein H, et al. A User’s Guide to MLwiN. London, UK: University of London, Centre of Multilevel Modelling, Institute of Education; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Rev. ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1987:xv, 474.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Laine C, Davidoff F, Lewis CE, et al. Important elements of outpatient care: a comparison of patients’ and physicians’ opinions. Ann Intern Med. 1996;125:640–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1986:xiii, 617.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Linn LS, Cope DW, Leake B. The effect of gender and training of residents on satisfaction ratings by patients. J Med Educ. 1984;59:964–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Delgado A, Lopez-Fernandez LA, Luna JD. Influence of the doctor’s gender in the satisfaction of the users. Med Care. 1993;31:795–800.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Bertakis KD, Helms LJ, Callahan EJ, Azari R, Robbins JA. The influence of gender on physician practice style. Med Care. 1995;33:407–16.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Roter DL, Geller G, Bernhardt BA, Larson SM, Doksum T. Effects of obstetrician gender on communication and patient satisfaction. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;93:635–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Murphy-Cullen CL, Larsen LC. Interaction between the sociodemographic variables of physicians and their patients: its impact upon patient satisfaction. Soc Sci Med. 1984;19:163–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Anderson LA, Zimmerman MA. Patient and physician perceptions of their relationship and patient satisfaction: a study of chronic disease management. Patient Educ Couns. 1993;20:27–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Haas JS, Cook EF, Puopolo AL, Burstin HR, Cleary PD, Brennan TA. Is the professional satisfaction of general internists associated with patient satisfaction? J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15:122–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Roter DL, Hall JA, Aoki Y. Physician gender effects in medical communication: a meta-analytic review. JAMA. 2002;288:756–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Gattellari M, Butow PN, Tattersall MH. Sharing decisions in cancer care. Soc Sci Med. 2001;52:1865–78.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Golin C, DiMatteo MR, Duan N, Leake B, Gelberg L. Impoverished diabetic patients whose doctors facilitate their participation in medical decision making are more satisfied with their care. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17:857–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Williams B, Coyle J, Healy D. The meaning of patient satisfaction: an explanation of high reported levels. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47:1351–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Williams S, Weinman J, Dale J. Doctor-patient communication and patient satisfaction: a review. Fam Pract. 1998;15:480–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Mead N, Bower P. Patient-centred consultations and outcomes in primary care: a review of the literature. Patient Educ Couns. 2002;48:51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Lewin SA, Skea ZC, Entwistle V, Zwarenstein M, Dick J. Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centered approach in clinical consultations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;CD003267.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda C. Zandbelt MSc.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zandbelt, L.C., Smets, E.M.A., Oort, F.J. et al. Satisfaction with the outpatient encounter. J GEN INTERN MED 19, 1088–1095 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30420.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30420.x

Key words

Navigation