Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Online learning has changed medical education, but many “educational” websites do not employ principles of effective learning. This article will assist readers in developing effective educational websites by integrating principles of active learning with the unique features of the Web.
DESIGN: Narrative review.
RESULTS: The key steps in developing an effective educational website are: Perform a needs analysis and specify goals and objectives; determine technical resources and needs; evaluate preexisting software and use it if it fully meets your needs; secure commitment from all participants and identify and address potential barriers to implementation; develop content in close coordination with website design (appropriately use multimedia, hyperlinks, and online communication) and follow a timeline; encourage active learning (self-assessment, reflection, self-directed learning, problem-based learning, learner interaction, and feedback); facilitate and plan to encourage use by the learner (make website accessible and user-friendly, provide time for learning, and motivate learners); evaluate learners and course; pilot the website before full implementation; and plan to monitor online communication and maintain the site by resolving technical problems, periodically verifying hyperlinks, and regularly updating content.
CONCLUSION: Teaching on the Web involves more than putting together a colorful webpage. By consistently employing principles of effective learning, educators will unlock the full potential of Web-based medical education.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
McKimm J, Jollie C, Cantillon P. ABC of learning and teaching: Web based learning. BMJ. 2003;326:870–3.
Chumley-Jones HS, Dobbie A, Alford CL. Web-based learning: sound educational method or hype? A review of the evaluation literature. Acad Med. 2002;77(10 suppl):S86-S93.
Hallgren RC, Parkhurst PE, Monson CL, Crewe NM. An interactive, Web-based tool for learning anatomic landmarks. Acad Med. 2002;77:263–5.
Kemper KJ, Amata-Kynvi A, Sanghavi D, et al. Randomized trial of an Internet curriculum on herbs and other dietary supplements for health care professionals. Acad Med. 2002;77:882–9.
Spickard A III, Alrajeh N, Cordray D, Gigante J. Learning about screening using an online or live lecture: does it matter? J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17:540–5.
Kamin C, O’Sullivan P, Deterding R, Younger M. A comparison of critical thinking in groups of third-year medical students in text, video, and virtual PBL case modalities. Acad Med. 2003;78:204–11.
Friedman RB. Top ten reasons the World Wide Web may fail to change medical education. Acad Med. 1996;71:979–81.
Alur P, Fatima K, Joseph R. Medical teaching websites: do they reflect the learning paradigm? Med Teach. 2002;24:422–4.
Minasian-Batmanian LC. Guidelines for developing an online learning strategy for your subject. Med Teach. 2002;24:645–7.
Horton S. Web Teaching Guide: A Practical Approach to Creating Course Web Sites. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press; 2000.
Cato J. User-centered Web Design. Harlow, England: Pearson Education Limited; 2001.
Kern DE, Thomas PA, Howard DM, Bass EB. Curriculum Development for Medical Education: A Six-step Approach. Baltimore, Md: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 1998.
Zhu E, Payette P, DeZure D. An Introduction to Teaching Online. CRLT Occasional Papers. Ann Arbor, Mich: University of Michigan; 2003.
Koller CA, Frankenfield JJ, Sarley CA. Twelve tips for developing educational multimedia in a community-based teaching hospital. Med Teach. 2000;22:7–10.
Davis MH, Harden RM. E is for everything—e-learning? Med Teach. 2001;23:441–4.
Toohey S, Watson E. Twelve tips on choosing web teaching software. Med Teach. 2001;23:552–5.
Greenhalgh T. Computer assisted learning in undergraduate medical education. BMJ. 2001;322:40–4.
Bell DS, Fonarow GC, Hays RD, Mangione CM. Self-study from web-based and printed guideline materials: a randomized, controlled trial among resident physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2000;132:938–46.
Grundman J, Wigton R, Nickol D. A controlled trial of an interactive, Web-based virtual reality program for teaching physical diagnosis skills to medical students. Acad Med. 2000;75(10 suppl):S47-S49.
Ludlow JB, Platin E. A comparison of Web page and slide/tape for instruction in periapical and panoramic radiographic anatomy. J Dent Educ. 2000;64:269–75.
Santer D, Michaelsen V, Erkonen W, et al. A comparison of educational interventions. Multimedia textbook, standard lecture, and printed textbook. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995;149:297–302.
Brooks DW. Web-teaching: A Guide to Designing Interactive Teaching for the World Wide Web. New York, NY: Plenum Press; 1997.
Rosenberg MJ. E-learning: Strategies for Delivering Knowledge in the Digital Age. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2001.
Sekikawa A, Aaron DJ, Acosta B, Sa E, LaPorte RE. Does the perception of downloading speed influence the evaluation of web-based lectures? Public Health. 2001;115:152–6.
Yuh JL, Abbott AV, Ontai S. Pilot study of a rating instrument for medical education Web sites. Acad Med. 2000;75:290.
Hoffman GM. Copyright in Cyberspace: Questions and Answers for Librarians. New York, NY: Neal-Schuman Publishers, Inc.; 2001.
Collison G, Elbaum B, Haavind S, Tinker R. Facilitating Online Learning: Effective Strategies for Moderators. Madison, Wis: Atwood Publishing; 2000.
Ellenchild Pinch W, Graves J. Using web-based discussion as a teaching strategy: bioethics as an exemplar. J Adv Nurs. 2000;32:704–12.
Lipman AJ, Sade RM, Glotzbach AL, Lancaster CJ, Marshall MF. The incremental value of Internet-based instruction as an adjunct to classroom instruction: a prospective randomized study. Acad Med. 2001;76:1060–4.
Steinert Y, McLeod P, Conochie L, Nasmith L. An online discussion for medical faculty: an experiment that failed. Acad Med. 2002;77:939–40.
Jha V, Duffy S. Ten golden rules for designing software in medical education: results from a formative evaluation of DIALOG. Med Teach. 2002;24:417–21.
Krug S. Don’t Make Me Think! A Common Sense Approach to Web Usability. Indianapolis, Ind: Macmillan USA; 2000.
The National Cancer Institute. Usability.gov: improving the communication of cancer research; Available at: http://usability.gov. Accessed June 4, 2003.
Meyers C, Jones TB. Promoting active learning: strategies for the college classroom. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass Inc.; 1993.
Kaufman DM. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: applying educational theory in practice. BMJ. 2003;326:213–6.
Papa FJ, Aldrich D, Schumacker RE. The effects of immediate online feedback upon diagnostic performance. Acad Med. 1999;74(10 suppl):S16-S18.
Jarvis P, Holford J, Griffin C. The Theory and Practice of Learning. London, UK: Kogan Page Limited; 1998.
Leong SL, Baldwin CD, Adelman AM. Integrating Web-based computer cases into a required clerkship: development and evaluation. Acad Med. 2003;78:295–301.
Dornan T, Lee C, Stopford A. Skills base: a Web-based electronic learning portfolio for clinical skills. Acad Med. 2001;76:542–3.
Carr M, Hewitt J, Scardamalia M, Reznick R. Internet-based otolaryngology case discussions for medical students. J Otolaryngol. 2002;31:197–201.
McGrath D, Maulitz R, Baldwin CD. An active learning framework that delivers clinical education case studies on the web. Acad Med. 2001;76:548.
Chueh H, Barnett G. “Just-in-time” clinical information. Acad Med. 1997;72:512–7.
Baumlin KM, Bessette MJ, Lewis C, Richardson LD. EMCyber-School: an evaluation of computer-assisted instruction on the Internet. Acad Emerg Med. 2000;7:959–62.
Cahill D, Cook J, Sithers A, Edwards J, Jenkins J. Evaluation of an online postgraduate education programme. Med Teach. 2002;24:425–8.
Wood DF. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: problem based learning. BMJ. 2003;326:328–30.
Wlodkowsi RJ. Strategies to enhance adult motivation to learn. In: Galbraith MW, ed. Adult Learning Methods: A Guide to Effective Instruction. 2nd ed. Malabar, Fla: Krieger Publishing Company; 1998;91–111.
Beasley BW, Kallail KJ, Walling AD, Davis N, Hudson L. Maximizing the use of a Web-based teaching skills curriculum for community-based volunteer faculty. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2001;21:158–61.
Miller AP, Haden P, Schwartz PL, Loten EG. Pilot studies of in-course assessment for a revised medical curriculum: II. Computer-based, individual. Acad Med. 1997;72:1113–5.
Morrison J. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine: evaluation. BMJ. 2003;326:385–7.
Cook DA, Dupras DM. Flexible teaching for inflexible schedules: an online resident curriculum in acute ambulatory care. Med Teach. 2003;25:330–1.
Zucker S, White JA, Fabri PJ, Khonsari LS. Instructional intranets in graduate medical education. Acad Med. 1998;73:1072–5.
Harden R. Myths and e-learning. Med Teach. 2002;24:469–72.
Knowles MS, Holton EF III, Swanson RA. The Adult Learner. 5th ed. Woburn, Mass: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1998.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
A presentation illustrating the step-by-step application of this process is available online at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/products/journals/suppmat/jgi/JG130029_appendix.ppt.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cook, D.A., Dupras, D.M. A practical guide to developing effective web-based learning. J GEN INTERN MED 19, 698–707 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30029.x
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30029.x