To read this content please select one of the options below:

Different views of trust and relational leadership: supervisor and subordinate perspectives

James D. Werbel (Department of Management, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA)
Paulo Lopes Henriques (Management Department (ISEG), Economics and Business Management School, Technical University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal)

Journal of Managerial Psychology

ISSN: 0268-3946

Article publication date: 6 November 2009

6475

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of the study is to investigate how the conditions of trust differ between supervisors and subordinates. By understanding these differences, it may be possible to improve the quality of a leader‐member exchange (LMX).

Design/methodology/approach

This is a quantitative study using supervisor and subordinate dyads from Portugal.

Findings

Supervisors reported that receptivity, availability, and discreteness were perceived to be more important in building a quality vertical dyad linkage as represented by LMX. Subordinates reported that availability, competence, discreteness, integrity, and openness were more important for building a quality vertical dyad linkage as represented by LMX.

Research limitations/implications

Status differences between supervisors and subordinates appear to influence conditions of trust. Supervisors are more concerned about conditions of trust that deal with supervisory delegation. Subordinates are more concerned about the conditions of trust based on interactional justice.

Originality/value

This research implies that trust is different between supervisors and subordinates. The research is important in building supervisor and subordinate relationships as both need to act in manners that engenders trust from the other side. The difference in conditions of trust may create conflicting expectations about how to effectively build trust.

Keywords

Citation

Werbel, J.D. and Lopes Henriques, P. (2009), "Different views of trust and relational leadership: supervisor and subordinate perspectives", Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 24 No. 8, pp. 780-796. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940910996798

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2009, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles