ARTICLES
Who Is at Greatest Risk of Adverse Long-Term Outcomes? The Finnish From a Boy to a Man Study

https://doi.org/10.1097/chi.0b013e31809861e9Get rights and content

ABSTRACT

Objective:

To study associations between comorbid psychopathology and long-term outcomes in a large birth cohort sample from age 8 to early adulthood.

Method:

The sample included long-term outcome data on 2,556 Finnish boys born in 1981. The aim was to study the impact of early childhood psychopathology types (externalizing versus internalizing versus both) and informant sources (self-report versus parent/teacher reports) on young adult outcomes, based on data from a military registry of psychiatric diagnosis, a police registry on criminal and drug offenses, and self-reported problems in late adolescence and early adulthood.

Results:

Children with combined conduct and internalizing problems at age 8 had the worst outcomes and highest risk of subsequent psychiatric disorders, criminal offenses, and self-reported problems at follow-up, with 62% of these boys manifesting psychiatric disorders, committing criminal offenses, or both at follow-up. Although these children included only 4% of the sample, they were responsible for 26% of all criminal offenses at follow-up. In contrast, children with conduct problems without internalizing problems and those with attention problems had much less severe but nonetheless elevated levels of risk of antisocial personality disorder and criminal offenses. Long-term outcomes for these two groups were substantially better than for children with combined conduct and internalizing problems. Children with “pure” emotional problems had an elevated risk only of similar emotional problems at follow-up.

Conclusions:

The subjective suffering and long-term burden to society is especially high among children with comorbid conduct and internalizing problems in childhood. A major challenge for child and adolescent psychiatric, education, and social services is to develop effective intervention strategies focusing on these children. Additional longitudinal epidemiological studies of this comorbidity group are needed, and, if replicated, such findings will have important implications for future diagnostic classification systems (DSM-V).

Section snippets

CHALLENGES IN CONDUCTING LONG-TERM OUTCOME STUDIES

There are several vexing methodological issues to consider when interpreting results from longitudinal studies of developmental psychopathology. First, how should one decide on appropriate methods for integrating reports from different sources (Kraemer et al., 2003a)? Low agreement among parents, teachers, and children about the presence of childhood emotional and behavioral problems or impairment in clinical and community settings is well documented (Achenbach et al., 1987, Bird et al., 1992,

ADDRESSING COMPLEXITY

Once we acknowledge the complexity of many possible combinations of symptoms, disorders, and informants that may in fact not be additive, the analytical challenges of exploring an unmanageable number of possible interactive combinations are statistically overwhelming. A parsimonious approach to managing this complexity, in the service of understanding psychopathology and its long-term outcomes, is needed.

Empirically based taxonomies of child psychopathology have yielded two broad dimensions of

Subjects

This investigation is a part of the nationwide “From a Boy to a Man” study, a follow-up study included in the Epidemiological Multicenter Child Psychiatric Study in Finland (Almqvist et al., 1999). The study design and methods have been described more extensively in previous reports in this journal (Sourander et al., 2004a, Sourander et al., 2004b, Sourander et al., 2005, Sourander et al., 2006). The original study sample was drawn from the total population of Finnish children born during 1981 (

Psychopathology Group Types and Cross-Sectional Associations at Age 8

The C-E group included 110 boys (4.3% of the sample), the conduct-only group 147 boys (5.8%), the attention group 102 boys (4.0%), the emotional-only group 245 boys (9.6%), and the invisible group 166 boys (6.5%). Table 1 shows the sample's descriptive characteristics and results of logistic regression and NNT analysis including family structure, parental education level, reported need for help, and psychopathology group types.

DISCUSSION

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of a representative sample of boys' long-term outcomes in young adulthood that captures psychiatric diagnoses, extensive data concerning functioning from universal military and criminal registries, and self-report information. As such, the present study has a number of significant strengths. Findings are derived from a community-based study sample representative of the target population, and the study design was a prospective follow-up

REFERENCES (65)

  • TM Achenbach

    Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist 4-18 and 1991 Profile

    (1991)
  • TM Achenbach et al.

    Six-year predictors of problems in a national sample, III: transition to young adult syndromes

    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry

    (1995)
  • TM Achenbach et al.

    Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity

    Psychol Bull

    (1987)
  • F Almqvist et al.

    Design and subjects of a Finnish epidemiological study on psychiatric disorders in childhood

    Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry

    (1999)
  • A Angold et al.

    Comorbidity

    J Child Psychol Psychiatry

    (1999)
  • RA Barkley et al.

    The adolescent outcome of hyperactive children diagnosed by research criteria

    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry

    (1990)
  • KJ Bennett et al.

    Predicting conduct problems: can high-risk children be identified in kindergarten and grade 1?

    J Consult Clin Psychol

    (1999)
  • KJ Bennett et al.

    Screening for conduct problems: does the predictive accuracy of conduct disorder symptoms improve with age?

    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry

    (2001)
  • J Biederman et al.

    A prospective 4-year follow-up study of attention-deficit hyperactivity and related disorders

    Arch Gen Psychiatry

    (1996)
  • HR Bird et al.

    Aggregating data from multiple informants in child psychiatric epidemiologic research

    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry

    (1992)
  • HR Bird et al.

    Patterns of diagnostic comorbidity in a community sample of children aged 9 through 16 years

    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry

    (1993)
  • RJR Blair

    The roles of orbital frontal cortex in the modulation of antisocial behavior

    Brain Cogn

    (2004)
  • MA Brotman et al.

    Prevalence, clinical correlates, and longitudinal course of severe mood dysregulation in children

    Biol Psychiatry

    (2006)
  • L Buydens-Branchey et al.

    Age of alcoholism onset, I: relationship to psychopathology

    Arch Gen Psychiatry

    (1989)
  • A Caspi et al.

    Behavioral observations at age 3 predict adult psychiatric disorders: longitudinal evidence from a birth cohort

    Arch Gen Psychiatry

    (1996)
  • I Colman et al.

    Birth cohort studies in psychiatry: beginning at the beginning

    Psychol Med

    (2004)
  • RJ Cook et al.

    The number needed to treat: a clinically useful measure of treatment effect

    BMJ

    (1995)
  • ME Ensminger et al.

    Childhood and adolescent antecedents of substance use in adulthood

    Addiction

    (2002)
  • L Ezepleta et al.

    A comparison of pure and comorbid CD/ODD and depression

    J Child Psychol Psychiatry

    (2006)
  • DM Fergusson et al.

    Show me the child at seven: the consequences of conduct problems in childhood for psychosocial functioning in adulthood

    J Child Psychol Psychiatry

    (2005)
  • DL Foley et al.

    Proximal psychiatric risk factors for suicidality in youth: the Great Smoky Mountains Study

    Arch Gen Psychiatry

    (2006)
  • E Fombonne et al.

    The Maudsley long-term follow-up of child and adolescent depression. 1. Psychiatric Outcomes in adulthood

    Br J Psychiatry

    (2001)
  • E Fombonne et al.

    The Maudsley long-term follow-up of child and adolescent depression. 2. Suicidality, criminality and social dysfunction in adulthood

    Br J Psychiatry

    (2001)
  • P Graham et al.

    Psychiatric disorders in the young adolescents. A follow-up study

    Proc R Soc Med

    (1973)
  • A Haavisto et al.

    Factors associated with depressive symptoms among 18-year-old boys: a prospective 10-year follow-up study

    J Affect Dis

    (2004)
  • A Haavisto et al.

    Factors associated with ideation and acts of deliberate self-harm among 18-year-old boys. A prospective 10-year follow-up study

    Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol

    (2005)
  • R Harrington et al.

    Adult outcome of childhood and adolescent depression: II. Links with antisocial disorders

    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry

    (1991)
  • SP Hinshaw

    On the distinction between attentional deficits/hyperactivity and conduct problems/aggression in child psychopathology

    Psychol Bull

    (1987)
  • MB Hofstra et al.

    Child and adolescent problems predict DSM-IV disorders in adulthood. A 14-year follow-up of Dutch epidemiological sample

    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry

    (2002)
  • N Ialongo et al.

    The course of aggression in first-grade children with and without comorbid anxious symptoms

    J Abnorm Child Psychol

    (1996)
  • PS Jensen et al.

    ADHD comorbidity findings from the MTA study: comparing comorbid groups

    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry

    (2001)
  • PS Jensen et al.

    Parent and child contributions to diagnosis of mental disorder: are both informants always necessary?

    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry

    (1999)
  • Cited by (0)

    This study was supported by the Sigrid Juselius Foundation, Yrjo Jahnsson Foundation, Finnish Defence Forces (MATINE), and Signe and Arne Gyllenberg Foundation.

    Article Plus (online only) materials for this article appear on the Journal's Web site: www.jaacap.com

    Disclosure: Dr. Jensen has received research funding from McNeil; has received unrestricted grants from Pfizer; has consulted to Best Practice, Inc., Shire, Janssen, Novartis, and UCB; and has participated on the speakers' bureaus of Janssen-Ortho, Alza, McNeil, UCB, CME Outfitters, and the Neuroscience Education Institute. Dr. Jensen also owns shares in Eli Lilly. The other authors have no financial relationships to disclose.

    View full text