LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
THE SOCIAL COMMUNICATON QUESTIONNAIRE (SCQ) AS A SCREENER FOR AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERS: ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE AND CROSS-CULTURAL VALIDITY

https://doi.org/10.1097/CHI.0b013e31816c42bdGet rights and content

REFERENCES (5)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (49)

  • The assessment of social responsiveness scale Lithuanian version

    2020, Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders
    Citation Excerpt :

    For the same reason we could not evaluate the test-retest reliability of the instrument, and therefore we were unable to assess the utility of the questionnaire for the therapeutic process. The majority of SRS validation studies have examined its convergent validity using such ‘golden standards’ of diagnostics as the ADOS, the ADI-R (Filipek et al., 2000; Ozonoff, Goodlin-Jones, & Solomon, 2005) or other widely used scales, e.g. the Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ) (Bölte, Holtmann, & Poustka, 2008) and the Autism Screening Questionnaire (ASQ) (Berument, Rutter, Lord, Pickles, & Bailey, 1999). Unfortunately, these scales have not been validated for the Lithuanian population and therefore in our study, like the one conducted in Taiwan (Wang et al., 2012), the diagnoses of the subjects in the ASD subsample were based only on the diagnostic criteria provided in the ICD-10.

  • Brief report: A pilot study of the validity and reliability of the Greek version of the Social Communication Questionnaire

    2017, Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders
    Citation Excerpt :

    There is a vast body of research studies (Allen, Silvore, Williams, & Hutchins, 2007; Bölte, Holtmann, & Poustka, 2008; Charman et al., 2007; Eaves, Winger & Ho, 2006; Sato et al., 2009; Öner, Öner, Çöp, & Munir, 2012; Wiggins et al., 2007) that examine the psychometric properties of the SCQ Lifetime form in preschool and school-aged children. Also, evidence of the cross-cultural validity of non English versions of the SCQ comes from the German adaptation (Bölte et al., 2008), the Turkish (Avcil, Baykara, Baydur, Münir, & İnal Emiroğlu, 2015; Öner et al., 2012) and the Portuguese version (Sato et al., 2009). From this literature body, it seems that some parameters such as the sample’s age (Allen et al., 2007; Brooks & Benson, 2013; Corsello et al., 2007; Lee, David, Rusyniak, Landa, & Newschaffer, 2007; Wiggins et al., 2007), the severity of the diagnosis (Bölte et al., 2008; Corsello et al., 2007; Johnson et al., 2011; Schanding, Nowell, & Goin-Kochel, 2012), participants’ IQs (Corsello et al., 2007; Eaves et al., 2006; Schanding et al., 2012), the existence of behavioral problems (Charman et al., 2007), participants’ verbal abilities (Eaves et al., 2006; Wiggins et al., 2007) and the completion of the SCQ prior to the ADI-R or to a formal assessment (Corsello, Anderson, Qui, Risi, & Lord, 2004; Corsello et al., 2007) affect the efficiency of this screener.

View all citing articles on Scopus

All statements expressed in this column are those of the authors and do not reflect the opinions of the Journal or the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. See the Instructions for Authors for information about the preparation and submission of Letters to the Editor.

View full text