ARTICLES
The Brief Impairment Scale (BIS): A Multidimensional Scale of Functional Impairment for Children and Adolescents

https://doi.org/10.1097/01.chi.0000163281.41383.94Get rights and content

ABSTRACT

Objective

This article provides the results of the psychometric testing of the Brief Impairment Scale (BIS). The BIS is a 23-item instrument that evaluates three domains of functioning: interpersonal relations, school/work functioning, and self-care/self-fulfilment. It capitalizes on the strengths of existing global measures while addressing some of their limitations.

Method

Cross-sectional parent respondent data from one clinical (N = 757) and two community samples (N = 1,888 and 1,132) of children ranging in age from 4 to 17 years is employed to test the reliability and validity of the BIS. Receiver operating characteristic analyses are employed to assess useful cutoff scores on the scale.

Results

The total scale's internal consistency ranged from 0.81 to 0.88 and from 0.56 to 0.81 on the three subscales. Test-retest reliability for individual items ranged from fair to substantial in all but six items. The BIS has high convergent and concurrent validity. Receiver operator characteristic analyses suggest possible thresholds for different uses.

Conclusions

The BIS is psychometrically sound, useful in assessments and as an outcome measure in clinical practice and research. Its advantages over other global impairment instruments are that it is respondent based, short in administration time, and multidimensional.

Section snippets

Description of the BIS

The BIS is administered to an adult informant about his or her child. Previous research suggests that the more reliable and valid assessments of child impairment are provided by adult caretakers (Bird, 1999; Bird and Gould, 1995; Bird et al., 1996). The BIS consists of 23 items scored along three functioning domains: interpersonal relations (parents, siblings, peers, teachers and other adults), school/work (attendance, performance, responsibility), and self-fulfillment (sports participation,

Internal Consistency

High internal consistency in the total scale (Cronbach's α ≥.80) replicated across the four samples (Table 1). With the exception of the self dimension in sample 2, the remaining α on the scales of the three impairment dimensions were ≥.60 in each of the samples.

Test-Retest Reliability

A respondent-based instrument does not require the interviewer to interpret the respondent's rating. Therefore, the instrument's test-retest reliability is not influenced by rater bias. Only sample 1C (N = 68) provided test-retest

DISCUSSION

The BIS provides a global measure of impairment, scored along three dimensions of functioning: interpersonal relations, functioning at school/work, and functioning in areas of self-care and self-fulfillment. It shows high internal consistency and test-retest reliability, overall, and in most of its individual items. Its items have face validity and the scale shows good convergent and concurrent validity. ROC analyses confirm the instrument's validity against two external validators: a CGAS

REFERENCES (39)

  • American Psychiatric Association

    Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition (DSM-IV)

    (1994)
  • MP Bates

    The Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale (CAFAS): review and current status

    Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev

    (2001)
  • L Bickman et al.

    Comparative outcomes of emotionally disturbed children and adolescents in a system of services and usual care

    Psychiatr Serv

    (1997)
  • H Bird

    The Assessment of Functional Impairment

  • H Bird et al.

    The use of diagnostic instruments and global measures of functioning in child psychiatry epidemiological studies

  • HR Bird et al.

    Estimates of the prevalence of childhood maladjustment in a community survey in Puerto Rico

    Arch Gen Psychiatry

    (1988)
  • HR Bird et al.

    The Columbia Impairment Scale (CIS): pilot findings on a measure of global impairment for children and adolescents

    Int J Methods Psychiatr Res

    (1993)
  • HR Bird et al.

    Global measures of impairment for epidemiologic and clinical use with children and adolescents

    Int J Methods Psychiatr Res

    (1996)
  • M Bravo et al.

    The Spanish translation and cultural adaptation of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC) in Puerto Rico

    Cult Med Psychiatry

    (1993)
  • Cited by (77)

    • The Unified Protocols for Children and Adolescents in Partial Hospitalization: Using Implementation Science Frameworks to Guide Adaptation

      2023, Cognitive and Behavioral Practice
      Citation Excerpt :

      Measures assessed caregiver and youth-reported symptoms, functional impairment, and core underlying dysfunctions addressed by the UP-C/A (e.g., emotional reactivity, regulation, distress tolerance). Table 4 presents changes in several of these key outcome measures at posttreatment and 1-month follow-up for each case example, including the PROMIS® Emotional Distress–Anxiety Short Form-8a and Depressive Symptoms Short Form-6a, Pediatric and Pediatric Proxy (Quinn et al., 2014; Irwin et al., 2012), the caregiver-reported Emotion Dysregulation Inventory–Reactivity Short Form (EDI; Mazefsky et al., 2018), and the caregiver-reported Brief Impairment Scale (BIS; Bird et al., 2005). “Paul” was a 10-year-old White male who was self-referred to PHP for disruptive behavior and emotion dysregulation.

    • Measurement Informed Care in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

      2022, Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      Early global assessment measures such as the Children’s Global Assessment Scale19 have been used as a marker of severity to complement any diagnosis and included items relevant to functioning. The Brief Impairment Scale20 and the Impairment Rating Scale (IRS)21 have been widely used in ADHD populations as short, reliable measures of function sensitive to change with treatment. The IRS is one of the few ADHD function scales that offers a version specifically for teachers.

    • A Review of the Evidence Base for Psychosocial Interventions for the Treatment of Emotion Dysregulation in Children and Adolescents

      2021, Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      Perepletchikova and colleagues20 observed that youth receiving DBT had significantly better functioning on the Children’s Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) at posttreatment and 3-month follow-up compared with youth in the control condition. Chronis-Tuscano and colleagues25 found that youth experienced reliable change on the Impairment Rating Scale from pretreatment to posttreatment, as did Evans and colleagues21 on the Brief Impairment Scale50 and a pair of studies by Luby and colleagues23,24 that used 2 different measures of impairment. Follow-up effects were examined in 9 studies.

    • Cerebrovascular Disease in Children Perinatally Infected With Human Immunodeficiency Virus in Zambia

      2020, Pediatric Neurology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Variables extracted from chart review included medical history, current and prior CD4 counts, viral loads, WHO stage, and ART regimens. Standardized questionnaires included the UNICEF Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey 5 adapted for an urban setting (MICS5, http://mics.unicef.org/tools), which evaluates SES based on factors including access to running water and electricity, toilet facilities, food security, parental education, income, and wealth, and the Brief Impairment Scale, which assess the child’s interpersonal, school, and social functioning.35 At least one standardized comprehensive neurological examination was conducted by a neurologist or medical student on all children having positive MRI findings.

    • Predictors of help-seeking behavior in mothers of preschoolers

      2023, Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Data were obtained through NIMH grants MH54827 (Dr. Canino, PI), MH56401 (Dr. Bird, PI), MH54827 (Dr. Canino, PI), and P01-MH 59876-02 (M. Alegria, PI), and from the National Center for Minority Health Disparities grant P20 MD000537-01 (Dr. Canino, PI). The authors acknowledge Dr. Adrian Angold's valuable comments and suggestions.

    Article Plus (online only) materials for this article appear on the Journal's Web site: www.jaacap.com.

    Disclosure: The authors have no financial relationships to disclose.

    View full text