Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
CLINICAL PERSPECTIVESEvidence-Based Thinking and the Alliance With Parents
Section snippets
FOUR WAYS EBT STRENGTHENS THE ALLIANCE WITH PARENTS
A rigorous but comprehensible discussion of relevant evidence can strengthen the alliance with parents in several ways. First, evidence-based dialogs help to create transparent thinking, where parents understand the reasoning as well as the evidence for and against a particular choice. Second, evidence-based dialogs provide a structure to settle disagreements. When resolving disputes, what relative weight should we give to cohort studies, randomized trials, case reports, anecdotes, and hearsay?
THE SUBSET OF PARENTS RESPONSIVE TO EBT
Despite these examples, factual evidence may have minimal effect in some situations. When parents are angry, agitated, or hostile, EBT may be quite useless. For example, the father of an adolescent boy suffering from major depression was himself an intensely angry divorced construction worker who belittled both his son and any efforts to help. His hopeless view of his son as worthless overpowered the evidence presented by the physician regarding the value of fluoxetine in major depression.
CONCLUSIONS
The rapidly expanding and improving child psychiatric literature, made more accessible with low-cost computers, high-speed modems, and widely available electronic databases, can join with explicit methods for appraising evidence derived from academic epidemiologists to strengthen the alliance with adolescents and their parents. Human warmth, empathy, and interest in psychodynamic understanding retain their central place. Blending in EBT adds transparency, facilitates shared decision-making
REFERENCES (18)
- et al.
Cognitive-behavioral treatment of adolescent depression: efficacy of acute group treatment and booster sessions
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
(1999) - et al.
Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): initial reliability and validity data
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
(1997) - et al.
Effect size of lithium, divalproex sodium, and carbamazepine in children and adolescents with bipolar disorder
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
(2000) - et al.
Behavioral psychotherapy for children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder: an open trial of a new protocol-driven treatment package
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
(1994) - et al.
Fluvoxamine for children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder: a randomized, controlled, multicenter trial
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
(2001) - et al.
NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children Version IV (NIMH DISC-IV): description, differences from previous versions, and reliability of some common diagnoses
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
(2000) - et al.
Does cognitive function improve with quetiapine in comparison to haloperidol?
Schizophr Res
(2002) - et al.
What do we mean by partnership in making decisions about treatment?
Br Med J
(1999) - et al.
A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of fluoxetine in children and adolescents with depression
Arch Gen Psychiatry
(1997)
Cited by (14)
The Use of Empirically Supported Strategies for Building a Therapeutic Relationship With an Adolescent With Oppositional-Defiant Disorder
2010, Cognitive and Behavioral PracticeAACAP 2005 research forum: Speeding the adoption of evidence-based practice in pediatric psychiatry
2007, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent PsychiatryCitation Excerpt :It does, however, make a distinction in background knowledge, which includes those aspects of the art of medicine, such as clinical interviewing, that are essential to skillful practice and foreground knowledge, as represented in a clinical question that may be answered by a research study. Relationships can be a focus of both background knowledge and foreground questions (e.g., Hawley and Weisz, 2005) and conveying the evidence when done compassionately enhances the quality of the doctor-patient relationship (Hamilton, 2004). Hence, although EBP draws a sharp distinction between basing clinical decision making on research evidence, on the one hand, and clinical experience, training, and the opinion of others on the other hand, EBP does not devalue clinical expertise or patient values and preferences, but rather attempts to understand their proper place in clinical decision making.
Gained in translation: Evidence-based medicine meets pediatric psychopharmacology
2006, Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North AmericaPractitioner perspectives on evidence-based practice
2005, Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North AmericaEmerging brain-based interventions for children and adolescents: Overview and clinical perspective
2005, Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America
Supported by Kaiser Foundation Research Institute grant CN-01JHami-02-H. The author acknowledges the assistance of faculty and fellow students at Kellogg College, University of Oxford Department for Continuing Education, Master's Programme in Evidence-Based Health Care (Ms. Janet Harris, Director), in learning evidence-based medicine (http://www.conted.ox.ac.uk/health/htmlfiles/master/masterfr.htm). The author also appreciates the editorial input of Dr. Michael Jellinek and Dr. Peter Szatmari in reviewing earlier drafts.