Articles
Predictors of Engagement in Adolescent Drug Abuse Treatment

https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200103000-00006Get rights and content

ABSTRACT

Objective

To identify key demographic, parent, and adolescent characteristics that influence engagement in outpatient drug abuse treatment.

Method

Youths aged 12 to 17 years (N = 224; 81% male and 72% African American) referred for drug treatment and their parents participated in this study. Marijuana was the primary substance of abuse. Data were gathered prior to treatment on demographic variables as well as on both parent and youth perspectives on youth, parent, and family functioning.

Results

A discriminant function analysis revealed that engagement in treatment was related to, in order of weighting, more positive parental expectations for their adolescent's educational achievement (standardized discriminant function coefficient [SDF] = 0.68), higher parental reports of youth externalizing symptoms (SDF = 0.59), and higher levels of family conflict perceived by the youth (SDF = 0.36). Family income, gender, juvenile justice status, minority group status, family structure, parental age and psychopathology, and treatment characteristics did not distinguish treatment-engaged from unengaged adolescents.

Conclusions

The results suggest that both parent and youth perceptions are pivotal to whether or not adolescents are engaged in psychotherapy. These findings lead the authors to recommend adolescent engagement interventions focusing on both the youth and his or her parents and suggest a content focus for adolescent engagement interventions.

Section snippets

Participants

Study participants were urban families with an adolescent between 12 and 17 years old who had been referred to treatment by the criminal justice, social welfare, or educational system for substance abuse and associated mental health problems. Upon referral, youth and parent participated in a two-session initial evaluation. After this evaluation, and as part of a larger project to evaluate treatment outcome, youths were randomly assigned to either individual or family therapy.

Two hundred

RESULTS

The hypotheses were examined through two types of analyses. First, one-way univariate analyses of variance were conducted on the demographic, adolescent, and family variables hypothesized to be important predictors of adolescent engagement. Next, discriminant function analysis was conducted to examine the relative contribution of each variable to predicting engagement in therapy.

DISCUSSION

As expected, adolescents engaged in treatment were distinguished from the teenagers not engaged primarily in terms of parent and family characteristics. The findings reveal, in particular, the importance of parents’ perceptions and attitudes. First, parents who perceived more externalizing symptoms in their adolescent were more likely to have their child remain in treatment than those who perceived less externalizing. These results suggest that parents’ recognition of a serious problem

REFERENCES (46)

  • DA Brent et al.

    A clinical psychotherapy trial for adolescent depression comparing cognitive, family, and supportive therapy

    Arch Gen Psychiatry

    (1997)
  • LR Derogatis

    SCL-90-R: Administration, Scoring, and Procedures Manual SE-II

    (1992)
  • TJ Dishion et al.

    Preventing escalation in problem behaviors with high-risk young adolescents: immediate and one-year outcomes

    J Consult Clin Psychol

    (1995)
  • W Feigelman

    Day-care treatment for multiple drug abusing adolescents: social factors linked with completing treatment

    J Psychoactive Drugs

    (1987)
  • T Gaines et al.

    Factors associated with dropping out of child and family treatment

    Am J Fam Ther

    (1981)
  • M Gilbert et al.

    Factors associated with dropout from psychotherapy with depressed adolescents

    Can J Psychiatry

    (1995)
  • SW Henggeler et al.

    Eliminating (almost) treatment dropout of substance abusing or dependent delinquents through home-based multisystemic therapy

    Am J Psychiatry

    (1996)
  • GN Holmbeck et al.

    Clinical-developmental interface: implications of developmental research for adolescent psychotherapy

    Psychother Theory Res Pract Train

    (1995)
  • Institute for Social Research

    National Survey Result on Drug Use From the Monitoring the Future Study, 1975–1995: College Students and Young Adults

    (1997)
  • AE Kazdin

    Premature termination from treatment among children referred for antisocial behavior

    J Child Psychol Psychiatry

    (1990)
  • AE Kazdin et al.

    Family experience of barriers to treatment and premature termination from child therapy

    J Consult Clin Psychol

    (1997)
  • AE Kazdin et al.

    Dropping out of child psychotherapy: distinguishing early and late dropouts over the course of treatment

    J Consult Clin Psychol

    (1994)
  • AE Kazdin et al.

    Risk for attrition in treatment of antisocial children and families

    J Clin Child Psychol

    (1993)
  • Cited by (104)

    • The impact of social network dynamics on engagement in drug use reduction programs among men and women who use drugs

      2022, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
      Citation Excerpt :

      Continuing recovery support care over a protracted period of at least 12 months appears to be essential if an individual desires an outcome of sustained recovery (Proctor & Herschman, 2014). Despite the well-documented benefits of prolonged engagement in SUD treatment and recovery support, many people with SUD often leave care programs before drug use cessation or control (Dakof, Tejeda, & Liddle, 2001; Deane, Wootton, Hsu, & Kelly, 2012; Lin et al., 2013; McHugh et al., 2013; McKay et al., 2004; Samuel, LaPaglia, Maccarelli, Moore, & Ball, 2011; Smyth, Fagan, & Kernan, 2012). While considerable research has addressed program and individual-based factors associated with retention (drug use severity, proper use of medications, program satisfaction (Arfken, Klein, di Menza, & Schuster, 2001; Hser, Evans, Huang, & Anglin, 2004; Siqueland et al., 2002; Zhang, Gerstein, & Friedmann, 2008), less study has occurred of the social environment where PWUDs spend most of their time.

    • Identifying treatment response subgroups for adolescent cannabis use

      2016, Addictive Behaviors
      Citation Excerpt :

      We hypothesize that severity would predict cluster membership based on the present results. Multiple variables tested that did not discriminate across clusters were significant predictors of treatment outcome in past studies including age (Friedman et al., 1995; Hendriks et al., 2012), and internalizing and externalizing psychopathology (Dakof et al., 2001; Hendriks et al., 2012). Some of these variables, including age and externalizing, were significant predictors at the univariate level, but not at the multivariate level.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Completion of this research was supported by grants P50-DA07697 and P50-DA11328 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse . The authors thank Cindy Rowe for comments on an earlier version of this article.

    View full text