Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
ARTICLESThe Service Assessment for Children and Adolescents (SACA): Adult and Child Reports
Section snippets
Symptom Agreement
A number of studies have examined parent-child agreement concerning behavior problems or symptoms. Meta-analyses of 119 studies revealed that correlations between children and parents were among the lowest of cross-informant correlations and varied with child's age, type of symptoms, and clinical status (Sawyer et al., 1993). It is interesting that, unlike the higher agreement between parents and older children on service use (Leaf et al., 1996), parent-child correlations concerning behavioral
Design
The SACA Reliability and Accuracy studies were conducted at 2 sites: Washington University in St. Louis (WU) and the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA). Internal review boards at each university reviewed and approved the procedures for obtaining parent consent and youth assent prior to the interview.
For the UCLA study, Ventura County Mental Health provided recruiters with a list of addresses of households with children aged 4 to 17 who had used services within the previous year,
Any Service Use
Information on service use in each of 25 specific settings listed in the youth version was aggregated to produce figures for any service use in 2 time spans: lifetime and in the past year. Parents and children showed good agreement on whether or not any services had been used in the youth's lifetime, 85% for a κ of 0.57 (Table 2). An examination of use of the 3 major venues for services (residential, outpatient, and school) elucidated differences in agreement. Agreement was better for any
DISCUSSION
The analysis of adult and child reports of mental health services in the SACA shows that the SACA is a promising instrument for services research. The agreement between parents and children is higher than that reported for the only other service use instrument with such data for children (Leaf et al., 1996). Furthermore, it is as high or higher than that reported for either diagnostic status or behavior symptom checklists. The MECA reported that their highest κ for generic categories of service
REFERENCES (30)
- et al.
Accuracy of parent mental health service reporting: results from a reverse record-check study
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
(1999) - et al.
Structured diagnostic interviews for children and adolescents: current status and future directions
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
(1987) - et al.
Child psychopathology rating scales and interrater agreement, I: parents' gender and psychiatric symptoms
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
(1988) - et al.
Child psychopathology rating scales and interrater agreement, II: child and family characteristics
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
(1988) - et al.
Informant variance: the issue of parent–child disagreement
J Am Acad Child Psychiatry
(1985) - et al.
Assessment of childhood depression: correspondence of child and parent ratings
J Am Acad Child Psychiatry
(1983) - et al.
Mental health service use in the community and schools: results from the four-community MECA study
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
(1996) - et al.
The NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children Version 2.3 (DISC-2.3): description, acceptability, prevalence rates, and performance in the MECA study
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
(1996) - et al.
Research on the clinical interview
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
(1987) - et al.
Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity
Psychol Bull
(1987)